Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate analysis of factors associated with recurrence of PUC-Ta

From: Level of mitoses in non-muscle invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas (pTa and pT1) at initial bladder biopsy is a simple and powerful predictor of clinical outcome: a multi-center study in South Korea

Variable

Category

Odds ratio

95% Confidence Interval

P-value

Age

 

1.00

0.97-1.03

0.9401

Sex

man vs. woman

1.11

0.50-2.47

0.7908

No of tumor

 

0.34

0.17-0.67

0.0021*

Size of tumor

 

2.27

1.05-5.07

0.0399*

Papillary fusion

2 vs 1

1.50

0.65-3.50

0.3430

3 vs 1

1.60

0.74-3.50

0.2348

Umbrella cell

2 vs. 1

0.95

0.44-2.07

0.9020

3 vs. 1

1.19

0.52-2.75

0.6723

Discohesiveness

2 vs. 1

1.93

0.80-4.78

0.1480

3 vs. 1

1.57

0.71-3.53

0.2682

Cell density

2 vs. 1

1.62

0.69-3.88

0.2737

3 vs. 1

0.88

0.37-2.08

0.7719

Nuclear pleomorphism

2 vs. 1

0.47

0.21-1.03

0.0621

3 vs. 1

0.39

0.14-1.03

0.0599

4 vs. 1

3.84

0.58-76.11

0.2324

Multinucleated giant cell

1 vs. 0

1.14

0.58-2.24

0.7041

Loss of polarity

2 vs. 1

1.03

0.41-2.59

0.9557

3 vs. 1

0.82

0.29-2.26

0.6981

Hyperchromasia

2 vs. 1

1.36

0.67-2.79

0.3904

3 vs. 1

0.97

0.26-3.47

0.9604

Nuclear groove

2 vs. 1

1.83

0.86-3.96

0.1184

3 vs. 1

1.60

0.65-3.99

0.3079

Prominent nucleoli

2 vs. 1

1.12

0.56-2.23

0.7491

3 vs. 1

0.81

0.15-3.90

0.7903

Whorling pattern

1 vs. 0

1.07

0.55-2.11

0.8327

Necrosis

2 vs 1

0.98

0.39-2.48

0.9694

3 vs 1

0.77

0.21-2.58

0.6680

4 vs 1

1.47

0.54-4.14

0.4490

Divergent histology

 

2.04

0.73-8.10

0.2172

Mitotic count

 

1.03

1.00-1.07

0.0468*

Mitotic count (CAT)

2 vs. 1

4.62

1.89-11.98

0.0011

3 vs. 1

2.52

0.94-6.95

0.0684

4 vs. 1

3.15

1.22-8.46

0.0193*

Mitotic level

2 vs. 1

2.13

0.83-5.70

0.1229

3 vs. 1

4.44

1.88-11.18

0.0010*

Apoptosis

2 vs 1

1.15

0.53-2.50

0.7246

3 vs 1

1.09

0.24-4.82

0.9116

Capillary proliferation

 

1.05

1.01-1.10

0.0136*

  1. No Number, CAT Categorical variable; *P < 0.05