Open Access

Association of TRPS1 gene with different EMT markers in ERα-positive and ERα-negative breast cancer

  • Peng Su1,
  • Jing Hu1,
  • Hui Zhang2,
  • Ming Jia1,
  • Weiwei Li1,
  • Xuanxuan Jing1 and
  • Gengyin Zhou1Email author
Diagnostic Pathology20149:119

DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-119

Received: 9 April 2014

Accepted: 2 June 2014

Published: 16 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease consisting of different subtypes. Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) gene, a GATA-type transcription factor, has been found to be highly expressed in breast cancer. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is known to play an important role in tumour invasion and metastasis. Our objective was to elucidate the different roles and clinical relevance of TRPS1 in different estrogen receptor (ER) expression subtypes of breast cancer.

Methods

An immunohistochemical study was performed. The correlation between clinicopathological features and other biomarker profiles were analysed statistically.

Result

TRPS1 expression was correlated with the patients’ age (P = 0.017). It was positively related with ERα (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor (PR) (P < 0.001) and ERβ (P = 0.001) status, but negatively associated with Ki67 (P = 0.002) and HER2 (P = 0.025) status. In ERα-positive breast cancer, TRPS1 expression was positively associated with the expression of E-cadherin (P < 0.001), β-catenin(P = 0.001), ERβ (P = 0.03), and p53 (P = 0.002) status, while in ERα-negative breast cancer, TRPS1 expression was correlated with slug (P = 0.004), vimentin (P = 0.003), smooth muscle actin (SMA) (P = 0.031), and IMP3 (P = 0.005) expression.

Conclusions

Based on our findings, we conclude that TRPS1 is positively associated with E-cadherin and β-catenin status in ERα-positive breast cancer cells, while it is also significantly associated with mesenchymal markers of EMT in ERα-negative breast cancer cells. TRPS1 can be a prognostic marker depending on the type of breast cancer.

Virtual Slides

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://​www.​diagnosticpathol​ogy.​diagnomx.​eu/​vs/​8686515681264281​

Keywords

TRPS1 Epithelial to mesenchymal transition Estrogen receptor Breast cancer

Background

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women, accounting for more than 1,300,000 cases and 450,000 deaths worldwide each year [1]. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that comes in different morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics with corresponding clinical behaviour [2]. The oncogenesis and progression of breast cancer is a complex process involving a variety of transcription factors, activation of oncogenes, and inactivation of tumour suppressor genes [3, 4].

Recently gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies have been identified Tricho-rhino-phalangeal syndrome-1 gene (TRPS1), a new GATA family member, to be highly prevalent gene in breast cancer [5, 6]. TRPS is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterised by craniofacial and skeletal anomalies due to mutations or deletions of the TRPS1 gene. It is composed of nine zinc finger motifs including a single GATA-type DNA-binding domain flanked by two potential nuclear localisation signals (NLS) and two C-terminal zinc fingers closely related to the domain found in the Ikaros family of lymphoid transcription factors [7]. It has been demonstrated that TRPS1 is a transcriptional repressor and its activities are dependent on both the highly conserved GATA DNA-binding domain and the Ikaros-like zinc finger motifs [8]. For example, TRPS1 can repress Stat3 to regulate proliferation and apoptosis of chondrocytes. TRPS1 controls epithelial proliferation through repressing SOX9 in the developing vibrissa follicle in mice. It can also repress the expression of Runx2, a key regulator of osteoblastogenesis and chondrocyte maturation [9]. Moreover, TRPS1 can suppress the osteocalcin expression through binding to its promoter [10].

As mentioned before, TRPS1 gene in human has been found to be overexpressed in breast cancer, expressed in more than 90% estrogen receptor α (ERα) positive and negative breast cancer subtype [6]. The gene is localised on human chromosome 8q23–24.1, a region highly amplified in several cancers, especially in prostate and breast cancer. It is important to note that TRPS1 gene has been found to be highly expressed not only in the mammary glands but also in prostate, testis, ovaries, kidneys, and lungs [11]. Increasingly, there are more evidences to suggest the involvement of TRPS1 in a variety of functions in human cancers [1215].

