Open Access

Study of β-catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin in oral squamous cell carcinoma with and without lymph node metastases

  • Partheeban Balasundaram1,
  • Manoj Kumar Singh1Email author,
  • Amit Kumar Dinda1,
  • Alok Thakar2 and
  • Rajni Yadav1
Diagnostic Pathology20149:145

DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-145

Received: 11 January 2014

Accepted: 9 February 2014

Published: 21 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Despite great improvement in the surgical treatment and adjunctive therapy for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), prognosis remains dismal in advanced cases. Regional metastatic disease is known to reduce recurrence free survival and disease specific survival significantly. The present study was conducted to evaluate the role of cell adhesion molecules β-catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin in predicting tumour metastasis of OSCC.

Methods

A total of sixty cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma were included for the study which comprised of 30 cases with lymph node metastases and 30 cases without metastases. Immunohistochemistry was performed for β-catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin on both the test groups along with 30 controls from normal buccal mucosa and inflammatory lesions each.

Results

There was no significant difference between the immunoreactivity for β-catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin between OSCC with and without lymph node metastases. Vimentin immunopositivity was noted with varying intensity in all cases of OSCC.

Conclusions

E-cadherin and β-catenin are probably not the key determinants for regional metastases in OSCC. The role of vimentin expression in OSCC and metastases is controversial and needs to be studied further.

Virtual slides

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here:http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/6506095201182002.

Keywords

Squamous cell carcinoma Metastases Lymph node β-catenin Vimentin E-cadherin

Background

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the sixth most common malignancy in the world and ranks as first in males in the Indian subcontinent. It is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality[1]. Despite great improvement in surgical treatment and adjunctive therapy, prognosis remains dismal in advanced cases. Regional metastatic disease is known to reduce recurrence free survival and disease specific survival significantly[2].

Adhesion molecules play a central role in pathogenesis and progression of malignant tumours[3]. Vimentin is an intermediate filament found predominantly in mesenchymal cells, but not in epithelial cells. However, it also exists in some carcinoma cell lines[46] and squamous cell carcinomas[7, 8].

Therefore, it is important to evaluate the role of cell adhesion molecules like β-catenin and E-cadherin along with vimentin in tumour metastasis of OSCC. In this study, we studied the immunohistochemical expression of vimentin, β-catenin and E-cadherin in oral squamous cell carcinoma with and without lymph node metastasis.

Methods

Patients and tissue specimens

A total of 60 cases of primary OSCC diagnosed over a period of 2 years (2010–2012) in the Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences were included for the study. All the patients had been surgically treated with tumour resection and radical neck dissection. None of the patients did receive any tumour specific therapy (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) before the resection. Thirty cases with a clinical suspicion of malignancy but diagnosed as inflammatory lesions on histology and 30 histologically confirmed normal mucosal margins from the resection specimens were included as control group. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences.

Histopathological evaluation

Specimens from all the cases were fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution and embedded in paraffin. Histological diagnosis was made on haematoxylin and eosin stained sections according to the revised criteria given by the World Health Organization (2005). OSCCs were classified into well, moderately and poorly differentiated grades. Staging was done based on TNM staging into four categories, stage I-IV.

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue sections (4 μm) cut from representative paraffin blocks were deparaffinised in xylene and rehydrated through graded alcohols. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked using 4% hydrogen peroxide. For antigen retrieval, the sections were processed by conventional microwave heating in 10mMol/L sodium citrate retrieval buffer (pH 6.0) for 30 minutes. The sections were then incubated for overnight with primary antibody at 4°C in a humid chamber for β catenin (Spring bioscience), E-cadherin (Spring bioscience) and vimentin (Thermo scientific). The dilutions used for the primary antibodies were 1:250, 1:100 and 1:400 for β catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin respectively. The sections were subsequently incubated with anti-mouse immunoglobulin in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing carrier protein and 15 mM Sodium Azide (large volume universal DAKO LSAB kit, Peroxidase, M/s Dakopatts, Denmark) at room temperature for 30 minutes for β-catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin. The sections were then washed three times with PBS (pH 7.2) for 2 min. The reaction product was developed with 3, 30-diaminobenzidine and counterstained with haematoxylin. Immunoreactivity in the tissue was judged independently by two pathologists who were blinded to the clinical data and other immunohistochemical results. Normal oral mucosal tissues were used as positive control. Negative controls were included in each slide run with omission of primary and secondary antibodies.

