Skip to main content

Table 2 Studies characteristics and the impact of CAIX on disease-free survival

From: The relationship between carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) and patient survival in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s)

Country

Patients (n)

Median follow up (months)

Cancer death n (%)

Subtype

Antibody for IHC/ dilution

Scoring method

High CAIX Expression n (%)

Score range and location

Definition of positive

Tumour stage

Multivariate variables

Hazard ratio

(95% CI)

p-value

HR estimation

Alves et al. 2019 [26]

Brazil

196

73.9

NA

Mixed BC

ab15086 1:200

Percentage and intensity

13 (7)

Score 0–6 Membranous

Score > 2

T1-4 N0-3 M0

NA

UV analysis NA

0.005

Reported in text

Jin et al. 2016 [45]

South Korea

270

NA

NA

TNBC

Abcam 1:75

Percentage

59 (22)

1–100 Membranous and cytoplasmic

 ≥ 10%

I-II

LVI, LN metastasis, HIF-1α, CAIX and combined HIF-1α and CAIX expression

MV analysis 2.65 (1.41–4.97)

0.002

Reported in text

Aomatsu et al. 2014 [51]

Japan

102

6.2

NA

Mixed BC

M75 1:1000

Intensity

47 (46)

Score 0–3 Membranous

Score ≥ 2

IIA-IIB or IIIA

ER, PR, molecular subtypes (HR + /Her-2) and CAIX expression

MV analysis 2.39 (1.04–5.49)

0.041

Reported in text

Noh, Kim, and Koo 2014 [44]

South Korea

334

NA

31 (9.3)

AR + /ER − BC

Abcam 1:100

Percentage and intensity

96 (29)

Score 0–6 Location not stated

Score ≥ 2

T1-3

T stage, LN status, histologic grade and CAIX expression

MV analysis 2.23 (0.67–7.43)

0.191

Reported in text

Choi, Jung, and Koo 2013

South Korea

276

67

23 (8)

Mixed BC

NA 1:100

Intensity

90 (33)

Score 0–3 Cytoplasmic

Score ≥ 2

T1-3 N0-3

-

UV analysis NA

0.271

Reported in text

Currie et al. 2013 [52]

New Zealand

87

NA

NA

Mixed BC

Novus Biologicals 1:1000

Percentage and intensity

43 (49)

Score 0–8 Membranous

Score ≥ 3

NA

-

UV analysis NA

0.47

Reported in text

Betof et al. 2012 [53]

USA

209

99.6

32 (16.6)

Mixed BC based on CT

M75 NA

Percentage and intensity

182 (88)

Score 0–300 Membranous and cytoplasmic

Score ≥ 50

NA

NA

UV analysis 1.82

0.014

Reported in text

Kaya et al. 2012 [54]

Turkey

111

110

NA

Group1:HR + ,

Her-2-ve

Group2:HR-, Her-2 + ve

H-120

1:100

Absent

or present

62 (65)

0–1

Membranous

Score ≥ 1

T1-4

N0-3

M0

-

UV analysis

NA

0.344

Survival

curve

Pinheiro et al. 2011 [17]

Portugal and

Brazil

122

NA

NA

Mixed BC

ab15086

1:2000

Percentage

and intensity

22 (18)

Score 0–6

Membranous

Score ≥ 3

T1-3

NA

UV analysis

NA

0.045

Survival

curve

Tan et al. 2009 [15]

UK and Australia

182

131.9

99 (21.7)

Mixed BC

Patients treated with CT (n = 182)

NA

Percentage

59 (14)

0–100

Membranous

 ≥ 10%

NA

NA

UV analysis

3.20 (1.79–5.70)

 < 0.001

Reported

in text

Trastour et al. 2007 [16]

France

132

138

20 (15)

Mixed BC

MN75

1:10,000

Percentage

38 (29)

0–100

Membranous

 > 1%

NA

Tumour size,

LN status, tumour grade, HIF-1α and CAIX expression

MV analysis

2 (1.0–4.2)

0.05

Reported

in text

Generali et al. 2006a [55]

Italy

166

53

22 (11.7)

Mixed BC

M75

1:50

Intensity

41 (24.7)

Score 0–2 Location not stated

Score ≥ 1

T2-4 N0-1

NA

UV analysis NA

0.02

Reported in text

Generali et al. 2006b [10]

Italy

169

NA

21 (12.5)

Mixed BC

M75

1:50

Intensity

41 (24)

Score 0–2 Location not stated

Score ≥ 1

T2–4 N0–1

LN status, tumour size, BCL2, Her-2, PR, ER, Ki67, p53 and CAIX expression

MV analysis 1.6 (0.8–3.2)

0.2

Reported in text

  1. Table detailing papers which investigated the prognostic role of CAIX on DFS
  2. IHC Immunohistochemistry, BC Breast cancer, CT Chemotherapy, LN Lymph node, LVI Lymphovascular invasion, HR Hormone receptor, ER Oestrogen receptor, PR Progesterone receptor, Her-2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor, AR Androgen receptor, CAIX Carbonic anhydrase IX, UV Univariate analysis, MV Multivariate analysis, HR Hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, NA Not available