Recent studies have reported that TRPS1 can regulate mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) during embryonic development in a number of tissues, including kidneys, cartilages, and bones [10, 16, 17]. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was first recognised as an important process during normal embryonic development [18]; however, carcinoma cells are also capable of reactivating EMT during tumour progression [19, 20]. During this transition, tumour cells lose epithelial characteristics such as cell apical-basal polarity, membrane-associated adherents, and cell-to-cell adhesion protein E-cadherin. Concurrently, these tumour cells also undergo a dramatic remodelling of the cytoskeleton to facilitate cell mortality and invasion; the cells are also transformed to obtain a spindle-like phenotype. A key feature of EMT is a gene switch, resulting in downregulation of E-cadherin and upregulation of vimentin, smooth muscle actin. Transcriptional factors, such as snail, slug, and twist, which function by suppressing the expression of epithelial specific adhesion molecules, such as E-cadherin, were unveiled as key regulators inducing EMT in breast cancer and other cancers [2124]. β-catenin was first identified as a protein that binds with E-cadherin to maintain cell-to-cell adhesion; however, it also functions as a transcription factor. Loss of membranous β-catenin expression and gain of cytoplasmic or nuclear β-catenin expression in neoplastic glands have been related to carcinogenesis and tumour progression in gastrointestinal cancers [25, 26]. Thus, by detecting these EMT markers, one can roughly estimate the tumour cells undergoing EMT from non-EMT tumour cells.

In addition to the involvement of TRPS1 in regulating MET, it has also been found to repress ZEB2, a key regulator of EMT that inhibits E-cadherin and other epithelial genes [12]. Realizing the potential of TRPS1 gene as the new EMT marker, we focused our work in elucidating different roles and clinical relevance of TRPS1 in ERα-positive and ERα-negative breast cancer subtypes.

Methods

Patients and tissue samples

This study was conducted on 180 paraffin-embedded breast samples, which were histopathologically diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma during 2007 to 2009 at the Department of Pathology of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. For using these clinical materials for research purposes, prior patient consent and approvals from the Research Ethics Committee of Shandong Medical University were obtained. All the diagnoses were made following the Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs of World Health Organisation Classification of Tumours.

Tissue microarray

For each hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide, two representative areas were selected and the corresponding spots were marked on the surface of the paraffin block. Using a tissue microarray (TMA) punching instrument, the selected areas were punched out and were placed into the recipient block side by side. Each tissue core was 2 mm in diameter and was assigned with a unique TMA location number that was linked to a database containing other clinicopathologic data [27].

Immunohistochemistry

The immunohistochemical study was carried out to examine altered protein expression in 180 paraffin-embedded breast tissues as described in previous publications [28]. All the markers were incubated with the sections overnight at 4°C; the markers included TRPS1 (sc-26974, diluted 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), P53 (Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, ZSGB-Bio, Beijing, China), E-Cadherin (24E10, diluted 1:400, Cell Signalling Technology, USA), mouse monoclonal antibody β-catenin (E-5, diluted 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), Vimentin ( D21H3, diluted 1:100, Cell Signalling Technology, USA), slug (C19G7, diluted 1:50, Cell Signalling Technology, USA); the second antibody was from IHC reagent kit (Zhongshan Biotechnology Company, Beijing, China). After diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining, the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. For negative controls, the antibodies were replaced with phosphate buffered saline (PBS).

Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining

The stained slides were reviewed and evaluated independently by two observers blinded to patients’ information. A dual semi-quantitative scale, combining the staining intensity as well as percentage of positive cells, was used to evaluate the protein staining. In brief, staining of TRPS1 was scored semi-quantitatively for intensity (0 = no expression, 1 = weak, 2 = moderate, and 3 = strong) and percentage of positive cells (0 = 0–10%, 1 = 10–30%, 2 = 30–50%; 3 = 50–80%, and 4 = 80–100%). The final score of TRPS1 was the staining score multiplied by the percentage of positive cells. The following cut-off levels were applied: 0 for negative and ≥ 1 for positive [15]. For β-catenin, membrane and cytoplasmic/nuclear expression were recorded separately as no staining, weak staining, or strong staining. Cases with more than 50% of nuclei stain were considered nuclear staining while cases with more than 50% of cytoplasm stain were considered cytoplasmic staining [29]. ER or PgR was positive if 1% of tumour cell nuclei were immuno reactive [30]. For other molecular markers, tumours were regarded as immune-positive if > 10% of tumour cells showed immunoreactivity. Cytoplasmic staining was considered positive for vimentin and SMA. Nuclear staining was considered positive for TRPS1, ERβ, slug and P53. Membranous staining was considered positive for E-cadherin.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the statistics software package SPSS 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test were performed to evaluate the correlation between TRPS1 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics, if appropriate. Bivariate correlations between study variables were calculated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Differences were considered statistically significant for P values < 0.05.

Results

Relationship of TRPS1 over-expression with the clinical features in breast cancer

In the analysis of a 180-member TMA, we found positive TRPS1 expression in 93 cases (51.7%), while 87 tumours (48.3%) were negative. Table 1 shows no significant correlation between the expression level of TRPS1 and biological factors such as histology grade (P = 0.903), pathological stage (P = 0.646), tumour size (P = 0.343), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.443), P53 status (P = 0.113), and IMP3 status (P = 0.618). In contrast, we found that TRPS1 expression was strongly correlated with the patients’ age (P = 0.017), Ki67 (P = 0.002), ERα (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor (PR) (P < 0.001), HER2 (P = 0.025), and ERβ status (P = 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis was preformed to confirm further the correlation between TRPS1 expression and patients’ age (−0.179, P = 0.016); Ki67 (−0.233, P = 0.002), ERα (0.333, P < 0.001), PR (0.31, P < 0.001), HER2 (−0.166, P = 0.025), and ERβ status (0.242, P = 0.001). We divided the patients into two groups as ERα-positive and ERα-negative. TRPS1 expression was observed in 69 (65.7%) of 105 ERα-positive patients, while in 24 (32%) of 75 ERα-negative patients.
Table 1

Correlation between TRPS1 expression and the clinicopathologic characteristics of breast cancer patients

Characteristics

n

TRPS1 expression

P value

Spearman

Value (r)

P value

Negative

Positive

Correlation

Age(y)

       

≤50

70

26

44

0.017

 

−0.179

0.016

>50

110

61

49

    

Grade

       

I

11

5

6

0.903

   

II

124

59

65

    

III

45

23

22

    

Pathological stage

       

I

49

23

26

0.646

   

II

85

44

41

    

III

46

20

26

    

Tumor size

       

<2

60

26

34

0.343

   

≥2

120

61

59

    

Lymph node metastasis

       

Negative

94

48

46

0.443

   

Positive

86

39

47

    

Expression of Ki67

       

≤25%

62

20

42

0.002

 

−0.233

0.002

>25%

118

67

51

    

Expression of P53

       

Negative

72

40

32

0.113

   

Positive

108

47

61

    

ERα

       

Negative

75

51

24

<0.001

 

0.333

<0.001

Positive

105

36

69

    

PR

       

Negative

75

50

25

<0.001

 

0.31

<0.001

Positive

105

37

68

    

HER-2

       

Negative

124

53

71

0.025

 

−0.166

0.025

Positive

56

34

22

    

E-cadherin

       

Negative

33

24

9

0.002

 

0.231

0.002

Positive

147

63

84

    

Slug

       

Negative

170

86

84

0.019

 

0.186

0.012

Positive

10

1

9

    

Vimentin

       

Negative

165

84

81

0.022

 

0.171

0.022

Positive

15

3

12

    

SMA

       

Negative

169

85

84

0.039

 

