Intrauterine growth restriction and placental angiogenesis

  • Figen Barut1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Aykut Barut2,

      Affiliated with

      • Banu Dogan Gun1,

        Affiliated with

        • Nilufer Onak Kandemir1,

          Affiliated with

          • Mehmet Ibrahim Harma2,

            Affiliated with

            • Muge Harma2,

              Affiliated with

              • Erol Aktunc3 and

                Affiliated with

                • Sukru Oguz Ozdamar1

                  Affiliated with

                  Diagnostic Pathology20105:24

                  DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-5-24

                  Received: 10 February 2010

                  Accepted: 22 April 2010

                  Published: 22 April 2010

                  Abstract

                  Background

                  Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic-fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) are factors that take part in placental angiogenesis. They are highly expressed during embryonic and fetal development, especially in the first trimester. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of placental angiogenesis in the development of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) by comparing the levels of expression of VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS in normal-term pregnancy and IUGR placentas.

                  Methods

                  The expression of VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS was studied using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase method in placental tissues diagnosed as normal (n = 55) and IUGR (n = 55). Results were evaluated in a semi-quantitative manner.

                  Results

                  The expression of all the markers was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in cytotrophoblasts, syncytiotrophoblasts, extravillous trophoblasts, vascular smooth muscle cells, chorionic villous stromal cells, and villous vascular endothelial cells of the IUGR placentas when compared with those collected from normal-term pregnancies.

                  Conclusion

                  Increased expression of VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS may be the result of inadequate uteroplacental perfusion, supporting the proposal that abnormal angiogenesis plays a role in the pathophysiology of IUGR.

                  Introduction

                  Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is a complicated placental vascular disease resulting in low birth weight, preterm delivery, and increased perinatal morbidity and mortality [14]. IUGR may be caused by various fetal, maternal, and placental factors [13, 5]. Angiogenesis, defined as the development of new vascular structures, is a placental factor playing an important role in the development of IUGR [24, 6, 7].

                  Angiogenesis involves the branching of new microvessels from pre-existing larger blood vessels. It is an important factor in normal embryogenesis and in physiological processes such as ovulation and the menstrual cycle [810]. Angiogenesis plays a role in the development of the villous vasculature and the formation of terminal villi in the human placenta. Placental vascular growth begins early in pregnancy and continues throughout gestation [9, 11]. The villous vasculature increases in number rather than vessel type from the 21st day of development until the end of the first trimester. From the 26th week of gestation until term, villous vascular growth changes from branching to non-branching angiogenesis due to the formation of mature intermediate villi that specialize in gas exchange. Specific angiogenic and inhibitory factors regulate these processes [4, 8, 9]. IUGR occurs as a result of the failure of elongation, branching, and dilation of the capillary loops and of terminal villous formation [4].

                  Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic-fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS; type III nitric oxide enzyme) have been identified as positive regulators of angiogenesis [8]. They are strongly expressed during embryonic and fetal development, especially in the first trimester [1, 6, 10, 1214].

                  VEGF, one of the first angiogenic factors identified, is widely believed to be the most important regulator of both normal and pathological angiogenesis [15]. It plays an essential role in the formation of new blood vessels [8, 12]. In pregnancy, VEGF participates in the proliferation, migration, and metabolic activity of trophoblasts [3, 4, 6, 12]. It is expressed by human villous and extravillous trophoblasts, and conclusive evidence indicates that it regulates trophoblast function by stimulating release of nitric oxide [4]. b-FGF acts as a modulator of tissue differentiation and placental angiogenesis [3, 6, 10, 13], and eNOS has an important role in the regulation of placental blood flow [14].

                  In this study, we investigated the relationship between placental angiogenesis and the expression of VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS in normal-term pregnancy and IUGR placentas.

                  Methods

                  Patients

                  A total of 110 placental tissues from uncomplicated and IUGR pregnancies were included in the study. These were collected from the Zonguldak Karaelmas University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Placentas from twin pregnancies, infants with congenital anomalies, fetal aneuploidy, those with proven intrauterine infections, and those from pregnancies with maternal complications such as chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or autoimmune diseases were excluded from the study.

                  Tissue samples

                  Placental tissues were divided in two study groups. The control group consisted of placental tissues collected from 55 women with uncomplicated pregnancies who delivered in the third trimester. The IUGR group contained tissues collected from 55 women in whom IUGR was defined on the basis of an estimated fetal weight of less than the tenth percentile for gestational age, reduced amniotic fluid volume, and Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery demonstrating absent end diastolic flow velocity [16]. The diagnosis of IUGR was established by serial obstetric ultrasonographic (ultrasound equipment: GE Logiq 7®, Penta Electronics, Ankara, Turkey) examination of fetal measurements such as weight, biparietal diameter, head circumference, femur length, and abdominal circumference. The placentas were weighed after removal of the cords and membranes. Multiple random samples were taken from each placenta, including one from the cord and one from the membrane roll.

                  Immunohistochemistry

                  Expression of VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS was analyzed in 110 placental villous tissues. Samples (1.5 × 1.5 × 1 cm in diameter) taken from the maternal surface of each placenta; infarct areas were excluded from the study. All tissues were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5-μm-thick sections, which were collected on slides coated with poly-L-lysine. After the paraffin was removed, the sections were rehydrated. Immunostaining was performed by the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked using 3% hydrogen peroxide. Antigen retrieval was carried out in a microwave oven for 15 minutes in 10 nM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for VEGF-A and eNOS. No antigen retrieval was used for b-FGF antibody. The sections were incubated at room temperature for one hour with RB-222-P rabbit polyclonal antibodies reactive with VEGF-A (a subgroup of VEGF) (1:100; NeoMarkers, Fremont, CA, USA), sc-79 mouse monoclonal antibodies reactive with FGF-2 (147) (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, California), and rabbit polyclonal antibodies reactive with eNOS (NeoMarkers, Fremont, CA, USA). After washing in phosphate-buffered saline with Tween-20, the tissues were incubated with a biotin-conjugated secondary antibody and then with a biotin-streptavidin complex for 30 min at room temperature. Reactions were visualized with 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, rinsed, and mounted.

                  Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining

                  The intensity and localization of the staining reaction in chorionic villous stromal cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, villous vascular endothelial cells, cytotrophoblasts, syncytiotrophoblasts, and extravillous trophoblasts was evaluated by two investigators blind to the purpose of the study. Immunoreactivity for antibodies was scored using a semi-quantitative scale for intensity of staining: 0 negative, no staining; 1+ weak positive; 2+ moderately positive; 3+ strongly positive.

                  Statistical analysis

                  Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS for Windows (version 13.0, Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD. Categorical variables are presented in percentages. Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare groups for clinical and immunohistochemical findings. P-values < 0.001 were considered statistically significant.

                  Results

                  Clinical and pathological data, including maternal, neonatal, and placental parameters are shown in Table 1. The mean gestational age of the normal pregnancies and those complicated by IUGR was 38.9 ± 5.9 weeks and 36.3 ± 22.9 weeks, respectively. Birth weight, placental weight, placental diameter, umbilical cord length, and APGAR scores were demonstrated to be significantly different between the two groups.
                  Table 1

                  Clinicopathological data and statistical comparison between IUGR and normal pregnancy

                  Clinical data

                  Normal pregnancy

                  (n: 55)

                  IUGR

                  (n: 55)

                  P value

                  Maternal age (year)

                  25.9 ± 4.1

                  27.0 ± 4.5

                  0.191

                  Gestational age (week)

                  38.9 ± 5.9

                  36.3 ± 22.9

                  0.000

                  Apgar score (mean) 1. minute

                  8.7 ± 1.2

                  5.9 ± 3.6

                  0.000

                  Apgar score (mean) 5. minute

                  9.7 ± 0.6

                  7.0 ± 2.9

                  0.000

                  Birth weight (g)

                  3041.5 ± 453.3

                  2023.9 ± 674.8

                  0.000

                  Placental weight (g)

                  508.9 ± 104.6

                  404.6 ± 161.2

                  0.000

                  Placental diameter (cm)

                  15.9 ± 1.5

                  13.6 ± 2.7

                  0.000

                  Umbilical cord length (cm)

                  29.2 ± 4.3

                  25.6 ± 6.3

                  0.000

                  Data were given as mean ± SD

                  *P: Statistical comparison of normal and IUGR placental tissues

                  The clinical and morphological features commonly associated with IUGR observed in 55 placentas are recorded in Table 2. A histological comparison of normal term pregnancy and IUGR placental tissues showed widespread infarct areas and increased syncytial knots or Tenney-Parker changes in the IUGR placentas (Fig. 1A, B).
                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-1596-5-24/MediaObjects/13000_2010_Article_269_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                  Figure 1

                  Histopathologic appearances of placental tissues A; Normal placental tissue B; Increased syncytial knots and villous vascular structures in IUGR placental tissue (H&E A; B; ×200).

                  Table 2

                  The evaluation of clinical and placental datas of 55 pregnancies complicated with IUGR

                  Clinical data

                  n (%)

                  Placental data

                  n (%)

                  Cesarean section rate

                  46 (83.6)

                  Umbilical cord knots

                  8 (14.5)

                  Fetal distress

                  9 (16.4)

                  Single umbilical artery

                  1 (1.8)

                  Premature rupture of the membranes

                  2 (3.6)

                  Placental infarction

                  51 (92.7)

                  Preterm birth

                  4 (7.3)

                  Placental calcification

                  31 (56.4)

                  Prematurity

                  1 (1.8)

                  Placental chorangiosis

                  3 (5.5)

                  Neonatal intensive care need

                  13 (23.6)

                  Chorioamnionitis

                  4 (7.3)

                  Neonatal hypoglycemia

                  1 (1.8)

                  Accessory lobe

                  1 (1.8)

                  Intrauterine fetal death

                  3 (5.5)

                    
                  Staining after incubation with primary antibodies reactive with VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS was observed in the cytoplasm of placental cells from normal term pregnancy and IUGR tissues. Expression of VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS in placental villous tissues was semi-quantified (Tables 3, 4 and 5). A statistically significant (p < 0.001) increase in the expression of VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS in IUGR placentas was observed in cytotrophoblast, syncytiotrophoblast, extravillous trophoblast, vascular smooth muscle, and villous stromal and endothelial cells compared with normal term pregnancy placentas.
                  Table 3

                  Localization and immunostaining intensity of VEGF expression in placental villous tissues

                   

                  Normal pregnancy

                  (n: 55)

                  IUGR

                  (n: 55)

                  Statistical comparison

                  P value

                  Score

                  0

                  n (%)

                  1+

                  n (%)

                  2+

                  n (%)

                  3+

                  n (%)

                  0

                  n (%)

                  1+

                  n (%)

                  2+

                  n (%)

                  3+

                  n (%)

                  P*

                  CVSC

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  VSMC

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  VVEC

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  ST

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  CT

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  EVT

                   

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  IUGR: Intrauterine growth restricted; CVSC: Chorionic villous stromal cells; VSMC: Vascular smooth muscle cells; VVEC: Villous vascular endothelial cells; ST: Syncytiotrophoblasts; CT; Cytotrophoblasts; EVT: Extravillous trophoblasts [Staining intensity of VEGF were scored as follows: 0 (negative), weak (1+), moderate (2+), and strong (3+)] *P: Statistical comparison of normal and IUGR placental tissues

                  Table 4

                  b-FGF expression in placental villous tissues

                   

                  Normal pregnancy

                  (n: 55)

                  IUGR

                  (n: 55)

                  Statistical comparison

                  P value

                  Score

                  0

                  n (%)

                  1+

                  n (%)

                  2+

                  n (%)

                  3+

                  n (%)

                  0

                  n (%)

                  1+

                  n (%)

                  2+

                  n (%)

                  3+

                  n (%)

                  P*

                  CVSC

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  VSMC

                  43 (78.2)

                  12 (21.8)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  VVEC

                  43 (78.2)

                  12 (21.8)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  ST

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  CT

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  EVT

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  IUGR: Intrauterine growth restricted; CVSC: Chorionic villous stromal cells; VSMC: Vascular smooth muscle cells; VVEC: Villous vascular endothelial cells; ST: Syncytiotrophoblasts; CT; Cytotrophoblasts; EVT: Extravillous trophoblasts [Staining intensity of FGF-b were scored as follows: 0 (negative), weak (1+), moderate (2+), and strong (3+)] *P: Statistical comparison of normal and IUGR placental tissues

                  Table 5

                  Localization and immunostaining intensity of eNOS expression in placental villous tissues

                   

                  Normal pregnancy

                  (n: 55)

                  IUGR

                  (n: 55)

                  Statistical comparison

                  P value

                  Score

                  0

                  n (%)

                  1+

                  n (%)

                  2+

                  n (%)

                  3+

                  n (%)

                  0

                  n (%)

                  1+

                  n (%)

                  2+

                  n (%)

                  3+

                  n (%)

                  P*

                  CVSC

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  10 (18.2)

                  45 (81.8)

                  <0.001

                  VSMC

                  48 (87.3)

                  7 (12.7)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  14 (25.5)

                  41 (74.5)

                  <0.001

                  VVEC

                  48 (87.3)

                  7 (12.7)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  14 (25.5)

                  41 (74.5)

                  <0.001

                  ST

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  CT

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  EVT

                  55 (100)

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  -

                  55 (100)

                  <0.001

                  IUGR: Intrauterine growth restricted; CVSC: Chorionic villous stromal cells; VSMC: Vascular smooth muscle cells; VVEC: Villous vascular endothelial cells; ST: Syncytiotrophoblasts; CT; Cytotrophoblasts; EVT: Extravillous trophoblasts [Staining intensity of eNOS were scored as follows: 0 (negative), weak (1+), moderate (2+), and strong (3+)] *P: Statistical comparison of normal and IUGR placental tissues

                  In normal term pregnancy placentas, staining was weak and located predominantly in the cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts (Fig. 2A, 3A, 4A). In IUGR placentas, strong staining was obtained with VEGF-A (Fig. 2B), b-FGF (Fig. 3B), and eNOS (Fig. 4B) primary antibodies.
                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-1596-5-24/MediaObjects/13000_2010_Article_269_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                  Figure 2

                  VEGF expression in placental tissues, A; Weak VEGF expression in cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts in normal pregnancy placenta, B; Strong immune reaction with VEGF in IUGR placental tissue (B-SA peroxidase, DAB, A; B; ×200).

                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-1596-5-24/MediaObjects/13000_2010_Article_269_Fig3_HTML.jpg
                  Figure 3

                  b-FGF expression in placental tissues, A; Normal placental villous displaying weak b-FGF immune reaction, B; Strong b-FGF expression in IUGR placenta (B-SA peroxidase, DAB, A; B; ×200).

                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-1596-5-24/MediaObjects/13000_2010_Article_269_Fig4_HTML.jpg
                  Figure 4

                  eNOS expression in placental tissues, A; Weak eNOS expression in normal pregnancy placenta, B; Strong immune reaction with eNOS in IUGR placenta (B-SA peroxidase, DAB, A; B; ×200). The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: http://​www.​textcheck.​com/​certificate/​muDdOz

                  Discussion

                  IUGR is an important cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. In developed countries, the incidence of IUGR is 3%, whereas in developing countries, it reaches 15-20%. It is one of the most commonly recognized abnormalities of the fetal condition and is a compounding factor in 26% or more of stillbirths [1, 4, 5]. It may also have long-term health implications for adults [17]. For these reasons, the accurate prediction, diagnosis, and appropriate management of pregnancies complicated with IUGR are important. In accordance with the clinical definition of IUGR, we observed significantly reduced fetal birth weight, amniotic fluid, and placental size and weight in our IUGR group.

                  The placenta, which normally has a rich vasculature, plays an important role in the development of IUGR. The most common cause of IUGR is placenta ischemia in which insufficient placental function results from deteriorated uteroplacental perfusion [3, 5, 7, 18]. The clinical features of ischemic placental disease are revealed throughout the second half of pregnancy, but the pathophysiological processes initiating the disease originate in the first half [17]. The process of promoting the development of neovessels may be activated by chemo-cytokines in some pathological situations such as ischemia [12]. Structural evidence suggests that placental oxygenation is important in controlling fetoplacental angiogenesis and hence, villous differentiation [9]. Insufficient uteroplacental perfusion leading to abnormal angiogenesis may result in the pathophysiology of IUGR [3, 4].

                  Changes appearing during placental development can be used as early markers of pathologies that may occur later in pregnancy. Placental ischemia is one such pathology, and it can be investigated in relation to various angiogenic mediators [17]. A hypoxic stimulus may lead to an excessive proliferation of villous capillaries and connective tissue via growth factors such as VEGF and FGF [19]. Abnormal vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and pseudovasculogenesis is correlated with the impaired placental and fetal development seen in complicated pregnancies such as IUGR [3] Angiogenesis may be regulated by oxygen status and by the production of angiogenic growth factors and their natural receptors and antagonists by vascular endothelial cells, pericytes, and trophoblasts. The resulting changes in fetal vasculature are associated with altered patterns of villous growth [18]. The results from our study support the literature reporting that an alteration in placental development accompanying deteriorated angiogenesis occurs in IUGR [4, 11, 17, 18]. Contrary to our findings, Lyall et al. [20] demonstrated a reduction in villous placenta VEGF expression in placental villous tissue from pregnancies complicated by IUGR and preeclampsia.

                  It is thought that the angiogenic factors VEGF, b-FGF, and eNOS have important roles in villous proliferation, trophoblast function, and angiogenesis as characterized by the formation of new vascular structures in the villous stroma [14]. VEGF is thought to exert a dual role in the placenta, acting on both angiogenesis and trophoblast function during placental development. The roles of VEGF, b-FGF and eNOS in placental angiogenesis may be altered in conditions such as IUGR [4, 14]. The increased expression of VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS that we have found in IUGR placentas may promote increased endothelial cell proliferation and migration and pathological angiogenesis [17]. It is likely that normal placental angiogenesis depends on the regulation of vascular development by a complex relationships among these factors and that they play an important role in the development of IUGR.

                  Conclusion

                  It is necessary to explain the regulatory mechanism of placental vascular development in order to elucidate the pathogenesis of IUGR and the associated placental vascular insufficiency. The observed, increased expression of VEGF-A, b-FGF, and eNOS suggests that abnormal angiogenic activity, caused by insufficient uteroplacental perfusion, results in the pathophysiology of IUGR.

                  Abbreviations

                  IUGR: 

                  Intrauterine growth restriction

                  VEGF: 

                  Vascular endothelial growth factor

                  VEGF-A: 

                  Vascular endothelial growth factor-A

                  b-FGF: 

                  Basic-fibroblast growth factor

                  eNOS: 

                  Endothelial nitric oxide synthase

                  H&E: 

                  Hematoxylin and eosin

                  B-SA: 

                  Biotin-streptavidin

                  DAB: 

                  3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride

                  CVSC: 

                  Chorionic villous stromal cells

                  VSMC: 

                  Vascular smooth muscle cells

                  VVEC: 

                  Villous vascular endothelial cells

                  CT: 

                  Cytotrophoblasts

                  ST: 

                  Syncytiotrophoblasts

                  EVT: 

                  Extra villous trophoblasts.

                  Declarations

                  Authors’ Affiliations

                  (1)
                  Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University
                  (2)
                  Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University
                  (3)
                  Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Karaelmas University

                  References

                  1. Gurel D, Özer E, Altunyurt S, Guclu S, Demir N: Expression of IGR-IR and VEGF and trophoblastic proliferative activity in placentas from pregnancies complicated by IUGR. Pathol Res Pract 2003, 199:803–809.View ArticlePubMed
                  2. Maulik D, Evans JF, Ragolia L: Fetal growth restriction: Pathogenic mechanisms. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006, 49:219–227.View ArticlePubMed
                  3. Arroyo JA, Winn VD: Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the IUGR placenta. Semin Perinatol 2008, 32:172–177.View ArticlePubMed
                  4. Ahmed A, Perkins J: Angiogenesis and intrauterine growth restriction. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000, 14:981–998.View ArticlePubMed
                  5. Özkan S, Vural B, Dalçık C, Taş A, Dalçık H: Placental expression of insulin-like growth factor-I, fibroblast growth factor-basic and neural cell adhesion molecule in pregnancies with small for gestational age fetuses. J Perinatol 2008, 28:468–474.View ArticlePubMed
                  6. Shiraishi S, Nakagawa K, Kinukawa N, Nakano H, Sueishi K: Immunuhistochemical localization of vascular endothelial growth factor in the human placenta. Placenta 1996, 17:111–121.View ArticlePubMed
                  7. Pardi G, Marconi AM, Cetin I: Pathophysiology of intrauterine growth retardation: role of the placenta. Acta Paediatr 1997,423(Suppl):170–172.
                  8. Frater JL, Kay NE, Goolsby CL, Crawford SE, Dewald GW, Peterson LC: Dysregulated angiogenesis in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Morphologic, immunohistochemical, and flow cytometric evidence. Diagn Pathol 2008, 3:16.View ArticlePubMed
                  9. Kaufmann P, Mayhew TM, Charnock-Jones DS: Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. II. Changes during normal pregnancy. Placenta 2004, 25:114–126.View ArticlePubMed
                  10. Lee MY, Huang JP, Chen YY, Aplin JD, Wu YH, Chen CY, Chen PC, Chen CP: Angiogenesis in differentiated placental multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells is dependent on integrin alpha5beta1. PLoS One 2009, 4:e6913.View ArticlePubMed
                  11. Nakagawa Y, Fujimoto J, Tamaya T: Placental growth by the estrogen-dependent angiogenic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor, throughout gestation. Gynecol Endocrinol 2004, 19:259–266.View ArticlePubMed
                  12. Helske S, Vuorela P, Carpén O, Hornig C, Weich H, Halmesmäki E: Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2 and 3 in placentas from normal and complicated pregnancies. Mol Hum Reprod 2001, 7:205–210.View ArticlePubMed
                  13. Hamai Y, Fujli T, Yamashita T, Kozuma S, Okai T, Taketani Y: Evidence for basic fibroblast growth factor as a crucial angiogenic growth factor, released from human trophoblasts during early gestation. Placenta 1998, 19:149–155.View ArticlePubMed
                  14. Myatt L, Eis ALW, Brockman DE, Greer IA, Lyall F: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in placental villous tissue from normal, pre-eclamptic and intrauterine growth restricted pregnancies. Hum Reprod 1997, 12:167–172.View ArticlePubMed
                  15. Ng YS, Krilleke D, Shima DT: VEGF function in vascular pathogenesis. Exp Cell Res 2006, 312:527–537.View ArticlePubMed
                  16. Galan HL, Pandipati S, Filly RA: Ultrasound evaluation of fetal biometry and normal and abnormal fetal growth. In Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. 5th edition. Edited by: Callen PW. USA: Saunders Elsevier; 2008:225–265.
                  17. Kinzler WL, Vintzileos AM: Fetal growth restriction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008, 2:125–131.
                  18. Mayhew TM, Charnock-Jones DS, Kaufmann P: Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. III. Changes in complicated pregnancies. Placenta 2004, 25:127–139.View ArticlePubMed
                  19. Benirschke K: Recent trends in chorangiomas, especially those of multiple and recurrent chorangiomas. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1999, 2:264–269.View ArticlePubMed
                  20. Lyall F, Young A, Boswell F, Kingdom JCP, Greer IA: Placental expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in placentae from pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction does not support placental hypoxia at delivery. Placenta 1997, 18:269–276.View ArticlePubMed

                  Copyright

                  © Barut et al. 2010

                  This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                  Advertisement