Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

CD10 expression in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Diagnostic Pathology20094:38

  • Received: 21 August 2009
  • Accepted: 16 November 2009
  • Published:



CD10 antigen is a 100-kDa-cell surface zinc metalloendopeptidase and it is expressed in a variety of normal and neoplastic lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate CD10 expression in urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder and to determine the correlation between immunohistochemical (IHC) CD10 expression and histopathologic parameters including grade and stage.


371 cases of urothelial bladder carcinomas, all from transurethral resections, were included in this study. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained sections from each case were reevaluated histopathologically according to WHO 2004 grading system. The TNM system was used for pathologic staging. Selected slides were also studied by IHC and a semiquantitative scoring for CD10 expression based on the percentage of positive cells was performed.


157 cases (42.3%) showed immunostaining while 214 cases (57.7%) were negative for CD10. 1+ staining was seen in 65 CD10 positive cases (41.4%), and 2+ in 92 cases (58.6%). Overall CD10 expression as well as 2+ immunostaining was significantly correlated with high histologic grade. Overall CD10 expression was also significantly higher in invasive pT1 and pT2-3 tumors compared to noninvasive pTa tumors. pT1 and pT2-3 tumors were also significantly correlated with 2+ immunostaining.


To date, only a few comparative IHC studies have assessed CD10 expression in urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder and this study represents the largest series. Our findings indicate that CD10 expression is strongly correlated with high tumor grade and stage in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, and that CD10 may be associated with tumor progression in bladder cancer pathogenesis.


  • CD10 Expression
  • Urothelial Carcinoma
  • CD10 Staining
  • Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma
  • High Grade Carcinoma


Cancer of the bladder represents the ninth most common cause of cancer worldwide and the 13th most numerous cause of death from cancer with an estimated 357,000 newly diagnosed cases and 145,000 cancer-related deaths in 2002 [1]. Most patients (70-80%) with newly diagnosed urothelial carcinoma of the bladder present with well-differentiated superficial papillary tumors. Prolonged survival in most patients with superficial cancers is achieved by transurethral resection (TUR) with or without intravesical chemotherapy [26]. Nonetheless, these patients still have a high risk of recurrence following initial resection [7]. The major prognostic factors in carcinoma of the bladder are the depth of invasion into the bladder wall and the degree of differentiation of the tumor. However, there is no reliable parameter predicting the risk of recurrence or progression. Molecular markers are, therefore, required to estimate the individual prognosis of patients as well as for effective diagnosis and treatment.

CD10 is a single-chain, 90-110-kDa cell surface zinc-dependent metalloprotease that inactivates various bioactive neuropeptides. Terms synonymous with CD10 include common acute lymphocytic leukemia antigen (CALLA), enkephalinase, membrane metalloendopeptidase (MME), membrane-associated neutral endopeptidase (NEP 24.11), and neprilysin [810]. Initially it was discovered on the surface of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells, and considered to be a tumor-specific antigen [11]. It was then found that a variety of normal cells including cells of nonhematopoietic origin such as glomerular and proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney, liver, breast myoepithelium, and lung, as well as fibroblasts and cells of the central nervous system are able to express CD10 [8, 9, 1218]. CD10 is expressed by a number of hematopoietic cells such as immature T and B cells, B cells of the germinal centers of lymphoid follicles, and granulocytes as well as lymphoid malignancies including the majority of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and also follicular center lymphoma, lymphoblastic, Burkitt's, and nodular poorly differentiated lymphocytic lymphomas, and chronic myelogenous leukemias in lymphoid blast crisis [1922]. CD10 expression has also been reported in several nonhematopoietic neoplasms including renal cell carcinoma, endometrial stromal tumor, solid and pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas, melanoma, carcinoma of the prostate, breast, stomach, and colon [16, 2332].

CD10 has a neutral endopeptidase activitiy and is known to regulate biological activities of peptide substrates including atrial natriuretic factor, endothelin, oxytocin, bradykinin, substance P angiotensins, enkephalins and bombessin-like peptides by reducing the local concentrations available for receptor binding and signal transduction [9, 10, 33, 34]. Recent evidence also demonstrated a correlation between apoptosis and CD10 expression [3538]. It may also play an important role in maintenance of homeostasis, neoplastic transformation, and tumor progression [3941]. CD10 expression in intratumoral stromal cells may also contribute to tumor progression [42].

