Skip to main content

A case report of a renal anastomosing hemangioma and a literature review: an unusual variant histologically mimicking angiosarcoma

Abstract

Anastomosing hemangioma, a benign vascular neoplasm histologically simulating angiosarcoma, is newly recognized and has been described primarily in the genitourinary tract. Here, we present a case of renal anastomosing hemangioma originating in the left kidney of a 32-year-old Chinese man with detailed computerized tomography (CT) and enhanced CT image information. The patient had no obvious signs and symptoms. The tumor was incidentally found by color Doppler imaging during a routine heath check-up. Subsequently, a detailed CT and an enhanced CT scan were performed. The tumor was well demarcated, and mahogany brown lesions, which measured 2.6 cm in maximum diameter, were observed. Microscopically, the tumor shows a lobular architecture with alternating cellular areas composed of anastomosing sinusoidal capillary-sized vessels lined by hobnail endothelial cells and edematous, hyaline paucicellular areas. Cytologically, the tumor cells were generally bland and exhibited positivity for CD31 and CD34 immunohistochemically. The patient had good status without evidence of tumor recurrence 21 months after the surgery. We suggest that more attention should be focused on this rare renal hemangioma variant and that it should not be over-diagnosed as a malignance, particularly an angiosarcoma.

Virtual Slides

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/13000_2014_159

Background

Primary benign vascular lesions of the kidney are uncommonly encountered in routine surgical pathology practice. A concern is that these lesions can mimic malignancy. Anastomosing hemangioma is a newly recognized variant of capillary hemangioma. Montgomery and Epstein recently described 6 cases of new variants of benign vascular tumors involving the kidneys, perinephric adipose tissue, and testes, which the authors designated as anastomosing hemangiomas [1]. Subsequently, more cases of this novel vascular tumor have been reported. Previously, this tumor seemed to be unique in the genitourinary system [1]–[3], with a particular proclivity for the kidney. However, more reports showed that, in addition to the genitourinary system, the adrenal gland [4], liver and gastrointestinal tract were potential sites [5]. Microscopically, this tumor is composed of anastomosing sinusoidal capillary-sized vessels and can be over-diagnosed as a malignance, particularly an angiosarcoma [2],[3],[6]. It is of great clinical importance, for misdiagnosis will results in disastrous consequence to the patient. Anastomosing hemangioma is a benign lesion that can be cured by local excision, while angiosarcoma is a malignant tumor that is capable of metastasis and may not be fully eradicated by localized surgical removal. Until recently, approximately 30 cases of anastomosing hemangiomas had been reported, but rarely with CT image information, and only 1 case was from China. Here, we describe a case of anastomosing hemangioma in a Chinese patient with detailed CT and enhanced CT scan image information. In addition, a brief review of previous cases published in the English-language literature is also discussed.

Case presentation

CT scan

A 32-year-old Chinese male patient with no obviously abnormal medical history was incidentally shown to have a left kidney lesion by color Doppler imaging during a routine heath check-up. The lesion was further detected with an abdominal CT scan. An unenhanced axial CT scan showed a left renal sinus mass with a round, well-circumscribed figure that was approximately 3.4 × 2.7 cm in size (Figure 1A). It appeared to be heterogeneous, and the CT values ranged from 27–35 Hu. The boundary of the lesion showed obviously annular and nodular enhancement with 37–117 Hu in the arterial phase of the contrast-enhanced CT (Figure 1B). In the venous phase, the lesion demonstrated further intense enhancement, which extended to the center with 62–145 Hu CT values (Figure 1C). The lesion showed homogeneously persistent enhancement and a well-circumscribed boundary on delayed images with CT values ranged from 90 to 112 Hu (Figure 1D). The adjacent renal cortex was pressed and thinned, while part of the cortex demonstrated decreasing perfusion.

Figure 1
figure 1

Unenhanced axial CT and contrast-enhanced CT scans. (A) Unenhanced axial CT scan. (B) Arterial phase of contrast-enhanced CT. (C) Venous phase of contrast-enhanced CT. (D) Delayed phase of contrast-enhanced CT.

HE and immunohistochemical studies

Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and immunohistochemical staining were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. For immunohistochemical examination, sections were pretreated in a microwave oven and incubated with primary antibodies against CD31 (JC/70A; in use, Maixin, China), CD34 (QBEnd/10; 1:200; Maixin, China), Ki-67 (MIB-2;1:200 Maixin,China), and SMA(1A4, in use; Maixin, China). Immunohistochemistry was performed with an immunohistochemistry autostainer (BenchMArk,XT, ROCHE), with diaminobenzidine as the chromogen and Mayer’s hematoxylin as the counterstain.

Results

Macroscopic examination demonstrated a round, well-circumscribed mass composed of firm, fleshy, mahogany brown tissue that measured 2.6 cm in maximum diameter, which abutted but did not invade the surrounding renal tissue.

Microscopically, the tumor was well demarcated but had no capsula. It demonstrated a loosely lobular architecture and showed no evidence of vascular invasion, necrosis or invasion into the perirenal fat or renal tissue. It showed alternating cellular and paucicellular areas at low power. At higher magnification, the tumor was composed of anastomosing sinusoidal capillary-sized vessels. The vessels were lined by hobnail endothelial cells and a flat endothelium focally. Zones of sclerosis and deposition of collagen between the sinusoidal vessels were observed. Cytologically, the tumor cells lacked cellular atypia, multilayering of endothelial cells and apoptotic figures or mitotic activity, although a slight degree of nuclear enlargement was observed. Scant lymphocytes were found, but no plasma cells or acute inflammatory cells were observed (Figure 2A-D). Immunohistochemical studies showed that the tumor cells were diffusely positive for CD31 (Figure 3A) and CD 34 (Figure 3B), and the stroma cells were positive for SMA (Figure 3C). Ki-67 (Figure 3D) expression was approximately 1% positive in tumor cells, which showed a lower proliferation index for the tumor.

Figure 2
figure 2

Histologic features of anastomosing hemangioma. (A) At low power, the tumor was well demarcated but had no capsula (HE; magnification × 40). (B) At higher magnification, the tumor was composed of anastomosing sinusoidal capillary-sized vessels. Scattered intravascular thrombi associated with extravasated, intact RBCs and hemosiderin were seen (HE; magnification × 100). (C) At higher power the tumor cells appeared oval to spindle in shape with minimal pleomorphism (HE; magnification × 200). (D) Under high magnification, the tumor cells lacked cellular atypia, multilayering of endothelial cells and apoptotic figures or mitotic activity (HE; magnification × 400).

Figure 3
figure 3

Immunohistochemical expression of the tumor. (A) CD 31 (HE; magnification × 100); (B) CD34 (HE; magnification × 200); (C) SMA (HE; magnification × 400) and (D) Ki-67 (HE; magnification × 100).

The histopathologic appearance and immunophenotypic feature of the tumor were indicative of a vascular tumor; however, as we lacked experience with tumor diagnosis, we could not exclude a high-differentiated angiosarcoma. After consultation with Dr. Joan Chen at the Elizabeth Hospital (Hong Kong, China), the lesion was diagnosed as an anatomosing hemangioma.

Discussion

Whereas most renal malignancies in adults are epithelial in origin, a small number are mesenchymal. Of these, vascular tumors and tumor-like lesions account for a very small subset [7]. They include a range of benign and malignant lesions, but most of these lesions are benign [3]. Though vascular tumors of the kidney are extremely unusual, hemangiomas of the kidney remain the most common renal vascular tumor [8]–[10]; in addition, rare cases such as hemangioblastoma was reported in kidney [11].

In 2009, Montgomery and Epstein described 6 cases of new variants of benign vascular tumors involving the kidneys, perinephric adipose tissue, and testes, which were designated as anastomosing hemangiomas [1]. Subsequently, more cases were reported that included the genitourinary system, adrenal gland [4], liver and gastrointestinal tract [5]. Including our case, a total of 31 cases (32 tumors; one patient had two lesions, one in each kidney) presented with a wide age range from 21 years to 83 years (median, 54 years; average, 56.3 years), with most patients within their fifth to sixth decade in age. These tumors showed a slight predilection for females, with a male to female ratio of approximately 1.38:1 (18:13). However, the tumor showed a slight predilection for males if only one kidney was involved [6]. Involved sites included the kidney (61.3%, 19/31), liver (12.9%, 4/31), ovary (9.6%, 3/31), testis (6.5%, 2/31), colon and small bowel (6.5%, 2/31), and adrenal gland (3.2%, 1/31). The tumor size of the 31 cases ranged from 0.1–5.0 cm (median: 2.0 cm, average: 2.1 cm). It seems that the tumor size in the liver (3.35 cm, 4/31) was larger than in the bowel (2.5 cm, 2/31), the kidney (2.1 cm, 20/31; 19 cases, one patient with two tumors), the adrenal gland (2.0 cm, 1/31), and testis (1.6 cm, 2/31). In the ovary, the tumor was the smallest of all tumors in these cases (0.46 cm). The reported clinical manifestations were variable, and some of them were detected incidentally by radiographic investigations for other unrelated reasons; some of the tumors showed a palpable mass in a superficial organ such as the testis; however, it is worthy to note that, in the kidney, approximately 37% (7/19) of the kidney lesions were associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD; Table 1) [6].

Table 1 Summary of the reported cases of anatomosing hemangioma

Radiologically, because of their general small size and nonspecific imaging findings, renal hemangiomas were rarely diagnosed preoperatively [12]. Imaging information about anastomosing hemangiomas in the kidney is limited. In our case, fortunately, we had unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT image information. The unenhanced axial CT scan showed a left renal sinus mass with a round, well-circumscribed figure that appeared to be heterogeneous. The boundary of the lesion showed an obviously annular and nodular enhancement in the arterial phase of the contrast-enhanced CT scan. In the venous phase, the lesion demonstrated further intense enhancement. The lesion showed homogeneously persistent enhancement and a well-circumscribed boundary on delayed images. The adjacent renal cortex was pressed and thinned, while part of the cortex demonstrated decreasing perfusion.

Macroscopically, anastomosing hemangiomas were 0.1–6 cm in diameter and were well demarcated but always with no capsula. They were accompanied by a mahogany brown spongy appearance, and there was no grossly evident necrosis or vascular invasion [1]–[7],[13].

Microscopically, most lesions were well marginated, but some showed a focally infiltrative pattern and even areas of intravascular extension [1],[2],[6]. At low power, the lesions demonstrated a loosely lobulated architecture, with alternating cellular zones and hypocellular areas. The cellular areas comprised proliferations of capillary sized vessels in an anastomosing pattern, while the paucicelluar areas comprised loose stroma tissue with elastic thin-walled blood vessels [1],[3],[7],[13],[14]. At higher magnification, the vessels were lined by hobnail endothelial cells and a flat endothelium focally. Zones of sclerosis and deposition of collagen between the sinusoidal vessels were observed. Scattered intravascular thrombi in small vessels associated with extravasated, intact RBCs and hemosiderin could be seen. Cytologically, a slight degree of nuclear enlargement was found, but cellular atypia, multilayering of endothelial cells and apoptotic figures or mitotic activity were not detected. Scant lymphocytes were observed, but no plasma cells or acute inflammatory cells were observed. Extramedullary hematopoiesis and intracytoplasmic hyaline globules have been reported in some cases, but not in all [2],[3]. It is worth mentioning that intracytoplasmic hyaline globules may facilitate but not confirm a diagnosis of anastomosing hemangioma, nor can it be a mark for differentiating benign or malignant tumors, for it can be observed in many other vascular lesions, including benign and malignant tumors such as papillary hemangiomas [15], pyogenic graulomas [16], Kaposi sarcomas [17], angiosarcomsa [18], and others. It has been interpreted as thanatosomes (secondary lysosomes), which show a positive PAS-D stain in all cases [2],[17],[18]. Immunohistochemical studies showed that the tumor cells were diffusely positive for CD34 and CD 31, the stroma cells were positive for SMA, and Ki-67 showed low proliferation activity of the tumor cells.

A differential diagnosis occurs both with benign and malignant vascular tumors, benign lesions such as intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia [19], atypical florid vascular proliferation [20], which are rarely seen in the kidney; malignant lesions such as epithelioid hemangioendothelioma [21] and angiosarcomas et al. Of all, differential diagnosis with angiosarcoma is of great importance. In our case, the possibility of an angiosarcoma was raised. An angiosarcoma can contain hyaline globules, with the former commonly displaying an anastomosing vascular pattern and hobnail endothelial cells, which could be confused with anastomosing hemangiomas. However, all the reported cases of anastomosing hemangiomas revealed almost no endothelial atypia, an absence of multi-layering and papillary endothelial tufting, and virtually an absence of mitotic activity or apoptotic figures, which are all features that would be unusual for angiosarcomas, which frequently exhibit frankly malignant natures both histologically and clinically [13]. Immunohistochemistry for SMA is helpful. It was found that SMA was positive in the myxoid supporting stroma cells of the anastomosing hemangioma, but negative in angiosarcomas.

All of the reported cases were treated with surgery. Of the 31 cases, follow-up information was available for 26 patients [1]–[7],[13]. Except for one patient who died of unrelated disease, no patients experienced tumor recurrences or metastases. However, many of these cases were recently recognized as having somewhat limited follow-up availability. Long-term surveillance of more cases is warranted to arrive at any definitive conclusion on expected biological behavior.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we presented a case of anastomosing hemangioma, a recently described variant of a capillary hemangioma in the kidney, with detailed CT and enhanced CT scan image information. In addition, we summarized the clinicopathologic features of all 32 such lesions published in the literature. These lesions are characterized by anastomosing vessel proliferation, which could lead to a false diagnosis of angiosarcoma. As pathologists, we need to be aware of this subset of hemangiomas and should not interpret these lesions as malignant.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case Report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

References

  1. Montgomery E, Epstein JI: Anastomosing hemangioma of the genitourinary tract: a lesion mimicking angiosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009, 33: 1364-1369. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181ad30a7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kryvenko ON, Gupta NS, Meier FA, Lee MW, Epstein JI: Anastomosing hemangioma of the genitourinary system: eight cases in the kidney and ovary with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011, 136: 450-457. 10.1309/AJCPJPW34QCQYTMT.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wetherell DR, Skene A, Manya K, Manecksha RP, Chan Y, Bolton DM: Anastomosing haemangioma of the kidney: a rare morphological variant of haemangioma characteristic of genitourinary tract location. Pathology. 2013, 45: 193-196. 10.1097/PAT.0b013e32835c782b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ross M, Polcari A, Picken M, Sankary H, Milner J: Anastomosing hemangioma arising from the adrenal gland. Urology. 2012, 80: e27-e28. 10.1016/j.urology.2012.05.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin J, Bigge J, Ulbright TM: Anastomosing hemangioma of the liver and gastrointestinal tract: an unusual variant histologically mimicking angiosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013, 37: 1761-1765. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182967e6c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao M, Li C, Zheng J, Sun K: Anastomosing hemangioma of the kidney: a case report of a rare subtype of hemangioma mimicking angiosarcoma and review of the literature.Int J. Clin Exp Pathol. 2013, 6: 757-765.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown JG, Folpe AL, Rao P, Lazar AJ, Paner GP, Gupta R, Cheville JC, Amin MB: Primary vascular tumors and tumor-like lesions of the kidney: a clinicopathologic analysis of 25 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010, 34: 942-949. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e4f32a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Da Costa NF, Renteria JM, Di Biase FG: Renal hemangioma. Int Braz J Urol. 2004, 30: 216-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jahn H, Nissen HM: Haemangioma of the urinary tract: review of the literature. Int J Urol. 1997, 4: 90-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell A, Fellows GJ, Smith JC: Partial nephrectomy for renal harmangioma. J R Soc Med. 1982, 75: 766-767. 10.1097/00007611-198206000-00040.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Y, Qiu XS, Wang EH: Sporadic Hemangioblastoma of the Kidney: a rare renal tumor.Diagn Pathol 2012, 7:49.,

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Katabathina VS, Vikram R, Nagar AM, Tamboli P, Menias CO, Prasad SR: Mesenchymal neoplasms of the kidney in adults: imaging spectrum with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2010, 30: 1525-1540. 10.1148/rg.306105517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehta V, Ananthanarayanan V, Antic T, Krausz T, Milner J, Venkataraman G, Picken MM: Primary benign vascular tumors and tumor-like lesions of the kidney: a clinicopathologic analysis of 15 cases. Virchows Arch. 2012, 461: 669-676. 10.1007/s00428-012-1333-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leggio L, Addolorato G, Abenavoli L, Ferrulli A, D’Angelo C, Mirijello A, Vonghia L, Schinzari G, Arena V, Perrone L, Citterio F, Bonomo L, Rapaccini GL, Capelli A, Barone C, Gasbarrini G: Primary renal angiosarcoma: a rare malignancy. A case report and review of the literature. Urol Oncol. 2006, 24: 307-312. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.10.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee H, Meier FA, Ma CK, Ormsby AH, Lee MW: Eosinophilic globules in 3 cases of glomeruloid hemangioma of the head and neck: a characteristic offering more evidence for thanatosomes with or without POEMS. Am J Dermatopathol. 2008, 30: 539-544. 10.1097/DAD.0b013e318182c800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukunaga M, Silverberg SG: Hyaline globules in Kaposi’s sarcoma: a light microscopic and immunohistochemical study. Mod Pathol. 1991, 4: 187-190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kao GF, Johnson FB, Sulica VI: The nature of hyaline (eosinophilic) globules and vascular slits of Kaposi’s sarcoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 1990, 12: 256-267. 10.1097/00000372-199006000-00006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vuletin JC, Wajsbort RR, Ghali V: Primary retroperitoneal angiosarcoma with eosinophilic globules. A combined light-microscopic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990, 114 (6): 618-622.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Akdur N, Donmez M, Gozel S, Ustun H, Hucumenoglu S: Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia: histomorphological and immunohistochemical features.Diagn Pathol 2013, 14(8):167.,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gu MJ, Choi JH, Kim SH: Atypical florid vascular proliferation in appendix: a diagnostic dilemma.Diagn Pathol 2013, 24(8):12.,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Flucke U, Vogels RJC, de Saint Aubain Somerhausen N, Creytens DH, Riedl RG, van Gorp JM, Milne AN, Huysentruyt CJ, Verdijk MAJ, van Asseldonk MM, Suurmeijer AJH, Bras J, Palmedo G, Groenen PJTA, Mentzel T: Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: clinicopathologic, immunhistochemical, and molecular genetic analysis of 39 cases.Diagn Pathol 2014, 9:131.,

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weihua Yin.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

LLT carried out HE and immunohistochemistry stain and drafted the manuscript. YD supplied the CT and enhanced CT image information. WHY supplied the case of the patient. JC diagnosed the case. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, LL., Dai, Y., Yin, W. et al. A case report of a renal anastomosing hemangioma and a literature review: an unusual variant histologically mimicking angiosarcoma. Diagn Pathol 9, 159 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-014-0159-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-014-0159-y

Keywords