Evaluation of immunoreactivity

Immunoreactivity was semi quantitatively evaluated on the basis of staining intensity and distribution using the immunoreactive score[9, 10].

Immunoreactive score = intensity score x proportion score. The intensity score was defined as 0: negative; 1: weak; 2: moderate; or 3: strong, and the proportion score was defined as 0: negative; 1: <10%; 2: 10-50%; 3: >50-80%; or 4: >80% positive cells. The total score ranged from 0 to 12. Immunoreactivity was divided into three groups based on the final score: negative immunoreactivity was defined as a total score of 0, low immunoreactivity was defined as a total score of 1–4, and high immunoreactivity was defined as a total score >4.

Statistical analysis

The correlation between clinicopathological parameters and β catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin expression were analysed using the chi square test and Fisher’s exact test. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics

A total of 60 cases of OSCC were analyzed, of which 30 cases had lymph node metastasis. Majority of them were males (77%) and females constituted 14 (23%) cases. Age range was 23 years to 72 years with a mean age of 44.79 years. Tongue was the most common site involved (52%). Well differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas included 38, 20 and 2 cases respectively. Of 60 cases, 21(35%) cases were Stage III, 17(28%) Stage IV, 16(27%) Stage I and 6(10%) in Stage II.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Both the control groups revealed a strong membranous staining pattern of E-cadherin with an absence or reduced expression in the superficial layer of mature well differentiated cells. Strong membranous β-catenin expression was observed in the suprabasal to the basal layers with absence of staining in the superficial layer in both the control groups. Vimentin expression was detected in the cytoplasm of the connective tissue mesenchymal cells of normal oral mucosal tissue, but not in the squamous epithelium (Figures 1 and2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-1596-9-145/MediaObjects/13000_2014_Article_1118_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Staining pattern of normal buccal mucosa. A. Normal buccal mucosa, H&E X200; B. High immunoreactivity of β-catenin in normal buccal mucosa X200; C. High immunoreactivity of E-cadherin in normal buccal mucosa X200; D. Absence of immunostaining for vimentin in normal squamous epithelium of buccal mucosa X200.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-1596-9-145/MediaObjects/13000_2014_Article_1118_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Staining pattern of oral lichen planus. A. Oral lichen planus, H&E XX200; B. High immunoreactivity for β-catenin in squamous epithelium of a case of lichen planus X200; C. High immunoreactivity for E-cadherin in squamous epithelium of a case of lichen planus X200; D. Absence of immunostaining for vimentin in squamous epithelium in a case of lichen planus X200.

Expression of β-catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin in OSCC patients

Comparison of expression of β-catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin in OSCC with and without lymph node metastases is enumerated in Table 1. OSCCs showed a weaker expression of both β-catenin and E-cadherin than the control groups (p <0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the degree of β-catenin (p = 1.000) and E-cadherin (p = 0.771) expression in study groups of OSCC with and without lymph node metastases. Vimentin expression was seen in all cases of OSCC. Vimentin was expressed in the cytoplasm of the tumour cells with weak to moderate intensity. However, there was no significant difference in the degree of vimentin (p = 0.360) expression in both the study groups (Figure 3).
Table 1

Comparison of OSCC with and without lymph node metastases

Groups

Beta catenin

p value

E- cadherin

p value

Vimentin

p value

 

≤4

5–12

 

≤4

5–12

 

≤4

5–12

 

OSCC without lymph node metastasis (n = 30)

9

21

0.771

7

23

1.000

25

5

0.360

OSCC with lymph node metastases (n = 30)

7

23

 

6

24

 

21

9

 
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1746-1596-9-145/MediaObjects/13000_2014_Article_1118_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Staining pattern of squamous cell carcinoma. A. Squamous cell carcinoma, buccal mucosa, H&E X200; B. Low immunoreactivity of β-catenin in a case of squamous cell ]carcinoma X200; C. Low immunoreactivity of E-cadherin in a case of squamous cell carcinoma X200; D. Low immunoreactivity for vimentin in a case of squamous cell carcinoma X200.

