Differentiated embryonic chondrocyte-expressed gene 1 is associated with hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and Ki67 in human gastric cancer
© Jia et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 January 2013
Accepted: 16 February 2013
Published: 27 February 2013
Gastric cancer is a leading causes of cancer-related deaths ,but the underlying molecular mechanisms of its progression are largely unknown. Differentiated embryonic chondrocyte-expressed gene 1 (DEC1), is an important transcription factor involved in the progression of tumors and has recently been identified to be strongly inducible by hypoxia. Little is known about the contribution of DEC1 to the intracellular hypoxia and proliferation signaling events in gastric cancer.
Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of DEC1, hypoxia-inducible factor 1(HIF-1α) and Ki67 in 173 human gastric cancer samples and adjacent non-tumor tissues samples. The relationship between DEC1, HIF-1α and Ki67 was evaluated.
DEC1 protein was persistently expressed in the nucleus and cytoplasm of gastric cancer tissue. The protein expression of DEC1 and HIF-1α in tumour tissues was 83.8% and 54.3%, respectively, and was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissues (83.8% vs 23.7%, P <0.001; 54.3% vs 12.7%, P< 0.001). The expression of DEC1 and HIF-1α was associated with poor histological differentiation. (P < 0. 01). Furthermore, DEC1 level was positively correlated with HIF-1α (P < 0. 01, r=0.290) and Ki67 expression (P < 0. 01, r=0.249).
The upregulation of DEC1 may play an important role in hypoxia regulation and cell proliferation in gastric cancer. The relevant molecular mechanism requires further investigation.
The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1794565980889391
Human differentiated embryonic chondrocyte-expressed gene 1 (DEC1) (also known as Stra13/Bhlhb2/Sharp2) is a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor. Although little is known about its function in human physiological and pathological processes, recent studies have shown that DEC1 is a hypoxia-induced gene involved in cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis [1, 2].
Miyazaki K et al.  identified the hypoxia response elements in the DEC1 promoter and found that the DEC1 gene is a direct target of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). DEC1 may be a hypoxia-regulated gene, so its expression in human tumors may be a direct marker of tumor hypoxia. The association of the clinical value of DEC1 expression and HIF-1α, the endogenous marker of hypoxia, has not been reported for gastric cancer. The studies with cultured cell lines have revealed that DEC1 expression is associated with hypoxia and HIF-1α protein expression, and blockage of the HIF-1α protein led to reduced DEC1 expression .
The clinical progression of gastric cancer is rapid and is reflected by various proliferation markers. The role of DEC1 in cell proliferation is inconsistent. DEC1 inhibits apoptosis in human embryonic kidney 293 cells [5, 6] and induces apoptosis in mouse fibroblast NIH3T3 cells . In addition, DEC1 has pro-apoptotic properties in human breast cancer cells .The intracellular signaling events related to the role of DEC1 in gastric cancer have not been well established.
In this study, we used immunohistochemistry to evaluate the expression status and clinicopathological features of DEC1 and HIF-1α in 173 human gastric cancer samples and its adjacent non-tumor tissues by immunohistochemistry. The associations between DEC1 and HIF-1α, and proliferation marker Ki67 were analyzed.
Materials and methods
Patients and samples
Surgically resected gastric cancer specimens were collected from 173 patients (117 males) at Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, China, January 2011 to June 2012. The mean age of the patients was 62 years (range 30–88 years). Among the 173 tumor samples, 53 were well or moderately differentiated and 120 were poorly differentiated. The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples were retrospectively and randomly selected from the files of the Department of Pathology after the protocol was approved by the local research ethics committee. All the samples were evaluated for diagnosis by 2 experienced pathologists for diagnosis. None of the patients had received chemotherapy or radiation therapy preoperatively.
The tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 12 h and were routinely processed. The paraffin wax-embedded tissue blocks were cut into 4-μm-thick sections. The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were heated at 60°C for 60 min and placed into xylene for deparaffinization and graded ethanol for rehydration, then washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The antigen retrieval involved the use of a prewarmed pressure cooker with a solution of antigen retrieval citrate buffer (pH 6.8) for 3 min. Following de-pressurization, cold water was poured into the cooker for 10 min, then sections were rinsed well in warm water. The sections were incubated in 3% H2O2 in methanol for 10 min, then washed 3 times with PBS and incubated with the primary antibodies rabbit polyclonal anti-DEC1 (1:50, Genetex, CA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-HIF-1α (1:50, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), or rabbit monoclonal anti-Ki67 (1:50, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) overnight in a moist chamber at 4°C. Following a final wash, the sections were incubated with secondary antibody (KIT-5010, Max Vision, Maixin.Bio, China); TBS-Tween20 was used in all dilutions and intervening rinses. The ections were allowed to develop in diaminobenzidine (DAB) for 5 min, and then were counterstained with hematoxylin. The slides were viewed under a microscope. The sections incubated without primary antibody were negative controls included in each run.
Immunohistochemical staining evaluation
The assessment of DEC1, HIF-1α was as previously described [9, 10], by percentage of stained tumor cells and staining intensity. We examined a minimum of 3 different high-power (× 400) fields of tumor infiltration. The percentage of positive tumor cells was rated as follows: 0, staining in ≤10% of tumor cells; 1+, weak staining in >10% of cells; 2+, moderate staining in >10% of cells; 3+, strong moderate staining in >10% of cells. Tumors scored as 3+/2+ were positive cases; tumors scored as 0/1+ were designated as negative cases. The Ki67 scoring system was 0 assigned for no cells staining positively; 1 for ≤ 10% of cells staining positively; 2 for > 10% of cells staining positively. The tumors scored as 3+/2+ were positive cases; the tumors scored as 0/1+ were designated as negative cases. Expression was analyzed by 2 independent investigators who used a multiheaded microscope and were blinded to the clinical data with consensus.
The statistical analysis used SPSS v11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A chi-square test was used to test the association of DEC1 and HIF-1α expression and the clinicopathological variables. The spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between DEC1 expression and HIF-1α and Ki67 expression. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Expression of DEC1 and HIF-1α in gastric cancer and adjacent non-tumour tissues
Expression of differentiated embryo chondrocyte 1 and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α protein in gastric cancer and adjacent non-tumor tissues n (%)
Adjacent non-tumor tissues
Correlation between the expression of DEC1 and clinicopathological factors
DEC1 protein expression
HIF-1α protein expression
Tumor size (cm)
Lymph node metastasis
Tumor differentiation status
Well and moderate
Nuclear expression of HIF-1α was found in 54.3% of the tumors, which was significantly higher than that in the adjacent normal tissues (54.3% vs 12.7%, P < 0.01, Table 1, Figure 1C and D). Furthermore, we also found that the expression of HIF-1α was correlated with lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and poorly differentiated histological grade (P < 0.05, Table 2).
Correlation of DEC1 and HIF-1α expression in human gastric cancer
Correlation between the expression of DEC1 and HIF-1 α
(n = 145)
(n = 28)
Positive (n = 94)
Negative (n = 79)
Correlation of DEC1 and Ki67 expression in human gastric cancer
Correlation between the expression of DEC1 and Ki67
(n = 145)
(n = 28)
Positive (n = 98)
Negative (n = 75)
Discussion and conclusions
Previous reports of the implications of DEC1 overexpression in cancer have been inconsistent [10–12], so we investigated gastric cancer specimens from a large consecutive series of gastric cancer patients who had undergone similar surgeries. We extended previous studies by finding a positive correlation between DEC1 and HIF-1α expression and cancer proliferation.
We found that the DEC1 protein was persistently expressed in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of gastric cancer. DEC1 was also widely expressed in the cytoplasm of other human tumours, including breast cancers, colon/pancreas adenoma, and ductal carcinomas . Only nuclear DEC1 reactivity was found in some clinicopathological studies [1, 13]. These differences might be explained by the status of the paraffinized sections, subjective interpretation by pathologists, the production of antibodies or the variation in techniques. Although a transcription factor, nuclear DEC1 is likely to be an active form, which is synthesized and degraded in the cytoplasm. Its expression may be redistributed during tissue collection, which would be difficult to control, but the overall expression indicates upregulation of the pathway in gastric cancer. In this study, positive DEC1 staining was found in 145 of 173 (83.8%) specimens, and nuclear/cytoplasmic DEC1 expression was found to be significantly correlated with nuclear HIF-1α expression. The analysis based on pure nuclear expression showed very marginal or no statistical association with HIF-1α, showing that strong cytoplasmic DEC1 expression, which is a tumourspecific finding, better reflects the DEC1 regulated pathway in paraffin-embedded material.
HIF-1α is a well-established molecule induced under hypoxic conditions . As well, DEC1 is inducible by HIF-1α in various cancer cell lines [5, 15–25]. The mechanism of this interaction has been shown to be the HIF-1α/β complex directly binding to the HIF-1 binding site in the hypoxia response element of the DEC1 promoter, which initiates the transcription of DEC1 [3, 17, 26]. Clinical studies revealed a possible association of HIF-1α and DEC1 expression by immunohistochemical staining in solid cancers such as non-small lung cancer and breast cancer [1, 2]. HIF-1-dependent hypoxia-induced DEC1 expression may be in a hypoxic status in solid cancers. Some studies have shown that the promotion or inhibition of cell differentiation by DEC1 is cell-type specific and differs in different original tissues. Overexpression of Stra13 inhibits mesodermal differentiation but promotes neuronal differentiation in P19 cells . DEC1 was found to be associated with the hypoxic response and high tumour grade in human breast cancers . In hepatocellular carcinoma, the expression of nuclear DEC1 was greater in well differentiated than in poorly differentiated malignant hepatocellular carcinoma . Furthermore, a positive association between tumour grade and HIF-1α has been reported . These observations suggest that tumor hypoxia can inhibit cancer cell differentiation, and DEC1, induced by HIF-1α, may function as a HIF-1α effector to mediate the effect of hypoxia on cell differentiation. Thus, DEC1 and HIF-1α expression is correlated with poor differentiation, as we describe, and is in accordance with the induction by HIF-1α and the ability of DEC1 to repress tumor differentiation.
In this study, we did not find any association between lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and DEC1 expression, which was in agreement with a study by Chakrabarti J et al.  study. Nevertheless, upregulation of DEC1 is strongly associated with HIF-1a and Ki67,previously shown to be associated with aggressive clinical behavior [9, 28, 33, 34], which supports that DEC1 is a marker of activated hypoxic pathways and a novel biomarker of clinical aggressiveness. Although further investigations are needed to clarify the molecular mechanisms involved in DEC1 overexpression, DEC1 may be a valuable therapeutic target in gastric cancer.
This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 81000869 and NSFC No 81272588), 973 Project grant (2012CB966503 and 2012CB966504).
- Giatromanolaki A, Koukourakis MI, Sivridis E, Turley H, Wykoff CC, Gatter KC, Harris AL: DEC1 (STRA13) protein expression relates to hypoxia- inducible factor 1-α and carbonic anhydrase-9 overexpression in non-small cell lung cancer. J Pathol. 2003, 200: 222-228. 10.1002/path.1330.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turley H, Wykoff CC, Troup S, Watson PH, Gatter KC, Harris AL: The hypoxia-regulated transcription factor DEC1 (Stra13, SHARP-2) and its expression in human tissues and tumours. J Pathol. 2004, 203: 808-813. 10.1002/path.1585.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miyazaki K, Kawamoto T, Tanimoto K, Nishiyama M, Honda H, Kato Y: Identification of functional hypoxia response elements in the promoter region of the DEC1 and DEC2 genes. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 47014-47021. 10.1074/jbc.M204938200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Y, Shi X, Wang M, Jia Y, Li B, Zhang Y, Liu Q, Wang Y: The increased expression of DEC1 gene is related to HIF-1α protein in gastric cancer cell lines. Mol Biol Rep. 2012, 39: 4229-4236. 10.1007/s11033-011-1209-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu M, Ge S, Yang D, Wan Y, Yan B: Abundant expression of Dec1/stra13/sharp2 in colon carcinoma: its antagonizing role in serum deprivation-induced apoptosis and selective inhibition of procaspase activation. Biochem J. 2002, 367: 413-422. 10.1042/BJ20020514.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Xie M, Yang J, Yang D, Deng R, Wan Y, Yan B: The expression of antiapoptotic protein survivin is transcriptionally upregulated by DEC1 primarily through multiple sp1 binding sites in the proximal promoter. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 3296-3306. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209363.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thin TH, Li L, Chung TK, Sun H, Taneja R: Stra13 is induced by genotoxic stress and regulates ionizing-radiation-induced apoptosis. EMBO. 2007, 8: 401-407. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400912.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Sato F, Kawamoto T, Fujimoto K, Morohashi S, Akasaka H, Kondo J, Wu Y, Noshiro M, Kato Y, Kijima H: Anti-apoptotic effect of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor DEC2 in human breast cancer cells. Genes Cells. 2010, 15: 315-325. 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01381.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Birner P, Schindl M, Obermair A, Plank C, Breitenecker G, Oberhuber G: Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor1α is a marker for an unfavorable prognosis in earlystage invasive cervical cancer. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 4693-4696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Y, Jia Y, Wang Y, Wang M, Li B, Shi X, Ma X, Xiao D, Sun Y: The hypoxia-regulated transcription factor DEC1 (Stra13, SHARP-2) and its expression in gastric cancer. OMICS. 2009, 13: 301-306. 10.1089/omi.2009.0014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi XH, Zheng Y, Sun Q, Cui J, Liu QH, Qü F, Wang YS: DEC1 nuclear expression: a marker of differentiation grade in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2011, 17: 2037-2043. 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.2037.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang W, Reiser-Erkan C, Michalski CW, Raggi MC, Quan L, Yupei Z, Friess H, Erkan M, Kleeff J: Hypoxia inducible BHLHB2 is a novel and independent prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 401: 422-428. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chakrabarti J, Turley H, Campo L, Han C, Harris AL, Gatter KC, Fox SB: The transcription factor DEC1 (stra13, SHARP2) is associated with the hypoxic response and high tumour grade in human breast cancers. Br J Cancer. 2004, 91: 954-958. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602059.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Semenza GL: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: master regulator of O2 homeostasis. Curr Opin Genet. 1998, 8: 588-594. 10.1016/S0959-437X(98)80016-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maxwell PH, Harris AL, Ratcliffe PJ: Identification of novel hypoxia dependent and independent target genes of the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) tumour suppressor by mRNA differential expression profiling. Oncogene. 2000, 19: 6297-6305. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wood SM, Wiesener MS, Yeates KM, Okada N, Pugh CW, Maxwell PH, Ratcliffe PJ: Selection and analysis of a mutant cell line defective in the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α-subunit (HIF-1α). Characterization of hif-1α-dependent and -independent hypoxia-inducible gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 8360-8368. 10.1074/jbc.273.14.8360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zawel L, Yu J, Torrance CJ, Markowitz S, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Zhou S: DEC1 is a downstream target of TGF-beta with sequence-specific transcriptional repressor activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 2848-2853. 10.1073/pnas.261714999.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Xie M, Song X, Gragen S, Sachdeva K, Wan Y, Yan B: DEC1 negatively regulates the expression of DEC2 through binding to the E-box in the proximal promoter. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 16899-16907. 10.1074/jbc.M300596200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Bi Z, Yan B, Wan Y: UVB radiation induces expression of HIF-1α and VEGF through the EGFR/PI3 K/DEC1 pathway. Int J Mol Med. 2006, 18: 713-719.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato F, Bhawal UK, Kawamoto T, Fujimoto K, Imaizumi T, Imanaka T, Kondo J, Koyanagi S, Noshiro M, Yoshida H, Kusumi T, Kato Y, Kijima H: Basic-helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factor DEC2 negatively regulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Genes Cells. 2008, 13: 131-144. 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01153.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura H, Tanimoto K, Hiyama K, Yunokawa M, Kawamoto T, Kato Y, Yoshiga K, Poellinger L, Hiyama E, Nishiyama M: Human mismatch repair gene, MLH1, is transcriptionally repressed by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors, DEC1 and DEC2. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 4200-4209. 10.1038/onc.2008.58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qian Y, Chen X: ID1, inhibitor of differentiation/DNA binding, is an effector of the p53-dependent DNA damage response pathway. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 22410-22416. 10.1074/jbc.M800643200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Li QQ: Embryo-chondrocyte expressed gene 1, downregulating hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, is another marker of lung tumor hypoxia. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007, 28: 549-558. 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2007.00516.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoon DY, Buchler P, Saarikoski ST, Hines OJ, Reber HA, Hankinson O: Identification of genes differentially induced by hypoxia in pancreatic cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001, 288: 882-886. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5867.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ehata S, Hanyu A, Hayashi M, Aburatani H, Kato Y, Fujime M, Saitoh M, Miyazawa K, Imamura T, Miyazono K: Transforming growth factor-beta promotes survival of mammary carcinoma cells through induction of antiapoptotic transcription factor DEC1. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 9694-9703. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1522.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ivanova AV, Ivanov SV, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A, Lerman MI: Regulation of STRA13 by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein, hypoxia, and the UBC9/ubiquitin proteasome degradation pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 15306-15315. 10.1074/jbc.M010516200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boudjelal M, Taneja R, Matsubara S, Bouillet P, Dolle P, Chambon P: Overexpression of Stra13, a novel retinoic acidinducible gene of the basic helix-loop-helix family, inhibits mesodermal and promotes neuronal differentiation of P19 cells. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 2052-2065. 10.1101/gad.11.16.2052.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qiu MZ, Han B, Luo HY, Zhou ZW, Wang ZQ, Wang FH, Li YH, Xu RH: Expressions of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and hexokinase-II in gastric adenocarcinoma: the impact on prognosis and correlation to clinicopathologic features. Tumour Biol. 2011, 32: 159-166. 10.1007/s13277-010-0109-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Zheng L, Wang SY, Zhu TF, Zhu HG: Clonal analysis of gastric carcinoma and precancerous lesions and its relation to Ki-67 protein expression. Neoplasma. 2009, 56: 48-55. 10.4149/neo_2009_01_48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ivanova AV, Ivanov SV, Zhang X, Ivanov VN, Timofeeva OA, Lerman MI: STRA13 interacts with STAT3 and modulates transcription of STAT3-dependent targets. J Mol Biol. 2004, 340: 641-653. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun H, Taneja R: Stra13 expression is associated with growth arrest and represses transcription through histone deacetylase (HDAC)-dependent and HDAC-independent mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000, 97: 4058-4063. 10.1073/pnas.070526297.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhawal UK, Sato F, Arakawa Y, Fujimoto K, Kawamoto T, Tanimoto K, Ito Y, Sasahira T, Sakurai T, Kobayashi M, Kashima I, Kijima H, Kuniyasu H, Abiko Y, Kato Y, Sato S: Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor DEC1 negatively regulates cyclin D1. J Pathol. 2011, 224: 420-429. 10.1002/path.2878.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cowen D, Troncoso P, Khoo VS, Zagars GK, Von Eschenbach AC, Meistrich ML, Pollack A: Ki-67 staining is an independent correlate of biochemical failure in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2002, 8: 1148-1154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Tobar A, Halpern M, Levy I, Shabtai E, Ben-Ari Z: Tissue expression of squamous cellular carcinoma antigen and Ki67 in hepatocellular carcinoma-correlation with prognosis: a historical prospective study. Diagn Pathol. 2011, 6: 121-129. 10.1186/1746-1596-6-121.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.