- Case Report
- Open Access
Cystic appearance - a new feature of solid fibrous tumours in the lacrimal gland: a case report with literature review
Diagnostic Pathology volume 14, Article number: 63 (2019)
Solitary fibrous tumours (SFTs) rarely occur in the orbit, especially in the lacrimal area. These tumours are mostly solid. Cystic changes have been documented, but they remain very rare. Only three cases of primary orbital solitary fibrous tumours with cystic changes have been reported in the literature, but no cases have been reported to occur in the lacrimal gland. Solitary fibrous tumours generally follow a benign course and are treated definitively with surgical excision. Data from the literature suggest that the cystic nature of SFT presents a risk of recurrence and could be a harbinger of malignancy.
A 42-year-old woman was admitted to the endocrinology department for right unilateral exophthalmia and epiphora in the last 8 months. An ophthalmological evaluation showed exophthalmia only in the right eye (22 mm) and normal visual acuity, visual field and extraocular movements. Investigations revealed normal thyroid function. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging detected a 4 × 2,2 × 2,7 cm septate pseudocystic mass in the right lacrimal gland. Given her lacrimal gland tumour diagnosis, the patient was submitted for neurosurgical intervention with total ablation of the tumoural mass and complete right dacryoadenectomy. Although the intraoperative extemporaneous examination results were suggestive of a haemangiopericytoma, histological and immunocytochemical examination showed an extrapleural SFT. The postoperative clinical evolution was favourable, with remission of the exophthalmia. Fifteen months after surgery, no signs of recurrence were noticed.
We report the first case of an SFT with cystic changes in the lacrimal gland. Although the presence of cavitary lesions alone does not necessarily indicate aggressive behaviour, cystic changes pose a risk of recurrence and may suggest malignant transformation over time. As a result, our case requires long-term follow-up due to recurrence and malignant potential.
Although until a few years ago the most frequent site of solitary fibrous tumours (SFTs) was thought to be the intrathoracic region, with a peculiar predilection for body cavity sites, this tumour can develop in any part of the body where mesenchymal cells are present. Orbital involvement was first independently reported in 1994 by Dorfman et al. and Westra et al., respectively [1, 2]. Until now, 90 cases of orbital SFTs have been reported in ophthalmologic and pathologic journals . SFTs can be found anywhere in the orbit, but they have rarely been observed and described in the lacrimal gland. Since 1996, when Scott et al. reported the first SFT in the lacrimal gland fossa, to our knowledge, only 15 such cases of SFT in the lacrimal gland and lacrimal gland fossa have been reported, with half of them reported in the last five years (Web of Science, Pub Med and Google Scholar). All SFTs in the lacrimal area have been communicated as isolated case reports. Orbital SFTs are mostly solid, and cystic tumours are very rarely observed. To date, no case of a cystic SFT in the lacrimal gland has been described. This new feature of the tumour requires closer monitoring of the patient because of the risk of recurrence and malignant transformation.
Materials and methods
We introduce a case of lacrimal SFT with cystic changes and a brief literature review regarding this specific topic. This research is based upon the collection of data from all cases of SFT involving the lacrimal gland area reported in the English-written literature starting with the first case reported in 1996 and including our current case.
We present the case of a 42-year-old Caucasian non-smoking female who was admitted in the Endocrinology Department for right unilateral exophthalmia and epiphora in the prior 8 months (Fig. 1a). Her family clinical history was positive for breast cancer (mother) and high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes (father) but negative for endocrine conditions. Since menarche at age 12, she has had regular menses and a childbirth.
In adolescence, the patient was diagnosed with allergic rhinitis, for which she received inconstant Xyzal. There was no inflammatory disease or previous trauma in the anamnesis.
On physical examination, the patient’s body mass index (BMI) was 24,8 kg/m2 and her clinical data were normal. The ophthalmological evaluation showed only exophthalmia of the right eye (22 mm) and normal visual acuity, visual field and extraocular movements. No optic nerve atrophy or papilledema was found. The neurological exam was normal. No abnormal findings were identified on current laboratory tests, including a full blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, glycaemia, renal profile, and liver function. The hormonal thyroid profile was within the normal range and showed no autoimmune abnormality. Ultrasonography of the anterior cervical region showed a thyroid with normal volume and structure. Under these circumstances, an orbital magnetic resonance was recommended. A well-defined 4 × 2,2 × 2,7 cm mass in the right lacrimal gland with septate pseudocystic appearance, small haemorrhagic areas, heterogeneous structure, and mass effect on adjacent structures without local bony remodelling was detected (Fig. 1b, c). The preoperative diagnosis was a lacrimal gland tumour.
Based on this diagnosis, the patient was referred to a neurosurgical department. The lesion was approached extraperiosteally through a sub-brow incision. The tumoural mass with swollen lacrimal gland was identified in a clear dissecting plane and isolated from the surrounding muscles and showed no local infiltration (Fig. 2a). Total ablation of the tumour and complete right dacryoadenectomy was performed (Fig. 2b).
Macroscopically, the tumour specimen was well-circumscribed and had a bosselated surface, a purple greyish colour, yellow areas and an elastic consistency and measured 2,5 × 1,7 × 1,5 cm in size (Fig. 2c). Intraoperative extemporaneous examination was suggestive of a haemangiopericytoma. Paraffin tissue blocks were prepared after fixation and routine processing steps. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed. Histopathological examination showed cellular proliferation of variable density and spindle or oval-shaped cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm that was sometimes vacuolated. The nuclei were oval-shaped with small visible nucleoli. The mitotic activity was reduced. The stroma contained large areas of collagen and frequent blood vessels of variable calibre; some of these had thin walls and a branched appearance (Fig. 3a). The diagnosis was highly suggestive of SFTs arising in the lacrimal gland. Immunohistochemical staining showed a Ki67 index of 8% in the tumour cells (Fig. 3b), strong and diffuse positivity for CD34 (Fig. 3c) and STAT6 (Fig. 3d), and zonal positivity for vimentin (Fig. 3d) and CD99 (Fig. 3f). Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) was positively expressed in rare, dispersed tumour cells. Actin and CD31 were not detected in tumour cells but were detected in blood vessels.
The postoperative clinical evolution was favourable, including remission of the exophthalmia (Fig. 1d) but persistent diplopia and limiting adduction and descent of right eye that improved over time. No evidence of residual tumour was found in the orbital magnetic resonance control (Fig. 1e,f). Fifteen months after surgery, no signs of recurrence were noticed. The patient remains under close follow-up.
SFTs represent a diverse group of ubiquitous rare spindle cell neoplasms with variable clinical behaviour and have not yet been fully explored. SFT was first described in 1931 by Klemperer and Rabin, who reported it as a primary neoplasm of the visceral pleura. Although once considered to originate from mesothelial cells, with the advent of immunohistochemistry, a fibroblastic origin, occasionally with myofibroblastic differentiation, is now accepted . Additionally, a possible cellular origin from a fibroblastic differentiated cell type in mesenchymal tissue that includes endoneural dendritic cells, dermal dendrocytes, or pericytes has been suggested . These tumours occur worldwide, and all races and ethnic groups are affected . In the lacrimal area, SFTs arise from the mesenchymal cells of the periductal connective tissue of the lacrimal gland or from the mesenchymal elements of the lacrimal gland fossa . The previously reported cases suggest that most orbital SFTs occur in middle-aged adults without an obvious association with sex. However, SFTs of the lacrimal gland and lacrimal fossa tend to occur at a younger age, with an average in the third decade, show a male predominance, and commonly have left orbit involvement . Our case does not overlap with this pattern.
