Low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma of salivary glands: report of two cases and review of the literature
© Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 January 2013
Accepted: 13 February 2013
Published: 18 February 2013
Low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma (LGCCC) is a recently described rare tumor of salivary gland which exhibits clinically indolent behavior. This tumor predominantly consists of intraductal components and frequently exhibits papillary-cystic or cribriform proliferation pattern. Considering the histological features of LGCCC, it should be distinguished with papillocystic variant of acinic cell carcinoma, conventional salivary duct carcinoma, cystadenocarcinoma, polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma, carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma and mammary analogue secretory carcinoma. Herein, we presented two cases of LGCCC. One arose in the left parotid region in a 48-year-old male, and the other one arose in the right parotid gland in a 59-year-old female. For both cases, immunohistochemically, the luminal tumor cells showed diffuse expression of CK and S100; p63 and smooth muscle actin displayed a continuous rim of myoepithelial cells around all tumor islets; no myoepithelial cells were admixed with the luminal cells. Both patients were alive with no tumor recurrence or metastasis at follow-up.
The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/2593621568999135
KeywordsSalivary Low-grade Duct Carcinoma Cribriform Cystadenocarcinoma
Low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma (LGCCC) is a rare neoplasm of salivary gland. Originally, it was described as a variant of salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) by Delgado et al. in 1996 . LGCCC usually occurs in elder people with a female predominance of 2:1. Parotid gland is the most common site of involvement [1–6]. Presentation in the palate , submandibular gland , intraparotid lymph node [2, 6] and accessory parotid gland  may occur but rare. LGCCC is characterized by the papillary-cystic or cribriform proliferation pattern and resembles the low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ or atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast in histology and biological features. LGCCC was originally denominated as low-grade salivary duct carcinoma (LGSDC) in order to distinguish with the conventional SDC. In contrast with the LGCCC, conventional SDC exhibits highly aggressive malignancy and high-grade histology similar to an invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. However, no definite association was found between LGCCC and conventional SDC; therefore, the third WHO classification regards this neoplasm as a variant of cystadenocarcinoma due to its cystic morphology .
Histologically, LGCCC was composed of single or multiple cystically enlarged ducts accompanied by adjacent intraductal proliferation. Various structures, such as cystic structures, loose cribriform and micropapillae pattern or solid area, could be observed in LGCCC. The typical cyst structures are lined by small or multilayered mild ductal cells with finely dispersed chromatin and small nucleoli. These tumor cells are diffusely strong positive for S100. Myoepithelial markers highlight the tumor cells rimming the cystic spaces, confirming the intraductal nature of LGCCC. Based on the histological features, LGCCC should be distinguished with other common parotid tumors including papillocystic variant of acinic cell carcinoma (PCV-ACC), conventional SDC, cystadenocarcinoma, polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma and mammary analogue secretory carcinoma (MASC).
A 48-year-old male was admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in August of 2011 for further examination because of the mass in the left parotid region. The mass was soft, non-tender and did not adhere to the skin. Ultrasound examination revealed a nonhomogenous hypoechogenic mass with anechogenic areas measuring 21×12 mm. Examination by fine needle aspiration cytology was not performed. The patient underwent parotidectomy without radiotherapy. The patient was alive with no tumor recurrence or metastasis at 16 months of follow-up.
The surgical specimen measured 3.5 cm in the greatest diameter. On cut surface, it showed a nonencapsulated tumor measured 2×1 cm. The tumor was whitish in color.
Immunohistochemically, the luminal tumor cells showed diffuse expression of CK and S100 (Figure 1I). Immunostaining for p63 (Figure 1J) and SMA displayed a continuous rim of myoepithelial cells around all tumor islets. No myoepithelial cells were admixed with the luminal cells. Tumor cells were negative for CEA, AR, ER, PR, EGFR, and Her-2/neu oncoprotein. Ki67 index was less than 5%.
A 59-year-old female was admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in May of 2012 for further examination because of the mass in the right parotid region. The physical examination showed a solid mass in the right parotid with slight tender and the mass did not adhere to the skin. Ultrasound examination revealed a homogenous hypoechogenic mass measuring 35×21×22 mm. Examination by fine needle aspiration cytology was not performed. The patient underwent parotidectomy without radiotherapy. The patient was alive with no tumor recurrence or metastasis at 7 months of follow-up.
The surgical specimen measured 4 cm in the greatest diameter. On cut surface, it showed a well-circumscribed tumor measured 3×2 cm. The tumor was whitish in color.
The tumor was demarcated from the surrounding parotid glands with a clear boundary (Figure 1E and F). The lesion was mainly composed of solid to cribriform and micropapillary structures, while the dilated cystic structures were rarely seen. No comedo necrosis was identified. The tumor cells were uniform without significant cytologic and nuclear atypia. They displayed round to oval nuclei with fine chromatin and pale to amphophilic cytoplasm (Figure 1G). Apocrine differentiation of tumor cells was observed locally (Figure 1H). No atypical mitosis was observed.
Immunohistochemically, the luminal tumor cells showed diffuse expression of CK, CK7 and S100 (Figure 1I). Immunostaining for p63 (Figure 1J) and smooth muscle actin (SMA) displayed a continuous rim of myoepithelial cells around all tumor islets. No myoepithelial cells were admixed with the luminal cells. Tumor cells were negative for CK20, AR, ER, PR, EGFR, and Her-2/neu oncoprotein. Ki67 index was less than 5%.
Reported cases of the low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma in the English-Language Literature and their prognosis
Delgado et al. 1996
Parotid (superficial lobe)
Right parotid (superficial lobe)
NED, 144 mos
Right parotid (superficial lobe)
NED, 132 mos
NED, 72 mos
NED, 24 mos
Left parotid (superficial lobe)
NED, 24 mos
Right parotid (intraparotid lymph node)
NED, 24 mos
Right parotid (deep lobe)
NED, 9 mos
Tatemoto et al. 1996
NED, 30 mos
Brandwein-Gensler et al. 2004
F 8 cases M 7 cases U 1 case
Parotid 15 cases (including one case from intraparotid lymph node)
NED, 12 mos
NED, 44 mos
NED, 17 mos
NED, 108 mos
NED, 24 mos
NED, 30 mos
NED, 62 mos
Submandibular gland 1 case
NED, 33 mos
NED, 30 mos
NED, 6 mos
NED, 132 mos
NED, 40 mos
NED, 24 mos
Weinreb et al. 2006
NED, 5 mos
Superficial parotidectomy and supraomohyoid neck dissection
NED, 60 mos
Right total parotidectomy and chemotherapy and radiation therapy
Arai et al. 2009
Right partial parotidectomy
NED, 24 mos
Laco et al. 2010
Right parotideomasseteric area
Enucleation of the tumor
NED, 24 mos
Nakatsuka et al. 2011
Accessory parotid gland
Local excision of the tumor
NED, 3 mos
NED, 12 mos
Weinreb et al. 2011
Left parotid (intraparotid lymph node)
NED, 16 mos
NED, 7 mos
Grossly, the clinical suggestion of LGCCC is used to be Warthin tumor according to the morphologic feature, that is, a slowly growing cystic mass. Histologically, the tumor is unencapsulated and composed of single or multiple cysts with an intraductal proliferation. The cystic cavity is in line with cytologically bland ductal cells. The intraductal proliferation has a cribriform pattern with “sieve-like spaces” similar to breast proliferations. The majority of the tumor is intraductal; however, small areas of invasion may be present. A total of 7/37 (19%) cases summarized in Table 1 have focal stromal invasion. The tumor cells usually display little cytologic atypia and low mitotic rate . Sometimes, the tumor cells have PAS-positive/diastase-resistant microvacuoles and yellow-brown, lipofuscin-like pigment. There is often associated hemorrhage, cholesterol clefts and hemosiderin-laden macrophages due to cyst rupture, while vascular and/or perineural invasion and comedonecrosis is absent in this tumor.
Immunohistochemically, LGCCC is characterized by diffusely strong positive for S100. However, Weinreb et al.  and Arai et al.  reported two cases of LGCCC with rarely negative for S100. All tumors examined for Her-2/neu oncoprotein, including our case, were negative. Most of the tumor structures have continuous myoepithelial rim confirmed by detection of myoepithelial markers, such as, CK5/6, CK14, SMA, and p63, thus clarifying an in situ nature of the neoplasm. Typically, admixture of luminal and myoepithelial cells is absent.
The differential diagnosis of LGCCC includes PCV-ACC, conventional SDC, cystadenocarcinoma, PLGA, carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma and MASC. PCV-ACC resembles LGCCC according to the intracytoplasmic PAS-positive/diastase-resistant granules (zymogen) and hemosiderin . In contrast to LGCCC, the more common microcystic growth pattern in PCV-ACC is usually seen adjacent to cystopapillary areas and display granular basophilic cytoplasm. PCV-ACC does not exhibit predominance of the intraductal component in histology and the intracytoplasmic vacuoles are uniform in size. Compared with LGCCC, PCV-ACC is predominantly negative (about 90%) for S100 and focally expressed if present . In addition, PCV-ACC mainly occurs in young people, while LGCCC usually affects older people.
Conventional SDC is a high-grade adenocarcinoma that is common in elder people over 50 years of age . Histologically, SDC resembles a high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, frequently accompanied by comedo necrosis and cribriform proliferation . SDC exhibits an apocrine-like appearance with positivity for GCDFP-15 and androgen receptor, which is occasionally observed in LGCCC, but SDC is negative for S-100. In addition, SDC usually exhibits a high Ki-67 labeling index. Occasional cases of SDC in situ (SDCIS) have been described [15–17]. The in situ–like appearance or noninvasive cribriform growth pattern make it hard to distinguish between SDCIS and LGCCC. In contrast to LGCCC, the atypical cells in SDCIS exhibit high nuclear pleomorphism and AR-positive/S100-negative profile. Weinreb et al.  reported a series of 3 intraductal neoplasms interpreted as LGCCC with some nuclear atypia of the tumor cells, all expressing AR and in 2 cases also showing S100 expression. Thus, they consider their LGCCC cases to be a low-grade variant of SDC with a potential for transformation into a high-grade carcinoma. At present, the relationship between LGCCC and SDCIS remains unclear although the current WHO classification considering LGCCC as a variant of cystadenocarcinoma. LGCCC may be either a separate entity based on distinctive immunohistochemical profile or an extremely low-grade end of the spectrum of SDCIS.
Recently, a new entity in the salivary gland called MASC has been described [18, 19], which shows a similar microvacuolar appearance to LGCCC and may have any of solid, cystic and papillary architectures. Similar to LGCCC, MASC is also positive for S100. All these characteristics make it difficult to distinguish between LGCCC and MASC. Although no cases of MASC with an intraductal growth pattern have been described, it should be noted that only one IDC/LGCCC was included in the control group tested for the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion in Skalova et al’s original description of MASC. For now, the presence of a complete myoepithelial layer around tumor nests is considered specific to LGCCC instead of MASC.
In the current WHO classification, LGCCC is regard as a variant of cystadenocarcinoma according to the histological features. However, conventional cystadenocarcinoma tends to be an invasive tumor and lacks the overall resemblance to intraductal breast proliferation. PLGA and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma should also be considered when rendering a diagnosis of LGCCC. PLGA can be distinguished from LGCCC by its distinctive neurotropism and infiltrative lobular, trabecular, and tubular patterns. The transition from myoepithelium to stromal spindle cell and myxoid or cartilaginous stroma is the typical features of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma, which is not observed in LGCCC.
Both of the cases exhibited the typical features of LGCCC, that is, intraductal proliferation and bland ductal cells arranged in a cribriform pattern whichresembled the low-grade breast lesions. Most of the tumor nests or cribriform structures in these two cases were rimming by the continuous myoepithelialium which confirmed by p63, thus, clarify an in situ nature of the neoplasm. The tumor cells in both cases were diffusely strong positive for S100. In addition, the Ki67 index in our cases was under 5%. All these findings supported the diagnosis of LGCCC, although the dilated cystic structures were not observed in Case 2.
Our report illustrated two cases of LGCCC which was a rare salivary tumor. LGCCC should be considered in the differential diagnosis of salivary tumors to avoid rendering a wrong diagnosis of other highly aggressive malignant tumor of salivary gland.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in Chief of this Journal.
- Delgado R, Klimstra D, Albores-Saavedra J: Low grade salivary duct carcinoma. A distinctive variant with a low grade histology and a predominant intraductal growth pattern. Cancer. 1996, 78: 958-967. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960901)78:5<958::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brandwein-Gensler M, Hille J, Wang BY, Urken M, Gordon R, Wang LJ, Simpson JR, Simpson RH, Gnepp DR: Low-grade salivary duct carcinoma: description of 16 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004, 28: 1040-1044. 10.1097/01.pas.0000128662.66321.be.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arai A, Taki M, Mimaki S, Ueda M, Hori S: Low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma of the parotid gland: a case report. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009, 36: 725-728. 10.1016/j.anl.2009.04.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laco J, Podhola M, Dolezalova H: Low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma of the parotid gland: a neoplasm with favorable prognosis, distinct from salivary duct carcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol. 2010, 18: 369-373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakazawa T, Kondo T, Yuminomochi T, Nakazawa K, Ishii Y, Mochizuki K, Kawasaki T, Yamane T, Miyata M, Motosugi U, Katoh R: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma of the salivary gland. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011, 39: 218-222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinreb I: Intraductal carcinoma of salivary gland (so-called low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma) arising in an intraparotid lymph node. Head Neck Pathol. 2011, 5: 321-325. 10.1007/s12105-011-0256-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tatemoto Y, Ohno A, Osaki T: Low malignant intraductal carcinoma on the hard palate: a variant of salivary duct carcinoma?. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1996, 32B: 275-277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakatsuka S, Harada H, Fujiyama H, Takeda K, Kitamura K, Kimura H, Nagano T, Ito M, Asada Y: An invasive adenocarcinoma of the accessory parotid gland: a rare example developing from a low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma?. Diagn Pathol. 2011, 6: 122-10.1186/1746-1596-6-122.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brandwein-Gensler M, Gnepp D, Skalova A, Nagano T: Tumours of the salivary glands. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, eds. World Health Organization Classifications of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics. Head and Neck Tumours. 2005, Lyon, France: IARC Press, 233-234.Google Scholar
- Kondo T: A case of lipomatous pleomorphic adenoma in the parotid gland: a case report. Diagn Pathol. 2009, 4: 16-10.1186/1746-1596-4-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ponniah I, SureshKumar P, Karunakaran K, Shankar KA, Kumaran MG, Preeti LN: Hemangioma in minor salivary glands: real or illusion. Diagn Pathol. 2006, 1: 21-10.1186/1746-1596-1-21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schraven SP, Plontke SK, Syha R, Fend F, Wolburg H, Adam P: Dendritic cell tumor in a salivary gland lymph node: a rare differential diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms. Diagn Pathol. 2011, 6: 94-10.1186/1746-1596-6-94.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weinreb I, Tabanda-Lichauco R, Van der Kwast T, Perez-Ordonez B: Low-grade intraductal carcinoma of salivary gland: report of 3 cases with marked apocrine differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006, 30: 1014-1021. 10.1097/00000478-200608000-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellis G, Simpson RHW: Acinic cell carcinoma. World Health Organization Classifications of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics. Head and Neck Tumours. Edited by: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. 2005, Lyon, France: IARC Press, 216-218.Google Scholar
- Anderson C, Muller R, Piorkowski R, Knibbs DR, Vignoti P: Intraductal carcinoma of major salivary gland. Cancer. 1992, 69: 609-614. 10.1002/1097-0142(19920201)69:3<609::AID-CNCR2820690302>3.0.CO;2-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheuk W, Miliauskas JR, Chan JK: Intraductal carcinoma of the oral cavity: a case report and a reappraisal of the concept of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in salivary duct carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004, 28: 266-270. 10.1097/00000478-200402000-00017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simpson RH, Desai S, Di Palma S: Salivary duct carcinoma in situ of the parotid gland. Histopathology. 2008, 53: 416-425. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03135.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Skalova A, Vanecek T, Sima R, Laco J, Weinreb I, Perez-Ordonez B, Starek I, Geierova M, Simpson RH, Passador-Santos F: Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary glands, containing the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene: a hitherto undescribed salivary gland tumor entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010, 34: 599-608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laco J, Svajdler M, Andrejs J, Hrubala D, Hacova M, Vanecek T, Skalova A, Ryska A: Pathol Res Pract. Mammary analog secretory carcinoma of salivary glands: A report of 2 cases with expression of basal/myoepithelial markers (calponin, CD10 and p63 protein). 2013,http://10.1016/j.prp.2012.12.005,Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.