- Case Report
- Open Access
An unusual case of Acanthamoeba Polyphaga and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa keratitis
Diagnostic Pathology volume 9, Article number: 105 (2014)
The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/5168343391150859
A 56-year-old woman with a history of disposable soft contact lens wear was referred to our university eye center for a corneal ulcer. Based on the microbial culture, the initial diagnosis was bacterial keratitis, which was unresponsive to topical fortified antibiotics. The patient was then examined using in vivo confocal microscopy, which revealed Acanthamoeba infection. This case emphasizes the need to suspect Acanthamoeba infection in soft contact lens wearers who present with progressive ulcerative keratitis or progressively worsening corneal ulcers that are not responsive to the usual antimicrobial therapy. It is also important to consider the possibility of a coinfection with bacterial and Acanthamoeba species.
Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a destructive disease characterized by significant visual morbidity, and prompt diagnosis is important for a good visual outcome. Like AK, Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis usually progresses rapidly and presents with suppurative stromal infiltrate and marked mucopurulent exudate. It should be noted that there is a possibility, in theory, that AK can develop in eyes with advanced bacterial keratitis. Coinfections with other microorganisms have been reported in patients with culture-proven AK [1, 2]. However, the exact clinical characteristics of such mixed infections remain unknown. Few publications have addressed this issue. Herein, we report an unusual case of coinfection with Acanthamoeba polyphaga and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as causes of corneal keratitis in a contact lens wearer in Shanghai.
A 56-year-old female teacher presented with a two-week history of increasing pain and redness in the left eye. The patient had a five-year history of disposable soft contact lens wear and was sometimes careless with the disinfecting routine. Occasionally, she would rinse her contact lenses and case in tap water instead of a sterile saline solution. The patient stated that she had no history of ocular trauma, overnight contact lens wear, hypertension, or diabetes. She had no known drug allergies and no systemic infections at the time of her presentation. She had been treated one week previously for a P. aeruginosa corneal ulcer and had received topical fortified tobramycin and levofloxacin, to which the organism had shown sensitivity in the laboratory (Figures 1A and D). She denied any significant improvement of her symptoms and signs. On examination, her best-corrected visual acuities were counting fingers in the left eye and 20/20 in the right. She had a large central corneal ulcer with an underlying grayish-white, paracentral, ring-shaped stromal infiltrate (Figure 1B). The hypopyon in the anterior chamber had improved significantly after the initial treatment with the topical antibiotics. The right eye was normal. The patient was examined using an in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). Interestingly, the IVCM images showed the presence of oval to round, double-walled, highly refractile structures with a polygonal inner wall, varying 12–25 μm in size. The morphology was consistent with that of Acanthamoeba cysts reported in other articles [3, 4]. The structures were surrounded by inflammatory cells (Figure 1E).
Upon confirmation of the presence of the Acanthamoeba species via the IVCM examination, an additional treatment regimen of topical 0.2% metronidazole and 0.02% polyhexamethylene biguanide drops given hourly was begun. Over the next two weeks, the stromal infiltrate showed slight improvement, and after 3-months treatment, the Acanthamoeba cysts could not be detected by IVCM examination. Five months after that, the patient underwent combined phacoemulsification and viscogoniosynechialysis due to the presence of peripheral synechiae and a cataract. The topical treatment was continued for a prolonged period, tapering off over 12 months. At present, the patient’s best-corrected vision is 1/20. The left eye shows no signs of inflammation (Figure 1C) or Acanthamoeba infection (Figure 1F) using IVCM but there are a few superficial blood vessels in the peripheral cornea. There is also a large, central corneal scar obscuring the visual axis. The intraocular appearance is normal, and ultrasonography indicates a normal posterior segment. The patient is currently awaiting a corneal transplantation.
This case emphasizes the need to suspect Acanthamoeba infection in soft contact lens wearers who present with progressive ulcerative keratitis and in progressively worsening corneal ulcers that are unresponsive to the usual antimicrobial therapy. It is also important to consider the possibility of a bacterial coinfection with the Acanthamoeba species. The exact reason why this combined inflammation occurred in our patient is still unknown. However, inquiries should be made regarding the patient’s contact lens cleaning history and the potential contamination of the contact lenses. Previous reports have revealed the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acanthamoeba in the microbiological cultures obtained from contact lenses [1, 5, 6]. In addition, previous studies have shown that almost 50% of Acanthamoeba-positive eyes had cultures that were positive for bacteria as well [2, 7]. A bacterial infection capable of supporting amoebic growth might play an important role in the pathogenesis of AK . In light of these observations, it is advisable to use real-time polymerase chain reaction or IVCM in the early detection and treatment of AK. This case emphasizes the importance of suspecting Acanthamoeba infection in at-risk patients.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
Dini LA, Cockinos C, Frean JA, Niszl IA, Markus MB: Unusual case of acanthamoeba polyphaga and pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis in a contact lens wearer from Gauteng, South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38 (2): 826-829.
Iovieno A, Ledee DR, Miller D, Alfonso EC: Detection of bacterial endosymbionts in clinical acanthamoeba isolates. Ophthalmology. 2010, 117 (3): 445-452. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.033.
Vaddavalli PK, Garg P, Sharma S, Sangwan VS, Rao GN, Thomas R: Role of confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of fungal and acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2011, 118 (1): 29-35. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.05.018.
Parmar DN, Awwad ST, Petroll WM, Bowman RW, McCulley JP, Cavanagh HD: Tandem scanning confocal corneal microscopy in the diagnosis of suspected acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2006, 113 (4): 538-547. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.022.
Ziak P, Ondriska F, Mrva M: Acanthamoeba keratitis after use of soft contact lenses–case report. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2003, 59 (5): 352-358.
Sharma R, Jhanji V, Satpathy G, Sharma N, Khokhar S, Agarwal T: Coinfection with acanthamoeba and pseudomonas in contact lens-associated keratitis. Optom Vis Sci. 2013, 90 (2): e53-e55. 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31827f15b4.
Ikeda Y, Miyazaki D, Yakura K, Kawaguchi A, Ishikura R, Inoue Y, Mito T, Shiraishi A, Ohashi Y, Higaki S, Itahashi M, Fukuda M, Shimomura Y, Yagita K: Assessment of real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of acanthamoeba and prognosis determinants of acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2012, 119 (6): 1111-1119. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.023.
Bottone EJ, Madayag RM, Qureshi MN: Acanthamoeba keratitis: synergy between amebic and bacterial cocontaminants in contact lens care systems as a prelude to infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1992, 30: 2447-2450.
The authors were supported by grants from the Key Clinic Medicine Research Program, the Ministry of Health, China (2010–2012); the National Science and Technology Research Program, the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (2012BAI08B01); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81170817, 81200658); and the Scientific Research Program, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, Shanghai (13430720400, 134119a8800, 13430710500). The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
JH and JJ contributed to the conception and design, and the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. ZL, JX, and XS have been involved in the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All the authors have given final approval of the version to be published.