To date, only a few studies have investigated CD10 expression in urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder [4346]. In the current study, we evaluated 371 urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder and sought to determine the correlation, if any, between IHC CD10 expression and histopathologic parameters including grade and stage and to find out whether CD10 expression could have a prognostic value in the assessment of urothelial cancer.


371 consecutive cases of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the bladder were included in this study. All tumor specimens were from transurethral resections. HE stained sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material were reevaluated histopathologically. Tumors were subclassified as papillary neoplasm of low malignant potential, as low-grade papillary carcinoma, or as high-grade papillary carcinoma according to the WHO 2004 grading system [47]. The TNM system was used for pathologic staging: Ta, noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma; T1, tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue; T2, tumor invades muscularis propria, and T3, tumor invades perivesical tissue [48].

IHC was performed using a streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique (UltraVision, Lab Vision, Fremont, CA, USA) with a monoclonal antibody to CD10 (NeoMarkers, Lab Vision, Fremont, CA, USA). 5-μm sections from paraffin-embedded samples were cut on poly-L-lysine coated slides, deparaffinized in xylene, and then dehydrated. For antigen retrieval, the slides were treated by microwave heating in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 minutes. 3% hydrogen peroxide was used for blocking endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections were incubated with primary antibody including CD10 at 1:50 dilution for one hour at room temperature. After washing in phosphate buffered saline, the samples were incubated with a biotin conjugated secondary antibody and then incubated using streptavidin-biotin system for 30 minutes at room temperature. The reactions became visible after immersion of the specimens in diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, then rinsed and mounted. Sections from nonneoplastic bladder mucosa were included as controls. Additional sections of renal tissue were also used as positive control. Staining of the cell membrane and/or cytoplasm was considered positive expression. A semiquantitative scoring based on the percentage of positive cells was performed according to the following staining criteria: -, negative (<5%); 1+ (5-50%); and 2+ (>50%).

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences v 10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software for Windows. Statistical significance of the results was evaluated by χ2 test. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.


The age of the patients ranged from 24 to 88 (mean ± SD 61.36 ± 9.74). Among 371 cases, 330 were (88.9%) male and 41 (11.1%) female with an average male to female ratio of 8:1. All 371 bladder neoplasms were low- or high-grade papillary urothelial carcinomas; no case of papillary neoplasm of low malignant potential was detected. 222 cases displayed low-grade morphology while 149 were high grade carcinomas. Considering the pathologic stages, 279 patients had pTa, 53 pT1, and 39 pT2-3. Only 2 cases were stage pT3 in the pT2-3 group.

Predominant IHC CD10 staining was cytoplasmic, but membranous staining was also observed. Table 1 shows the overall CD10 expression according to the histologic grade and pathologic stage. 157 of the 371 cases (42.3%) showed CD10 immunostaining while 214 cases (57.7%) were negative for CD10. C010 immunoreaction was higher with higher histologic grade (p < 0.0001). CD10 expression was also significantly higher in stages pT1 and pT2-3 than in stage pTa (p < 0.0001).
Table 1

Overall CD10 expression according to the histologic grade and pathologic stage





Negative No. (%)

Positive No. (%)









222 (59.8%)






149 (40.2%)








279 (75.2%)






53 (14.3%)






39 (10.5%)

*High-grade vs. low-grade; pT1 and pT2-3 vs. pTa: p < 0.0001

Table 2 demonstrates the individual CD10 staining scores in 157 cases with positive expression according to the histologic grade and pathologic stage. 1+ expression was seen in 65 cases (41.4%) while 92 cases (58.6%) demonstrated 2+ staining. 2+ immunostaining strongly correlated with high grade (p < 0.0001). pT1 and pT2-3 tumors also significantly correlated with 2+ immunostaining (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Noninvasive (pTa) papillary urothelial carcinoma demonstrating strong ( thick arrows ) and weak ( thin arrows ) CD10 immunostaining.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Another example of noninvasive (pTa) papillary urothelial carcinoma showing strong CD10 expression.

Figure 3
Figure 3

CD10 expression in invasive (pT1) papillary urothelial carcinoma. Intense staining corresponds to cells with high grade histology (arrows).

Figure 4
Figure 4

Diffuse CD10 immunostaining in invasive (pT2) urothelial carcinoma. Membranous and cytoplasmic staining is best appreciated in the inset.

Table 2

CD10 staining scores in cases with positive expression according to the histologic grade and pathologic stage





1+ No. (%)

2+ No. (%)









36 (22.9%)






121 (77.1%)






75 (47.8%)






45 (28.7%)






37 (23.5%)

*High-grade vs. low-grade; pT1 and pT2-3 vs. pTa: p < 0.0001


High recurrence rate in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is a vital problem despite the improving treatment options. The risk of bladder cancer recurrence following initial resection in patients with Ta or T1 tumors may be as high as 80% [7]. A number of molecular markers reported to be of prognostic value have been well-studied. Including these are blood group antigens, tumor suppressor gene p53, cell cycle regulator proteins p27 and cyclin E, E-cadherin, CD44 and many others [4958]. However, there are still conflicting results although some of them may be attributed to different staining protocols or patient selections [59].

In the current study, we demonstrated CD10 IHC expression in 42.3% of the urothelial carcinomas of the bladder. CD10 staining of the malignant cells revealed a strong correlation not only with histologic grade but also with pathologic stage. Moreover, percentage of CD10 staining appeared to increase with higher grade; 91 of the 121 high grade carcinomas showed 2+ reaction. Vast majority of the low-grade carcinomas had 1+ staining pattern. The same was true for invasive tumors: 2+ reaction was seen in 32 of 45 pT1 carcinomas and in 30 of 37 pT2-3 carcinomas. Although pTa tumors mainly expressed 1+ reaction, a somewhat balanced distribution was observed in staining scores in this group.

The first study assessing CD10 activity in bladder was performed by Koiso et al [43]. They found that both enzyme activity and IHC expression were higher in superficial cancers than invasive cancers and normal urothelium. They concluded that CD10 was expressed at a certain stage of differentiation in the course of neoplastic process. The absence of IHC CD10 expression in nonneoplastic urothelium was shown after the development of CD10 monoclonal antibody appropriate for paraffin-embedded tissues [33]. Chu and Arber reported positive cytoplasmic staining in 13 of 24 (54%) urothelial carcinomas, while there was no reaction in nonneoplastic tissues [23]. However, the correlation of CD10 expression with pathologic stage or histologic grade was not investigated in that study. These results suggest that neoplastic tissues rather than nonneoplastic epithelium have a propensity for CD10 expression. Conversely, Murali et al demonstrated CD10 staining in 5 of the 10 cases of nonneoplastic urothelium [44]. Despite the small number of cases, they found CD10 expression in 80% of invasive carcinomas and also proved that the staining intensity for the high-grade group (including invasive carcinoma, high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma, and carcinoma in situ) was statistically higher than that of the low-grade group (including low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential and normal urothelium). In another study by Bircan et al, 34 of 79 (43%) urothelial carcinomas and only one case of nonneoplastic epithelium showed CD10 staining [45]. They found an inverse correlation between CD10 expression and tumor stage, but no association with histologic grade or staining score was detected. The authors proposed that the higher level of CD10 expression in noninvasive carcinomas appears to inhibit cell invasion. In a more recent series of 49 cases by Abdou et al, CD10 expression significantly correlated with some parameters including advanced stage, tumor size, and shorter mean survival but not with grade [46]. The authors suggested that CD10 appears to be associated with tumor progression and that it could play a pivotal role in bladder cancer pathogenesis, a proposal also supported by our findings. Apparently, our study-in which CD10 staining increased with grade and stage-bears some similarities with and shows some differences from these previous reports.

There may be several possibilities about the role of CD10 in urothelial tumorigenesis. First, CD10 is a cell surface metalloprotease and one can easily postulate that CD10 expressing tumors have the capacity to create a microenvironment that facilitates cancer cell invasion and metastasis [42, 60, 61]. This appears the most likely explanation for the significant correlation of CD10 with grade and stage in our study. If this is the case, it may also be speculated that since invasive bladder carcinomas most likely originate from high-grade noninvasive lesions rather from low-grade tumors [6264], tumors with high grade and stage seem more likely to express CD10. Another possible mechanism is that the increased IHC CD10 expression with increasing grade and stage may indicate accumulation of mutated, nonfunctional CD10 rather than its normal counterpart [44].

On the other hand, it was recently found that CD10 expression was associated with higher apoptotic index in diffuse large B cell lymphoma [65]. Several hypothesis have been proposed about the potential role of CD10 during apoptosis. CD10 could prevent the cells' possible rescue from apoptosis by degrading cytokines capable of delivering anti-apoptotic signals, or by degrading peptide signals [37]. Moreover, CD10 expression may take part in preventing unwanted inflammatory reaction initiated by activated cells undergoing apoptosis, and it may protect these cells from potential attacks by the immune system [37, 66]. Consequently, the contribution of CD10 to the neoplastic process appears multifaceted and may be related with other additional factors.

Indeed, the results of several studies in human tumors other than urothelial carcinoma have also revealed that changes in CD10 activity produce different influences in different tumor types. Neoplasms arising from tissues that normally express CD10 such as endometrial stromal tumors, renal cell carcinoma, trophoblastic tumors, and solid and pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas may also express this antigen [2327, 67, 68]. CD10 also acts as a key marker in differentiating endometrial stromal sarcoma from smooth muscle tumors [24]. By contrast, low or absent CD10 expression have been reported in several tumors including small cell and non-small cell carcinoma of the lung, and carcinomas of breast, stomach, and colon [18, 42, 6971]. It has been shown that CD10 promotes apoptosis and inhibits cell migration in prostate carcinoma [38, 72]. Accordingly, CD10 expression diminishes with tumor progression, particularly in metastatic, androgen-independent prostate cancers [41]. On the other hand, studies in melanomas have shown that CD10 expression correlates with tumor progression and metastasis [2931]. Bilalovic et al found that CD10 expression was significantly higher in primary melanomas with higher Clark level and larger Breslow thickness [31]. These findings are somewhat parallel to our results, since Clark level and larger Breslow thickness are two important prognostic determinates associated with metastasis in melanoma and the same is true for tumor grade and stage in bladder carcinoma. Stromal CD10 expression has also been observed in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas, and in invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast but not in normal tissues, a finding supporting the hypothesis that CD10 may facilitate invasion and metastasis [70, 71, 42]. Therefore, it appears that CD10 may contribute to the neoplastic processes in different tissue types, probably by different or incompletely understood mechanisms.


This study represents the largest series of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder examined for CD10 immunoexpression in relation to histologic grade and pathologic stage. We found that CD10 expression is strongly correlated with tumor grade and stage in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, and that CD10 may be associated with tumor progression in bladder cancer pathogenesis. Although the exact biologic function of CD10 and mechanisms of action by which it regulates neoplastic process as well as its significance in different types of tissues are not yet clear, it may provide an additional parameter for evaluating bladder tumors. Further studies with large number of cases are needed to confirm our results and to elucidate the role and significance of CD10 in urothelial carcinoma.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Pathology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
Department of Pathology, Istanbul Educational Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey


  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005, 55: 74-108. 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Torti FM, Lum BL: The biology and treatment of superficial bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1984, 2: 505-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Witjes JA, Caris CT, Mungan NA, Debruyne FM, Witjes WP: Results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential intravesical therapy with mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette-Guerin versus mitomycin C alone in patients with superficial bladder cancer. J Urol. 1998, 160: 1668-1671. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62377-2. discussion 1671-1672View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Huland H, Otto U, Droese M, Klöppel G: Long-term mitomycin C instillation after transurethral resection of superficial bladder carcinoma: influence on recurrence, progression and survival. J Urol. 1984, 132: 27-29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Griffin PP, Heney NM, Althausen AF, Efird JT: Selective bladder preservation by combination treatment of invasive bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993, 329: 1377-1382. 10.1056/NEJM199311043291903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Soloway MS: Evaluation and management of patients with superficial bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 1987, 14: 771-780.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Holmäng S, Hedelin H, Anderström C, Johansson SL: The relationship among multiple recurrences, progression and prognosis of patients with stages Ta and T1 transitional cell cancer of the bladder followed for at least 20 years. J Uro. 1995, 153: 1823-1826. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67321-X. discussion 1826-1827View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. LeBien TW, McCormack RT: The common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen (CD10)--emancipation from a functional enigma. Blood. 1989, 73: 625-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shipp MA, Look AT: Hematopoietic differentiation antigens that are membrane-associated enzymes: Cutting is the key!. Blood. 1993, 82: 1052-1070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Arber DA, Weiss LM: CD10: a review. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 1997, 5: 125-140. 10.1097/00022744-199709000-00001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown G, Hogg N, Greaves M: Candidate leukaemia-specific antigen in man. Nature. 1975, 258: 454-456. 10.1038/258454a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Metzgar RS, Borowitz MJ, Jones NH, Dowell BL: Distribution of common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen in nonhematopoietic tissues. J Exp Med. 1981, 154: 1249-1254. 10.1084/jem.154.4.1249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Platt JL, LeBien TW, Michael AF: Stages of renal ontogenesis identified by monoclonal antibodies reactive with lymphohemopoietic differentiation antigens. J Exp Med. 1983, 157: 155-172. 10.1084/jem.157.1.155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Braun MP, Martin PJ, Ledbetter JA, Hansen JA: Granulocytes and cultured human fibroblasts express common acute lymphoblastic leukemia-associated antigens. Blood. 1983, 61: 718-725.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Loke SL, Leung CY, Chiu KY, Yau WL, Cheung KN, Ma L: Localisation of CD10 to biliary canaliculi by immunoelectron microscopical examination. J Clin Pathol. 1990, 43: 654-656. 10.1136/jcp.43.8.654.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gusterson BA, Monaghan P, Mahendran R, Ellis J, O'Hare MJ: Identification of myoepithelial cells in human and rat breasts byanti-common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen antibody A 12. Natl Cancer Inst. 1986, 77: 343-349.Google Scholar
  17. Quackenbush EJ, Gougos A, Baumal R, Letarte M: Differential localization within human kidney of five membrane proteins expressed on acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. J Immunol. 1986, 136: 118-124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sunday ME, Hua J, Torday JS, Reyes B, Shipp MA: CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11 in developing human fetal lung. Patterns of expression and modulation of peptide-mediated proliferation. J Clin Invest. 1992, 90: 2517-2525. 10.1172/JCI116145.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hokland P, Rosenthal P, Griffin JD, Nadler LM, Daley J, Hokland M, Schlossman SF, Ritz J: Purification and characterization of fetal hematopoietic cells that express the common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen (CALLA). J Exp Med. 1983, 157: 114-129. 10.1084/jem.157.1.114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Greaves MF, Hariri G, Newman RA, Sutherland DR, Ritter MA, Ritz J: Selective expression of the common acute lymphoblastic leukemia (gp 100) antigen on immature lymphoid cells and their malignant counterparts. Blood. 1983, 61: 628-639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Swerdlow S, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Vardiman JW: WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. 2008, Lyon: IARCGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu YJ, Johnson GD, Gordon J, MacLennan IC: Germinal centres in T-cell-dependent antibody responses. Immunol Today. 1992, 13: 17-21. 10.1016/0167-5699(92)90199-H.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chu P, Arber DA: Paraffin-section detection of CD10 in 505 nonhematopoietic neoplasms. Frequent expression in renal cell carcinoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma. J Clin Pathol. 2000, 113: 374-382. 10.1309/8VAV-J2FU-8CU9-EK18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chu PG, Arber DA, Weiss LM, Chang KL: Utility of CD10 in distinguishing between endometrial stromal sarcoma and uterine smooth muscle tumors: an immunohistochemical comparison of 34 cases. Mod Pathol. 2001, 14: 465-471. 10.1038/modpathol.3880335.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McCluggage WG, Sumathi VP, Maxwell P: CD10 is a sensitive and diagnostically useful immunohistochemical marker of normal endometrial stroma and of endometrial stromal neoplasms. Histopathology. 2001, 39: 273-278. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2001.01215.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Toki T, Shimizu M, Takagi Y, Ashida T, Konishi I: CD10 is a marker for normal and neoplastic endometrial stromal cells. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2002, 21: 41-47. 10.1097/00004347-200201000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Notohara K, Hamazaki S, Tsukayama C, Nakamoto S, Kawabata K, Mizobuchi K, Sakamoto K, Okada S: Solidpseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: immunohistochemical localization of neuroendocrine markers and CD10. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000, 24: 1361-1371. 10.1097/00000478-200010000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tawfic S, Niehans GA, Manivel JC: The pattern of CD10 expression in selected pathologic entities of the prostate gland. Hum Pathol. 2003, 34: 450-456. 10.1016/S0046-8177(03)00077-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanitakis J, Narvaez D, Claudy A: Differential expression of the CD10 antigen (neutral endopeptidase) in primary versus metastatic malignant melanomas of the skin. Melanoma Res. 2002, 12: 241-244. 10.1097/00008390-200206000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Carrel S, Zografos L, Schreyer M, Rimoldi D: Expression of CALLA/CD10 on human melanoma cells. Melanoma Res. 1993, 3: 319-323. 10.1097/00008390-199310000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bilalovic N, Sandstad B, Golouh R, Nesland JM, Selak I, Torlakovic EE: CD10 protein expression in tumor and stromal cells of malignant melanoma is associated with tumor progression. Modern Pathology. 2004, 17: 1251-1258. 10.1038/modpathol.3800174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sato Y, Itoh F, Hinoda Y, Ohe Y, Nakagawa N, Ueda R, Yachi A, Imai K: Expression of CD10/neutral endopeptidase in normal and malignant tissues of the human stomach and colon. J Gastroenterol. 1996, 31: 12-17. 10.1007/BF01211181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McIntosh GG, Lodge AJ, Watson P, Hall AG, Wood K, Anderson JJ, Angus B, Horne CH, Milton ID: NCL-CD10-270: a new monoclonal antibody recognizing CD10 in parafin-embedded tissue. Am J Pathol. 1999, 154: 77-82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shipp MA, Stefano GB, D'Adamio L, Switzer SN, Howard FD, Sinisterra J, Scharrer B, Reinherz EL: Downregulation of enkephalin-mediated inflammatory responses by CD10/neutral endopeptidase 24.11. Nature. 1990, 347: 394-396. 10.1038/347394a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cutrona G, Ulivi M, Fais F, Roncella S, Ferrarini M: Transfection of the c-myc oncogene into normal Epstein-Barr virus-harboring B cells results in new phenotypic and functional features resembling those of Burkitt lymphoma cells and normal centroblasts. J Exp Med. 1995, 181: 699-711. 10.1084/jem.181.2.699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cutrona G, Leanza N, Ulivi M, Melioli G, Burgio VL, Mazzarello G, Gabutti G, Roncella S, Ferrarini M: Expression of CD10 by human T cells that undergo apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 1999, 94: 3067-3076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Morabito F, Mangiola M, Rapezzi D, Zupo S, Oliva BM, Ferraris AM, Spriano M, Rossi E, Stelitano C, Callea V, Cutrona G, Ferrarini M: Expression of CD10 by B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells undergoing apoptosis in vivo and in vitro. Haematologica. 2003, 88: 864-873.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sumitomo M, Shen R, Walburg M, Dai J, Geng Y, Navarro D, Boileau G, Papandreou CN, Giancotti FG, Knudsen B, Nanus DM: Neutral endopeptidase inhibits prostate cancer cell migration by blocking focal adhesion kinase signaling. J Clin Invest. 2000, 106: 1399-1407. 10.1172/JCI10536.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kondepudi A, Johnson A: Cytokines increase neutral endopeptidase activity in lung fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1993, 8: 43-49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Velden van der VH, Naber BA, Spoel van der P, Hoogsteden HC, Versnel MA: Cytokines and glucocorticoids modulate human bronchial epithelial cell peptidases. Cytokine. 1998, 10: 55-65. 10.1006/cyto.1997.0257.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Papandreou CN, Usmani B, Geng Y, Bogenrieder T, Freeman R, Wilk S, Finstad CL, Reuter VE, Powell CT, Scheinberg D, Magill C, Scher HI, Albino AP, Nanus DM: Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 loss in metastatic human prostate cancer contributes to androgen-independent progression. Nat Med. 1998, 4: 50-57. 10.1038/nm0198-050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Iwaya K, Ogawa H, Izumi M, Kuroda M, Mukai K: Stromal expression of CD10 in invasive breast carcinoma: a new predictor of clinical outcome. Virchows Arch. 2002, 440: 589-593. 10.1007/s00428-002-0639-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Koiso K, Akaza H, Ohtani M, Miyanaga N, Aoyagi K: A new tumor marker for bladder cancer. Int J Urol. 1994, 1: 33-36. 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1994.tb00005.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Murali R, Delprado W: CD10 ýmmunohistochemical staining in urothelial neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005, 124: 371-379. 10.1309/04BHF6A80BQMH7HT.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bircan S, Candir O, Kapucuoglu N, Serel TA, Ciris M, Karahan N: CD10 expression in urothelial bladder carcinomas: A pilot study. Urol Int. 2006, 77: 107-113. 10.1159/000093901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Abdou AG: CD10 expression in tumour and stromal cells of bladder carcinoma: an association with bilharziasis. APMIS. 2007, 115: 1206-1218. 10.1111/j.1600-0643.2007.00645.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sauter G, Algaba F, Amin MB, Busch C, Cheville J, Gasser T, Grignon D, Hofstaedter F, Lopez-Beltran A, Epstein JI: Non-invasive urothelial neoplasias. WHO classification of non-invasive papillary urothelial tumors. Edited by: Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn I. 2004, Lyon: IARC Press, 89-157.Google Scholar
  48. Sobin LH, Wittekind C: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 2002, New York: Wiley-LissGoogle Scholar
  49. Mitra AP, Datar RH, Cote RJ: Molecular staging of bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2005, 96: 7-12. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05557.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Shariat SF, Tokunaga H, Zhou J, Kim J, Ayala GE, Benedict WF, Lerner SP: p53, p21, pRB, and p16 expression predict clinical outcome in cystectomy with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 1014-1024. 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Esrig D, Elmajian D, Groshen S, Freeman JA, Stein JP, Chen SC, Nichols PW, Skinner DG, Jones PA, Cote RJ: Accumulation of nuclear p53 and tumor progression in bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994, 331: 1259-1264. 10.1056/NEJM199411103311903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lipponen PK: Over-expression of p53 nuclear oncoprotein in transitional-cell bladder cancer and its prognostic value. Int J Cancer. 1993, 53: 365-370. 10.1002/ijc.2910530304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Juhl BR, Hartzen SH, Hainau B: A, B, H antigen expression in transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Cancer. 1986, 57: 1768-1775. 10.1002/1097-0142(19860501)57:9<1768::AID-CNCR2820570910>3.0.CO;2-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Srinivas V, Orihuela E, Lloyd KO, Old LJ, Whitmore WF: Estimation of ABO(H) isoantigen expression in bladder tumors. J Urol. 1985, 133: 25-28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sarkis AS, Dalbagni G, Cordon-Cardo C, Zhang ZF, Sheinfeld J, Fair WR, Herr HW, Reuter VE: Nuclear overexpression of p53 protein in transitional cell bladder carcinoma: a marker for disease progression. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993, 85: 53-59. 10.1093/jnci/85.1.53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Otto T, Bex A, Schmidt U, Raz A, Rübben H: Improved prognosis assessment for patients with bladder carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 1997, 150: 1919-1923.