Skip to main content

Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma with TSC2 mutation: a case report and literature review



Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is an under-recognized, emerging new entity of sporadic renal neoplasms, which is listed as a rare type of renal cell carcinoma in the 2022 WHO renal tumor classification. It is easily misdiagnosed because its characteristics are insufficiently understood.

Case presentation

We report one case of ESC-RCC, a 53-year-old female patient with a right kidney mass found during clinical examination. The patient experienced no discomforting symptoms. Computer-tomography imaging at our urinary department showed a round soft tissue density shadow around the right kidney. Microscopic examination revealed a tumor displaying a solid-cystic composition of eosinophilic cells with unique features, revealed by characteristic immunohistochemical markers (CK20-positive/CK7-negative), and a nonsense mutation in TSC2. Ten months after the renal tumor resection, the patient presented in good condition with no recurrence or metastasis.


The distinct morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular characteristics of ESC-RCC we describe here, based on our case and the relevant literature, highlight the key points of the pathological and differential diagnosis of this novel renal neoplasm. Our findings will therefore deepen our understanding of this novel renal neoplasm and help reduce misdiagnosis.


The 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) kidney tumor classification lists eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) as a new and rare RCC type, with an incidence rate of approximately 0.2% [1,2,3]. Because ESC-RCC is an indolent neoplasm associated with good prognosis and low metastatic potential, it is important to distinguish it from other renal cell carcinomas. However, the incidence of ESC-RCC remains low and less than 60 cases have been reported in the literature to date. Insufficient understanding of its characteristics very often leads to misdiagnosis. Here we report the case of a 53-year-old female with ESC-RCC in the right kidney, and analyze and summarize clinical data, histopathological characteristics, immunohistochemistry, and molecular findings, to improve our understanding of the disease and reduce misdiagnosis.

Case report

A 53-year-old female patient was hospitalized after a right renal mass was detected on clinical examination. The patient had not reported discomforting symptoms and had no relevant family history. Computer-tomography imaging at our urinary department showed a round soft tissue density shadow around the right kidney. The tumor size was approximately 41 mm × 40 mm, and its intensity appeared slightly lower than that of the renal cortex, which is a feature of malignant renal tumors (Fig. 1). The patient showed no obvious abnormalities in liver or kidney function or serum tumor markers. She underwent right renal tumor resection via laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery, and part of the excised kidney and tumor tissues were sent for pathological examination.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CT image of urinary system:

A, the plain scan image showed a round soft tissue density shadow in the right kidney

B, the enhanced image showed uneven and obvious enhancement in the cortical phase, and the degree of enhancement was slightly lower than that of the renal cortex

The gross mass with a grey-white cystic solid was 41 mm × 40 mm in size and clearly distinguishable from the surrounding renal tissue. Microscopic observation revealed that the cytoplasm of the tumor cells was rich in eosinophilic particles. Nuclei were round or oval in shape. Clear nucleoli were visible at 400× magnification in some cells. The nuclei had a WHO/ISUP grade 2. Cells were arranged cystically with hobnail cells lining the cystic wall in the cystic area. In the solid area, cells were arranged in nests and sheets. Eosinophilic bodies were visible in the cytoplasm, and focal foam cells and lymphocytes infiltration were observed in the stroma (Fig. 2). Immunohistochemical labeling indicated that pan-cytokeratin, vimentin, CK20, PAX-8, AMACR, and SDHB were positively expressed, to varying degrees. The expression of CD117, CK7, CD10, CA IX, and TFE3 was negative (Fig. 2). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed a nonsense mutation with amino acid variant information c.1288 A > T p.R430 * in TSC, located in exon 13 of the gene and resulting in the termination of the encoded protein at arginine at position 430. The mutation-to-copy number ratio was 35.21%. Three additional missense mutations (TSC2, CDK12 and ERBB4) were detected.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pathological characteristics of the tumor:

A, The gross tumor showed Clear boundaries on cut surface; B, The tumor showed solid and cystic structures, tumor cells were rich in eosinophilic cytoplasm. HE staining with magnification ×40; C, Solid areas: The tumor cells were arranged in a nest and sheet. HE staining with magnification ×100; D, Cystic areas: The tumor cells were arranged in hobnail-like, Foam cells and lymphocytes infiltration were observed in the stroma. HE staining with magnification × 100; E, The tumor cells were focal positive expression of CK20. Staining by the En Vision method with magnification ×40; F, The tumor cells were negative of CK7. En Vision method with magnification × 40

The tumor was solitary, 41 mm in diameter, and had clear boundaries. Microscopy showed visible cystic and solid areas. The tumor cells were rich in eosinophilic cytoplasm in the solid areas and in foam cells and lymphocytes in the stroma. As the patient showed the most important diagnostic characteristics of immunohistochemical markers (CK20-positive/CK7-negative) and a nonsense mutation in TSC2, we made the final diagnosis of ESC-RCC. At a followup examination 10 months after the surgery, we found no evidence of recurrence or metastasis.


ESC-RCC is a newly identified renal epithelial tumor with unique clinical manifestations, histopathological features, and a molecular immune phenotype. It is officially listed as a new RCC type in the WHO classification of renal tumors published in 2022. In the following, we summarize and analyze the relevant literature and discuss the clinical manifestations, histopathology, molecular immunohistochemical characteristics, clinical treatment, and prognosis of this novel renal neoplasm in relation to the case presented above.

Clinical manifestations

In 2010, Schreiner et al. [4] first reported that ESC-RCC occurs almost exclusively in adult women with tuberous sclerosis (TSC). The tumor was also identified by Trpkov et al. [1, 2] in sporadic patients with non-tuberous sclerosis. Recently, it was found that TSC and ESC-RCC do not commonly co-occur, and that only approximately 10% of patients with ESC-RCC have concurrent clinical symptoms of TSC [5, 6]. Onset age ranges widely, from 14 to 79 years, with an average of 57 years. Men can also develop the disease [7, 8]. Clinical manifestations do not include obvious symptoms, and the tumors are usually discovered accidentally, without patients experiencing low back pain or hematuria, and show indolent biological behavior [9]. Some reports have shown that this disease can also metastasize to the lungs and liver [10, 11]. In the largest series of 19 patients with ESC-RCC, with a mean follow-up of 49.6 months, 89% had stage pT1 disease. Among them, three died of other diseases [2]. The primary treatment for ESC-RCC is surgical resection with partial or radical nephrectomy, according to the tumor stage. The case presented here represents an adult female who was clinically asymptomatic during examination. Ten months after renal tumor resection, the patient was in good condition and showed no recurrence or metastasis.

Pathological characteristics

Morphological characteristics

Typical morphological characteristics of ESC-RCC are that the tumor is mostly solitary, generally grayish-yellow, and 12–135 mm in diameter (average, 34 mm). The tumor is cystic and well demarcated from the surrounding renal tissue. Large or microcystic structures are observed in the cystic areas of the tumor, and foam cells and lymphocytes infiltration in the focal stroma. The tumor cells in solid areas are arranged in nest, acinar, and sheet structures, with rich eosinophilic cytoplasm and eosinophilic bodies. There are also reports of papillary, vacuolar structures and scattered single or tiny cell clusters [12]. In our case, ESC-RCC was a well-defined solitary tumor with a cystic section and a clear boundary. Microscopically, visible cystic and solid areas were observed. The cystic area differed in size and the cystic wall was lined with hobnail-like tumor cells. The tumor cells were rich in eosinophilic cytoplasm in the solid areas and foam cells and lymphocytes in the stroma, which is the typical pathological morphology of ESC-RCC.

Immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics

We detected varying expression levels of the immunohistochemical markers CK20, PAX-8, and AMACR in the tumor cells of our patient, but not of CD117, CK7, CD10, and CA IX. CK20-positivity/CK7-negativity is the most important diagnostic marker for ESC-RCC. Focal CK7-positivity has been reported in 25% of cases [1, 2, 13]. To assess the relevant molecular genetics of ESC-RCC, Trpkov et al. analyzed molecular karyotype expression in 12 ESC-RCC cases, and found that the tumor can exhibit copy number acquisition of chromosomes 16, 7, 13q, and 19p, copy number deletion of Xp11.21 and 22q11.23, and loss of heterozygosity of TSC1 and TSC2. Multiple other studies have reported the presence of mutations in both TSC1 and TSC2 in ESC-RCC [8, 14, 15]. Although some patients do not exhibit clinical manifestations of TSC, they do show a loss of heterozygosity or TSC2 copy number acquisition. However, the specific molecular genetic characteristics of ESC-RCC require further investigation. Although our patient exhibited no clinical manifestations of TSC, a nonsense mutation in TSC2 was detected, alongside varying expression levels of CK20 and PAX-8 and no expression of CD117 and CK7 on immunohistochemistry. These features supported the diagnosis of ESC-RCC.

Differential diagnosis

For an accurate diagnosis, ESC-RCC needs to be differentiated from other renal tumors with eosinophilic cytoplasm or cystic solid structures, including the following: (1) Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: The tumor cells are arranged in a nest or acinar structure, and the cytoplasm is eosinophilic. However, the stroma is rich in a thin parenchymal vascular network. It can also be distinguished by immunohistochemistry, with the markers CA IX, CD10, and PAX-8 showing mostly positive and CK7 mostly negative results. (2) Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: The cytoplasm of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is transparent or eosinophilic, and the tumor cells are solid or acinar, usually without large cystic structures, and contain thick wall blood vessels. The tumor cells are large and polygonal with clear cell membranes and visible perinuclear empty halos. The immunohistochemical marker CK7 and on Hale colloidal iron staining are a characteristic diffuse strongly positive expression. (3) Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion-associated renal cell carcinoma: Its microscopically visible rich cytoplasm is transparent or eosinophilic, with a broad papillary or, in rare cases, a cystic or microcystic structure, obvious nucleoli, and stroma with a large number of psammoma bodies. High expressed TFE3 fusion proteins are characteristic immunohistochemical markers. (4) Succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: It is mainly manifested by the lack of SDHB protein expression and SDH gene germline mutation; the microscopic features of tumor cells are a lobulated contour, pushing growth, a solid nest arrangement, cystic structure, rich cytoplasm, eosinophilic flocculation, and vacuolar appearance. The absence of the expression of immunohistochemical marker SDHB is necessary for disease diagnosis. (5) Epithelioid angiomyolipoma: The tumor cells are mostly solid, composed of polygonoid epithelioid cells and spindle cells, cytosolic eosinophilic, and immunohistochemically expressing Melan-A and melanosome-associated antigen. However, cases of ESC-RCC with epithelioid angiomyolipoma characteristics have been reported, and the tumor cells express Melan-A, melanosome-associated antigen, CK20, and PAX8, among which CK20 and PAX8 may be effective for a differential diagnosis. Molecular detection methods can also be used when making a differential diagnosis is difficult.


In conclusion, ESC-RCC is a new rare type of RCC, according to the 2022 edition of the WHO renal tumor phenotype, with unique clinical manifestations, pathological features, and molecular immunophenotypes. Here, we report a case of ESC-RCC characterized by eosinophilic cytoplasm with characteristic immunohistochemical markers (CK20-positive/CK7-negative) and a nonsense mutation in TSC2. Our analysis and summary of the clinical data, morphological characteristics, immunohistochemistry, and molecular findings of the disease will deepen our understanding of this novel renal neoplasm and help practitioners make pathological and differential diagnoses.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during the current study are included in this published article.



Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma


Tuberous sclerosis


World Health Organization


  1. Trpkov K, Hes O, Bonert M, et al. Eosinophilic, solid, and cystic renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic study of 16 unique, sporadic neoplasms occurring in women [J]. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(1):60–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trpkov K, Abou-Ouf H, Hes O, et al. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC): further morphologic and molecular characterization of ESC RCC as a distinct entity [J]. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(10):1299–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. João Lobo R, Ohashi,Mahul B, Amin, et al. WHO 2022 landscape of papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma [J]. Histopathology. 2022;81(4):426–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schreiner A, Daneshmand S, Bayne A, et al. Distinctive morphology of renal cell carcinomas in tuberous clerosis. [J] Int J Surg Pathol. 2010;18(5):409–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parilla M, Kadri S, Patil SA, et al. Are sporadic eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinomas characterized by somatic tuberous sclerosis gene mutations? [J]. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(7):911–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo J, TretiakovaMS TroxellML, et al. Tuberous sclerosisassociated renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 57 separate carcinomas in 18 patients [J]. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(11):1457–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y, Reuter VE, Matoso A, et al. Reevaluation of 33 ‘unclassified’ eosinophilic renal cell carcinomas in young patients [J]. Histopathology. 2018;72(4):588–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palsgrove DN, Li Y, Pratilas CA, et al. Eosinophilic solid and cystic (ESC) renal cell carcinomas harbor TSC mutations: molecular analysis supports an expanding clinicopathologic spectrum [J]. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(9):1166–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Meenakshi Kamboj G, Gupta S, Pasricha, et al. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma: a rare under-recognized indolent entity [J]. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2021;64(4).

  10. McKenney JK, Przybycin CG, Trpkov K et al. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinomas have metastatic potential [J]. Histopathology 2018 ;72(6):1066–7.

  11. Tretiakova MS. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma mimicking epithelioid angiomyolipoma: series of 4 primary tumors and 2 metastases[J]. Hum Pathol. 2018;80:65–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen YB, Mirsadraei L, Jayakumaran G, et al. Somatic mutations of TSC2 or MTOR characterize a morphologically distinct subset of sporadic renal cell carcinoma with eosinophilic and vacuolated cytoplasm [J]. Am J SurgPathol. 2019;43(1):121–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Trpkov K, Williamson SR, Gill AJ et al. Correction to: Novel, emerging and provisional renal entities: the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia [J]. ModPathol, 2021;34(5):1037.

  14. Parilla M, Kadri S, Patil SA, et al. Are sporadic eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinomas characterized by somatic tuberous sclerosis gene mutations? [J]. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(7):911–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehra R, Vats P, Cao X et al. Somatic Bi-allelic loss of TSC genes in eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma[J]. Eur Urol, 2018;74(4): 483–486.

Download references


Not applicable.


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Xin He and Deyu Guo conceived and designed the case report.Xin He, Ying Chen, and Hao Tang made pathological diagnosis of the patient. Yujuan Xu participated in the routine and immunohistochemistry production.Qiang Chen collected clinical data. Caihong Wang contributed to analyzing the CT data. Xingyan Zhu rechecked the data. Deyu Guo participated in the diagnosis and revising the manuscript.All authors contributed to the writing of the paper and approved the fnal version for publication. The author(s) read and approved the fnal manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deyu Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

There is no conflict of interest between all authors

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, X., Chen, Y., Tang, H. et al. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma with TSC2 mutation: a case report and literature review. Diagn Pathol 18, 53 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Case report
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma
  • TSC2
  • Mutations
  • Misdiagnosis