Study | Statistics | Agreement | Resultsa |
---|
Between-reader | APA % | 99.3 | Pass |
n/N | 296/298 |
95% CI | 98.0–100.0 |
ANA % | 99.3 | Pass |
n/N | 300/302 |
95% CI | 98.0–100.0 |
OPA % | 99.3 | Pass |
n/N | 298/300 |
95% CI | 98.0–100.0 |
Within-reader | APA % | 99.0 | Pass |
n/N | 296/299 |
95% CI | 98.0–100.0 |
ANA % | 99.0 | Pass |
n/N | 298/301 |
95% CI | 98.0–100.0 |
OPA % | 99.0 | Pass |
n/N | 297/300 |
95% CI | 98.0–100.0 |
Background | OPA % | 100.0 | Pass |
n/N | 600/600 |
95% CI | 99.4–100.0 |
- Counts indicate the number of pairwise comparisons and do not represent the number of unique cases
- ANA Average negative agreement, APA Average positive agreement, CI Confidence interval, OPA Overall percent agreement, PD-L1 Programmed death-ligand 1, TAP Tumor Area Positivity
- aThe acceptance criteria for between-reader precision were ≥ 85% ANA and APA; the acceptance criteria for within-reader precision were ≥ 90% OPA, and ≥ 85% ANA and APA. The acceptance criterion for background staining was that the assay must produce acceptable levels of non-specific staining on ULTRA instruments in at least 90% of samples