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Toma V, Hauri D, Schmid U, Ackermann D, Maurer R, Alund G, Knönagel H, Rist M, Gasser TC, Sauter G, Roth J: Focal loss of CD44 variant protein expression is related to recurrence in superficial bladder carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 1999, 155: 1427-1432.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Del Pizzo JJ, Borkowski A, Jacobs SC, Kyprianou N: Loss of cell cycle regulators p27(Kip1) and cyclin E in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder correlates with tumor grade and patient survival. Am J Pathol. 1999, 155: 1129-1136.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Schoenberg M: Biomarkers for transitional cell carcinoma-con. Urology. 2001, 57: 849-851. 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)00975-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Basset P, Wolf C, Rouyer N, Bellocq JP, Rio MC, Chambon P: Stromelysin-3 in stromal tissue as a control factor in breast cancer behavior. Cancer. 1994, 74: 1045-1049. 10.1002/1097-0142(19940801)74:3+<1045::AID-CNCR2820741511>3.0.CO;2-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Talvensaari-Mattila A, Pääkkö P, Höyhtyä M, Blanco-Sequeiros G, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T: Matrix metalloproteinase-2 immunoreactive protein: a marker of aggressiveness in breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1998, 83: 1153-1162. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980915)83:6<1153::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Cheng L, Neumann RM, Nehra A, Spotts BE, Weaver AL, Bostwick DG: Cancer heterogeneity and its biologic implications in the grading of urothelial carcinoma. Cancer. 2000, 88: 1663-1670. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000401)88:7<1663::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO;2-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee R, Droller MJ: The natural history of bladder cancer: implications for therapy. Urol Clin N Am. 2000, 27: 1-13. 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70229-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Cheng L, Cheville JC, Neumann RM, Bostwick DG: Natural history of urothelial dysplasia of the bladder. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999, 23: 443-447. 10.1097/00000478-199904000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Bai M, Agnantis NJ, Skyrlas A, Tsanou E, Kamina S, Galani V, Kanavaros P: Increased expression of the Bcl6 and CD10 proteins is associated with increased apoptosis and proliferation in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Mod Pathol. 2003, 16: 471-480. 10.1097/01.MP.0000067684.78221.6E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Di Maria GU, Bellofiore S, Geppetti P: Regulation of airway neurogenic inflammation by neutral endopeptidase. Eur Respir J. 1998, 12: 1454-1462. 10.1183/09031936.98.12061454.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Ordi J, Romagosa C, Tavassoli FA, Nogales F, Palacin A, Condom E, Torne A, Cardesa A: CD10 expression in epithelial tissues and tumors of the gynecologic tract: a useful marker in the diagnosis of mesonephric, trophoblastic, and clear cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003, 27: 178-186. 10.1097/00000478-200302000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Cameron RI, Ashe P, O'Rourke DM, Foster H, McCluggage WG: A panel of immunohistochemical stains assists in the distinction between ovarian and renal clear cell carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003, 22: 272-276. 10.1097/01.PGP.0000071044.12278.43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Cohen AJ, Bunn PA, Franklin W, Magill-Solc C, Hartmann C, Helfrich B, Gilman L, Folkvord J, Helm K, Miller YE: Neutral endopeptidase: variable expression in human lung, inactivation in lung cancer, and modulation of peptide-induced calcium flux. Cancer Res. 1996, 56: 831-839.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Ogawa H, Iwaya K, Izumi M, Kuroda M, Serizawa H, Koyanagi Y, Mukai K: Expression of CD10 by stromal cells during colorectal tumor development. Hum Pathol. 2002, 33: 806-811. 10.1053/hupa.2002.125773.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Yao T, Takata M, Tustsumi S, Nishiyama K, Taguchi K, Nagai E, Tsuneyoshi M: Phenotypic expression of gastrointestinal differentiation markers in colorectal adenocarcinomas with liver metastasis. Pathology. 2002, 34: 556-560. 10.1080/0031302021000035965-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Dai J, Shen R, Sumitomo M, Goldberg JS, Geng Y, Navarro D, Xu S, Koutcher JA, Garzotto M, Powell CT, Nanus DM: Tumor suppressive effects of neutral endopeptidase in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 1370-1377.PubMedGoogle Scholar


© Bahadir et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.