Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation between expression of EMT and clinicopathological parameters in Kazakh ESCCs

From: Association of tumour-associated macrophages with cancer cell EMT, invasion, and metastasis of Kazakh oesophageal squamous cell cancer

Variable

Cases

E-cadherin low expression 0/1 + (%)

E-cadherin high expression 2+/3 + (%)

X2

P

Vimentin low expression 0/1 + (%)

Vimentin high expression 2+/3 + (%)

X2

P

Age(y)

≤58

58

29(50%)

29(50%)

3.628

0.057

30(51.7%)

28(48.3%)

0.090

0.764

> 59

42

13(31%)

29(69%)

  

23(54.8%)

19(45.2%)

  

Gender

Male

62

30(48.4%)

32(51.6%)

2.732

0.098

26(41.9%)

36(58.1%)

8.109

0.005*

Female

38

12(31.6%)

26(68.4%)

  

27(71.1%)

11(28.9%)

  

Differentiation

High

26

9(34.6%)

17(65.4%)

0.055a

0.814a

13(50%)

13(50%)

  

Moderate

47

15(31.9%)

32(68.1%)

8.382b

0.004b#

30(63.8%)

17(36.2%)

5.069

0.079

Poor

27

18(66.7%)

9(33.3%)

5.445c

0.020c

1(37%)

2(63%)

  

Depth of invasion

T1-T2

29

3(10.3%)

26(89.7%)

16.802

<0.001*

25(86.2%)

4(13.8%)

18.081

< 0.001*

T3-T4

71

39(54.9%)

32(45.1%)

  

28(39.4%)

43(60.6%)

  

Clinical stage

I-II

65

19(29.2%)

46(70.8%)

12.431

<0.001*

45(69.2%)

20(30.8%)

19.640

< 0.001*

III-IV

35

23(65.7%)

12(34.3%)

  

8(22.9%)

27(77.1%)

  

Lymph node metastasis

pN-

55

18(32.7%)

37(67.3%)

4.314

0.038*

37(67.3%)

18(32.7%)

9.995

0.002*

pN+

45

24(53.3%)

21(46.7%)

  

16(35.6%)

29(64.4%)

  

Lymphatic metastasis

pN-

32

7(21.9%)

25(78.1%)

7.824

0.005*

23(71.9%)

9(28.1%)

6.730

0.009*

pN+

68

35(51.5%)

33(48.5%)

  

30(44.1%)

43(55.9%)

  
  1. *p < 0.05. # p < 0.0125
  2. a compared to moderate differentiation
  3. b compared to poor differentiation
  4. c compared to high differentiation