All patients with lacrimal SFTs present one or more symptoms relating to a growing tumoural mass at the site of the lacrimal gland. This may be accompanied by upper eyelid swelling, occasionally limited ocular motility, unilateral eyeball displacement and facial deformity. In our case, there was no palpable mass. Sometimes, localization of the tumour in the lacrimal area causes eyeball protrusion, leading to misinterpretation as endocrine exophthalmia and the referral of the patient to an endocrinology service, as occurred in our case. These tumours have previously tended to grow slowly, form a single mass, and sometimes exert compressive effects on the adjacent viscera or neurovascular structures; the exception was one case that did not exceed 3.5 cm in size.
In addition to a complete physical examination, affected patients should undergo imaging tests that may include X-rays, ultrasound, computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the previously reported cases, a well-demarcated mass with regular margins and no infiltrating adjacent structures or bone remodelling was described. MRI features can be variable, are correlated with cellular components and collagen, degenerative changes, haemorrhage and necrosis within the tumours. Compared with the cerebral cortex or extraocular muscle, SFTs in the lacrimal area show isointense signals on T1-weighted images and variable signals on T2-weighted images . In addition, angiography can be used to demonstrate a hypervascularized tumour resembling an angioma . In our case, the tumoural mass was examined by MRI and showed hypointense signal intensity on T1-weighted images and mixed isointense and hyperintense signal intensity on T2-weighted images with cystic lesions with multiple septae, which have not previously been reported in SFTs of the lacrimal gland.
Because of variable clinical presentations and histologic appearances, the diagnosis of SFTs can be a challenge, as we observed in our case, when the result of an extemporaneous examination is not confirmed by the results obtained in paraffin-embedded tissues and immunohistochemistry. SFTs can be misdiagnosed as other mesenchymal lesions (haemangiopericytomas, giant cell angiofibromas, monophasic synovial sarcomas or fibrous histiocytomas), smooth muscle tumours (leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas), neural tumours (gliomas, fibrous meningiomas, schwannomas, or neurofibromas), etc. In the past, some SFTs have probably been misdiagnosed as other spindle cell neoplasms. An extensive histopathological analysis of 41 fibroblastic lesions of the orbit that had different diagnoses, including haemangiopericytomas, fibrous histiocytoma, mixed tumours and giant cell angiofibroma, led to their reclassification as SFTs .
Histopathological and immunohistochemical staining features and, more recently, molecular analyses are the basic tools used to diagnose SFTs and also have prognostic value. Additionally, fine needle aspiration has been mentioned as useful for diagnosing SFT . Similar to other locations, SFTs occurring in the lacrimal fossa can histologically mimic haemangiopericytoma . The histological differentiation of these two types of lesions is difficult because cases of haemangiopericytoma can show features of SFT and vice versa [14,15,16]. Many pathologists consider haemangiopericytoma and solitary fibrous tumour to represent a continuum of tumours . Solitary fibrous tumours and haemangiopericytomas overlap, even if they are not identical entities. For this reason, the WHO has created a combined term, SFT/haemangiopericytoma, to describe these lesions. According to the 2016 CNS WHO classification, which uses molecular parameters in addition to histology, the SFT/hemangiopericytoma classification sets three tumour grades: grade I (often diagnosed as SFT), grade II (corresponding typically to haemangiopericytoma) and grade III (previously termed anaplastic haemangiopericytoma) . The differential diagnosis of haemangiopericytoma is mandatory due to its malignant course and its rate of recurrence and metastasis, which contrast with the benign evolution of SFT. In our case, spindle cells with long processes (fibroblast-like cells) and minimal cytoplasm, small elongated nuclei and small visible nucleoli were observed to have a haphazard distribution. The stroma was collagenized, with thick bands of collagen interspersed between the tumour cells. Branching staghorn vasculature, similar to that seen in haemangiopericytoma, was found. Mature adipocytes and giant multinucleated stromal cells, which have been reported in other cases, were absent . The histological criteria for malignancy include tumours greater than 5 cm, cellular pleomorphism, infiltrative growth, necrosis, haemorrhage, nuclear atypia and high mitotic activity (> 4 mitoses/10 hpf) . In our case, no signs of malignancy were identified, there was no nuclear atypia, and mitotic figures were rare.
Immunohistochemical tests are necessary to confirm the diagnosis. CD34 has over time become considered the most sensitive marker for SFTs (95–100%); therefore, to call a tumour an ‘SFT’, it should be CD34-positive . In all cases reported until now, the SFTs of the lacrimal area showed uniform positivity for CD34 and vimentin. Other markers, including Bcl-2 and CD99, were variably expressed. Markers such as desmin, SMA, EMA, CK and S100 protein, were negative. In our case, tumoural cells were positive for CD34, vimentin and CD99, infrequently positive for EMA and negative for SMA and CD31, and the Ki67 index was 8%.
Cytogenetic studies are also needed to improve understanding of the clinical and pathological features of SFTs. Although research is underway, some karyotypic aberrations, including both numerical and structural abnormalities, have been reported [20, 21]. Additionally, several studies show that SFTs are characterized by the overexpression of multiple genes, such as genes encoding LDH1, therapeutic targets (kinases and histone deacetylases retinoic acid receptors), and multiple growth factors (PDGF, EGF, VEGF, IGF2, etc.) .
Recent molecular analyses suggest that SFTs are positive for nuclear protein STAT6, which is overexpressed due to a paracentric inversion on chromosome 12q13 and NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion [23, 24]. Today, this marker is considered the molecular hallmark of SFT, and it is mandatory in the immunological panel used for the diagnosis of SFTs [25, 26]. To date, this marker has been investigated in only two cases of SFTs in the lacrimal gland. In our case, nuclear STAT6 showed intense and diffuse nuclear staining, supporting the diagnosis of SFT.
Another gene that is upregulated in SFTs is GRIA2, which encodes a subunit of a class of glutamate receptors thought to mediate increased cell proliferation. In a recent study, this marker, which has not yet been researched in lacrimal gland SFTs, was found to be positive in 89% of SFTs and negative in more than 99% of all other histological mimics occurring in soft tissue . However, it should be noted that molecular testing is expensive and not available in every laboratory.
As in other sites of SFTs, effective treatment of SFT of the lacrimal gland and lacrimal fossa means complete resection of the tumour. Sometimes, the entire lacrimal gland may have to be removed, as occurred in our case. No other treatments (radiotherapy or chemotherapy) have proved to be efficient. According to some authors, preoperative arterial embolization can be considered because of the risk of bleeding during surgical resection of these highly vascularized tumours .
Evolution and prognosis
A correct diagnosis is mandatory for proper therapy and management of patients with SFT. Until now, it has been estimated that most extrapleural tumours, with the exception of those of mediastinal origin, have a benign outcome. Usually, recurrences have been attributed, for the most part, to incomplete resection. A review of 189 cases of CNS SFTs revealed that the rate of recurrence in incomplete resection was 58,1%, whereas the rate was 14% in cases of total excision . In addition, SFTs may undergo malignant transformation when not completely excised. Ten to 15% of SFTs are aggressive even when they appear morphologically benign [30, 31].
It is unclear whether SFTs occurring in the lacrimal gland exhibit recurrences or malignant behaviour. To date, no cases with recurrence or metastasis have been reported, suggesting a possible non-aggressive evolution for lacrimal gland SFTs. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because statistical analyses were performed on only a small number of reported cases. Could the recurrence or malignant behaviour of these tumours be correlated with their morphological features? Although orbital SFTs are mostly solid tumours, partial or complete cystic changes have been reported in seven previous cases (three primary and four recurrent), but none of these occurred in the lacrimal gland. [32,33,34,35,36]. Although the mere presence of cavitary lesions does not necessarily indicate aggressive behaviour, cystic degeneration poses a risk of recurrence and may suggest malignant transformation over time, especially in recurrent tumours. . The mechanism of cystic degeneration is unknown, but it has been suggested that the tumour outgrows its blood supply, leading to necrotic areas that are later reabsorbed, generating cystic spaces . No data are available to establish whether there is a relationship between tumour age and the onset of cystic degeneration.
With new advances in medical research, more cases of orbital solitary fibrous tumours, including SFTs in the lacrimal area, are being diagnosed and reported. To date, in all previously reported cases, SFTs of the lacrimal gland were solid tumours, and cystic changes were not been described prior to our case. Cystic degeneration of the tumour requires long-term follow-up because recurrence at the site of surgery or metastasis can occur several years after the excision of the primary tumour, even in tumours that behave benignly.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Body mass index
Cluster of differentiation
Epidermal growth factor
Epithelial membrane protein
Glutamate ionotropic receptor AMPA type subunit 2
Insulin-like growth factor
Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1
Magnetic resonance imaging
NGFI-A binding protein 2
Platelet-derived growth factor
Solitary fibrous tumour
Smooth muscle actin
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 6
Vascular endothelial growth factor
World Health Organization
Dorfman DM, To K, Dickersin GR, Rosenberg AE, Pilch BZ. Solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18:281–7.
Westra WH, Gerald WL, Rosai J. Solitary fibrous tumor. Consistent CD34 immunoreactivity and occurrence in the orbit. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18:992–8.
Shen J, Li H, Feng S, Cui H. Orbital solitary fibrous tumor: a clinicopathologic study from a Chinese tertiary hospital with a literature review. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:1069–78.
Langman G. Solitary fibrous tumor: a pathological enigma and clinical dilemma. J Thorac Dis. 2011;3:86–7.
Morgan MB, Smoller BR. Solitary fibrous tumors are immunophenotypically distinct from mesothelioma(s). J Cutan Pathol. 2000 Oct;27(9):451–4.
Penel N, Amela EY, Decanter G, Robin YM, Marec-Berard P. Solitary fibrous tumors and so-called hemangiopericytoma. Sarcoma. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/690251.
Scott IU, Tanenbaum M, Rubin D, Lares E. Solitary fibrous tumour of the lacrimal gland fossa. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1613–8.
Mupas-Uy J, Kitaguchi Y, Takahashi Y, Takahashi E, Kakizaki H. Solitary fibrous tumor in the lacrimal gland Fossa: a case report. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2016;7:398–403.
Kim HJ, Kim YD, Yim YJ, Kim ST, Jeon P, Kim KH, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit: CT and MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:857–62.
Chang SK, Yoon DY, Choi CS, Yun EJ, Seo YL, Nam ESCT. MR, and angiography findings of a solitary fibrous tumor of the larynx: a case report. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:568–71.
Furusato E, Valenzuela IA, Fanburg-Smith JC, Auerbach A, Furusato B, Cameron JD, et al. Orbital solitary fibrous tumor: encompassing terminology for hemangiopericytoma, giant cell angiofibroma, and fibrous histiocytoma of the orbit: reappraisal of 41 cases. Hum Pathol. 2011;42:120–8.
Krishnamurthy V, Suchitha S, Asha M, Manjunath GV. Fine needle aspiration cytology of solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit. J Cytol. 2017;34:104–6.
Kovar D, Lestak J, Voldrich Z, Voska P, Hrabal P, Belsan T, et al. Solitary fibrous tumour of the lacrimal gland with apparent hemangiopericytoma - like characteristics: a case study. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9570.1000346.
Hori E, Kurimoto M, Fukuda O, Takahashi C, Nagai S, Oya T, et al. Recurrent intracranial solitary fibrous tumor initially diagnosed as hemangiopericytoma. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2007;24:31–4.
Bouvier C, Métellus P, de Paula AM, Vasiljevic A, Jouvet A, Guyotat J, et al. Solitary fibrous tumors and hemangiopericytomas of the meninges: overlapping pathological features and common prognostic factors suggest the same spectrum of tumors. Brain Pathol. 2012;22:511–21.
Brum M, Nzwalo H, Oliveira E, Pelejão MR, Pereira P, Farias JP, et al. Solitary fibrous tumors of the orbit and central nervous system: a case series analysis. Asian J Neurosurg. 2018;13:336–40.
Goldsmith JD, van de Rijn M, Syed N. Orbital hemangiopericytoma and solitary fibrous tumor: a morphologic continuum. Int J Surg Pathol. 2001;9:295–302.
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–20.
Son DH, Yoo SH, Sa H, Cho K. A solitary fibrous tumor with giant cells in the lacrimal gland: a case study. Korean J Pathol. 2013;47:158–62.
Rakheja D, Wilson KS, Meehan JJ, Schultz RA, Maale GE, Timmons CF. Extrapleural benign solitary fibrous tumor in the shoulder of a 9-year-old girl:case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2004;7:653–60.
Manor E, Bodner L. Chromosomal aberrations in oral solitary fibrous tumor. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2007;174:170–2.
Demicco EG, Wani K, Fox PS, Bassett RL, Young ED, Lev D, et al. Histologic variability in solitary fibrous tumors reflects angiogenic and growth factor signaling pathway alterations. Hum Pathol. 2015;46:1015–26.
Robinson DR, Wu YM, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Cao X, Lonigro RJ, Sung YS, et al. Identification of recurrent NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions in solitary fibrous tumor by integrative sequencing. Nat Genet. 2013;45:180–5.
Ronchi A, Cozzolino I, Zito Marino F, Accardo M, Montella M, Panarese I, et al. Extrapleural solitary fibrous tumor: a distinct entity from pleural solitary fibrous tumor. An update on clinical, molecular and diagnostic features. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2018;34:142–50.
Doyle LA, Vivero M, Fletcher CD, Mertens F, Hornick JL. Nuclear expression of STAT6 distinguishes solitary fibrous tumor from histologic mimics. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:390–5.
Demicco EG, Harms PW, Patel RM, Smith SC, Ingram D, Torres K, et al. Extensive survey of STAT6 expression in a large series of mesenchymal tumors. Am J ClinPathol. 2015;143:672–82.
Vivero M, Doyle LA, Fletcher CD, Mertens F, Hornick JL. GRIA2 is a novel diagnostic marker for solitary fibrous tumour identified through gene expression profiling. Histopathology. 2014;65:71–80.
Botchu R, Khan AN, Adair W, Elabassy M. Solitary fibrous tumor made resectable after successful endovascular embolization. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2011;42:287–91.
Fargen KM, Opalach KJ, Wakefield D, Jacob RP, Yachnis AT, Lister JR. The central nervous system solitary fibrous tumor: a review of clinical, imaging and pathologic findings among all reported cases from 1996 to 2010. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;113:703–10.
Vallat-Decouvelaere AV, Dry SM, Fletcher CD. Atypical and malignant solitary fibrous tumors in extrathoracic locations: evidence of their comparability to intra-thoracic tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:1501–11.
Gengler C, Guillou L. Solitary fibrous tumour and haemangiopericytoma: evolution of a concept. Histopathology. 2006;48:63–74.
Polomsky M, Sines DT, Dutton JJ. Solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit with multiple cavities. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29:e117–9.
Feuerman JM, Flint A, Elner VM. Cystic solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:385–7.
Alam S, Backiavathy V, Mukherjee B, Subramanian K. A rare case of giant multicystic solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit. Orbit. 2018;37:69–72.
Graue GF, Schubert HD, Kazim M. Correlation between clinical features, imaging and pathologic findings in recurrent solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit. Orbit. 2013;32:375–80.
Krishnakumar S, Subramanian N, Mohan ER, Mahesh L, Biswas J, Rao NA. Solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit: a clinicopathologic study of six cases with review of literature. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:544–54.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Dan Hortopan (imaging) and Dr. Vasile Ciubotaru (surgeon) for their contributions to this study.
No external funding was used for this paper.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Institute of Endocrinology “C.I. Parhon” and adhered to the tenets of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editor of this journal.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.