Open Access

Biphenotypic human papillomavirus-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a report of two cases

  • Gayani Pitiyage1,
  • Mary Lei2,
  • Teresa Guererro Urbano2,
  • Edward Odell1, 3 and
  • Selvam Thavaraj1, 3Email author
Diagnostic Pathology201510:97

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-015-0334-9

Received: 11 May 2015

Accepted: 25 June 2015

Published: 11 July 2015

Abstract

Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is now recognised as a subtype of head and neck cancer with distinct clinical, molecular and histological characteristics. The majority of these carcinomas are of non-keratinising squamous type but there is a growing number of histomorphologic variants of this disease. Here we describe the clinical, histomorphologic and immunophenotypic features of two cases of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma demonstrating a clearly delineated biphasic differentiated and undifferentiated phenotype.

Keywords

Biphasic Biphenotypic Differentiated Human papillomavirus Oropharyngeal Squamous cell carcinoma Undifferentiated Variant

Background

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OpSCC) associated with high-risk subtypes of human papillomavirus (HPV) demonstrates distinct demographic and clinical characteristics. These carcinomas often arise in non-smokers who do not consume alcohol to excess and present on average 5–6 years earlier than site and staged matched HPV-negative carcinomas [1]. Importantly, patients with HPV-associated OpSCC have significantly improved overall and disease-specific survival compared to HPV-negative controls. Alongside these observations, HPV-associated OpSCC have also been shown to contain fewer cumulative mutations and demonstrate particular histomorphological features [2, 3], recapitulating the reticulated crypt of Waldeyer’s ring and lacking keratin with little or absent squamous maturation [4]. Other microscopic features strongly predictive of HPV-association are an architectural arrangement as broad interconnecting strands, large islands or sheets, a well-delineated invasive front and lack of significant stromal desmoplasia [5]. These clinicopathological features have led some authorities to call for recognition of HPV-associated OpSCC as a distinct entity in future classifications [6].

While the majority of HPV-associated OpSCC are of non-keratinising type, a growing number of divergent morphological types have been described recently. These include basaloid squamous cell carcinoma, papillary squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, lymphoepithelial carcinoma and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma [712]. These reports are limited to isolated cases or small series and the clinical and biological significance of these subtypes are yet to be elucidated, particularly whether these histological subtypes have similar prognostic implications to conventional non-keratinising OpSCC. Defining the morphological diversity of HPV-associated OpSCC is necessary to determine the clinical behaviour of these possible variants.

We describe the clinical, histomorphologic and immunophenotypic features of two cases of HPV-associated OpSCC demonstrating a clearly delineated biphasic differentiated and undifferentiated phenotype.

Case presentation

Case 1

A fifty-nine year old male presented with a 4 × 2 cm lump in the right neck at level II. He had noticed the swelling for less than one week but reported a three year history of sore throat, fatigue, reduced exercise tolerance and shortness of breath. He had never smoked and consumed 18 international units of alcohol per week. There was no other lymphadenopathy and no intra-oral abnormality. Fine needle aspiration cytology was inconclusive and the patient underwent a diagnostic lymph node excision for histological evaluation, which showed metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) and 15fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) were undertaken to identify the primary site and revealed a 2 cm mass involving the right tonsil with a right sided level II lymph node mass extending into the deep lobe of the right parotid gland. He was treated with radical chemoradiation comprising image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivering 65Gy in 30 fractions to the oropharynx and right neck level II with 54Gy in 30 fractions to right neck levels III to V and left neck levels II to V. Concomitant cisplatin 100 mg/m2 was given on days 1 and 29 of radiotherapy. A FDG-PET/CT scan performed at 3 months post-treatment confirmed a complete metabolic response. The patient remains disease free after 15 months.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Histological evaluation of the excised lymph showed complete effacement by carcinoma comprising two clearly demarcated and morphologically distinct subpopulations of cells. In most areas, the two subpopulations were separated by fibrous tissue bands. Where the two phenotypes were not separated by fibrous tissue, there was abrupt delineation of the subpopulations without any intermediate transition. One component was composed of broad interconnecting strands of tumour cells with obvious squamous maturation but with minimal keratinisation typical of conventional HPV-associated OpSCC, designated the ‘differentiated’ component. The second component, referred to as the ‘undifferentiated’ component, was arranged as syncytial sheets of cells with comparatively large vesicular nuclei (Fig. 1a, b and c). Immunohistochemically, both components demonstrated strong nuclear positivity for p63 (1:50, Clone 4A4, Santa Cruz) and strong nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for p16 (pre-diluted, CINTec, MTM Laboratories) in greater than 70 % of tumour cells (Fig. 1d and e). While the differentiated component demonstrated strong and moderate staining for CK5/6 (1:25, Clone D5/16 B4, Dako; Fig. 1g) and Vimentin (1:500, Clone V9, Dako; Fig. 1j), respectively, expression of these proteins were weak to absent in the undifferentiated component. Similarly, while there was moderate protein expression of CK8/18 (1:2, Clone Cam5.2, Dako) and CK19 (1:50, Clone RCK108, Dako) in the differentiated areas, there was no staining for these cytokeratins in the undifferentiated component (data not shown). Both components were negative for CK7 (1:200, Clone OV-TL 12/30, Dako) and CK20 (1:25, Clone Ks 20.8, Dako; data not shown). A modified quick score was used for semi-quantification of immunohistochemical staining. Briefly, the proportion and intensity of staining was quantified from 0–5 and 0–3, respectively. The quick score is the sum of the proportion and intensity giving a range of 0–8 [13]. There was also a greater proliferation index (Ki-67; 1:50, Clone MIB-1, Dako; data not shown) and a denser population of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs; CD45, 1:100, Dako; Fig. 1h) in the differentiated component in this case. By contrast, the undifferentiated cells showed strong diffuse nuclear staining for high-risk HPV DNA (Inform HPV III Family 16 probe, Ventana Medical Systems) suggestive of episomal viral DNA while the differentiated cells only showed punctate nuclear staining in a pattern consistent with viral integration (Fig. 1f).
Fig. 1

Representative histological and immunohistochemical photomicrographs of Case 1. a-c. Low, medium and high power views (original magnification x25, x100 and x200, respectively, H&E), d. p63, e. p16, f. high-risk HPV ISH, g. CK5/6, h. CD45, j. Vimentin

Case 2

A fifty-four year old male presented with an eight month history of right-sided level II neck lump. He had a life-long history of smoking 10 cigarettes a day and heavy alcohol use of 40 international units per week. Examination revealed a 2 cm right sided tonsillar mass extending to the tonsillar pillar and the soft palate with a 6 × 4 cm right sided neck mass spanning levels II and III. Tonsil biopsy confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. The patient was treated with two 3-weekly cycles of induction chemotherapy comprising cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 on days 1–4, followed by radical chemoradiation. IMRT consisted of 65Gy in 30 fractions to the oropharynx and right neck levels Ib, II and the upper part of level III and 54Gy in 30 fractions to the right neck lower level III, IV and V and left neck levels II to V. Concomitant cisplatin 100 mg/m2 was delivered on days 1 and 29 of radiotherapy. A 3 month post-treatment FDG-PET-CT scan showed an equivocal FDG uptake of 4.5 maximum Standardised Uptake Variable (SUV) noted at the original site but with no mass lesion correlated on CT imaging and only low-grade FDG uptake in minimally enlarged right sided level II neck nodes. A multidisciplinary review recommended surveillance with repeat FDG-PET/CT scanning after three months.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Incisional biopsy of the right tonsil showed a biphenotypic carcinoma with features similar to those of Case 1. In addition, the differentiated component demonstrated a focal papillary architecture lacking keratinisation and centred on the tonsillar crypts (Fig. 2a, b and c). Both components demonstrated strong nuclear positivity for p63 and strong nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for p16 in greater than 70 % of tumour cells (Fig. 2d and e). By contrast to Case 1, the differentiated component showed greater percentage and intensity of staining for CK7 (Fig. 2g) and CK19. Furthermore, unlike Case 1, both components showed similar percentage and intensity for CK8/18 and similar percentage of cells in cycle (data not shown). Also by contrast to Case 1, high-risk HPV ISH showed diffuse nuclear staining in the differentiated compartment and a punctate pattern in the undifferentated areas (Fig. 2f). A slightly lower density of TILs was present in the former component (Fig. 2h). The relative expression of Vimentin in the two components was similar to that of Case 1 (Fig. 2j). The immunohistochemical profiles for cases 1 and 2 are summarised in Table 1.
Fig. 2

Representative histological and immunohistochemical photomicrographs of Case 2. a-c. Low, medium and high power views (original magnification x25, x100 and x200, respectively, H&E), d. p63, e. p16, f. high-risk HPV ISH, g. CK7, h. CD45, j. Vimentin

Table 1

Summary of patient demographic, clinical, follow-up data as well as immunohistochemical and in-situ hybridisation profiles. The immunohistochemical profile is summarised as follows: quick score 0 = −, 1–2 = +, 3–5 = ++, 6-8 = +++. *Strong diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining in >70 % of tumour cells

 

Case 1

Case 2

Age

59

54

Sex

Male

Male

TNM

T2 N2b

T1 N2b

Treatment

Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy

Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy

Follow-up

18 months

6 months

Immunophenotype

Differentiated component

Undifferentiated component

Differentiated component

Undifferentiated component

 AE1/3

+++

+++

+++

+++

 CK5/6

+++

+

+++

+++

 CK7

-

-

++

-

 CK8/18

+++

+

++

++

 CK19

+++

-

+++

++

 CK20

-

++

-

-

 Vimentin

+++

++

++

++

 Ki-67

+++

++

+++

+++

 p63

+++

+++

+++

+++

 p16*

+++

+++

+++

+++

HR-HPV ISH

Fine, punctate

Strong, diffuse

Strong, diffuse

Fine, punctate

TILs

+++ (>75 %)

+ (25-50 %)

+ (25-50 %)

++ (50-75 %)

Discussion

Determining the HPV status of OpSCCs has important prognostic significance since it is now well established that patients with HPV-associated tumours have improved outcome compared to site-matched HPV-negative controls [14, 15]. In addition to distinctive clinical and demographic features, HPV-associated OpSCC has particular histological features. They recapitulate the tonsil reticulated crypt epithelium, lack keratinisation, form syncytial sheets with inconspicuous intercellular bridges and often contain areas of central necrosis. Furthermore, these tumours invade as sheets, broad interconnecting strands or large islands, lack stromal desmoplasia and have a rich tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) population. [5, 6]. Chernock et al. used the term ‘non-keratinising’ to describe these features and demonstrated a strong positive correlation with HPV status [2]. Interestingly, this non-keratinising morphology predicts improved survival and has strong inter-observer reliability among pathologists [2, 16]. In a subsequent review article, Chernock postulated that recognition of these histological features may be of benefit in clinical situations where p16 immunohistochemistry or HPV-specific testing are not available [5]. However, it is important to note that using histomorphological criteria to predict HPV status, and thereby as a prognostic indicator’ is limited to the ‘keratinising’ and ‘non-keratinising’ subtypes of OpSCC.

While the great majority of HPV-associated OpSCCs are of ‘non-keratininsing’ type, there is a growing number of reports detailing divergent phenotypes including basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), papillary SCC, adenosquamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated (lymphoepithelial) carcinoma and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma [712, 1720]. However, further work is necessary to determine whether the biphenotypic variant has prognostic implications compared with conventional HPV-associated OpSCC.

There have been recent calls to replace the current World Health Organisation OpSCC grading system of well-, moderately- and poorly-differentiated with a three tier system of ‘keratinising SCC’, ‘non-keratinising SCC’ and ‘non-keratinising SCC with maturation’ [5, 6, 16, 21]. The latter, which has also been termed ‘hybrid SCC’, is described as ‘consisting of definitive areas with non-keratinising SCC morphology but also having maturing squamous differentiation comprising >10 % of tumour surface area.’ [16]. In this subtype, there is a gradual transition from conventional areas of non-keratinising SCC to area with squamous maturation or ‘frank keratinisation’. There are several differences between the cases described in the current report and the ‘non-keratinising SCC with maturation’. In the former, two phenotypes are morphologically and immunophenotypically distinct and there is lack of transition between the differentiated and undifferentiated components; a zone of fibrous tissue almost always separates the two areas (Figs. 1a, b, c, 2a, b and c). Furthermore, in the current cases the ‘undifferentiated’ component demonstrated features similar to those described as HPV-associated lymphoepithelial carcinoma [11]. These features do not fulfil the criteria of a ‘non-keratinising SCC with maturation’ as originally described and the cases in the current report are histomorphologically distinct [5, 16].

In the two cases reported here, both components demonstrated similar staining patterns for p16, p63, CK19 and Vimentin. Interestingly, in Case 1, strong staining for high-risk HPV DNA ISH, a function of viral copy number [22], was present in the undifferentiated component and co-localised with weak CK5/6 staining, lack of CK7 expression and a low TIL density (Fig. 1f, h and Table 1). By contrast, Case 2 showed strong ISH staining in the differentiated component and was associated with strong CK5/6, moderate CK7 expression and a moderate density of TILs (Fig. 2f, h and Table 1). This suggests that the two phenotypes are not explained by HPV physical status or copy number alone. Recent reports demonstrate the prognostic utility of TILs in HPV-associated OpSCC [2325]. The current cases pose a prognostic dilemma since the TIL density varied markedly between component phenotypes. The lack of consistent correlation between morphological and immunophenotype with viral copy number in the current two cases raises the possibility that factors other than relative HPV oncoprotein expression are likely to influence the biological behaviour of this disease.