Patients without lymph node metastases were nearly equally distributed in age groups of ≤50 years and >50 years where as patients with lymph node metastases predominantly belonged to the ≤50 years group. There were no statistically significant differences between the clinical variables (age, sex, site, size of tumour and histological differentiation) in OSCC with and without lymph node metastases as enumerated in Table 2.
Table 2

Correlation of clinical variables in OSCC with and without lymph node metastases

Variable

OSCC without lymph node metastases (n = 30)

OSCC with lymph node metastases (n = 30)

P value

Age: ≤ 50 yrs

16

24

0.054

  > 50 yrs

14

6

Sex: Female

6

8

0.761

  Male

24

22

Site: Tongue

14

17

0.605

  Buccal mucosa

16

13

Size: ≤ 4 cm

24

23

1.000

  > 4 cm

6

7

Differentiation: WDSCC

17

21

0.698

  MDSCC

12

8

  PDSCC

1

1

There was no statistically significant difference between the expressions of β-catenin, E-cadherin or vimentin and clinicopathological variables (age, sex, site, size of tumour, histological differentiation and stage) in OSCCs with and without lymph node metastases as listed in Table 3. Thus, all these variables did not affect the expression of adhesion molecules.
Table 3

Correlation of β catenin, E-cadherin and vimentin expression level of tumours and clinical variables

Variable

Total cases(n = 60)

β catenin

P value

E-cadherin

P value

Vimentin

P value

  

Low

High

 

Low

High

 

Low

High

 

Male

46

15

31

0.085

10

36

1.000

34

12

0.484

Female

14

1

13

3

11

12

2

≤ 50 yrs

40

11

29

1.000

12

28

0.768

29

11

0.347

> 50 yrs

20

5

15

5

15

17

3

Tongue

31

8

23

1.000

8

23

0.535

25

6

0.547

Buccal mucosa

29

8

21

5

24

21

8

WDSCC

38

10

28

0.538

6

32

0.390

31

7

0.200

MDSCC

20

4

16

6

14

13

7

PDSCC

2

1

1

0

2

1

1

≤ 4 cm

47

12

35

0.731

10

37

1.000

35

12

0.713

> 4 cm

13

4

9

3

10

11

2

Stage I&II

22

6

16

1.000

3

19

0.338

18

4

0.542

Stage III&IV

38

10

28

10

28

28

10

Discussion

Oda T et al. proposed three mechanisms of alteration of cadherin-mediated cell adhesion system in human cancers in vivo and in vitro. The first is down-regulation of E-cadherin expression and its gene mutation[11]. Existence of altered E-cadherin expression in human cancers and a significant relationship between reduced E-cadherin expression and clinicopathological factors, such as dedifferentiation, invasiveness, or metastasis was previously reported[12]. The second is abnormality or deletion of catenins[13, 14]. The third abnormality is biochemical modification of catenins. It has been demonstrated that tyrosine phosphorylation of β-catenin induced by various factors (eg. v-src, hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor) suppresses E-cadherin function in vitro[15].

The present study revealed the down regulation of molecular markers β-catenin and E-cadherin in OSCC along with aberrant expression of vimentin. However, the present study did not show any significant difference in the expression of E- cadherin, β- catenin and vimentin in OSCC with and without lymph node metastases.

As proposed by various studies[1619], there was decreased expression of E-cadherin and β-catenin in OSCC tumour cells, in comparison to strong expression in the control groups. This was statistically significant in OSCC without lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002, p = 0.011) and OSCC with lymph node metastases (p = 0.011, p = 0.024).

