Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Case Report
  • Open Access

Duodenal gangliocytic paraganglioma, a rare entity among GEP-NET: a case report with immunohistochemical and molecular study

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Diagnostic Pathology20149:54

  • Received: 2 October 2013
  • Accepted: 3 March 2014
  • Published:


Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are the most incident neuroendocrine tumors. In the new WHO classification (2010) the embryological derivation of each neoplastic entity is one of the most important parameters. Gangliocytic Paraganglioma is a tumor originating in the hindgut, a rare neoplasm, generally affecting the second portion of the duodenum, the majority of which are benign.

Cases of gangliocytic paraganglioma with local metastasis or local recurrence have also been reported.

We describe a GP in a 48-year-old caucasian male with an unusual site (4th portion of duodenum) and an interesting immunohistochemical and molecular pattern. In particular, we examined the expression of some neuroendocrine markers and a marker of neuronal differentiation, NeuroD1, whose expression can help to better understand the nature of this neoplasia.

Virtual slides

The virtual slides for this article can be found here:


  • Gangliocytic paraganglioma
  • ND markers
  • Neuro D1


Gangliocytic paraganglioma (GP) is a rare gastrointestinal tumor of uncertain histogenesis, with immunohistochemical features of neuroendocrine type.

This neoplasia, in the context of the new WHO classification (2010) of Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (GEP-NET) tumors is classified as tumor derived from the hindgut [1].

Usually, it is located in the second part of the duodenum and, in a few cases, in the esophagus, jejunum, pylorus, pancreas and upper mediastinum and is characterized by benign clinical behavior and a favorable outcome.

However, recent studies have highlighted the presence of paraganglioma in other sites, particularly in the retroperitoneum [2], with a case that metastasizes to the vertebra [3].

Moreover, cases of regional lymph node metastasis and local recurrence have been reported, suggesting a potential malignant progression of this tumor [4, 5].

Histologically GP is a triphasic neoplasia. It is composed of three cellular types: epithelioid, ganglion and spindle cells, whose identification is supported by immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of neuronal and neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CD56, S-100, NSE and Somatostatin) [6].

Currently, the only prognostic marker for neuroendocrine tumors is Ki67 index expression associated with mitotic index. Molecular markers indicative of poor prognosis have not yet been identified.

Recently, a new marker, NeuroD1 (Neurogenic Differentiation 1), has been shown to act as a neuronal differentiation factor. NeuroD1 is a transcription factor originally identified in beta pancreatic cells and it is able to convert epithelial cells into neurons in Xenopus Embryos [7]. Moreover, NeuroD1 has been identified as a new neuroendocrine marker in GEP-NET and prostate cancer (pCA). In GEP-NET its expression seems to be related to differentiation degree [8], while in pCA its expression is more frequent than Chromogranin A [9, 10]. Cytoplasmic positive staining for NeuroD1 was also strongly associated with MPI (microscopic perineural invasion).

In this report we present a case of Gangliocytic paraganglioma on which some neuroendocrine markers (Syn, CgA, CD56, NSE) and NeuroD1 expression have been tested by IHC. On the same sample NeuroD1 expression has also been determined by quantitative Real Time PCR.

Case presentation

GP shows evidence of neuronal differentiation, also supported by cell positivity for several neuroendocrine (ND) markers.

In this case, a 48-year-old caucasian man was referred to our Institution after recurrent upper GI bleeding with melena. The patient reported a four month history of intermittent coffee ground stools, fatigue and weight loss. Clinical examination was uneventful and the patient was hemodinamically stable with 8.4 g/dl value of Haemoglobin and a Hematocrit of 28%. Iron deficiency was also present. No history of previous pathologies was reported. Pan-colonoscopy was negative and a standard gastroscopy had been performed at another Institution, revealing a 4 cm bulky mass of the distal duodenum. Gastroscopy was repeated in our institution with pediatric instrument to have a better evaluation of the mass. The lesion, located in the 4th duodenal portion, was included in the duodenal wall and covered with normal mucosa with a bleeding surface. Multiple biopsies were performed but the results were inconclusive.

A CT-scan was also performed, revealing a thickening of the 4th portion of the duodenal wall and non-lymphadenopathies.

The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy with segmental resection of the 4th portion of the duodenum and the first jejunal loop. An end to end anastomosis between the 4th duodenal portion and the jejunum was carried out. The patient was discharged on the 6th post-operative day after an uneventful course.

Twenty-four months after surgery, the patient was diagnosed disease free.

Macroscopically the surgical specimen showed a polypoid lesion, covered with smooth mucosa with microerosion area, of 4 cm × 4 cm × 3 cm. All tumor samples were stained with H/E (hematoxilin/eosin). IHC stains were then performed.

Under microscopic observation the tumor was composed of epithelioid cell nests, areas of spindle cells and scattered ganglion cells (Figure 1). The neoplastic proliferation affected submucosal layers up to the lamina propria and was covered with duodenal mucosa devoid of morphological abnormalities, with focal areas of erosion of the epithelial layer.
Figure 1
Figure 1

H&E: A) panoramic view with epithelioid and ganglion cells (4X); B) high magnification of epithelioid cellular elements (20X); C) panoramic view with epithelioid, spindle and ganglion cells (10X); D) high magnification of ganglion cells (20X).

The panel of immunohistochemical markers used showed a negative cellular reaction for cytokeratin (CK) 7 (Dako, OVTL 12/30, 1: 200), CK20 (Dako, Ks20.8, 1:50), CDX2 (Dako, DAK-CDX2, 1:50) and CD117 (Dako, CD117, 1:50). A low positive cellular reaction was present for Vimentin (NeoMarkers, Westinghouse, California, D9, 1:1000.), S100 (Dako, 1:3000), Chromogranin A (Dako, A0430, 1:1500) and Somatostatin (Abcam, ab103790, 1:200) while a strong positive cellular reaction was detected for Synaptophysin (Dako,1:3000), CD56 (Dako, 123C3, 1:50) and NSE (Dako, BBS/NC/VI-H14, 1:100) (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Immunostaining: A) Low expression (< 2%) of ki67 (10X); B) High expression of CD56 in epithelioid cells (10X); C) low expression of CgA (10X); D) Low/Moderate expression of Somatostatin (20X); E) High expression of Synaptophysin (10X); F) High expression of S100 protein in spindle cells (10X).

The final histological examination revealed a GP tumor.

After histological diagnosis, we evaluated the expression by IHC of NeuroD1 marker with primary antibody against human NeuroD1(Abcam, ab60704,1:200) for one hour of incubation. The sections were rinsed in TBS and incubated for 20 min with Novocastra Biotinylated Secondary Antibody (RE7103), a biotin-coniugated secondary antibody formulation that recognize mouse and rabbit immunoglobulins.

The sections were then rinsed in TBS and incubated for 20 min with Novocastra Streptavidin-HRP (RE104). Peroxidase reactivity was visualized using a 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB).

IHC staining of Neuro D1 was scored as follows: - , if < 5% of tumor cells were stained; +, if there were focal, weak tumor cells staining; ++, if there were moderate tumor cells staining; +++, if there were marked tumor cells staining.

NeuroD1 showed a marked positivity (+++), (Figure 3) mostly cytoplasmic, especially in ganglion and epithelioid cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Neuro D1 immunostaining: A) cytoplasmic positivity in epithelioid and ganglion cells (4X); B) cytoplasmic positivity in epithelioid cells (40X).

Finally, for gene expression analysis, total RNA was isolated from a frozen biopsy of the tumor stored in our Institutional Bio-Bank, using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The sample was treated with RNase-free DNase (Qiagen GmbH, Hilde, Germany) to prevent amplification of genomic DNA. A total of 1 mg RNA was subjected to cDNA synthesis. Quantitative Real Time -PCR (qRT PCR) was performed in a Light Cycler system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) using specific TaqMan Gene Expression Assays for human NeuroD1 (Real Time Designer Assay cod. 05583055001, Roche Molecular Biochemicals).

qRT PCR analysis showed NeuroD1 over-expression compared to other cancer samples used as controls (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Real time PCR expression of NeuroD1: 1) pancreatic normal sample; 2) pancreatic tumor sample; 3) prostatic tumor sample; 4) GP sample. All reactions were performed in triplicate and data are expressed as mean of relative amount of mRNAs levels.


GP is a rare neuroendocrine tumor of the digestive tract (GEP-NET ), originating in the hindgut, and mainly located at the second portion of the duodenum. It is usually benign.

Histopathological diagnosis of the disease requires the detection of a triphasic pattern of growth, represented by three cellular components: epithelioid cells, spindle shaped cells and ganglion-like cells [1].

The majority of the reported cases of duodenal GP has been of benign nature, even if some cases in literature showed the presence of regional lymph nodes metastasis [5]. Distant metastases have not been observed. Radical surgery with lymph node dissection is therefore required.

In the new WHO classification of NET(2010), the only parameter of prognostic value is represented by Ki67 index expression.

The case reported in this paper was characterized by a sessile polypoid lesion that at routine histopathological examination was diagnosed as duodenal GP, with negativity for CK 7 and CK 20 and with positivity for several neuroendocrine markers.

Since the identification of new molecular markers of both diagnostic and prognostic value becoming increasingly necessary, we decided to evaluate the expression of another neuroendocrine marker, NeuroD1, recently described in GEP-NET and other malignancies.

Our data, derived from immunohistochemistry, confirmed the positive protein expression of the NeuroD1 marker in this case of GP. Furthermore, we have also determined NeuroD1 gene expression on the same fresh cryopreserved sample, showing even in this case an overexpression of the marker.

The aberrant expression of NeuroD1 in GP, although a very rare tumor, could complete the panel of neuroendocrine markers for the diagnosis of these tumors.

Moreover, NeuroD1 may be identified on a largest casuistry of NETs to verify its role in the pathogenesis of these malignancies.


Even if GP follows a benign course and invasive growth patterns and lymph node metastasis are rare events, the identification of new molecular markers markers associated with its neuroendocrine differentiation, is necessary.

In this context, Neuro D1 could be an important element also for the development of more tailored therapies for patients with this disease, as already described for other neuroendocrine tumors [1113].



Authors’ Affiliations

Pathology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G Pascale”-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
Division of Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G Pascale”-IRCCS, Naples, Italy


  1. Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT, Capella C, Klimstra DS, Klo¨ppel G, Komminoth P, Solcia E: Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 2010, Lyon: IARC PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Jinchen H, Jitao W, Cai L, Jiang L, Lang Z, Qu G, Liu H, Yao W, Yu G: Retroperitoneal composite pheochromocytoma-ganglioneuroma: a case report and review of literature. Diagn Pathol. 2013, 8: 63-10.1186/1746-1596-8-63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. He J, Wang X, Zheng W, Zhao Y: Retroperitoneal paraganglioma with metastasis to the abdominal vertebra: a case report. Diagn Pathol. 2013, 8: 52-10.1186/1746-1596-8-52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sundararajan V, Robinson-Smith TM, Lowy AM: Duodenal gangliocytic paraganglioma showing lymph node metastasis: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003, 127: 139-141.Google Scholar
  5. Okubo Y, Yokose T, Tuchiya M, Mituda A, Wakayama M, Hasegawa C, Sasai D, Nemoto T, Shibuya K: Duodenal gangliocyticparaganglioma showing lymph node metastasis: a rare case report. Diagn Pathol. 2010, 5: 27-10.1186/1746-1596-5-27.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Moyana TN, Xiang J, Senthilselvan A, Kulaga A: The spectrum of neuroendocrine differentiation among gastrointestinal carcinoids: importance of histologic grading, MIB-1, p53, and bcl-2 immunoreactivity. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000, 124: 570-576.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee JE, Hollenberg SM, Snider L: Conversion of Xenopus ectoderm into neurons by NeuroD, a basic helix-loop-helix protein. Science. 1995, 268: 836-884. 10.1126/science.7754368.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Shida T, Furuya M, Kishimoto T, Nikaido T, Tanizawa T, Koda K, Oda K, Takano S, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H, Ohtsuka M, Nakatani Y, Miyazaki M: The expression of NeuroD and mASH1 in the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Mod Pathol. 2008, 21: 1363-1370. 10.1038/modpathol.2008.121.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cindolo L, Franco R, Cantile M, Schiavo G, Liguori G, Chiodini P, Salzano L, Autorino R, Di Blasi A, Falsaperla M, Feudale E, Botti G, Gallo A, Cillo C: NeuroD1 expression in human prostate cancer: can it contribute to neuroendocrine differentiation comprehension?. Eur Urol. 2007, 52: 1365-1373. 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.030.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Cindolo L, Cantile M, Franco R, Chiodini P, Schiavo G, Forte I, Zlobec I, Salzano L, Botti G, Gidaro S, Terracciano L, Cillo C: Parallel determination of NeuroD1, chromogranin-A, KI67 and androgen receptor expression in surgically treated prostate cancers. Int Braz J Urol. 2011, 37: 57-66. 10.1590/S1677-55382011000100008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffmann KM, Furukawa M, Jensen RT: Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: classification, functional syndromes, diagnosis and medical treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005, 19: 675-697.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Pinchot SN, Pitt SC, Sippel RS, Kunnimalaiyaan M, Chen H: Novel targets for the treatment and palliation of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2008, 9: 576-582.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Capdevila J, Salazar R: Molecular targeted therapies in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Target Oncol. 2009, 4: 287-296. 10.1007/s11523-009-0128-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Tatangelo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.