Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations of KRAS mutation status with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics in 153 patients

From: Clinicopathological correlates and prognostic significance of KRAS mutation status in a pooled prospective cohort of epithelial ovarian cancer

n (%)

KRAS wild type

KRAS mutated

P-value

 

136(89%)

17(11%)

 

Age

   

Mean

63.38

60.71

0.293

Median

62.00

62.00

 

Range

47-83

49-69

 

Histological subtype

   

Mucinous

5(3.7)

7(41.2)

<0.001

Serous

87(64.0)

3(17.6)

 

Endometroid

30(22.1)

5(29.4)

 

Other

14(10.3)

2(11.8)

 

Differentiation grade

   

Well-moderate

36(26.5%)

11(64.7)

0.001

Poor

100(73.5)

6(35.3)

 

Clinical Stage

   

I

20(16.0)

6(40.0)

0.088

II

16(12.8)

2(13.3)

 

III

70(56.0)

4(26.7)

 

IV

19(15.2)

3(20.0)

 

Missing

11

15

 

ER

   

≤10%

56/43.1)

11(64.7)

0.092

>10%

74(56.9)

6(35.3)

 

Missing

6

0

 

PR

   

≤10%

111(84.1)

10(62.5)

0.035

>10%

21(15.9)

6(37.5)

 

Missing

4

1

 

AR

   

≤10%

112(82.4)

13(76.5)

0.554

>10%

24(17.6)

4(23.5)

 

Missing

0

0

 

Chek1

   

Low

36(28.8)

8(53.3)

0.053

High

89(71.2)

7(46.7)

 

Missing

11

2

 

Chek2

   

Low

43(33.6)

9(56.2)

0.075

High

85(66.4)

7(43.8)

 

Missing

8

1