Conclusion

We describe two cases of biphasic HPV-associated OpSCC demonstrating distinct differentiated and undifferentiated histological phenotypes. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this entity in the literature and adds to the growing number of histological variants of HPV-associated OpSCC. Further work is required to determine the prognostic significance of this variant.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case series and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CK: 

Cytokeratin

FDG-PET/CT: 

15fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography

HPV: 

Human papillomavirus

OpSCC: 

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

TIL: 

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Head and Neck Pathology, 4th Floor Tower Wing, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
(2)
Department of Clinical Oncology, Lower Ground Floor, Lambeth Wing, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital
(3)
Mucosal and Salivary Biology, King’s College London Dental Institute, 4th Floor Tower Wing

References

  1. Gillison ML, D'Souza G, Westra W, Sugar E, Xiao W, Begum S, et al. Distinct risk factor profiles for human papillomavirus type 16-positive and human papillomavirus type 16-negative head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:407–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chernock RD, El-Mofty SK, Thorstad WL, Parvin CA, Lewis Jr JS. HPV-related nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: utility of microscopic features in predicting patient outcome. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3:186–94.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal N, Frederick MJ, Pickering CR, Bettegowda C, Chang K, Li RJ, et al. Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1. Science. 2011;333:1154–7.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Westra WH. The morphologic profile of HPV-related head and neck squamous carcinoma: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6 Suppl 1:S48–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chernock RD. Morphologic features of conventional squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: 'keratinizing' and 'nonkeratinizing' histologic types as the basis for a consistent classification system. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6 Suppl 1:S41–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewis Jr JS, Chernock RD. Human papillomavirus and Epstein Barr virus in head and neck carcinomas: suggestions for the new WHO classification. Head Neck Pathol. 2014;8:50–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chernock RD, Lewis Jr JS, Zhang Q, El-Mofty SK. Human papillomavirus-positive basaloid squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract: a distinct clinicopathologic and molecular subtype of basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2010;41:1016–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jo VY, Mills SE, Stoler MH, Stelow EB. Papillary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: frequent association with human papillomavirus infection and invasive carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:1720–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Masand RP, El-Mofty SK, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Flanagan JJ, Lewis Jr JS. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the head and neck: relationship to human papillomavirus and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2011;5:108–16.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanna J, Reimann JD, Haddad RI, Krane JF. Human papillomavirus-associated adenocarcinoma of the base of the tongue. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:1516–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Singhi AD, Stelow EB, Mills SE, Westra WH. Lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma of the oropharynx: a morphologic variant of HPV-related head and neck carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:800–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bates T, McQueen A, Iqbal MS, Kelly C, Robinson M. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the oropharynx harbouring oncogenic HPV-infection. Head Neck Pathol. 2014;8:127–31.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Detre S, Saclani Jotti G, Dowsett M. A "quickscore" method for immunohistochemical semiquantitation: validation for oestrogen receptor in breast carcinomas. J Clin Pathol. 1995;48:876–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rainsbury JW, Ahmed W, Williams HK, Roberts S, Paleri V, Mehanna H. Prognostic biomarkers of survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2013;35:1048–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Robinson M, Schache A, Sloan P, Thavaraj S. HPV specific testing: a requirement for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6 Suppl 1:S83–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis Jr JS, Khan RA, Masand RP, Chernock RD, Zhang Q, Al-Naief NS, et al. Recognition of nonkeratinizing morphology in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma - a prospective cohort and interobserver variability study. Histopathology. 2012;60:427–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. El-Mofty SK. HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma variants in the head and neck. Head and neck pathology. 2012;6 Suppl 1:S55–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bishop JA, Westra WH. Human papillomavirus-related small cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1679–84.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Begum S, Westra WH. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is a mixed variant that can be further resolved by HPV status. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1044–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kraft S, Faquin WC, Krane JF. HPV-associated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the oropharynx: a rare new entity with potentially aggressive clinical behavior. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:321–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Barnes L. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Bishop JA, Ma XJ, Wang H, Luo Y, Illei PB, Begum S, et al. Detection of transcriptionally active high-risk HPV in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as visualized by a novel E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization method. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1874–82.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ritta M, Landolfo V, Mazibrada J, De Andrea M, Dell'Oste V, Caneparo V, et al. Human papillomavirus tumor-infiltrating T-regulatory lymphocytes and P53 codon 72 polymorphisms correlate with clinical staging and prognosis of oropharyngeal cancer. New Microbiol. 2013;36:133–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nordfors C, Grun N, Tertipis N, Ahrlund-Richter A, Haeggblom L, Sivars L, et al. CD8+ and CD4+ tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in relation to human papillomavirus status and clinical outcome in tonsillar and base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:2522–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. King EV, Ottensmeier CH, Thomas GJ. The immune response in HPV oropharyngeal cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3, e27254.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pitiyage et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement