Usual interstitial pneumonia coexisted with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, What’s the diagnosis?
© Fang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 2 October 2012
Accepted: 28 November 2012
Published: 3 December 2012
The differential diagnosis between idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia(INSIP) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis(IPF)/usual interstitial pneumonia(UIP)is tough in both clinicians and pathologists. In this study, we analyzed the lesions of right lung removed from a 58-year-old patient by gross and microscopy. The results showed that the pathological appearance of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and UIP coexisted in his upper lobe. Besides, because of severe fibrosis in middle and lower lobes, it was hard to distinguish the lesions of NSIP fibrotic pattern (NSIP-F) or UIP. Based on clinic-radiologic-pathological data, the diagnosis of INSIP-F was made for this patient finally. Our study suggests that UIP is not always an accurate diagnosis when the NSIP and UIP coexist, and NSIP can have regions of UIP.
The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/2573531681608730
KeywordsNonspecific interstitial pneumonia Usual interstitial pneumonia Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia Diagnosis
Because of different treatment and prognosis for idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia(INSIP) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) / usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), accurate diagnosis for this two diseases become critical for clinicians and pathologists[1–3]. However, the differential diagnosis among them is hard for both clinicians and pathologists, especially between INSIP fibrotic pattern (INSIP-F) and IPF/UIP. Some experts often prone to make the diagnosis of UIP when the pathological appearance of UIP and NSIP exist at the same time. Up to now, pathological descriptions for NSIP are mainly from biopsy specimens, lacking the observation of whole lung sample from operation, which results in unilateral understanding of such lesion. Here, we report one case of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) diagnosed by clinic-radiologic-pathological (CRP) method, in which UIP pattern existed with NSIP; the sample was a whole right lung removed from pneumonectomy.
After treatment with glucocorticoid in the initial two years, his symptoms were reduced and pulmonary function was improved greatly, but the absorption of lesions wasn’t manifest. One year later, his chest CT displayed aggravated lesions, showing fibrous strips with traction bronchiectasis (Figures1C~D). Pulmonary function disorder became more severe than that of two years ago (FVC 54.2%, FEV152.7%, VC 67.9%, TLC 63.5%, DLCO/VA 66.1%), accompanying anoxemia and type I respiratory failure (pH 7.4, PaO2 58mmHg, PaCO2 35 mmHg, SO2 88%). With estimation for body condition, right lung transplantation was operated for this patient, but he died of respiratory failure after two weeks even if the surgery was successful.
American Thoracic Society(ATS) reported a comprehensive research about INSIP in 2008. Among the 193 cases of NSIP from published data, they found that only 67 cases were INSIP (34.72%), 28 cases of them were UIP (14.51%). Through which we can see it is difficult for clinicians and pathologists to distinguish INSIP from UIP. Histologicially, NSIP-F has a uniform pattern, characterized by expansion of the interstitium, a variable extent of chronic inflammation and fibrosis which can be collagenous or fibroblastic, lacking or scarcity of fibroblastic foci, primarily distinguishing it from UIP.
Our case showed various histological appearance of upper lobe. Not only was there the migration between NSIP-C and NSIP-F, but also the morphological appearance of NSIP and UIP coexisted in upper lobe. For example, formation of cystic fibrous gas cavity with fibroblast foci was hard to be differentiated from honeycomb, the latter and fibroblast foci were the morphological features of UIP. Besides, pathological appearance of middle and lower lobes showed the severe fibrosis and consolidation, formation of cystic gas cavity and alveolar structural remodeling and so on. Aforementioned pathological features render us hard to make a diagnosis of NSIP-F or UIP. Final diagnosis were based on the following points: (1) Without honeycomb change in chest CT scan, which conforming to NSIP-F; (2) Response to glucocorticoid to some extent; (3) Typical feature of NSIP in light fibrosis region; small fibroblast foci both in size and amount which occupied less than 10% of all slides, and looser collagen than myogelosis occurred in UIP. If the materials were all from only one lobe or the size of tissue was too small, the patient would possibly be misdiagnosed, or at least we would hardly make the diagnosis as NSIP-F or UIP.
How to make diagnosis when the histological pattern of NSIP coexists with UIP in multiple lobes biopsies? Flaherty et al. found that 26% of 109 patients had both the pattern of UIP and NSIP after analyzing several lobes of lung biopsy, so they thought as long as one lobe had the appearance of UIP, these patients should be diagnosed as UIP because of the poor prognosis of it. Recently, ATS/European Respiratory Society (ERS)/Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS)/Latin America Thoracic Society (ALAT) established the diagnosis guideline of IPF which concluded that some puzzling cases of IPF should be diagnosed based on combination with pathological information and HRCT, and the appearance of honeycomb lung showed in HRCT is an important feature of UIP, whereas our case showed the pathological appearance of NSIP together with UIP, without honeycomb lung, so after a comprehensive analysis of all slides, we diagnosed our case as INSIP with UIP-like areas.
Differential diagnosis of INSIP includes drug induced lung injury, the terminal stage of eosinophilic pneumonia and lung damage caused by environment exposure. However, our case had no usage of cytotoxic drugs and immunosuppressants, occupational and environmental exposure history. Thus it is easy to discriminate our case from above other diseases. Kirby et al. reported that 9 out of 28 recipients with renal allograft history who had pulmonary complications, including pulmonary hemorrhage, organizing pneumonia and pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, but no NSIP was found. We also excluded eosinophilic pneumonia, because our patient didn’t show an increasing number of eosinophile granulocytes in his peripheral blood and eosinophile granulocytes infiltrated in his lung lesions.
Histologicially, cystic fibrous gas cavity can be found in the whole right lung in our case, and the lesion almost existed in terminal stage of chronic lung disease. We assume that the obstruction of proximal bronchial results in extension of distal bronchial gradually, which may be the cause of the lesion, but the molecule mechanisms of the lesion are elusive. Besides, the metaplasia of bronchial was also a predominant feature in our case, some region even had hyperplasia of alveolar epithelium and abnormal expression of P53 (Figure5C). It has been reported that the patients with long-term chronic pulmanary fibrosis may developed into lung cancer and the atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of lung is related with the development of adenocarcinoma of lung. Of note, our case showed that the hyperplastic type alveolar epithelium had strongly positive expression of SP-A (Figure5B), which is a major player in the pulmonary cytokine-network and to act in the pulmonary host defense, so further study is needed to detect the role of SP-A in the pathogenesis and prognostic evaluation of NSIP.
In summary, we described one case of INSIP from gross to light microscopy for removed lung. Three main findings were as followings: (1) The existences of heterogeneity and transmigration between these subtypes of INSIP, if it is the case, the predominant appearance should be considered for diagnosis. (2) The metaplasia of bronchiole epithelium and formation of cystic fibrous gas cavity are also pathological characteristic of INSIP-F rather than features only for UIP. (3) It is possible for small fibroblastic foci to appear in INSIP, which means INSIP might also have UIP-like regions. In a word, the CRP diagnosis is the best way for such puzzling cases. In addition, it is worth noticing that if patient has terminal interstitial lung disease and need the surgery of lung transplantation, it should pay attention to the selection of recipients and postoperative care.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor -in-chief of this journal.
Professor YXH is a director of department of pathology who has expert field of differential diagnosis of interstitial pulmonary disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine. Professor LHP is a director of department of respiratory medicine, and expert on the field of interstitial pulmonary disease treatment, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine.
Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia
Usual interstitial pneumonia
Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
INSIP fibrotic pattern
Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia
NSIP cellular Type
NSIP fibrotic pattern
American Thoracic Society. Xia Fang and Benfang Luo are the Co-first author.
Sincerely thank Dr. Weize Qiu,Long Zhang and Zhangjun Zheng for their skilllfull technical assistance. Department of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine.
- American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopatic Interstitial Pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002, 165: 277-304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katzenstein AL, Myers JL: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: clinical relevance of pathologic classification. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998, 157: 1301-1315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Travis WD, Matsui K, Moss J, Ferrans VJ: Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: prognostic significance of cellular and fibrosing patterns: survival comparison with usual interstitial pneumonia and desquamative interstitial pneumonia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000, 24: 19-33. 10.1097/00000478-200001000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Travis WD, Hunninghake G, King TE, Lynch DA, Colby TV, Galvin JR, Brown KK, Chung MP, Cordier JF, du Bois RM, Flaherty KR, Franks TJ, Hansell DM, Hartman TE, Kazerooni EA, Kim DS, Kitaichi M, Koyama T, Martinez FJ, Nagai S, Midthun DE, Müller NL, Nicholson AG, Raghu G, Selman M, Wells A: Idiopatic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: report of an American Thoracic Society project. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008, 177: 1338-1347. 10.1164/rccm.200611-1685OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flaherty KR, Travis WD, Colby TV, Toews GB, Kazerooni EA, Gross BH, Jain A, Strawderman RL, Flint A, Lynch JP, Martinez FJ: Histopathologic variability in usual and nonspecific interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 164: 1722-1727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, Martinez FJ, Behr J, Brown KK, Colby TV, Cordier JF, Flaherty KR, Lasky JA, Lynch DA, Ryu JH, Swigris JJ, Wells AU, Ancochea J, Bouros D, Carvalho C, Costabel U, Ebina M, Hansell DM, Johkoh T, Kim DS, King TE, Kondoh Y, Myers J, Müller NL, Nicholson AG, Richeldi L, Selman M, Dudden RF, Griss BS, Protzko SL, Schünemann HJ, ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Committee on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011, 183: 788-824. 10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirby S, Satoskar A, Brodsky S, Pope-Harman A, Nunley D, Hitchcock C, Pelletier R, Ross P, Nadasdy T, Shilo K: Histological spectrum of pulmonary manifestations in kidney transplant recipients on sirolimus inclusive immunosuppressive regimens. Diagn Pathol. 2012, 7: 25-10.1186/1746-1596-7-25.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Theegarten D, Boukercha S, Philippou S, Anhenn O: Submesothelial deposition of carbon nanoparticles after toner exposition: Case report. Diagn Pathol. 2010, 5: 77-10.1186/1746-1596-5-77.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kayser K, Nwoye JO, Kosjerina Z, Goldmann T, Vollmer E, Kaltner H, André S, Gabius HJ: Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of lung: its incidence and analysis of clinical, glycohistochemical and structural features including newly defined growth regulators and vascularization. Lung Cancer. 2003, 42: 171-182. 10.1016/S0169-5002(03)00289-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldmann T, Kähler D, Schultz H, Abdullah M, Lang DS, Stellmacher F, Vollmer E: On the significance of Surfactant Protein-A within the human lungs. Diagn Pathol. 2009, 4: 8-10.1186/1746-1596-4-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagata N, Kitasato Y, Wakamatsu1 K, Kawabata M, Fukushima K, Kajiki A, Kitahara Y, Watanabe K: Prognostic value of immunohistochemical surfactant protein A expression in regenerative/hyperplastic alveolar epithelial cells in idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Diagn Pathol. 2011, 6: 25-10.1186/1746-1596-6-25.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.