0.154

0.039

Positive

11

2

9

    

β-catenin

       

Negative

67

42

25

0.003

 

0.221

0.003

Positive

113

45

68

    

ERβ

       

≤2

92

55

37

0.001

 

0.242

0.001

>2

87

31

56

    

IMP3

       

Negative

157

77

80

0.618

   

Positive

23

10

13

    

Relationship of TRPS1 expression with EMT markers in breast cancer

As TRPS1 may be a critical regulator of EMT during breast cancer initiation and progression, the expression of EMT markers, including E-cadherin, β-catenin, vimentin, SMA and slug, were stained in human breast cancer TMA. Statistical analysis indicated that the immunohistochemical expression of TRPS1 is directly correlated with E-cadherin (P = 0.002) and β-catenin (P = 0.003), which was further confirmed by Spearman correlation analysis (E-cadherin: r = 0.231, P = 0.002; β-catenin: r = 0.221, P = 0.003) (Table 1). Moreover, we also found that TRPS1 expression was significantly correlated with slug (P = 0.019), vimentin (P = 0.022) and SMA (P = 0.039); the corresponding Spearman correlation values are 0.186 (P = 0.012), 0.171 (P = 0.022), and 0.154 (P = 0.039).

Correlation between TRPS1 expression and molecular markers in ERα-positive breast cancer

We analysed the molecular markers in ERα-positive breast cancer. Table 2 shows the expression of TRPS1 is positively associated with E-cadherin (P < 0.001), β-catenin (P = 0.001), ERβ (P = 0.03), and p53 (P = 0.002) status (Figure 1). However, the TRPS1 expression is not associated with slug (P = 0.549), vimentin (P = 0.296), SMA (P = 0.296), and IMP3 (P = 0.605).
Table 2

Correlation between TRPS1 expression and molecular markers in ER α positive breast cancer patients

Characteristics

n

TRPS1 expression

P value

Spearman

Value (r)

P value

Negative

Positive

Correlation

Age(y)

       

≤50

42

9

33

0.023

 

−0.221

0.023

>50

63

27

36

    
 

Expression of P53

      

Negative

45

23

22

0.002

 

0.307

0.001

Positive

60

13

47

    
 

E-cadherin

      

Negative

16

13

3

<0.001

 

0.42

<0.001

Positive

89

23

66

    

Slug

       

Negative

102

36

66

0.549

   

Positive

3

0

3

    

Vimentin

       

Negative

101

36

65

0.296

   

Positive

4

0

4

    

SMA

       

Negative

101

36

65

0.296

   

Positive

4

0

4

    

β-catenin

       

Negative

34

19

15

0.001

 

0.315

0.001

Positive

71

17

54

    

ERβ

       

≤2

46

21

25

0.03

 

0.211

0.03

>2

59

15

44

    

IMP3

       

Negative

101

34

67

0.605

   

Positive

4

2

2

    
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-1596-9-119/MediaObjects/13000_2014_Article_989_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Expression of markers in ERα -positive breast cancer (Magnification 200X). A. Positive nuclear staining for TRPS1, B. Positive membranous staining for E-cadherin, C. Positive membranous staining for β-catenin, D. Positive nuclear staining for ERβ, and E. Positive nuclear staining for P53.

Correlation between TRPS1 expression and molecular markers in ERα-negative breast cancer

For ERα negative breast cancer cases, Table 3 shows that the immunohistochemical expression of TRPS1 has correlation with slug (P = 0.004), vimentin (P = 0.003), SMA (P = 0.031), and IMP3 (P = 0.005), which was further confirmed by Spearman correlation analysis (Figure 2).
Table 3

Correlation between TRPS1 expression and molecular markers in ER α negative breast cancer patients

Characteristics

n

TRPS1 expression

P value

Spearman

Value (r)

P value

Negative

Positive

Correlation

Age(y)

       

≤50

28

17

11

0.296

   

>50

47

34

13

    
 

Expression of P53

      

