- Short report
- Open Access
Does the radiofrequency impedance-controlled endometrial ablation have any morphologic effects on uterine leiomyomata?: Report of 3 cases
© Fadare et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 13 June 2008
- Accepted: 01 July 2008
- Published: 01 July 2008
A variety of novel endometrial ablation technologies are now in routine use. A subset of uteri that had previously undergone these treatments will ultimately be evaluated by the pathologist. However, the full spectrum of histologic changes that may result from these treatments has received only sporadic attention. The NovaSure™ [Hologic Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA] endometrial ablation system is one of several available second-generation technologies and its particular endometrial ablative power is based on the delivery of radiofrequency energy. The present analysis was designed to decipher any histologic changes (if any) associated with the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation system relative to benign smooth muscle tumors of the uterine corpus. Over a one-year period, 3 uteri that had previously undergone the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation and which also had leiomyomatous mass lesions were evaluated. The leiomyomatous mass lesions were extensively sampled and were evaluated for cellular shapes (epithelioid change, cellular rounding, extraordinary cytoplasmic eosinophilia, clear cell change, cytoplasmic vacuolation), nuclear changes (nucleomegaly, nucleolomegaly, multinucleation, hyperchromasia, symplastic changes), necrosis (coagulative and/or infarct), mitotic activity, apoptotic bodies or pyknotic cells, myxoid change, hyalinization. The three uteri were resected 61, 47 and 74 (mean 60.7) days post-ablation. After a detailed evaluation of multiple submucosal, intramural and subserosal leiomyomata from these 3 uteri, no noteworthy histologic changes were identified in the tumors. Since the presence or absence of tumor necrosis is one histologic criterion by which malignant potential is assigned to uterine smooth muscle neoplasms, defining any extrinsic processes that may establish, or contribute to this finding is clinically relevant. The findings reported herein suggests that if a leiomyoma that was obtained from a patient that had recently undergone the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation displays any degenerative changes such as necrosis, the changes are probably not attributable to the ablation.
- Radiofrequency Energy
- Smooth Muscle Neoplasm
- Uterine Corpus
- Endometrial Ablation
Endometrial ablation entails the destruction of the endometrial lining by one of several energy forms that is delivered through a hysteroscope-like or similar instrument. Some of the available endometrial ablation technologies include The NovaSure™ system [Hologic (Cytyc) Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA, which ablates the endometrial surface via radiofrequency energy], the ThermaChoice UBT (Gynecare Inc, Somerville, NJ, USA) and Cavaterm (Wallsten Medical, Morges, Switzerland) systems (which deliver thermal energy from heated fluid in a balloon), the HerOption system [American Medical Systems Inc, Minnetonka, MN, USA, which is based on freezing the endometrium surface], the HTA system [BEI Medical/Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA, which is based on the use of heated saline], and the Microsulis system [Microsulis Medical Ltd, Pampano Beach, FL, USA, which is based on microwave energy].
As noted previously, NovaSure™ is one of several second-generation endometrial ablation systems and has been used with increasing frequency over the past decade. The NovaSure™ system received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2001 for the permanent ablation of the endometrial lining of women with menorrhagia that can be attributed to non-neoplastic causes [1, 2]. The endometrial ablative power is derived from radiofrequency energy. Briefly, a conformable bipolar electrode array that is mounted on an expandable frame is transcervically inserted into the endometrial cavity. The array expands to form a confluent lesion on the entire internal surface of the endometrium. Radiofrequency energy is then transmitted for a period of approximately 90 seconds, and the endometrium and the superficial myometrium are thereby ablated. Increasing tissue depth of ablation causes an automatic cessation of power-delivery at a threshold of 50 ohms or at 120 seconds, and the maximum power requirements are predetermined [1, 2] Recently, we encountered a distinctive uterus that was removed from a patient who had undergone the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation and received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor agonist (Leuprolide acetate) within the 7 months that preceded her hysterectomy. The leiomyomata in the sample displayed extensive infarct-type degeneration, which we attributed to the Leuprolide acetate pretreatment. However, the case raised the possibility that the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation may have contributed to the observed changes. The present analysis was designed to decipher any histologic changes (if any) associated with the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation system relative to benign smooth muscle tumors of the uterine corpus, since degenerative changes such as necrosis are components of the diagnostic criteria by which pathologists assign malignant potential to these tumors.
