Skip to main content
Download PDF

Quality of sweat test (ST) based on the proportion of sweat sodium (Na) and sweat chloride (Cl) as diagnostic parameter of cystic fibrosis: are we on the right way?

Diagnostic Pathology volume 11, Article number: 103 (2016) Cite this article

  • The Erratum to this article has been published in Diagnostic Pathology 2017 12:22

Abstract

Background

To assess the quality of sweat test (ST) based on the proportion of sweat sodium and sweat chloride as diagnostic parameter of cystic fibrosis (CF).

Methods

A retrospective study of 5,721 sweat samples and subsequent descriptive analysis were carried out. The test was considered “of good quality” (correct) when: (i) sweat chloride was lower than 60 mEq/L, and sweat sodium was higher than sweat chloride; (ii) sweat chloride was higher than 60 mEq/L, and sweat sodium was lower than sweat chloride.

Results

The study included 5,692/5,721 sweat samples of ST which had been requested due to clinical presentations compatible with CF and/or neonatal screenings with altered immunoreactive trypsinogen values. Considering the proportion of sweat sodium and sweat chloride as ST quality parameter, the test was performed correctly in 5,023/5,692 (88.2 %) sweat samples. The sweat chloride test results were grouped into four reference ranges for chloride (i) chloride < 30 mEq/L: 3,651/5,692 (64.1 %); (ii) chloride ≥ 30 mEq/L to < 40 mEq/L: 652/5,692 (11.5 %); (iii) ≥ 40 mEq/L to < 60 mEq/L: 673/5,692 (11.8 %); (iv) ≥ 60 mEq/L: 716/5,692 (12.6 %). In the comparative analysis, there was no association between ST quality and: (i) symptoms to indicate a ST [respiratory (p = 0.084), digestive (p = 0.753), nutritional (p = 0.824), and others (p = 0.136)], (ii) sweat weight (p = 0.416). However, there was a positive association with: (i) gender, (ii) results of ST (p < 0.001), (iii) chloride/sodium ratio (p < 0.001), (iv) subject’s age at the time of ST [grouped according to category (p < 0.001) and numerical order (p < 0.001)]. For the subset of 169 patients with CF and two CFTR mutations Class I, II and/or III, in comparative analysis, there was a positive association with: (i) sweat chloride/sodium ratio (p < 0.001), (ii) sweat chloride values (p = 0.047), (iii) subject’s age at the time of the ST grouped by numerical order (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Considering that the quality of ST can be assessed by levels of sweat sodium and sweat chloride, an increasing number of low-quality tests could be observed in our sweat samples. The quality of the test was associated with important factors, such as gender, CF diagnosis, and subjects’ age.

Background

The sweat test (ST) is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) [1]. Around half a century has passed since its description; however, questions remain about its reproducibility and reliability, especially in cases of borderline sweat results [2]. There are only a few quality parameters to perform ST. In addition, the role of sweat sodium as quality marker for ST is unknown.

Increased chloride values observed in ST are due to mutations in the CFTR gene (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator), which encodes a protein with the same name [3]. A conclusive diagnosis of CF can be made with the identification of two mutations in the CFTR gene [4, 5]. It is not always possible to conduct genetic tests and perform complete CFTR gene sequencing for all patients, due to high costs and/or technical limitations. And yet, ST has been widely used as a tool for the diagnosis of CF for over 50 years.

Although ST has high sensitivity and specificity, it may produce inconsistent results. Analysis of ST alone may be insufficient to diagnose CF. Therefore; additional tests should be performed, such as nasal potential difference measurement, assessment of CFTR function in rectal biopsies, and evaporimetry [6–9]. Patients with CF usually have low sodium conductance, and consequently, elevated sodium concentration in sweat. This is because the activity of the epithelial sodium channel depends on the activity of the CFTR protein [10]. In CF diagnosis, sodium has a poor discriminatory power in comparison with chloride, even with an existing correlation between their levels in sweat [1, 11, 12]. Current protocols do not recommend the use of concentrations of sweat sodium as a diagnostic parameter for CF and/or as a quality marker to perform exams [12]. Although not used for CF diagnosis, concentrations of sweat sodium are analyzed by some laboratories, and used as an internal quality control procedure, since concentrations of chloride and sodium tend to be similar [1, 2, 11]. The use of chloride/sodium ratio has been proposed in order to screen patients with CF and borderline values in the ST. However, there is no consensus on this quality parameter [2].

This study aimed to verify the quality of ST based on the levels of sweat sodium and sweat chloride measured in ST of subjects with and without CF, performed in a referral center for a period of approximately 30 years with the same sweat dosage method.

Methods

A retrospective study of 5,721 sweat samples and ST descriptive analysis were carried out. The ST was considered “of good quality” (correct) when: (i) sweat chloride was lower than 60 mEq/L, and sweat sodium was higher than sweat chloride in subjects without CF; (ii) sweat chloride was higher than 60 mEq/L, and sweat sodium was lower than sweat chloride in patients with CF (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Sweat test quality by the chloride sweat and sodium sweat (proposed criteria)

Full size image

The concentrations of chloride and sodium in sweat were determined by chloridrometry and flame photometry, respectively. The collection of sweat was performed by the classical Gibson & Cooke method [13].

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee from University of Campinas (Unicamp) (# 474326). The variables were collected from records of ST performed in the laboratories of the center for Gastroenterology Services and Pediatric Gastroenterology at the University Hospital of the Unicamp.

The patients’ medical records included: name, age at time of the examination, gender, medical record number, indications for ST (pulmonary, digestive, nutritional and/or others), family history of CF, weight of collected sweat sample, concentrations of sweat chloride and sweat sodium, and the chloride/sodium ratio in the sweat samples. Tests with sweat weight lower than 75 mg were excluded.

Patients were grouped into three categories according to age: (i) birth to < six months; (ii) ≥ 6 months to <18 years; (iii) ≥ 18 years [2]. The concentration of sweat chloride was used to group the sweat samples according to the CF diagnosis, as follows: (i) chloride < than 30 mEq/L; (ii) chloride ≥ 30 mEq/L to < 40 mEq/L; (iii) chloride ≥ 40 mEq/L to < 60 mEq/L; (iv) ≥ 60 mEq/L (positive test for CF) [14].

All test ordered for the same patient were analyzed, even when a patient had undergone more than one test. The study approached ST and not the result of the prevalence of CF in the samples.

For a subset of 169 patients with CF, the CFTR mutation screening was positive for two CFTR mutation Class I, II and/or III. The samples with two CFTR mutation Class I, II and/or III were analyzed individually. Mutations of CFTR were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (F508del) followed by enzymatic digestion (G542X, R1162X, R553X, G551D and N1303K) – [PCR/ restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)]. Other mutations in the CFTR gene could be identified by sequencing or use of the SALSA MLPA method (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification) Kit P091-C1 CFTR-MRC-Holland S4X, 2183A > G, 1717-G > A, I618T with MegaBace1000® (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, USA) and ABI 3500 (Applied Biosystems - Thermo Fisher Scientific, São Paulo/SP, Brazil).

Descriptive statistics including numbers of observations, means, standard deviations, medians, minimums and maximums were used to summarize continuous variables. Confidence intervals (95 %) were calculated for proportions. Categorical data was presented as tables of frequency counts and associated percentages.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) [15]. The comparison between variables with categorical distribution was carried out by Test χ2 (Pearson and Likelihood ratio) and Fisher’s exact test, depending on the data distribution. For the analysis of variables with numerical distribution, Fisher’s exact test and one-way analysis of variance were used. Non-parametric statistical test, such as Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis, were applied when necessary. The graphics and identification of difference between the groups obtained by Kruskal-Wallis test were performed in MedCalc® for Windows, version 16.1 (MedCalc® Software, Ostend, Belgium). α = 0.05 was set for all analyses. The GPower software version 3.1.9.2 (Moorenstraße, Düsseldorf, Germany) [16, 17] was used to calculate the power of the sample adopting power value above 80 %.

Results

The study included 5,721 sweat samples of ST, which had been requested due to clinical presentation compatible with CF and/or neonatal screening with altered immunoreactive trypsinogen values. Of these sweat samples, 29 (0.51 %) were excluded: (i) 23 showed sweat weight lower than 75 mg; (ii) four had no indication about sweat weight; (iii) one lacked laboratory data; (iv) one had no sodium value. Thus, 5,692 sweat samples were included in this study. The gender of 17 subjects (0.3 %) could not be determined, as the tests had been carried out with the newborn’s mother’s name, after newborn screening. So, 3,023 sweat samples collected from males (53.3 %) and 2,652 (46.7 %) sweat samples collected from females were included and analyzed.

The mean age of the subjects was 12.12 ± 17.84 years; and median 4 (ranging from 0 to 85.58) years. In 146 (2.6 %) sweat samples, there was no record to confirm the exact age at the time of the examination. The following frequency was obtained for each age group: (i) ≤ 0 to 6 months: 634/5,611 (11.33 %) samples; (ii) > 6 months to ≤ 18 years: 3,897/5,611 (69.5 %) samples; (iii) > 18 years: 1,080/5,611 (19.2 %) samples.

The mean sweat chloride concentration was 32.45 ± 27.67 mEq/L, median 22.30 (ranging from 1 to 213.10) mEq/L. The mean sweat sodium level was 36.45 ± 21.56 mEq/L, median 29.5 (ranging from 6.30 to 154.70) mEq/L. Clinical indications for having the sweat test performed included (i) breathing symptoms: 2,920/3,791 (77 %); (ii) digestive symptoms: 464/3,791 (12.2 %); (iii) nutritional symptoms: 435/3,791 (11.5 %); (iv) others: 467/3,791 (12.3 %). The initial medical request for ST of 1,901/5,692 (33.4 %) sweat samples could not be obtained. The sweat chloride/sodium ratio showed a mean level of 0.821 ± 0.250; median of 0.799 (ranging from 0.06 to 2.51).

Considering the quality of the ST based on the proportion of sweat chloride and sweat sodium, the test was performed correctly in 5,023/5,692 (88.2 %) samples, and incorrectly in 669/5,692 (11.8 %).

The sweat samples were grouped into four reference ranges for chloride and their respective interpretative comments: (i) chloride < 30 mEq/L: 3,651/5,692 (64.1 %); (ii) chloride ≥ 30 mEq/L to < 40 mEq/L: 652/5,692 (11.5 %); (iii) chloride ≥ 40 mEq/L to < 60 mEq/L: 673/5,692 (11.8 %); (iv) chloride ≥ 60 mEq/L: 716/5,692 (12.6 %).

In comparative analysis, there was no association between the quality of ST and: (i) symptoms to request the test [breathing (p = 0.084), digestive (p = 0.753), nutritional (p = 0.824) and others (p = 0.136)], and (ii) sweat weight (p = 0.416). At the same time, there was a positive association with: (i) gender (p = 0.001), (ii) result of ST (p < 0.001), (iii) sweat chloride/sodium ratio (p < 0.001), and (iv) subject’s age at the time of the ST [grouped by category (p < 0.001) and numerical order (p < 0.001)] (Table 1 and Fig. 2).

Table 1 Comparison between the quality of the sweat test based on the concentrations of sweat chloride and sweat sodium (proposed criteria) and the gender and age of subjects examined, as well as the results of the sweat test in view of the sweat chloride concentration obtained in the exam
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure2

a and b Association between quality of sweat test (proposed criteria) and sweat chloride/sodium ratio. Correct: N = 5,023; mean = 0.784 ± 0.234; median = 0.766; range from 0.06 to 2.51; Incorrect: N = 669; mean = 1.102 ± 0.184; median = 1.071; range from 0.66 to 2.31. p < 0.001. c and d Association between quality of the sweat test and the subject’s age at the time of the examination. Correct: N = 4912; mean = 10.545 ± 16.523; median = 4; range from 0 to 85.58; Incorrect: N = 634; mean = 24.370 ± 22.366; median = 15.92; range 0 to 80.83. p < 0.001. Statistical analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney test. α = 0.05

Full size image

For the subset of 169 patients with CF and two CFTR mutations Class I, II and/or III, in comparative analysis. There was no association between the quality of ST and: (i) gender (p = 1); (ii) subject’s age at the time of the ST grouped by category (p = 0.128); (iii) symptoms to request the test [breathing, digestive, nutritional and others – all patients with CF showed corrected data (p > 0.05)], (iv) sweat weight (p = 0.191), (v) sweat sodium values (p = 0.151). At the same time, there was a positive association with: (i) sweat chloride/sodium ratio (p < 0.001), (ii) sweat chloride values (p = 0.047), (iii) subject’s age at the time of the ST grouped by numerical order (p = 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison between the quality of the sweat test based on the concentrations of sweat chloride and sweat sodium (proposed criteria) and age of subjects examined, as well as the results of the sweat test in view of the sweat chloride concentration obtained in the exam. All subjects had cystic fibrosis and two CFTR mutations Class I, II and/or III
Full size table

The frequency of CFTR mutations Class I, II and/or III is showed in the Table 3.

Table 3 Distribution of patients with cystic fibrosis considering the genotype for mutations in the CFTR gene and classes of identified mutations
Full size table

Discussion

Patients with two identified mutations in the CFTR gene do not usually show normal sweat values in their tests. CF patients show proportionately elevated values for both sodium and chloride electrolytes; with a difference between them, that does not usually exceed 15 mEq/L. In CF, sweat sodium concentration is usually lower than sweat chloride concentration, and the opposite relationship is observed in individuals without CF [18].

In this study, this parameter was used to assess the quality of ST. When comparing the quality of ST with gender, it was observed that the numbers of correct tests were greater in males than females. A possible explanation is the fact that women produce lower sweat volume due to the constitution of their sweat glands. Men have fewer active sweat glands, but higher sweating rate per gland. Women show lower cholinergic and β-adrenergic sweat secretion rates than men [8, 9].

The comparison between the quality and results of ST for CF diagnosis showed a higher number of incorrect tests in the chloride concentration range of 40 to 60 mEq/L, known as borderline range for the ST, as determined by Gibson and Cooke [14]. Some studies approach the need to assess the test results with age-related reference intervals [1, 2, 11, 12, 19]. Patients with clinical CF and chloride levels in ST between 30 and 59 mEq/L may have two mutations in the CFTR gene [12, 20].

Sweat chloride reference value between 30 and 59 mEq/L is associated with borderline range, depending on the individual’s age, and it may possibly include individuals with Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Related Metabolic Syndrome. It is estimated that 8 to 15 % of subjects in this group may receive delayed diagnosis of CF and the initial clinical presentation of CF may be confused with other respiratory diseases [21, 22].

According to the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, CF is likely to be diagnosed when chloride concentration is greater than or equal to 60 mEq/L in two-sample ST. For infants up to six months of age, CF is very unlikely to be diagnosed when the chloride concentration is equal to or less than 29 mEq/L; as well as for individuals older than six months of age, when chloride concentration is equal to or less than 39 mEq/L. In our study, a greater number of incorrect tests were observed in the age group over 18 years. It appears that sweat chloride peaked in adults over 18 years of age, suggesting that the borderline value of 60 mEq/L to diagnose CF may not be sensitive for all age groups [2]. During the first 24 h after birth, sweat electrolyte values may be transiently elevated in normal infants, followed rapid decline of electrolytes in the first days of life. Moreover, it can be difficult to obtain adequate amount of sweat during the first weeks after birth, especially in preterm infants [23].

The concentration of electrolytes in the sweat increases with age and healthy adults may have chloride levels above 60 mEq/L [24, 25]. Furthermore, at the time of interpretation of ST, it should be considered that some rare CFTR gene may be related to borderline or negative values ST [18, 25].

In addition to CF, some diseases may cause increased concentrations of sweat chloride, and most diseases can be differentiated based on clinical presentations. Some examples include: atopic dermatitis, hypogammaglobulinemia, glycogen storage disease type I, mucopolysaccharidosis type I, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, pseudohypoaldosteronism, celiac disease, adrenal insufficiency, and untreated hypothyroidism. False positive result may occur in case of malnutrition, dehydration, skin conditions (eczema or rash) and ST technical errors during induction, collection and measure of chloride and sodium concentrations [18, 25].

False negative result is related to the presence of edema, use of mineralocorticoid, collection and analysis of insufficient amount of sweat, and other technical problems [25, 26]. Sweat sample was collected by experienced personnel in accordance with international guidelines and internal quality control procedures, in order to minimize possible methodological errors and misdiagnosis, as some symptoms may resemble those of CF.

There were two limitations to this study. First, this study did not include controls: all subjects were referred to ST due to their clinical manifestations, positive newborn screening results for CF, or family history. Second, it was not possible to confirm a diagnosis of CF for all patients using a genetic study. However, the data including CFTR mutations was included in the present manuscript and showed similar results as the first analysis for all exams performed.

Conclusions

It is assumed that quality of the ST can be assessed by concentrations of sweat sodium and sweat chloride; however, our study showed a great number of poor quality sweat tests. The quality of the tests was associated with some important factors, such as gender, CF diagnostic results, and age of subjects. Although ST is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of CF, it has limitations and may produce both false positive and false negative results. Constant efforts should be targeted to understand ST results and seek quality markers to perform the tests, in order to allow accurate screening of patients. The objective is to make identification of mutations in the CFTR gene possible for all patients and/or to make it a regular screening method for patients suspected of having CF. The CFTR mutation screening can only be achieved with minimized costs and improved technical resources, which enable complete CFTR gene sequencing, and include all mutations with their respective classes and types. Thus, considering the proportion adopted in this study, the quantification and use of sweat sodium is still needed in ST. Special attention should be paid to borderline range for the diagnosis of CF, where a greater chance of errors could be observed.

Abbreviations

CF:

CYSTic fibrosis

CFTR:

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator

SPSS:

Statistical package for social sciences

ST:

Sweat test

Unicamp:

University of Campinas

References

  1. 1.

    Collie JT, Massie RJ, Jones OH, LeGrys VA, Greaves RF. Sixty five years since the New York heat Wave: Advances in sweat testing for Cystic Fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49:106–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Traeger N, Shi Q, Dozor AJ. Relationship between sweat chloride, sodium, and age in clinically obtained samples. J of Cyst Fibros. 2014;13:10–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cutting G. Modifier genes in Mendelian disorders: The example of cystic fibrosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1214:57–69.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    McKone F, Velentgas P, Swenson A, Goss C. Association of sweat chloride concentration at time of diagnosis and CFTR genotype with mortality and cystic fibrosis phenotype. J of Cyst Fibros. 2015;14:580–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Levy H, Farrell P. New challenges in the diagnosis and management of cystic fibrosis. J of Pediatrics. 2015;166:1337–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ng RT, Marson FA, Ribeiro JD, Ribeiro AF, Bertuzzo CS, Ribeiro MA, Severino SD, Sakano E. Nasal potential difference in cystic fibrosis considering severe CFTR mutations. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:306825.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gonska T, Ip W, Turner D, Han W, Rose J, Durie P, Quinton P. Sweat gland bioeletrics differ in cystic fibrosis: a new concept for potential diagnosis and assessment of CFTR function in cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2009;64:932–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Quinton P. A synopsis of methods of sweat tests in pathology. Clin Biochem. 2014;47:757–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Quinton P, Molyneux L, Ip W, Dupuis A, Avolio J, Tullis E, et al. Beta adrenergic sweat secretion as a diagnostic test for cystic Fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):732–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Quinton P. Cystic Fibrosis: lessons from the sweat gland. Phisiology. 2007;22:212–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mishra A, Greaves R, Massie J. The limitation of sweat electrolyte reference intervals for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a systemic review. Clin Biochem Rev. 2007;28:60–6.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Farrell PM, Rosenstein BJ, White TB, Accurso FJ, Castellani C, Cutting GR, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in newborns through older adults: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus report. J of Pediatr. 2008;153(2):S4–S14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mirsha A, Greaves R, Smith K, Carlin J, Wootton A, Stirling R, et al. Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis by Sweat Testing: Age-Specific Reference Intervals. J of Pediatr. 2008;153:758–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gibson LE, Cooke RE. A test for concentration of electrolytes in sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas utilizing pilocarpine by iontophoresis. Pediatrics. 1959;23(5):545–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    SPSS. 21.0 for windows (computer program): Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Release version 21.0. Chicago: SPSS. Incorporation; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Beauchamp M, Lands LC. Sweat testing: a review of current technical requirements. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005;39:507–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Christiansen A, Nybo M. Lack of harmonization in sweat testing for cystic fibrosis-a national survey. Scandinavian J of Clin Investigation. 2014;74:708–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    O’ Sullivan BP, Freedman SD. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 2009;54:595–605.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Groves T, Robinson P, Wiley V, Fitzgerald D. Long term outcomes of children with intermediate sweat chloride values in infancy. J of Pediatr. 2015;166(6):1469–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ren M, Desai H, Platt M, Dixon M. Clinical outcomes in infants with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) related metabolic syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011;46:1079–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Eng W, LeGrys V, Schecheter M, Laughon M, Barker P. Sweat testing in pre term and full term infants less than 6 weeks of age. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005;40:64–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hall SK, Stableforth DE, Green A. Sweet sodium and chloride concentrations-essential criteria for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in adults. Ann Clin Biochem. 1990;27(4):576–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mattar A, Gomes E, Adde F, Leone C, Rodrigues J. Comparison between classic Gibson and Cooke technique and sweat conductivity test in patients without cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010;86:109–14.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Leig M. Diagnosis of CF despite normal or borderline sweat chloride. Paediatric Respir Rev. 2004;5:357–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Financial support from the following institutions: FALM: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), for sponsoring the researches #2011/12939-4 and #2015/12858-5; Fundo de Apoio à Pesquisa ao Ensino e à Extensão da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, for sponsoring the research #0648/2015. JDR: FAPESP, for sponsoring the research #2011/18845-1. The funding was used in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and the writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials achieved in the manuscript were available at Laboratory of Pulmonary Physiology, Center for Pediatrics Investigation, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas.

Authors’ contributions

AGF, FALM, JDR: made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content; given final approval of the version to be published; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. CCSG, MAGOR, LBM, MFS, CSB, ES, MG, IAP, MCP, GH, CEL, AADCT, AOP, MCRS, EAL, RJNN, AFR: made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee from University of Campinas (#474326).

Author information

Author notes

    Affiliations

    1. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

      Alethéa Guimarães Faria, Fernando Augusto Lima Marson, Carla Cristina de Souza Gomez, Maria Ângela Gonçalves de Oliveira Ribeiro, Lucas Brioschi Morais, Maria de Fátima Servidoni, Maura Goto, Gabriel Hessel, Adyléia Aparecida Dalbo Contrera Toro, Andressa Oliveira Peixoto, Maria Cristina Ribeiro Simões, Elizete Aparecida Lomazi, Roberto José Negrão Nogueira, Antônio Fernando Ribeiro & José Dirceu Ribeiro

    2. Laboratory of Pulmonary Physiology, Center for Pediatrics Investigation, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

      Alethéa Guimarães Faria, Fernando Augusto Lima Marson, Maria Ângela Gonçalves de Oliveira Ribeiro, Lucas Brioschi Morais, Maria de Fátima Servidoni & José Dirceu Ribeiro

    3. Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

      Fernando Augusto Lima Marson & Carmen Sílvia Bertuzzo

    4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

      Eulália Sakano

    5. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

      Ilma Aparecida Paschoal & Mônica Corso Pereira

    6. Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

      Carlos Emílio Levy

    7. Departamento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126, Barão Geraldo, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, CEP: 13083-887, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

      Fernando Augusto Lima Marson

    Authors
    1. Alethéa Guimarães Faria
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Fernando Augusto Lima Marson
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Carla Cristina de Souza Gomez
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Maria Ângela Gonçalves de Oliveira Ribeiro
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Lucas Brioschi Morais
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Maria de Fátima Servidoni
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Carmen Sílvia Bertuzzo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Eulália Sakano
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Maura Goto
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Ilma Aparecida Paschoal
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Mônica Corso Pereira
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Gabriel Hessel
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    13. Carlos Emílio Levy
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    14. Adyléia Aparecida Dalbo Contrera Toro
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    15. Andressa Oliveira Peixoto
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    16. Maria Cristina Ribeiro Simões
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    17. Elizete Aparecida Lomazi
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    18. Roberto José Negrão Nogueira
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    19. Antônio Fernando Ribeiro
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    20. José Dirceu Ribeiro
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Fernando Augusto Lima Marson.

    Additional information

    An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-017-0611-x.

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Faria, A.G., Marson, F.A.L., Gomez, C.C.d.S. et al. Quality of sweat test (ST) based on the proportion of sweat sodium (Na) and sweat chloride (Cl) as diagnostic parameter of cystic fibrosis: are we on the right way?. Diagn Pathol 11, 103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-016-0555-6

    Download citation

    Keywords

    • Cystic fibrosis
    • Diagnosis
    • Electrolytes
    • Sweat

    Diagnostic Pathology

    ISSN: 1746-1596

    Contact us