Open Access

Expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in rat brain lesions following traumatic brain injury

  • Kai Xu1,
  • Zicheng Yang1,
  • Rongchen Shi1,
  • Chunxia Luo2 and
  • Zhiren Zhang1Email author
Diagnostic Pathology201611:72

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-016-0522-2

Received: 9 April 2016

Accepted: 31 July 2016

Published: 9 August 2016

Abstract

Background

Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor with multiple functions operating in a variety of organs, including the brain. Recent studies have revealed that AhR played a functional role in traumatic injuries. This paper aims to study the expression of AhR during the early phase following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) in rat brains by immunohistochemistry.

Methods

Weight-drop induced TBI was performed in rats. The expression of AhR in brain of TBI rats were examined by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Neuron expression of AhR in the rat brains of experiment group had been upregulated since day 3 in lesional hemisphere compared to that of the control group and mainly located in the cytoplasm, indicating an inactivated state. Interestingly, the accumulation of AhR+ non-neuron cells became significant as early as 18 h after injury, which had kept increasing until 24 h post injury and then decreased slowly. For AhR+ non-neuron cells, the AhR mainly located in cell nucleus, indicating a reactive status. Furthermore, double staining showed that most AhR+ non-neuron cells co-localized with W3/13, a marker for T lymphocytes, but not with ED-1 (for activated microglia/macrophages) or GFAP (for activated astrocytes), suggesting that most AhR+ non-neuron cells were T lymphocytes.

Conclusion

This is the first study concerning AhR expression in brains following TBI, and our data demonstrated that AhR was upregulated and activated in T lymphocytes following TBI. More research is needed to make a more conclusive conclusion.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury T lymphocytes Aryl hydrocarbon receptor

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health threat in the society. While the contact and initial force cause multifocal lesions, the secondary injury can be more dreadful and diffuse. Delayed neuronal death in secondary injury can be due to several cellular and subcellular cascades such as release of excitatory amino acid (EAA), influx of Ca++ , and mechanical distortion of the cell membrane [1].

Immune responses in the CNS have recently drawn lots of attention, despite its long-lasting perception as a site of immune privilege [2]. The infiltration of immune cells following TBI has been well documented for some cell types, including neutrophils, microglia/macrophages and T lymphocytes [3]. Activated neutrophils upregulate adhesion molecules to enhance their association and migration into tissues and produce reactive intermediates, cytokines and chemokines, etc. Activated microglia/macrophages show high heterogeneity, and the activation may be beneficial, deleterious, or neutral [2]. Moreover, functions of T lymphocytes are more complicated. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that enter the brain [4] and different subsets of T cells are involved in contradictory activities like a double-edged sword [5]. These immune cells orchestrate and lead to neuronal degeneration or regeneration/repair depending on the context [2]. However, details on the changes and exact roles of immune cells following TBI remain scarce.

Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor of the basic helix-loop-helix/per-ARNT-Sim (bHLH/PAS) superfamily [6]. It can be activated by a variety of exogenous and endogenous compounds [7]. Upon ligand binding, AhR translocates into the nucleus to form an active heterodimeric complex [8] and triggers rapid transcriptional activations [9] in a variety of organs and cell systems. In addition to the classical knowledge of responding to environmental toxicants via exogenous ligands, recent studies pointed out that the physiological functions of AhR included cell differentiation, apoptosis [10, 11], immune response, [12] and injury repairing [13, 14].

AhR was identified in the brain [15], regulating neuronal cell cycle control and apoptosis [16]. Moreover, AhR has been identified in T lymphocytes and macrophages as a regulator of cytokine production [17]. Recent studies also revealed that AhR is involved in controlling helper T cell differentiation [18, 19]. However, the expression of AhR following TBI remains unknown. Therefore, this experiment was performed to study the spatiotemporal expression of AhR in brains of weight-drop induced TBI rats.

Methods

TBI brain tissue library

The brain libraries of the control group and the experiment group of rats used in this study have been described previously [20]. In brief, weight-drop induced TBI was performed in Lewis rats. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tuebingen University (No. HF 2/06).

Immunohistochemistry

A previous reported protocol for immunohistochemistry was applied to detect the expression of different proteins using following primary antibodies: anti-AhR (1:100; Lifespan Bioscience, Seattle, USA), anti-ED-1 (1:100; Serotec, Oxford, Great Britain) for macrophages, anti-W3/13 (1:100; Serotec, Oxford, Great Britain) for T lymphocytes and anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein for astrocytes (GFAP; 1:500; Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA) [20, 21].

Data acquisition and statistical analysis

After immunostaining, brain sections were examined by light microscopy. For single AhR staining, the numbers of AhR+ cells were counted in 8 non-overlapping high-power fields (HPFs, x400 magnification) for each section. Results were presented as arithmetic means of AhR+ cells per HPF and standard errors of means (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests (Graph Pad Prism 4.0 software). The significance levels were set at p < 0.05.

Results

In this study, open skull weight drop injury generates a reproducible local lesion in the ipsilateral cortex. The development of the lesion was first analyzed by Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) Staining and has been described previously by Zhang [20]. In brief, significant leukocyte infiltration and hemorrhage can be observed at the first day after injury. At day 4 post injury, a lesioned cavity together with its surrounding perilesional tissue loss formed under the impact areas.

The expression of AhR in TBI and non-TBI brains was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. In our applied weight-drop model, cortex is the primary injury site. Moreover, the traumatic impact may influence areas like the hippocampus, resulting in complex cognitive problems. Therefore, the expression of AhR in cortex and hippocampus was mainly investigated. In in the cortex of normal rat brains, weak AhR immunoreactivity (IR) was observed, which mainly localized to neuron cells (Fig. 1a, b). Similarlly, weak IR of AhR was detected in hippocampus of normal rats, which was observed in the pyramid cell layer of CA fields (Fig. 1c, d) and granular layer of dentate gyrus (Fig. 1e).
Fig. 1

Immunohistochemical labeling of AhR in neurons of normal brains (b, d, e, and f) and brains 3 days post-TBI. a The specificity of AhR antibody was demonstrated by staining without the primary antibody and no IR was seen. b, c Examples of coronal sections of the cortex from normal brains (b) and brains 3 days after TBI (c). AhR expression (blue dots) was observed in the neurons of brain cortex in normal brains (b) and elevated three days post injury (c). di Examples of coronal sections of the AhR expression in hippocampus from normal brains (df) and brains 3 days after TBI (gi). AhR expression was observed in neurons of pyramid cell layer of CA fields (e and h) and granular layer of dentate gyrus (f and i) in normal brains (df) and elevated in brains 3 days after TBI (gi). The boxed areas indicate regions further observed under high-power magnification. The lower boxed areas represent the area of dentate gyrus and the upper boxed areas hippocampal CA fields

After TBI, no visible change of AhR IR was detected in the contralateral hemisphere (Data not shown). In the injured (ipsilateral) sides, AhR expression in neuron cells in the cortex outside of lesion and hippocampus was upregulated since day 3. As shown in Fig. 1c, g, h and i, more AhR+ cells were observed and the IR of AhR became stronger as well compared to normal control at day 3 post injury. Interestingly, while an upregulation of AhR was observed following TBI, IR of AhR in neuron cells in the cortex and hippocampus was mainly localized to cytoplasm but not nucleus, indicating an inactivated state.

However, the accumulation of non-neuron AhR+ cells was observed in the lesion areas. We then quantified the non-neuron AhR+ cells in lesional areas. After TBI, a slight increase of AhR+ non-neuron cells was observed to be confined to the lesion as early as 18 h post-injury (p.i.) (Fig. 2; 6.3 ± 1.5 per HPF, p > 0.05 compared to normal control). The maximal accumulation of AhR+ non-neuron cells in the lesional region was observed 24 h p.i. (36.0 ± 7.6 per HPF, P < 0.001; Fig. 2 and Fig. 3b). Thereafter the accumulation of AhR+ non-neuron cells decreased with time but still remained significantly higher than normal control (48 h: 27.2 ± 5.4 per HPF, p < 0.05; 96 h: 15.6 ± 5.4 per HPF, p < 0.05; Fig. 2 and Fig. 3c, d).
Fig. 2

Time course of lesional AhR+ non-neuron cell accumulation in TBI. The numbers of parenchymal AhR+ non-neuron cells of every rat brain coronal section were counted in 8 HPFs. In each field, only positive cells with the nucleus at the focal plane were counted. Results were presented as arithmetic means of positive cells per HPF and standard errors of means (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test. *: p < 0.05 compared to normal control

Fig. 3

Accumulation of AhR+ non-neuronal cells in traumatic brains. In 12 h brains, AhR+ non-neuronal cells were rarely seen (a). Accumulation of AhR+ non-neuronal cells in the lesioned regions at day 1 (b), 2 (c) and 4 (d), respectively, after TBI. e Micrographs show that most AhR+ non-neuronal cells exhibited lymphocyte morphology with small cell body and cytoplasm (blue and brown dots). f Occasionally, the localization of AhR+ lymphocyte-like cells in the peri-vascular spaces corresponding to peri-vascular spaces was observed, indicating the blood origin. Furthermore, in AHR+ non-neuron cells, AhR was mainly localized to nucleus, suggesting an activated status (e and f)

At the lesioned site, most of the AhR+ cells exhibited lymphocyte morphology with small cell body and cytoplasm (Fig. 3e). Occasionally, the localization of AhR+ lymphocyte-like cells at the peri-vascular spaces corresponding to peri-vascular spaces was observed, indicating the blood origin (Fig. 3f). More interestingly, in AhR+ non-neuron cells, AhR mainly localized in nucleus, suggesting an activated status (Fig. 3e, f).

To further identify the cellular sources of these non-neuron AhR+ cells in the lesions, we performed double-staining experiments with W3/13 antibody (recognized T lymphocytes), ED-1 antibody (recognized activated microglia/macrophages) and GFAP antibody (recognized astrocytes). As shown in Fig. 4a, b, most non-neuron AhR + cells were co-labeled with W3/13 (more than 90 %). ED-1+ microglia/macrophages and GFAP+ astrocytes very rarely co-expressed AhR near the lesional areas following TBI (Fig. 4c, d). Therefore T cells were the major cellular sources of non neuronal AhR in the lesion areas following TBI.
Fig. 4

AhR double labeling in brain sections from day 1 after TBI. a Most AhR+ non-neuronal cells (brown) co-expressed W3/13 (blue). The boxed areas indicate the regions that were further observed under high-power magnification shown in (b). c and d: However, most AhR+ non-neuronal cells (blue) did not co-localize with ED1+ microglia (brown, c) or GFAP+ astrocytes (brown, d). Scale bar = 100 μm for (a, c) and d; 50 μm for (b)

Discussion

In this study, the expression of AhR in neurons of normal rat brain was mainly detected in the cortex and hippocampus in a low or moderate level, and occasionally found in the pyramid cell layer of CA fields, which was similar to previous report [15, 22]. In neurons, the expression of AhR increased following TBI but was mainly localized in the cytoplasm, indicating an inactivated state. However, due to the relative insensitivity of our applied method, a small amount of AhR may still exist in nucleus. Under pathological conditions, the over-expression of AhR was reported to induce neural differentiation [10] and AhR was also involved in controlling neuron cell cycle and apoptosis [11, 19].

The accumulation of AhR+ lymphocytes in lesional areas following TBI was observed in our study. Normally, T cells cannot enter the CNS. However, under pathological conditions, such as activated by CNS-derived auto-antigen and increased blood-brain barrier permeability, T cells can infiltrate into CNS parenchyma and exert multi-functions [23]. Clausen et al. reported that T lymphocytes (both CD4+and CD8+ cells) were detected in the lesional cortex at 12 h after TBI [3]. The reported infiltration, which is similar to our observation, peaked at 24 h and then slightly decreased.

Functions of T cells in brain injury are complicated and conflicting observations have been reported by different groups. Autoreactive Th1 cells by vaccination were reported to improve functional recovery after closed head injury [24]. Moreover, passive transferred autoreactive Th2 cells also accelerate recovery in spinal cord contusion [25]. However, immediate post-lesional transfer of MBP-specific T cells exacerbated lesion pathology in spinal cord contusion [26]. Furthermore, depletion of regulatory T cells (Treg) by CD25 antibody, reported by Liesz et al., profoundly increased delayed brain damage and deteriorated functional outcome in acute experimental stroke [27]. CD8+ T cells were less studied in injury models, but they are proved to infiltrate the lesion after TBI and may also play a part in the pathological process following TBI [3].

Currently, AhR can be detected in naïve T cells [28] and its expression was reported in the Th17 and Treg subsets [29] but not in Th1 or Th2 subsets [28]. Negishi et al. reported a modulation of the naïve Th cell differentiation into Th1/Th2 cells toward Th1 dominance under the activation of AhR treated by representative AhR ligands in vitro [28]. Moreover, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), the exogenous AhR ligand, promoted Treg differentiation [18], while tryptophan photoproducts 6-formylindolo-[3,2-b]-carbazole (FICZ) would promote Th17 cell differentiation [18, 19]. AhR can also be expressed in CD8+ T cells and promote CD8+ Treg cell differentiation under TCDD treatment [30]. In our investigation, accumulation of AhR+ T lymphocytes was observed following TBI. Though the exact function of AhR in TBI still remains unclear, AhR might modulate the differentiation of T lymphocytes to influence the balance of immune response and contribute to the outcome of TBI [28, 29].

Conclusions

Taken together, we have shown an early accumulation of activated AhR+ T cells in TBI. AhR expression might play a role in the degeneration/regeneration processes following TBI by modulating the differentiation of T lymphocytes. Our results warrant future studies of the AhR function in brain trauma.

Abbreviations

AhR, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor; bHLH/PAS, basic helix-loop-helix/per-ARNT-Sim; DAB, diaminobenzidine; EAA, excitatory amino acid; FICZ, 6-formylindolo-[3,2-b]-carbazole; HE, Harris Hematoxylin and Eosin; HPFs, high-power fields; p.i., post-injury; SEM, standard errors of means; TBI, traumatic brain injury

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Schluesener and Dr. Zhang, Zhi-Yuan from Institute of Brain Research, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany, for providing the TBI tissue library and kind help with immunostaining.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Projects of New Drugs (2012ZX09103301035) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81471190). Both fundings supported the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and the writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

We declared that materials described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes, without breaching participant confidentiality.

Authors’ contributions

KX participated in study design, execution, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript. RCS participated in study design and execution and analysis of data. ZCY participated in study design, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript. CXL assisted in execution of the study. ZRZ conceived of the study design, participated in data analysis and interpretation, and in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors declare that this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tuebingen University (No. HF 2/06).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Immunology, Third Military Medical University of PLA
(2)
Department of Neurology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University

References

  1. Farkas O, Povlishock JT. Cellular and subcellular change evoked by diffuse traumatic brain injury: a complex web of change extending far beyond focal damage. Prog Brain Res. 2007;161:43–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ransohoff RM, Brown MA. Innate immunity in the central nervous system. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(4):1164–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Clausen F, Lorant T, Lewen A, Hillered L. T lymphocyte trafficking: a novel target for neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(8):1295–307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Louveau A, et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature. 2015;523:337–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Arumugam TV, Granger DN, Mattson MP. Stroke and T-cells. Neuromolecular Med. 2005;7(3):229–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barouki R, Coumoul X, Fernandez-Salguero PM. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor, more than a xenobiotic-interacting protein. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(19):3608–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stejskalova L, Dvorak Z, Pavek P. Endogenous and exogenous ligands of aryl hydrocarbon receptor: current state of art. Curr Drug Metab. 2011;12(2):198–212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fraccalvieri D, Soshilov AA, Karchner SI, et al. Comparative analysis of homology models of the AH receptor ligand binding domain: verification of structure-function predictions by site-directed mutagenesis of a nonfunctional receptor. Biochemistry. 2013;52(4):714–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bock KW, Kohle C. The mammalian aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor: from mediator of dioxin toxicity toward physiological functions in skin and liver. Biol Chem. 2009;390(12):1225–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Akahoshi E, Yoshimura S, Ishihara-Sugano M. Over-expression of AHR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) induces neural differentiation of Neuro2a cells: neurotoxicology study. Environ Health. 2006;5:24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Nebert DW, Roe AL, Dieter MZ, Solis WA, Yang Y, Dalton TP. Role of the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor and [Ah] gene battery in the oxidative stress response, cell cycle control, and apoptosis. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;59(1):65–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Esser C, Rannug A, Stockinger B. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor in immunity. Trends Immunol. 2009;30(9):447–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Baban B, Liu JY, Mozaffari MS. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist, leflunomide, protects the ischemic-reperfused kidney: role of Tregs and stem cells. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012;303(11):R1136–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shivanna B, Chu C, Welty SE, Jiang W, Wang L, Couroucli XI, Moorthy B. Omeprazole attenuates hyperoxic injury in H441 cells via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(10):1910–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Petersen SL, Curran MA, Marconi SA, Carpenter CD, Lubbers LS, McAbee MD. Distribution of mRNAs encoding the arylhydrocarbon receptor, arylhydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, and arylhydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-2 in the rat brain and brainstem. J Comp Neurol. 2000;427(3):428–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kajta M, Wojtowicz AK, Mackowiak M, Lason W. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated apoptosis of neuronal cells: a possible interaction with estrogen receptor signaling. Neuroscience. 2009;158(2):811–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Imler Jr TJ, Petro TM. Decreased severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis during resveratrol administration is associated with increased IL-17 + IL-10+ T cells, CD4(-) IFN-gamma + cells, and decreased macrophage IL-6 expression. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009;9(1):134–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Quintana FJ, Basso AS, Iglesias AH, Korn T, Farez MF, Bettelli E, Caccamo M, Oukka M, Weiner HL. Control of T(reg) and T(H)17 cell differentiation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature. 2008;453(7191):65–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Veldhoen M, Hirota K, Christensen J, O'Garra A, Stockinger B. Natural agonists for aryl hydrocarbon receptor in culture medium are essential for optimal differentiation of Th17 T cells. J Exp Med. 2009;206(1):43–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang Z, Artelt M, Burnet M, Trautmann K, Schluesener HJ. Lesional accumulation of P2X4 receptor + monocytes following experimental traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2006;197(1):252–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lavin AL, Hahn DJ, Gasiewicz TA. Expression of functional aromatic hydrocarbon receptor and aromatic hydrocarbon nuclear translocator proteins in murine bone marrow stromal cells. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;352(1):9–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gramatzki D, Pantazis G, Schittenhelm J, Tabatabai G, Kohle C, Wick W, Schwarz M, Weller M, Tritschler I. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor inhibition downregulates the TGF-beta/Smad pathway in human glioblastoma cells. Oncogene. 2009;28(28):2593–605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Price CJ, Warburton EA, Menon DK. Human cellular inflammation in the pathology of acute cerebral ischaemia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(11):1476–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kipnis J, Nevo U, Panikashvili D, Alexandrovich A, Yoles E, Akselrod S, Shohami E, Schwartz M. Therapeutic vaccination for closed head injury. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20(6):559–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Walsh JT, Watson N, Kipnis J. T cells in the central nervous system: messengers of destruction or purveyors of protection? J Immunology. 2014;141(3):340–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones TB, Ankeny DP, Guan Z, McGaughy V, Fisher LC, Basso DM, Popovich PG. Passive or active immunization with myelin basic protein impairs neurological function and exacerbates neuropathology after spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurosci. 2004;24(15):3752–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Liesz A, Suri-Payer E, Veltkamp C, Doerr H, Sommer C, Rivest S, Giese T, Veltkamp R. Regulatory T cells are key cerebroprotective immunomodulators in acute experimental stroke. Nat Med. 2009;15(2):192–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Negishi T, Kato Y, Ooneda O, Mimura J, Takada T, Mochizuki H, Yamamoto M, Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Furusako S. Effects of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling on the modulation of TH1/TH2 balance. J Immunol. 2005;175(11):7348–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Veldhoen M, Duarte JH. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: fine-tuning the immune-response. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22(6):747–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Funatake CJ, Marshall NB, Kerkvliet NI. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin alters the differentiation of alloreactive CD8+ T cells toward a regulatory T cell phenotype by a mechanism that is dependent on aryl hydrocarbon receptor in CD4+ T cells. J Immunotoxicol. 2008;5(1):81–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement