Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Diagnostic Pathology

Fig. 3

From: Comparison of clinical behavior between mucinous ovarian carcinoma with infiltrative and expansile invasion and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

Fig. 3

Survival analysis of mucinous carcinoma with infiltrative or expansile invasion and high-grade serous carcinoma. (A) Progression-free survival (PFS) curves of all cases of mucinous carcinoma (MC) with infiltrative invasion, MC with expansile invasion, and high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). HGSC has a worse prognosis than MC with expansile invasion (p < 0.01), and there is no statistically significant difference between MC with infiltrative invasion and HGSC (p = 0.60). (B) overall survival (OS) curves of all cases of MC with infiltrative invasion, MC with expansile invasion, and HGSC. HGSC has a worse prognosis than MC with expansile invasion (p < 0.01), and there is no statistically significant difference between MC with infiltrative invasion and HGSC (p = 0.89). (C) PFS curves of cases of MC with infiltrative invasion, MC with expansile invasion, and HGSC at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I. MC with expansile invasion has a better prognosis than HGSC (p = 0.04), and there is no statistically significant difference between MC with infiltrative invasion and HGSC (p = 0.88). (D) OS curves of cases of MC with infiltrative invasion, MC with expansile invasion, and HGSC at FIGO stage I. There is no statistically significant difference between MC with infiltrative invasion and HGSC (p = 0.34); statistical significance between MC with expansile invasion and HGSC is not evaluable. (E) PFS curves of cases of MC with infiltrative invasion, MC with expansile invasion, and HGSC at FIGO stages II to IV. MC with infiltrative invasion has a worse prognosis than HGSC (p < 0.01), and there is no statistically significant difference between MC with expansile invasion and HGSC (p = 0.07). (F) OS curves of cases of MC with infiltrative invasion, MC with expansile invasion, and HGSC at FIGO stages II to IV. MC with infiltrative invasion has a worse prognosis than HGSC (p < 0.01), and there is no statistically significant difference between MC with expansile invasion and HGSC (p = 0.14)

Back to article page