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition is an important biological process during development and oncogenesis. It is characterized by a reduction of epithelial polarities and production of mesenchymal phenotypes. Down regulation of epithelial marker like E-cadherin and increase in mesenchymal marker vimentin are hallmarks of transition[20, 21].

Few studies have detected the expression of vimentin in OSCC patients and cell lines[22, 23]. Similar feature was noted in the present study.

Down regulation and loss of E-cadherin was associated with lymph node metastases and advanced stage of OSCC according to various studies[18, 2426] while few studies[16, 17, 27, 28] failed to prove this prognostic value. The present study followed the latter trend.

Reduced staining intensity of the E-cadherin molecule has been correlated by Rodrigo et al. with the presence of nodal metastatic disease in a study on 101 patients with supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma[29] although, few studies failed to show this relationship[27, 30]. Bukholm et al.[31] reported that there was no significant difference between the expression of E-cadherin and the presence of regional metastasis in human breast cancer, and it is said that the significance of changes in the E-cadherin complex may vary from tumour to tumour[32].

Reduced β-catenin staining was a predictive marker for lymph node metastases in OSCC according to few studies[24, 33, 34] and not by others[16, 27, 35]. The present study did not have a significant difference in the reduced expression of β-catenin and lymph node metastases in OSCC.

Several factors related to methodology may account for the discrepancy in results. The method of evaluation of immunostaining and the definition of under-expression is quite variable, hence compromising accurate comparison of data.

In some studies, a semi-quantitative estimation of the immunoreactive intensity was used[24, 25, 33, 36, 37] with varying percentage criteria, while other studies have not assessed expression according to the percentage of positively stained cells[38, 39]. Moreover, the expression analysis has been carried out in different areas of the tumour by different investigators. Some studies have focussed on the invasive tumour front[33, 38] while other studies have examined expression in random areas[24, 36, 37, 39] within the tumour. It would, however, appear from the results in the present study and other studies on OSCC[16, 17, 25, 27, 28, 35, 36, 39] that E-cadherin and β-catenin are probably not the key determinants for regional metastases in OSCC.

In this study, all tumors in both the groups expressed cytoplasmic positivity for vimentin with varying intensity. Of 60 cases of OSCC, 45 cases (75%) exhibited a low immunoreactive score and 15 cases (25%) exhibited high immunoreactive score. Poorly differentiated OSCC constituted two cases, of which one exhibited high immunoreactive score (50%). The number of cases in the poorly differentiated carcinoma category was less for a valid comparison.

Various molecules have been studied in head and neck carcinomas. Low level of p27 expression has been reported an unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma[40]. CypA/MMP9 signal pathway and up-regulation of USP9X may be attributed to the malignant transformation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)[41, 42]. Also, over-expression of ABCG2 and V-ATPase is noted in ESCC. RNAi targeting CXCR4 is known to inhibit proliferation and invasion of esophageal carcinoma cells[43]. Both ABCG2 and V-ATPase are over-expressed in esophageal squamous cancer cells[44]. Some new molecules are being studied in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Mir-205 has been demonstrated as a novel molecular marker for the detection of metastatic HNSCC[45]. In another study, primary tumors and positive nodes of the metastatic cases revealed decreased expression of collagen XVIII and CBP2/HSP47 in metastases[46]. More studies on role of integrins, epidermal growth factor receptor, matrix metalloproteinases, cathepsins, chemokine receptors and angiogenesis markers are needed for future.

Conclusions

Expression of β-catenin and E-cadherin is though downregulated in oral squamous cell carcinomas, it solely does not predicts lymph node metastasis. Aberrant vimentin expression is seen in these tumours. Loss of intercellular adhesion is only one of the stages required for the occurrence of metastases; there could be a need for other phenomena, such as loss of cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix, which can be caused by the metalloproteinases expression, which has to be further evaluated. Detailed studies on KCl co transporter −3 (KCC 3) functions with emphasis on disruption of E-cadherin/β–catenin complex formation and cell-cell junction dysfunction are required.

Abbreviations

OSCC: 

Oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
(2)
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global cancer statistics 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005, 55: 74-108. 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Grandi C, Alloisio M, Moglia D, Podrecca S, Sala L, Salvatori P, Molinari R: Prognostic significance of lymphatic spread in head and neck carcinomas: therapeutic implications. Head Neck Surg. 1985, 8: 67-73. 10.1002/hed.2890080202.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fillies T, Buerger H, Gaertner C, August C, Brandt B, Joos U, Werkmeister R: Catenin expression in T1/2 carcinomas of the floor of the mouth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005, 34: 907-911. 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.03.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ramaekers FCS, Haeg D, Kant A, Moesker O, Jap PH, Vooijs GP: Coexpression of keratin and vimentin type intermediate filaments in human metastatic carcinoma cells. Proc Nactl Acad Sci USA. 1983, 80: 2618-2623. 10.1073/pnas.80.9.2618.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyer B, Tucker GC, Valles AM, Franke WW, Thiery JP: Rearrangements of desmosomal and cytoskeletal proteins during the transition from epithelial to fibroblastoid organization in cultured rat bladder carcinoma cells. J Cell Biol. 1989, 109: 1495-1509. 10.1083/jcb.109.4.1495.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Sommers CL, Walker-Jones D, Heckford SE, Worland P, Valverius E, Clark R, McCormick F, Stampfer M, Abularach S, Gelmann EP: Vimentin rather than keratin expression in some hormone-independent breast cancer cell lines and in oncogene-transformed mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 1989, 49: 4258-4263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Iyer PV, Leong ASY: Poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas of the skin can express vimentin. J Cutan Pathol. 1992, 19: 34-39. 10.1111/j.1600-0560.1992.tb01556.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Imai K, Kumagal S, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E, Nakanishi I, Okada Y: Immunolocalization of desmoglein and intermediate filaments in human oral squamous cell carcinomas. Head Neck. 1995, 17: 204-212. 10.1002/hed.2880170307.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chui X, Egami H, Yamashita J, Kurizaki T, Ohmachi H, Yamamoto S, Ogawa M: Immunohistochemical expression of the c-kit proto-oncogene product in human malignant and non-malignant breast tissues. Br J Cancer. 1996, 73: 1233-1236. 10.1038/bjc.1996.236.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Engels K, Knauer SK, Metzler D, Simf C, Struschka O, Bier C, Mann W, Kovacs AF, Stauber RH: Dynamic intracellular survivin in oral squamous cell carcinoma: underlying molecular mechanism and potential as an early prognostic marker. J Pathol. 2007, 211: 532-540. 10.1002/path.2134.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Oda T, Kanai K, Oyama T, Yoshiura K, Shimoyama Y, Birchmeier W, Sugimura T, Hirohashi S: E-cadherin gene mutations in human gastric carcinoma cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 1858-1862. 10.1073/pnas.91.5.1858.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Shiozaki H, Tahara H, Oka H, Miyata M, Kobayashi K, Tamura S, Lihara K, Doki Y, Hirano S, Takeichi M, Mori T: Expression of immunoreactive E-cadherin adhesion molecules in human cancers. Am J Pathol. 1991, 139: 17-23.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Matsui S, Shiozaki H, Inoue M, Tamura S, Doki Y, Kadowaki T, Iwazawa T, Shimaya K, Nagafuchi A, Tsukita S: Immunohistochemical evaluation of α-catenin expression in human gastric cancer. Virchows Arch. 1994, 424: 375-381.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Matsuyoshi N, Hamaguchi M, Taniguchi S, Nagafuchi A, Tsukita S, Takeichi M: Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion is perturbed by v-src tyrosine phosphorylation in metastatic fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1992, 118: 703-714. 10.1083/jcb.118.3.703.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu LK, Jiang XY, Zhou XX, Wang DM, Song XL, Jiang HB: Upregulation of vimentin and aberrant expression of E-cadherin/β catenin complex in oral squamous cell carcinomas: correlation with the clinicopathological features and patient outcome. Mod Pathol. 2010, 23: 213-224. 10.1038/modpathol.2009.160.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurtz KA, Hoffman HT, Zimmerman MB, Robinson RA: Decreased E-Cadherin but not beta-catenin expression is associated with vascular invasion and decreased survival in head and neck squamous carcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006, 134: 142-146. 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.026.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gurkiran K, Sunitha C, Nirmala R, Laxmi R: Expression of E-cadherin in primary oral squamous cell carcinoma and metastatic lymph nodes: An immunohistochemical study. Indian J Dent Res. 2009, 20: 71-76. 10.4103/0970-9290.49075.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Laxmidevi LB, Angadi PV, Pillai RK, Chandreshekar C: Aberrant β-catenin expression in the histologic differentiation of oral squamous cell carcinoma and verrucous carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study. J Oral Sci. 2010, 52: 633-640. 10.2334/josnusd.52.633.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee JM, Dedhar S, Kalluri R, Thompson EW: The epithelial mesenchymal transition: new insights in signaling, development and disease. J Cell Biol. 2006, 172: 973-981. 10.1083/jcb.200601018.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Takkunen M, Grenman R, Hukkanen M, Korhonen M, Garcia de Herreros A, Virtanen I: Snail-dependent and –independent epithelial-mesenchymal transition in oral squamous carcinoma cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006, 54: 1263-1275. 10.1369/jhc.6A6958.2006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. de Araujo VC, Pinto DS, de Sousa SOM, Nunes FD, de Araujo NS: Vimentin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993, 250: 105-109. 10.1007/BF00179308.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Islam S, Kim JB, Trendel J, Wheelock MJ, Johnson KR: Vimentin expression in human squamous carcinoma cells: relationship with phenotypic changes and cadherin-based cell adhesion. J Cell Biochem. 2000, 78: 141-150. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(20000701)78:1<141::AID-JCB13>3.0.CO;2-R.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Tanaka N, Odajima T, Ogi K, Ikeda T, Satoh M: Expression of E-cadherin, alpha-catenin, and beta-catenin in the process of lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2003, 89: 557-563. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601124.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Diniz-Freitas M, Garcia-Caballero T, Antunez-Lopez J, Gandara-Rey JM, Garcia-Garcia A: Reduced E-cadherin expression is an indicator of unfavourable prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2006, 42: 190-200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cruz MC, Pereira AL, Lopes FF, Nonaka CF, Silva RR, Freitas Rde A, Souza LB, Pinto LP: Immunohistochemical expression of E-cadherin and CD44v6 in squamous cell carcinomas of the lower Lip and tongue. Braz Dent J. 2009, 20: 64-69.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Andrews NA, Jones AK, Helliwell TR, Kinsella AR: Expression of the E-cadherin-catenin cell adhesion complex in primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck and their nodal metastases. Br J Cancer. 1997, 75: 1474-1480. 10.1038/bjc.1997.252.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang X, Zhang J, Fan M: The expression of E-cadherin at the invasive tumor front of oral squamous cell carcinoma: immunohistochemical and RTPCR analysis with clinicopathological correlation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009, 107: 547-554. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.11.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodrigo JP, Dominguez F, Alvarez C: Expression of E-cadherin in squamous cell carcinomas of the supraglottic larynx with correlations to clinicopathological features. Eur J Cancer. 2002, 38: 1059-1064. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00399-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Takes RP, de Jong RJ B, Schuuring E, Hermans J, Vis AA, Litvinov SV, van Kreiken JH: Markers for assessment of nodal metastasis in laryngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997, 123: 412-419. 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900040048008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Bukholm IK, Nesland JN, Karesen R, Jacobsen U, Borresen-Dale AL: E-cadherin and alpha, beta and gamma catenin protein expression in relation to metastasis in human breast carcinoma. J Pathol. 1998, 185: 262-266. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199807)185:3<262::AID-PATH97>3.0.CO;2-Y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kinsella AR, Green B, Lepts GC, Hill CL, Bowie G, Taylor BA: The role of the cell adhesion molecule E-cad in large bowel tumour cell invasion and metastasis. Br J Cancer. 1993, 67: 904-909. 10.1038/bjc.1993.169.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Bankfalvi A, Krabort M, Vegh A, Felszeghy E, Piffko J: Deranged expression of the E-cadherin/b-catenin complex and the epidermal growth factor receptor in the clinical evolution and progression of oral squamous cell carcinomas. J Oral Pathol Med. 2002, 31: 450-457. 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2002.00147.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Cai ZG, Shi XJ, Gao Y, Wei MJ, Wang CY, Yu GY: β-catenin expression pattern in primary oral squamous cell carcinoma. Chin Med J. 2008, 121: 1866-1870.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Murakami A, Nakagawa T, Fukushima C, Torii M, Sueoka K, Nawata S, Takeda O, Ishikawa M, Sugino N: Relationship between decreased expression of squamous cell carcinoma antigen 2 and E-cadherin in primary cervical cancer lesions and lymph node metastasis. Oncol Rep. 2008, 19: 99-104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Freitas Rde A, Silveira EJ, Silveira JP, Silva FM, Amorim RF: Correlation of ß-catenin expresssion and metastasis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Cir Bras. 2010, 25: 513-517. 10.1590/S0102-86502010000600010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Chow V, Yuen AP, Lam KY, Tsao GS, Ho WK, Wei WI: A comparative study of the clinicopathological significance of E-cadherin and catenins (alpha, beta, gamma) expression in the surgical management of oral tongue carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2001, 127: 59-63. 10.1007/s004320000177.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Yamada K, Jordan R, Mori M, Speight PM: The relationship between E-cadherin expression, clinical stage and tumour differentiation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Dis. 1997, 3: 82-85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams HK, Sanders DSA, Jankowski JAZ, Landini G, Brown AM: Expression of cadherins and catenins in oral epithelial dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 1998, 27: 308-317.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Okamoto M, Nishimine M, Kishi M, Kirita T, Sugimura M, Nakamura M, Konishi N: Prediction of delayed neck metastasis in patients with stage I/II squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. J Oral Pathol Med. 2002, 31: 227-233. 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2002.310406.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Jiang Q, Yang H, Cheng C, Xiong H, Liu S, Long J, Zhang Y, Fang W, Liu Z: Decreased P27 protein expression is correlated with the progression and poor prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Diagnostic Pathol. 2013, 8: 212-10.1186/1746-1596-8-212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Li Y, Guo H, Dong D, Wu H, Li E: Expression and prognostic relevance of Cyclophilin A and matrix metalloproteinase 9 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Diagnostic Pathol. 2013, 8: 207-10.1186/1746-1596-8-207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Peng J, Hu Q, Liu W, He X, Cui L, Chen X, Yang M, Liu H, Wei W, Liu S, Wang H: USP9X expression correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Diagnostic Pathol. 2013, 8: 177-10.1186/1746-1596-8-177.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang T, Mi Y, Pian L, Gao P, Xu H, Zheng Y, Xuan X: RNAi targeting CXCR4 inhibits proliferation and invasion of esophageal carcinoma cells. Diagnostic Pathol. 2013, 8: 104-10.1186/1746-1596-8-104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang L, Lu Q, Han Y, Li Z, Zhang Z, Li X: ABCG2/V-ATPase was associated with the drug resistance and tumor metastasis of esophageal squamous cancer cells. Diagnostic Pathol. 2012, 7: 180-10.1186/1746-1596-7-180.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Fletcher AM, Heaford AC, Trask DK: Detection of metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using the relative expression of tissue specific Mir-205. Transl Oncol. 2008, 1 (4): 202-208. 10.1593/tlo.08163.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Nikitakis NG, Rivera H, Lopes MA, Siavash H, Reynolds MA, Ord RA, Sauk JJ: Immunohistochemical expression of angiogenesis-related markers in oral squamous cell carcinomas with multiple metastatic lymph nodes. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003, 119 (4): 574-586. 10.1309/JD3DHGCDGAUN1R0J.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Balasundaram et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement