Skip to main content

Table 3 Studies characteristics and the impact of CAIX on overall survival

From: The relationship between carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) and patient survival in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s)

Country

Patients

(n)

Median

follow up

(months)

Cancer

death

n (%)

Subtype

Antibody for

IHC/dilution

Scoring method

High CAIX

Expression n (%)

Score range and location

Definition of positive

Tumour stage

Multivariate

variables

Hazard ratio

(95% CI)

p-value

HR

estimation

Alves et al

2019 [26]

Brazil

176

73.9

NA

Mixed BC

ab15086

1:200

Percentage

and intensity

13 (7.4)

Score 0–6 Membranous

Score ≥ 3

T1-4

N0-3

M0

-

UV analysis

NA

0.143

Reported

in text

Ozretic et al

2018 [25]

Croatia

64

55.5

10 (15.6)

TNBC

ab15086

1:100

Percentage

and intensity

49 (77)

NR

Membranous

NA

NA

-

UV analysis

NA

0.493

Reported

in text

Noh, Kim, and

Koo 2014 [44]

South Korea

334

NA

31 (9.3)

AR + /ER − BC

NA

1:100

Percentage

and intensity

96 (28.7)

Score 0–6

Location

not stated

Score ≥ 2

T1-3

T stage, LN status, histologic grade and CAIX expression

MV analysis

15.89 (1.82–131.6)

0.010

Reported

in text

Choi, Jung, and

Koo 2013 [46]

South

Korea

276

67

23 (8.3)

Mixed BC

NA

1:100

Intensity

90 (32.6)

Score 0–3

Cytoplasmic

Score ≥ 2

T1-3

N0-3

-

UV analysis

NA

0.195

Reported

in text

Currie et al

2013 [52]

New Zealand

87

NA

NA

Mixed BC

NA

1:1000

Percentage

and intensity

43 (49)

Score 0–8

Membranous

Score ≥ 3

NA

-

UV analysis

NA

0.91

Reported

in text

Betof et al. 2012

[53]

USA

209

99.6

32 (16.6)

Mixed BC

based on CT

M75

NR

Percentage

and intensity

182 (88)

Score 0–300

Membranous

and cytoplasmic

Score ≥ 50

NA

NA

UV analysis

3.77

0.010

Reported

in text

Kaya et al

2012 [54]

Turkey

111

110

NA

Group1:HR + ,

Her-2-ve

Group 2:HR-, Her-2 + ve

H-120

1:100

Absent

or present

62 (65)

0–1

Membranous

Score ≥ 1

T1-4

N0-3

M0

-

UV analysis

NA

0.109

Survival

curve

Beketic-Oreskovic

et al. 2011 [23]

Croatia

40

55.8

24 (60)

Mixed BC

NA

1:100

Percentage

and intensity

24 (60)

Score 1–3

Membranous

and cytoplasmic

Score > 52.5

NA

Necrosis, tumour size, LN status, histological grade and CAIX expression

MV analysis 4.14 (1.28–13.35)

0.018

Reported

in text

Jubb et al

2010 [56]

United Kingdom

151

120

NA

Mixed BC

M75

NA

Percentage

49 (32)

0–100 Membranous and cytoplasmic

 > 10%

NA

-

UV analysis 0.88 (0.43–1.81)

0.73

Reported

in text

Lancashire et al

2010 [48]

United

Kingdom

244

67

NA

Mixed BC

(n = 160)

Abcam 15,086

1:2,500

Absent

or present

29 (18.1)

0–1

Membranous

Score ≥ 1

NA

-

UV analysis NA

0.085

Reported

in text

Tan et al

2009 [15]

UK and

Australia

182

131.9

99 (21.7)

Mixed BC

treated with CT (182)

NA

Percentage

59 (14)

0–100

Membranous

 ≥ 10%

NA

LN status, tumour grade, tumour size and CAIX expression

MV analysis 3.20 (1.79–5.70)

 < 0.001

Reported

in text

Kyndi et al

2008 [24]

Denmark

945

204

NA

Mixed BC

M75

1:2,500

Percentage

151 (16)

0–100

Membranous

 ≥ 10%

NA

LN status, tumour size, grade, HR and Her-2 status, menopausal status/systemic treatment

UV analysis 1.30 (1.06–1.60)

NA

Reported

In text

Hussain et al

2007 [22]

United Kingdom

144

48

28 (19.4)

Mixed BC

M75

1:100

Intensity

and pattern

37 (26)

Score 1–5

Membranous

Score ≥ 2

NR

Vascular invasion and CAIX expression

MV analysis 2.43 (1.07–5.53)

0.035

Reported

in text

Brennan et al

2006 [50]

Sweden

400

166.8

NA

Mixed BC 1–3 + ve LN Premenopausal

M75 1:2000

Absent

or present

42 (11)

0–1 Membranous

 ≥ 1%

II

NA

UV analysis

NA

0.022

Reported

in text

Generali et al

2006b [10]

Italy and UK

169

NR

21 (11.5)

Mixed BC

M75 1:50

Intensity

41 (24)

Score 0–2 Location not stated

Score ≥ 1

T2–4

N0–1

NA

UV analysis

NA

0.001

Reported

in text

Chia et al. 2001

[13]

United Kingdom

103

74.4

32 (31)

Mixed BC

M75 1:50

Percentage and intensity

49 (48)

Score 0–300 Membranous

Score ≥ 50

NA

LN status, grade, size, ER, necrosis and CAIX expression

MV analysis

2.61 (1.01–6.75)

0.05

Reported

In text

  1. Table detailing papers which investigated the prognostic role of CAIX on OS
  2. IHC Immunohistochemistry, BC Breast cancer, CT Chemotherapy, LN Lymph node, LVI Lymphovascular invasion, HR Hormone receptor, ER Oestrogen receptor, PR Progesterone receptor, Her-2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor, AR Androgen receptor, CAIX Carbonic anhydrase IX, UV Univariate analysis, MV Multivariate analysis, HR Hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, NA Not available