Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic table of the breast cancer cohort, with clinical characteristics across subtypes

From: Evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in molecular subtypes of an Indian cohort of breast cancer patients

No. of patients

 

All BC

ER+

HER2+

TNBC

p-values

229

90

58

81

 

Age (n = 227)

(Mean ± S.D)

54.4 ± 12.2

56.1 ± 12.5

55.1 ± 11.9

51.8 ± 11.9

0.0635*

Early (> 50)

86 (37.9%)

29 (32.2%)

21 (36.2%)

36 (45.6%)

0.1941

Late (≤ 50)

141 (62.1%)

61 (67.8%)

37 (63.8%)

43 (54.4%)

 

NA

2

0

0

2

 

Menopausal status (n = 192)

pre

58 (30.2%)

21 (28.0%)

11 (21.6%)

26 (39.4%)

0.0992

post

134 (69.8%)

54 (72.0%)

40 (78.4%)

40 (60.6%)

 

NA

37

15

7

15

 

Grade (n = 229)

Low (I/II)

111 (48.5%)

67 (74.4.%)

25 (43.1%)

19 (23.5%)

<  0.0001

High (III)

118 (51.5%)

23 (25.6%)

33 (56.9%)

62 (76.5%)

 

NA

0

0

0

0

 

Tumor size (cT) (n = 216)

T1

66 (30.6%)

35 (40.2%)

13 (24.1%)

18 (24%)

0.2913

T2

136 (63%)

47 (54.0%)

38 (70.4%)

51 (68%)

 

T3

12 (5.5%)

4 (4.6%)

3 (5.6%)

5 (6.7%)

 

T4

2 (0.9%)

1 (1.1%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.3%)

 

NA

13

3

4

6

 

LN status (cN) (n = 206)

negative

65 (31.6%)

31 (36.9%)

14 (28.0%)

20 (27.8%)

0.3904

positive

141 (68.4%)

53 (63.1%)

36 (72.0%)

52 (72.2%)

 

NA

23

6

8

9

 

Clinical_Stage (n = 209)

Early(<IIB)

84 (40.2%)

41 (47.7%)

15 (30%)

28 (38.4%)

0.1185

Late(≥IIB)

125 (59.8%)

45 (52.3%)

35 (70%)

45 (61.6%)

 

NA

20

4

8

8

 

pT (primary tissue, no NACT) (n = 128)

T0

6 (4.7%)

4 (8.7%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (4.4%)

0.4153

T1

30 (23.5%)

14 (30.5%)

5 (13.5%)

11 (24.4%)

 

T2

85 (66.4%)

26 (56.5%)

30 (81.1%)

29 (64.4%)

 

T3

4 (3.1%)

1 (2.2%)

1 (2.7%)

2 (4.4%)

 

T4

3 (2.3%)

1 (2.2%)

1 (2.7%)

1 (2.2%)

 

NA/NACT_Yes

101

44

21

36

 

pN (primary tissue, no NACT) (n = 128)

negative

86 (67.2%)

31 (67.4%)

22 (59.5%)

33 (73.3%)

0.4119

positive

42 (32.8%)

15 (32.6%)

15 (40.5%)

12 (26.7%)

 

NA/NACT_Yes

101

44

21

36

 

pathological Stage (primary tissue, no NACT) (n = 128)

Early(<IIB)

85 (66.4%)

31 (67.4%)

21 (56.8%)

33 (73.3%)

0.2819

Late(≥IIB)

43 (33.6%)

15 (32.6%)

16 (43.2%)

12 (26.7%)

 

NA/NACT_Yes

101

44

21

36

 

LVI (n = 229)

negative

184 (80.3%)

67 (74.4%)

47 (81.0%)

70 (86.4%)

0.1426

positive

45 (19.7%)

23 (25.6%)

11 (19.0%)

11 (13.6%)

 

NA

0

0

0

0

 

NACT (n = 218)

No

142 (65.1%)

52 (62.2%)

40 (70.2%)

50 (65.8%)

 

Yes

76 (34.9%)

33 (38.8%)

17 (29.8%)

26 (34.2%)

 

NA

11

5

1

5

 

PCR status after NACT (n = 60)

pCR

15 (25%)

3 (11.1%)

2 (22.2%)

10 (41.7%)

0.0414

RD

45 (75%)

24 (88.9%)

7 (77.8%)

14 (58.3%)

 

NA

17

7

8

2

 

Survival outcomes

No. followed-up

219

87

54

78

 

Time in Months Mean (range)

22(0–172)

18(0–84)

24(0–172)

24(0–132)

 

Median months

14

12

14

18

 

# Recurred (local, distant)

18

5

3

10

 

# Death due to disease

6

2

0

4

 
  1. A cohort of IDC patients was grouped according to the ER+, HER2+ and TNBC subtypes. Clinical parameters such as age at diagnosis, menopausal status, tumor grade, radiological and pathological tumor size, lymph node positivity, stage, and LVI are listed. The number of patients is listed according to the clinical variables reported at the time of diagnosis. For patients who did not receive NACT/NAHT, pT and pN retrieved from the surgery pathology report are noted. For patients who received NACT/NAHT, pathological response to the therapy is noted based on their ypTypN status. A total number of patients with follow-up, mean time to follow-up and follow-up status are also noted. The distribution of clinical parameters across the ER+, HER2+ and TNBC subtypes, was analyzed using the 2*3 (4*3 and 5*3 in case of clinical and pathological tumor size) χ2 contingency test with GraphPad Prism v.5. Bold font indicates significant p-values
  2. *For comparing mean age differences among the subtypes, one way ANOVA was performed
  3. LVI lymphovascular invasion, NACT Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pCR pathological complete response