Three uteri that had previously undergone the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation and which also had leiomyomatous mass lesions were evaluated in detail to determine if this treatment is associated with any morphologically recognizable changes. The 3 cases represented all such cases evaluated over a one-year period. The first and second patients, a 49-year-old African-american (case 1) and a 45-year old caucasian (case 2), both presented with long-term menorrhagia that was refractory to a variety of treatments. They underwent the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation without complications. Sixty-one (case 1) and 47 (case 2) days later, they each underwent a simple hysterectomy for persistent menorrhagia. The third patient, a 51-year-old caucasian (case 3), underwent the ablation procedure for persistent menometrorrhagia, and similarly underwent a simple hysterectomy for persistent bleeding 74 days after the ablation. None of the 3 patients received hormonal treatments for their uterine masses. The cut surfaces of all the leiomyomata in all 3 cases displayed their typical whorled appearance and none displayed any evidence of degeneration or hemorrhage. In the case 1 uterus, there was a solitary, 7.8 cm intramural mass in the posterior wall of the corpus. This mass was 0.9 cm from the endometrial surface at the closest point. Twenty-five large sections were processed from this mass. In the case 2 uterus, there were a total of 4 corporal masses, including 1 submucosal (1.4 cm), intramural (5.7 cm), and 2 subserosal (1.1 cm, 2.4 cm). A total of 35 large sections were processed from these masses. In the case 3 uterus, there were 2 posterior wall masses in the corpus, one of which was submucosal and which measured 3.7 cm in maximum dimension, and the other of which was intramural and which measured 4.6 cm in maximum dimension. A total of 25 large sections were processed from these masses. All sections were then evaluated in detail for any morphologic changes that were notably distinct from what would typically be expected in a leiomyoma. Each case was evaluated for cellular shapes (epithelioid change, cellular rounding, extraordinary cytoplasmic eosinophilia, clear cell change, cytoplasmic vacuolation), nuclear changes (nucleomegaly, nucleolomegaly, multinucleation, hyperchromasia, symplastic changes), necrosis (coagulative and/or infarct), mitotic activity, apoptotic bodies or pyknotic cells, myxoid change, hyalinization etc.
Prospective studies with long-term follow-up have shown that the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation system is an efficacious modality to manage menorrhagia, with very low complication rates and high success rates regarding stoppage of excessive bleeding [3–5]. Nevertheless, in 2.9 to 8% of cases, surgical re-intervention is necessary due to treatment failures (persistent bleeding), complications, or other unrelated indications that may arise after the ablation [3–6]. The resultant uteri thereby come to pathologic attention and may show distinctive morphologic changes . We previously reported the pathologic findings of one uteri that was removed 38 days after the ablation. These included a distinctive 3- to 6-mm-thick, hyalinized, subendometrial band, severe endometrial stromal fibrosis, some endometrial myxoid change, and a lack of significant changes in adenomyotic aggregates and leiomyomata in the myometrium beneath the band . Livengood et al reported the histologic changes associated with "treatment failures" of a variety of endometrial ablation technologies, NovaSure™ included  The authors found that for water-balloon and radiofrequency based modalities, persistent post-ablation bleeding is related to "treatment-related thermally-fixed vessels" . There are no other published studies specifically centered on the histologic changes associated with ablation technologies to the author's knowledge. The importance of defining the histologic spectrum brought about by these modalities lies not only in the better understanding of changes associated with failures of these treatments, but in not misclassifying an iatrogenic change as a biologic and/or neoplastic one.
In the present analysis, the authors segregated three leiomyomata-laden uteri that had previously undergone the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation over a one-year period, to determine if this treatment is associated with any morphologically recognizable changes in the smooth muscle tumors. After a detailed evaluation of such neoplasms, no distinctive histologic changes were identified.
It is concluded that the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation probably does not cause any morphologically recognizable changes to leiomyomata being evaluated at an average of 60.7 days after treatment. It is unclear if tumors removed within a shorter time-frame post-ablation will display any changes. However, hysterectomies are typically performed within the time frames noted herein, when sufficient time has passed post-ablation for all parties to be convinced of its ineffectiveness for that particular patient, and for a surgical procedure to be scheduled. Since the presence or absence of tumor necrosis is one histologic criteria by which malignant potential is assigned to uterine smooth muscle neoplasms, defining any extrinsic processes that may establish, or contribute to this finding is clinically relevant. The findings reported herein suggests that if a leiomyoma that was obtained from a patient that had recently undergone the NovaSure™ endometrial ablation displays any degenerative changes such as necrosis, the changes are probably not attributable to the ablation.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Defense or other Departments of the United States Government.
- Summary of Safety and effectiveness data: NovaSure™ controlled-controlled endometrial ablation system. Accessed 12/19/04, [http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf/p010013.html]
- Instructions for use. NovaSure™ disposable device. Accessed 12/19/04, [http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf/p010013.html]
- Gallinat A: An impedance-controlled system for endometrial ablation: five-year follow-up of 107 patients. J Reprod Med. 2007, 52: 467-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fulop T, Rákóczi I, Barna I: NovaSure impedance controlled endometrial ablation: long-term follow-up results. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007, 14: 85-90. 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.09.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baskett TF, Clough H, Scott TA: NovaSure bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation: report of 200 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005, 27: 473-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bongers MY: Second-generation endometrial ablation treatment: Novasure. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007, 21: 989-94. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.03.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fadare O, Qin L, Martel M, Tavassoli FA: Pathology of the NovaSure (radio-frequency) impedance-controlled endometrial ablation system. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005, 129: 1175-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livengood R, Bailey N, Coad JE: Endometrial Ablation for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding: Histologic Insights into Treatment Failures. Mod Pathol. 2007, 20 (suppl 2): 206A-abstractGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.