Negative

27

17

10

0.483

   

Positive

48

34

14

    
 

E-cadherin

      

Negative

17

11

6

0.741

   

Positive

58

40

18

    

Slug

       

Negative

68

50

18

0.004

 

0.369

0.001

Positive

7

1

6

    

Vimentin

       

Negative

64

48

16

0.003

 

0.362

0.001

Positive

11

3

8

    

SMA

       

Negative

68

49

19

0.031

 

0.271

0.019

Positive

7

2

5

    

β-catenin

       

Negative

33

23

10

0.78

   

Positive

42

28

14

    

ERβ

       

≤2

46

34

12

0.167

   

>2

29

17

12

    

IMP3

       

Negative

56

43

13

0.005

 

0.323

0.005

Positive

19

8

11

    
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-1596-9-119/MediaObjects/13000_2014_Article_989_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Expression of markers in ERα -negative breast cancer (Magnification 200X). A. Positive nuclear staining for TRPS1, B. Positive cytoplasmic staining for vimentin, C. Positive nuclear staining for slug. D. Positive cytoplasmic staining for SMA, and E. Positive cytoplasmic staining for IMP3.

Discussion

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease consisting of multiple molecular subtypes. The presence of hormone receptors ER, PR, and human EGFR-2 (HER-2) are significantly meaningful in therapeutic decision-making for patients with breast cancer. In addition, these factors may also predict the probability of disease relapse. Hormone receptor-positive tumours have favourable outcomes because of their response to endocrine manipulations such as tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, or ovarian ablation [31]. Tumours with ERα-negative phenotype tend to have poor prognosis, unlike their hormone receptor or HER-2 positive counterparts; hence, such ERα-negative tumours lack targeted therapeutics.

Next, we investigated the expression of TRPS1 in primary human breast cancer samples and explored its association with major breast tumour histological specialties and patients’ clinical characteristics. TRPS1 was positively associated with ER and PR expressions and negatively associated with HER2 status, which is consistent with previous study [6].

When the cut-off level score for TRPS1 to be positive is 1, the TRPS1 was not remarkably associated with the tumour grade, pathological stage, tumour size and lymph node metastasis. However, upon changing the cut-off level score of TRPS1 to be positive as ≥ 2, TRPS1 was found to be positively associated with lymph node metastasis and P53 status (data not shown).

However, previous studies showed that higher TRPS1 expression, when analysed using univariate and multivariate models, predicted better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in a subgroup of ERα+, stage I/II breast cancer patients who received endocrine therapy only [32]. Recent studies have also confirmed that high TRPS1 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and higher pathological stage of patients with colon cancer [14]. All these findings support our hypothesis that TRPS1 may not merely be an indicator of better prognosis as shown in other studies. However, further research using larger patient cohort and more breast cancer cell lines is required to elucidate this contradictory result.

Epithelial cancer cells attain mesenchymal features that make them easier to invade the surrounding tissues and metastasise during EMT process. We used IHC to analyse these markers in 180 patients. Although TRPS1 was significantly associated with E-cadherin and β-catenin, it was also positively associated with mesenchymal markers such as vimentin, SMA, and slug. The above data did not comply with previous results that TRPS1 inhibits EMT process in breast cancer progression [12]. Hence, we divided the patients into two groups as ERα-positive and ERα-negative and reanalysed these EMT markers. Surprisingly, in ERα-positive breast cancer, we found TRPS1 to be positively associated with E-cadherin and β-catenin status with no significant correlation with any of the mesenchymal markers. Consistent with our hypothesis, significant association was also found between TRPS1 expression and E-cadherin expression in ERα + breast cancer cases [32]. In ERα-negative breast cancer, we found TRPS1 to be positively associated with vimentin, SMA and slug. TRPS1 was also found to be positively related with IMP3, which is expressed preferentially in triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). IMP3 is a member of insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) mRNA-binding proteins family. It contributes to the migration and invasion of TNBC cells. Thus, TRPS1 may be associated with the migration, invasion, and EMT in ERα-negative breast cancer cells. Ligand-activated ERα could suppress slug transcription through direct association with the slug promoter. Human breast cancers, which lack ligand-activated ERα, may then over-express slug that may downregulate E-cadherin and lead to EMT [33]. We found TRPS1 to be associated with different EMT markers by different ERα status, therefore, ERα might play an important role in affecting the relationship between TRPS1 and EMT markers.

Estrogen receptors include estrogen receptor α (ERα) and estrogen receptor β (ERβ). Most studies have provided evidence that ERβ acts as a negative modulator of ERα and indicates a good prognosis with prolonged DFS [34, 35]. Several investigators have found ERβ expression to be positively correlated with poor prognostic phenotypes such as accelerated proliferation and basal phenotype in ERα-negative breast cancer [36, 37]. We also stained ERβ and found its expression to be correlated with TRPS1 expression. TRPS1 expression was not regulated by ER signalling since estrogen withdrawal using charcoal-stripped serum did not affect TRPS1 gene or protein expression in ERα-positive breast cancer cell lines [32]. Thus, we have assumed that TRPS1 might transcriptionally both regulate genes and affect tumour growth and development to varying degrees.

Conclusions

There are many possible explanations for the different association between the molecular markers with TRPS1 in ERα-positive and ERα-negative breast cancer. First, TRPS1 is capable of binding to numerous cofactors of various functions. Second, it may either promote or inhibit carcinoma processing depending on the context and amount of protein present [38, 39]. Based on the above results, we conclude that TRPS1 is positively associated with E-cadherin and β-catenin status in ERα-positive breast cancer, while it also has a significant association with mesenchymal markers of EMT in ERα-negative breast cancer. However, further studies with large number of tumours and breast cancer cell lines are required to validate the precise function of TRPS1 gene in breast cancer.

Abbreviations

TRPS1: 

Tricho-rhino-phalangeal syndrome I

EMT: 

Epithelial to mesenchymal transition

ER: 

Estrogen receptor

IMP3: 

Insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) mRNA-binding protein 3

TNBC: 

Triple negative breast cancer

SMA: 

Smooth muscle actin.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, Shandong University School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Pathology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

