Stromal micropapillary pattern predominant lung adenocarcinoma - a report of two cases
Diagnostic Pathology volume 6, Article number: 92 (2011)
Generally, adenocarcinomas with micropapillary pattern, featuring small papillary tufts lacking a central fibrovascular core, are thought to have poor prognosis. This pattern has been described in various organs. However, tumor cells with micropapillary pattern of lung adenocarcinoma are more often seen to float within alveolar spaces (aerogenous micropapillary pattern, AMP) than in fibrotic stroma like other organs (stromal micropapillary pattern, SMP) and SMP predominant lung adenocarcinoma (SMPPLA) has not been well described yet. We presented two cases of SMPPLA which were found in the last four years. Both the cases showed more than 50% of SMP in the tumor area. The majority of the stromal micropapillary clusters expressed MUC1 and epithelial membrane antigen along the outer surface of cell membrane. On the other hand, connective tissues surrounding stromal micropapillary clusters showed no reactivity for epithelial markers (thyroid transcription factor-1 and cytokeratin) or endothelial marker (D2-40 and CD34). It means clusters of SMP do not exist within air space or lymphatic or vessel lumens. The tumors with SMP often presented lymphatic permeation and vessel invasion, and intriguingly, one of the two cases showed metastasis to the mediastinal lymph node. Additionally, both the cases showed EGFR point mutations of exon 21. These results suggest that SMPPLA might be associated with poor prognosis and effective for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
A new lung adenocarcinoma classification has been proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS). In this classification, the micropapillary subtype of lung adenocarcinoma (MSLA) was recommended as a newly added subtype of lung adenocarcinoma to lepidic, acinar, papillary, and solid subtypes defined in the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification [1, 2]. Generally, the micropapillary pattern is defined as tumor cells growing in papillary tufts, which lack fibrovascular cores surrounded by lacunar spaces and has been reported to be associated with a high incidence of nodal metastasis and poor prognosis [3–6]. This pattern has been described in various organs such as breast [7, 8], urinary bladder [9, 10], ovary [11, 12], salivary gland , and is known to behave aggressively. In other organs than the lung, this pattern was observed mainly in stroma as invasive components (stromal micropapillary pattern: SMP) [7–19]; however in lung, MSLA is widely recognized as floating tumor cells within alveolar spaces (aerogenous micropapillary pattern: AMP) [3, 4].
We examined whether SMP predominant subtypes were present in lung adenocarcinoma. During the period from February 2007 to December 2010, 559 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were consecutively treated by surgical resection at the Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan, and we found only two cases of SMP predominant lung adenocarcinoma (SMPPLA) (0.36%). We reported the cases of SMPPLA and attempted to describe the clinicopathological features.
A 49-year-old Japanese man was referred to the hospital with lung adenocarcinoma, which was diagnosed by the transthoracic needle biopsy. A computed tomography (CT) scan detected a 32 mm-sized localized solid tumor in the right upper lobe and swelling of the mediastinal lymph node (Figure 1a). He was an ex-smoker and admission laboratory tests showed increased carcinoembryonic antigen (9.6 ng/mL). A right upper lobectomy with lymph node dissection was performed and the tumor was diagnosed as lung adenocarcinoma in pathological T2aN2M0 and stage IIIA determined on the basis of the TNM classification of Union of International Cancer Control . After that, he underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and he was alive without recurrence ten months after operation.
A 57-year-old Japanese man who was a never smoker was referred to the hospital with abnormal shadow on his chest CT scan. A CT scan detected a 29 mm-sized localized solid nodule with pleural indentation in the right upper lobe, and the histological diagnosis of the tumor by transbronchoscopic biopsy was lung adenocarcinoma (Figure 1b). Laboratory tests showed slightly elevated squamous cell carcinoma antigen (1.6 ng/mL). A right upper lobectomy with lymph node dissection was performed and diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma in pathological T2aN0M0 and stage IB. After that, he underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and he was alive without recurrence nine months after operation.
The excised specimens were fixed in a solution of 10% buffered formaldehyde and the sections were embedded in paraffin. Four micrometer-thick sections including the largest cut surface of the tumor were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), alcian blue and elastica-van-Gieson (AB-EVG) stain. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with the primary antibodies listed in Table 1. Lepidic, acinar, papillary and solid subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma were determined according to the 2004 WHO classification. AMP of lung adenocarcinoma was determined according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma .
Macroscopic examination of the excised specimens showed the sharply-demarcated tumor measuring 36 × 25 × 30 mm in size, white in color on cut surface in the case 1 (Figure 2a), and the tumor measuring 33 × 20 × 40 mm in size, grayish white in color on cut surface in the case 2 (Figure 2b).
Microscopically, the tumors of both the cases were composed of stromal micropapillary predominant adenocarcinoma, which were proliferation of nonmucinous atypical cuboidal epithelial cells. In the case 1, the tumor was composed of 55% SMP, 5% lepidic, 30% acinar, 5% papillary pattern and 5% AMP (Figure 3a). In the case 2, the tumor was composed of 55% SMP, 20% lepidic and 25% acinar pattern (Figure 3b) and lacked AMP. In both the cases, lymphatic and vessel invasion were often observed. Lymphatic invasion was confirmed on immunohistochemistry using D2-40 antibody. The case 1 showed pleural invasion and resected regional lymph nodes had metastatic foci composed of tumor cells with a micropapillary pattern (Figure 4).
Immunohistochemically, the outer surface of the SMP cell clusters in both the cases showed membranous expression of MUC1 and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), indicating an 'inside-out' pattern. Both the cases showed E-cadherin expression on intercellular cell membranes of micropapillary tufts of SMP tumor cells. Tumor cells constituting SMP showed positive staining for Ki-67 (MIB-1, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark); positive rate were 24% in case 1, 62% in case 2. In SMP component, positive and negative tumor cells for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and surfactant protein A (SP-A) staining were observed in the case 1, on the other hand, the case 2 showed TTF-1 expression and SP-A repression in almost all tumor cells. Tumor cells outside SMP showed MUC1 and EMA expression on free surface of cell membrane, but MUC1 positive cells were fewer than those in SMP. Tumor cells outside SMP in case 1 showed strong TTF-1 expression. D2-40, CD34 and factor VIII were not found in cells constituting micropapillary tufts. Moreover TTF-1, cytokeratin (CK), D2-40, CD34 and factor VIII were negative in luminal inner surface surrounding micropapillary tufts (Table 1 Figure 5a-d). These results means micropapillary tufts of SMP lack fibrovascular core and were not located within alveolar space, vascular or lymphatic vessels.
A study of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene status of exon 19 and 21 was performed by the methods described elsewhere . Written informed consent for genetic analysis of the tumor cells was obtained from the patients. As a result, both the cases showed an L858R point mutation at exon 21.
In the two cases presented, we recognized that tumor cells of SMP had reduced expression of SP-A, but tumor cells outside SMP had its strong expression. Additionally, we identified the tumor cluster cells were surrounded by the connective tissue which was negative for TTF-1 or CK. And these components were also negative for D2-40 and CD34. The results suggested micropapillary tufts of SMP were not located within alveolar space, vascular or lymphatic vessels but in stroma and reduced the phenotypic expression like SP-A .
AMP of MSLA has been reported to express of MUC1 . We identified expression of MUC1 and EMA in the outer surface of papillary clusters like those in AMP of the case 1. This staining pattern is called as an 'inside-out' pattern in the invasive micropapillary carcinoma of breast [7, 8] and several organs [9–19]. Therefore, the polarity called as an 'inside-out' pattern of the tumor cells is thought to be a characteristic feature in SMP and AMP of lung adenocarcinoma.
Previous studies have reported that a micropapillary pattern is associated with a poor prognosis in stage I lung adenocarcinoma because of its aggressive behavior, as shown by frequent lymph node metastasis, lymphatic permeation, vascular invasion and pleural invasion [4–6]. In the current two cases, lymphatic permeation and vascular invasion were often observed. In addition, the case 1 showed pleural invasion and the resected regional lymph node had metastatic foci composed of tumor cells with a micropapillary pattern. Though it is too early to refer to prognosis of SMPPLA because of short duration of observation, we may say SMPPLA has strong association with vascular invasion.
We also performed a mutational analysis of EGFR gene mutations and both the cases showed EGFR mutations of exon 21. These results suggest that SMPPLA might be associated with poor prognosis and effective for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
In conclusion, we recognized the presence of SMPPLA. Since SMPPLA is very rare as far as we investigated, further studies are required to determine the clinical significance of SMPPLA in detail.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
aerogenous micropapillary pattern
stromal micropapillary pattern
SMP predominant lung adenocarcinoma
the micropapillary subtype of lung adenocarcinoma
Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson AG, Geisinger KR, Yatabe Y, Beer DG, Powell CA, Riely GJ, Van Schil PE, Garg K, Austin JH, Asamura H, Rusch VW, Hirsch FR, Scagliotti G, Mitsudomi T, Huber RM, Ishikawa Y, Jett J, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Sculier JP, Takahashi T, Tsuboi M, Vansteenkiste J, Wistuba I, Yang PC, Aberle D, Brambilla C, Flieder D, et al.: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011, 6: 244-285. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206a221.
Yoshizawa A, Motoi N, Riely GJ, Sima CS, Gerald WL, Kris MK, Park BJ, Rusch VW, Travis WD: Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases. Mod Pathol. 2011, 24: 653-664. 10.1038/modpathol.2010.232.
Amin MB, Tamboli P, Merchant SH, Ordóñez NG, Ro J, Ayala AG, Ro JY: Micropapillary component in lung adenocarcinoma: a distinctive histologic feature with possible prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002, 26: 358-364. 10.1097/00000478-200203000-00010.
Miyoshi T, Satoh Y, Okumura S, Nakagawa K, Shirakusa T, Tsuchiya E, Ishikawa Y: Early-stage lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary pattern, a distinct pathologic marker for a significantly poor prognosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003, 27: 101-109. 10.1097/00000478-200301000-00011.
Nagano T, Ishii G, Nagai K, Ito T, Kawase A, Takahashi K, Nishimura Y, Noshiwaki Y, Ochiai A: Structural and biological properties of a papillary component generating a micropapillary component in lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2010, 67: 282-289. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.04.014.
Tsutsumida H, Nomoto M, Goto M, Kitajima S, Kubota I, Hirotsu Y, Wakimoto J, Hollingsworth MA, Yonezawa S: A micropapillary pattern is predictive of a poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma, and reduced surfactant apoprotein A expression in the micropapillary pattern is an excellent indicator of a poor prognosis. Mod Pathol. 2007, 20: 638-647. 10.1038/modpathol.3800780.
Kuba S, Ohtani H, Yamaguchi J, Hayashi H, Uga T, Kanematsu T, Shimokawa I: Incomplete inside-out growth pattern in invasive breast carcinoma: association with lymph vessel invasion and recurrence-free survival. Virchows Arch. 2011, 458: 159-169. 10.1007/s00428-010-1033-2.
Guo X, Chen L, Lang R, Fan Y, Zhang X, Fu: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: association of pathologic features with lymph node metastasis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006, 126: 740-746. 10.1309/AXYY4AJTMNW6FRMW.
Sangoi AR, Beck AH, Amin MB, Cheng L, Epstein JI, Hansel DE, Iczkowski KA, Lopez-Beltran A, Oliva E, Paner GP, Reuter VE, Ro JY, Shah RB, Shen SS, Tamboli P, McKenney JK: Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the urinary tract among urologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010, 34: 1367-1376. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181ec86b3.
Amin MB, Ro JY, el-Sharkawy T, Lee KM, Troncoso P, Silva EG, Ordóñez NG, Ayala AG: Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994, 18: 1224-1232. 10.1097/00000478-199412000-00005.
Burks RT, Sherman ME, Kurman RJ: Micropapillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. A distinctive low-grade carcinoma related to serous borderline tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996, 20: 1319-1330. 10.1097/00000478-199611000-00003.
Eichhorn JH, Bell DA, Young RH, Scully RE: Ovarian serous borderline tumors with micropapillary and cribriform patterns: a study of 40 cases and comparison with 44 cases without these patterns. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999, 23: 397-409. 10.1097/00000478-199904000-00004.
Yamamoto H, Uryu H, Segawa Y, Tsuneyoshi M: Aggressive invasive micropapillary salivary duct carcinoma of the parotid gland. Pathology Int. 2008, 58: 322-336. 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2008.02231.x.
Mogi A, Nabeshima K, Hamasaki M, Uesugi N, Tamura K, Iwasaki A, Shirakusa T, Iwasaki H: Pleural malignant mesothelioma with invasive micropapillary component and its association with pulmonary metastasis. Pathology Int. 2009, 59: 874-879. 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02459.x.
Kondo T: Bile duct adecarcinoma with minor micropapillary component: a case report. Cases Journal. 2009, 2: 51-10.1186/1757-1626-2-51.
Shimoda M, Okada Y, Hayashi Y, Hatano S, Kawakubo H, Omori T, Ishii S, Sugiura H: Primary invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the stomach. Pathology Int. 2008, 58: 513-517. 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2008.02265.x.
Sakamoto K, Watanabe M, Cruz CD, Honda H, Ise H, Mitsui K, Namiki K, Mikami Y, Moriya T, Sasano H: Primary invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the colon. Histopathology. 2005, 47: 479-484. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02241.x.
Verdú M, Roman R, Calvo M, Rondon N, Garcia B, Gonzalez M, Vidal A, Puig X: Clinicopathological and molecular characterization of colorectal micropapillary carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2011, 24: 729-738. 10.1038/modpathol.2011.1.
Kim MJ, Hong SM, Jang SJ, Yu E, Kim JS, Kim KR, Gong G, Ro JY: Invasive colorectal micropapillary carcinoma: an aggressive variant of adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2006, 37: 809-815. 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.10.018.
Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors: TNM classification of malignant tumors, seventh edition. 2009, Wiley-Blackwell
Matsukuma S, Yoshihara M, Kasai F, Kato A, Yoshida A, Akaike M, Kobayashi O, Nakayama H, Sakuma Y, Yoshida T, Kameda Y, Ysuchiya E, Miyagi Y: Rapid and simple detection of hot spot mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor, BRAF, and NRAS in cancers using the loop-hybrid mobility shift assay. J Mol Diagn. 2006, 8: 504-512. 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060030.
Goldmann Torsten, Kähler Daniel, Schultz Holger, Abdullah Mahdi, Lang Dagmar, Stellmacher Florian, Vollmer Ekkehard: On the significance of Surfactant Protein-A within the human lungs. Diagnostic Pathology. 2009, 4: 8-12. 10.1186/1746-1596-4-8.
The authors thank the technicians of the Pathology Laboratory Division in the hospital for the technical assistance.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MO and TY designed the study, performed clinical and pathological investigation, and wrote the drafts. YS participated in pathological and genetical investigation. SO performed the histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. CH, KW, KN, TW and RH assisted the clinical investigation. HN participated in managing and operating the patients. YK assisted the pathological investigation. KY participated in collecting clinical data and images. TI participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Ohe, M., Yokose, T., Sakuma, Y. et al. Stromal micropapillary pattern predominant lung adenocarcinoma - a report of two cases. Diagn Pathol 6, 92 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-6-92