Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of extraprostatic extension between systematic template biopsy and fusion guided prostate biopsy

From: Detection of extraprostatic extension by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted combined with systemic template prostate biopsy

Biopsy methods

All (n = 2848)

TR (n = 1917)

TP (n = 931)

EPE-detection rate, n (%)

   

Combined methods

40 (1.4)

20 (1.0)

20 (2.1)

EPE detected in SBx

29 (1.0)

14 (0.7)

15 (1.6)

In SBx only

20 (0.7)

11 (0.6)

9 (1.0)

In both SBx and TBx

9 (0.3)

3 (0.2)

6 (0.6)

EPE detected in TBx

20 (0.7)

9 (0.5)

11 (1.2)

In TBx only

11 (0.4)

6 (0.3)

5 (0.5)

In both SBx and TBx

9 (0.3)

3 (0.2)

6 (0.6)

p value

0.196

0.296

0.430

  1. TR transrectal fusion guided prostate biopsy, TP transperineal fusion guided prostate biopsy, EPE extraprostatic extension, SBx systemic template biopsy, TBx MRI-US fusion targeted biopsy, Combined diagnosis by SBx and/or TBx, p EPE detected in SBx vs. EPE detected in TBx