Skip to main content

Table 7 BAL cell counts in different subgroups of IIP in other studies*

From: Diagnostic approach to interstitial pneumonias in a single centre: report on 88 cases

Subgroup

Author

n

lympho.

macroph.

neutroph.

eosinoph.

UIP/IPF

Our study

22**

18.0%

64%

10%

7.5%

Haslam 1980[54]

18

3.8%

62.7%

9.8%

4.9%

Costabel 1992[30]

22

15%

61%

19%

5%

Matuso 1996[24]

30

19.4%

73.1%

4.7%

2.8%

Shindoh 1986[55]

20

22.5%

67.9%

7%

2.1%

Daniil 1999[25]

8

8.4%

76.8%

9.6%

5.8%

Nagai 1998[19]

64

7.2%

83%

5.9%

3.3%

RBILD

Our study

5**

14%

77%

6.8%

2%

Myers 1987[26]

3

2.3%

95.7%

2%

n.d.

NSIP

Our study

14**

36%

45.3%

13.3%

5%

Katzenstein 1994[33]

n.d.

37.3%

47.4%

8%

5.5%

Park 1996[34]

7

36.5%

34.4%

23.6%

4.8%

Daniil 1999[25]

8

9.3%

79.3%

7.8%

3.2%

COP

Our study

9**

40%

46%

8%

5.7%

Nagai 1996[56]

16

44.4%

45.5%

6.4%

2.2%

Costabel 1992[30]

10

44%

39%

10%

6%

Epler 1994[48]

12

41%

51%

4%

3%

  1. *mast cells are not mentioned in all studies, therefore total numbers (percentage) do not reach 100% in each study. **results were not available in all cases.