References

  1. Cancer Genome Atlas N: Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012, 490: 61-70.View Article
  2. Preat F, Simon P, Noel JC: Differences in breast carcinoma immunohistochemical subtypes between immigrant Arab and European women. Diagn Pathol. 2014, 9: 26PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  3. Wang S, Li H, Wang J, Wang D: Expression of microRNA-497 and its prognostic significance in human breast cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2013, 8: 172PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  4. Zhang Q, Zhang Q, Cong H, Zhang X: The ectopic expression of BRCA1 is associated with genesis, progression, and prognosis of breast cancer in young patients. Diagn Pathol. 2012, 7: 181PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  5. Radvanyi L, Singh-Sandhu D, Gallichan S, Lovitt C, Pedyczak A, Mallo G, Gish K, Kwok K, Hanna W, Zubovits J, Armes J, Venter D, Hakimi J, Shortreed J, Donovan M, Parrington M, Dunn P, Oomen R, Tartaglia J, Berinstein NL: The gene associated with trichorhinophalangeal syndrome in humans is overexpressed in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 11005-11010.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  6. Chen JQ, Litton J, Xiao L, Zhang HZ, Warneke CL, Wu Y, Shen X, Wu S, Sahin A, Katz R, Bondy M, Hortobagyi G, Berinstein NL, Murray JL, Radvanyi L: Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis and prognostic significance of TRPS-1, a new GATA transcription factor family member, in breast cancer. Horm Cancer. 2010, 1: 21-33.PubMedView Article
  7. Momeni P, Glockner G, Schmidt O, Von Holtum D, Albrecht B, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Hennekam R, Meinecke P, Zabel B, Rosenthal A, Horsthemke B, Ludecke HJ: Mutations in a new gene, encoding a zinc-finger protein, cause tricho-rhino-phalangeal syndrome type I. Nat Genet. 2000, 24: 71-74.PubMedView Article
  8. Malik TH, Shoichet SA, Latham P, Kroll TG, Peters LL, Shivdasani RA: Transcriptional repression and developmental functions of the atypical vertebrate GATA protein TRPS1. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 1715-1725.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  9. Napierala D, Sam K, Morello R, Zheng Q, Munivez E, Shivdasani RA, Lee B: Uncoupling of chondrocyte differentiation and perichondrial mineralization underlies the skeletal dysplasia in tricho-rhino-phalangeal syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17: 2244-2254.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  10. Piscopo DM, Johansen EB, Derynck R: Identification of the GATA factor TRPS1 as a repressor of the osteocalcin promoter. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 31690-31703.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  11. Chang GT, Steenbeek M, Schippers E, Blok LJ, Van Weerden WM, Van Alewijk DC, Eussen BH, Van Steenbrugge GJ, Brinkmann AO: Characterization of a zinc-finger protein and its association with apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 1414-1421.PubMedView Article
  12. Stinson S, Lackner MR, Adai AT, Yu N, Kim HJ, O’Brien C, Spoerke J, Jhunjhunwala S, Boyd Z, Januario T, Newman RJ, Yue P, Bourgon R, Modrusan Z, Stern HM, Warming S, de Sauvage FJ, Amler L, Yeh RF, Dornan D: TRPS1 targeting by miR-221/222 promotes the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer. Sci Signal. 2011, 4: ra41PubMedView Article
  13. Chang GT, Jhamai M, Van Weerden WM, Jenster G, Brinkmann AO: The TRPS1 transcription factor: androgenic regulation in prostate cancer and high expression in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004, 11: 815-822.PubMedView Article
  14. Hong J, Sun J, Huang T: Increased expression of TRPS1 affects tumor progression and correlates with patients’ prognosis of colon cancer. BioMed Res Int. 2013, 2013: 454085PubMedPubMed Central
  15. Hu J, Su P, Jia M, Wu X, Zhang H, Li W, Zhou G: TRPS1 expression promotes angiogenesis and affects VEGFA expression in breast cancer. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2014, 239: 423-429.View Article
  16. Gai Z, Zhou G, Itoh S, Morimoto Y, Tanishima H, Hatamura I, Uetani K, Ito M, Muragaki Y: Trps1 functions downstream of Bmp7 in kidney development. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009, 20: 2403-2411.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  17. Itoh S, Kanno S, Gai Z, Suemoto H, Kawakatsu M, Tanishima H, Morimoto Y, Nishioka K, Hatamura I, Yoshida M, Muragaki Y: Trps1 plays a pivotal role downstream of Gdf5 signaling in promoting chondrogenesis and apoptosis of ATDC5 cells. Genes Cells. 2008, 13: 355-363.PubMedView Article
  18. Thiery JP: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathologies. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003, 15: 740-746.PubMedView Article
  19. Thiery JP: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 442-454.PubMedView Article
  20. Kalluri R, Weinberg RA: The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119: 1420-1428.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  21. Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009, 139: 871-890.PubMedView Article
  22. Kang Y, Massague J: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: twist in development and metastasis. Cell. 2004, 118: 277-279.PubMedView Article
  23. Blanco MJ, Moreno-Bueno G, Sarrio D, Locascio A, Cano A, Palacios J, Nieto MA: Correlation of Snail expression with histological grade and lymph node status in breast carcinomas. Oncogene. 2002, 21: 3241-3246.PubMedView Article
  24. Prasad CP, Rath G, Mathur S, Bhatnagar D, Parshad R, Ralhan R: Expression analysis of E-cadherin, Slug and GSK3beta in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 325PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  25. Hsu HP, Shan YS, Jin YT, Lai MD, Lin PW: Loss of E-cadherin and beta-catenin is correlated with poor prognosis of ampullary neoplasms. J Surg Oncol. 2010, 101: 356-362.PubMed
  26. Kim K, Lu Z, Hay ED: Direct evidence for a role of beta-catenin/LEF-1 signaling pathway in induction of EMT. Cell Biol Int. 2002, 26: 463-476.PubMedView Article
  27. Xiang L, Su P, Xia S, Liu Z, Wang Y, Gao P, Zhou G: ABCG2 is associated with HER-2 expression, lymph node metastasis and clinical stage in breast invasive ductal carcinoma. Diagn Pathol. 2011, 6: 90PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  28. Su P, Zhang Q, Yang Q: Immunohistochemical analysis of Metadherin in proliferative and cancerous breast tissue. Diagn Pathol. 2010, 5: 38PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  29. Sung R, Kang L, Han JH, Choi JW, Lee SH, Lee TH, Park SH, Kim HJ, Lee ES, Kim YS, Choi YW, Park SM: Differential Expression of E-Cadherin, beta-Catenin, and S100A4 in Intestinal Type and Nonintestinal Type Ampulla of Vater Cancers. Gut and liver. 2014, 8: 94-101.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  30. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M, Hicks DG, Lester S, Love R, Mangu PB, McShane L, Miller K, Osborne CK, Paik S, Perlmutter J, Rhodes A, Sasano H, Schwartz JN, Sweep FC, Taube S, Torlakovic EE, Valenstein P, Viale G, Visscher D, Wheeler T, Williams RB, et al.: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 2784-2795.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  31. Sethi S, Sarkar FH, Ahmed Q, Bandyopadhyay S, Nahleh ZA, Semaan A, Sakr W, Munkarah A, Ali-Fehmi R: Molecular markers of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition are associated with tumor aggressiveness in breast carcinoma. Transl Oncol. 2011, 4: 222-226.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  32. Chen JQ, Bao Y, Lee J, Murray JL, Litton JK, Xiao L, Zhou R, Wu Y, Shen XY, Zhang H, Sahin AA, Katz RL, Bondy ML, Berinstein NL, Hortobagyi GN, Radvanyi LG: Prognostic value of the trichorhinophalangeal syndrome-1 (TRPS-1), a GATA family transcription factor, in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013, 24: 2534-2542.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  33. Ye Y, Xiao Y, Wang W, Yearsley K, Gao JX, Barsky SH: ERalpha suppresses slug expression directly by transcriptional repression. Biochem J. 2008, 416: 179-187.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  34. Paruthiyil S, Parmar H, Kerekatte V, Cunha GR, Firestone GL, Leitman DC: Estrogen receptor beta inhibits human breast cancer cell proliferation and tumor formation by causing a G2 cell cycle arrest. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 423-428.PubMedView Article
  35. Lazennec G: Estrogen receptor beta, a possible tumor suppressor involved in ovarian carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2006, 231: 151-157.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  36. Skliris GP, Leygue E, Curtis-Snell L, Watson PH, Murphy LC: Expression of oestrogen receptor-beta in oestrogen receptor-alpha negative human breast tumours. Br J Cancer. 2006, 95: 616-626.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  37. Jensen EV, Cheng G, Palmieri C, Saji S, Makela S, Van Noorden S, Wahlstrom T, Warner M, Coombes RC, Gustafsson JA: Estrogen receptors and proliferation markers in primary and recurrent breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 15197-15202.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  38. Fantauzzo KA, Tadin-Strapps M, You Y, Mentzer SE, Baumeister FA, Cianfarani S, Van Maldergem L, Warburton D, Sundberg JP, Christiano AM: A position effect on TRPS1 is associated with Ambras syndrome in humans and the Koala phenotype in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17: 3539-3551.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  39. Wuelling M, Kaiser FJ, Buelens LA, Braunholz D, Shivdasani RA, Depping R, Vortkamp A: Trps1, a regulator of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation, interacts with the activator form of Gli3. Dev Biol. 2009, 328: 40-53.PubMedView Article

Copyright

© Su et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement