Skip to main content

Completing the view – histologic insights from circular AAA specimen including 3D imaging

A methodologic approach towards histologic analysis of circumferential AAA samples


Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a pathologic enlargement of the infrarenal aorta with an associated risk of rupture. However, the responsible mechanisms are only partially understood. Based on murine and human samples, a heterogeneous distribution of characteristic pathologic features across the aneurysm circumference is expected. Yet, complete histologic workup of the aneurysm sac is scarcely reported. Here, samples from five AAAs covering the complete circumference partially as aortic rings are investigated by histologic means (HE, EvG, immunohistochemistry) and a new method embedding the complete ring. Additionally, two different methods of serial histologic section alignment are applied to create a 3D view. The typical histopathologic features of AAA, elastic fiber degradation, matrix remodeling with collagen deposition, calcification, inflammatory cell infiltration and thrombus coverage were distributed without recognizable pattern across the aneurysm sac in all five patients. Analysis of digitally scanned entire aortic rings facilitates the visualization of these observations. Immunohistochemistry is feasible in such specimen, however, tricky due to tissue disintegration. 3D image stacks were created using open-source and non-generic software correcting for non-rigid warping between consecutive sections. Secondly, 3D image viewers allowed visualization of in-depth changes of the investigated pathologic hallmarks. In conclusion, this exploratory descriptive study demonstrates a heterogeneous histomorphology around the AAA circumference. Warranting an increased sample size, these results might need to be considered in future mechanistic research, especially in reference to intraluminal thrombus coverage. 3D histology of such circular specimen could be a valuable visualization tool for further analysis.


Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is the most frequent aortic aneurysm bearing an inherent threat of rupture [12]. Currently, only surgical aneurysm exclusion by either open or endovascular repair at a specific diameter threshold corresponding to an estimated annual rupture risk is an accepted treatment [8, 38]. Below this diameter, watchful waiting is indicated and past as well as current attempts for medically induced AAA growth inhibition have proven unsuccessful in clinical trials [21, 24].

This might be due to a still incomplete understanding of the underlying pathogenesis and mechanisms involved in aneurysm initiation and progression [13, 29]. While specific features, such as angiogenesis and matrix degradation in the aneurysmatic vessel wall, have been identified as key drivers of aneurysm progression in general—histologic studies have revealed a broad heterogeneity of the disease between individual patients [5, 7, 26]. Recently, it has become obvious that intraluminal thrombus (ILT) coverage providing a viscoelastic and enzymatically active compartment with eventual uneven biomechanical force distribution might be associated with a distinct histomorphologic apparel [3, 14].

However, intraoperative sampling of AAA specimens is most frequently restricted to the left-anterior and anterior wall of the aneurysm sacincised during open repair. Thus, mechanisms at the actual rupture site, as well as the other parts of the aneurysm circumference, can only be speculated on and are scarcely reported [10, 39]. Despite consensual guidelines on preparation, nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for histopathologic reports on aortic specimen, initially developed for the ascending aorta, the variety of features reported is huge and most often not standardized [16, 34, 35].

Classic histology is restricted to a 2D examination of limited numbers of 1–4 µm thicksections, only partially representing the entire specimen [26, 28]. Here, a volumetric visualization, applying 3D reconstructions of histology based whole slide image scans might be helpful for better visualization enabling a more in-depth analysis [15, 23].

Thus, in this small exploratory study we aimed to proof feasibility of histologic preparation and staining of complete AAA rings and 3D histology and provide histologic insights from the complete circumference, especially the most often neglected dorsal part of the AAA.

Patients, material and methods

Patient identification and ethical statement

Patient samples were acquired at two university hospitals during 2018 to 2020 from open aortic repair procedures, where anatomically and surgically feasible without posing additional threat to the respective patient. We aimed to take samples perpendicular to the aneurysm centerline axis (Fig. 1). In all cases the aneurysm sac was closed over the proximal anastomosis where possible to prevent direct contact of the duodenum and the prosthesis. Additionally, the retroperitoneum was closed to prevent direct contact of the intestine and the prosthesis. Indications for open repair were surgical reasons, patient will or operator’s choice in line with international guidelines [38].

Fig. 1
figure 1

CT-angiograms and sample acquisition site. The figure presents transverse (upper panel) and coronal (lower panel) representative images of patients 1–5. The dotted box represents the approx. site of sample acquisition. Of note, ruptures site in Patient 4 (arrow). All samples are presented in the same orientation (A = anterior, P = posterior, R = right, L = left, H = head, T = tail). Of note, intraluminal thrombus (ILT) ( +) is observed to various extents in all patients. Below the CTA images, the corresponding further histologic presentation in the following (supplement) figures for each individual patient is given. Dimensions of macroscopic samples are listed in Table 1

Patient data was pseudonymized for biobanking and anonymized for further analysis. The study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and tissue sampling was approved by the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission Klinikum rechts der Isar: 576/18 S and Ethikkommission Universitätsspital Zürich: 2020–00378).

Patient demographics and comorbidities (age, gender, arterial hypertension, smoking status, peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dialysis or renal insufficiency) were retrieved from electronic patient records.

Sample acquisition and preparation

After removal from the intraoperative situs, tissue was immediately placed in phosphate-buffered saline for transportation into the laboratory.

Classic approach (patients 1 and 2)

Samples were then fixed in formalin (4% PFA) for 24 h. If necessary, decalcification on EDTA basis (Entkalker soft SOLVAGREEN®, Carl ROTH, Karlsruhe, Germany) was performed for 2–7 days. Afterwards specimens were prepared for paraffin embedding in standard size (40 × 28 × 6.8 mm) POM histology cassettes (Kartell, Noviglio, Italy).

Entire aortic ring approach (patients 3–5)

The circumference of the aneurysm sac was reconstructed using a Prolene 5 0 (Ethicon) suture. Due to the expected tissue shrinkage, samples were mounted on a conical shaped hand-crafted polystyrene cylinder and pinned down with 20G needles in a fashion allowing longitudinal movement of the sample on the cylinder (Suppl. Fig. 1). The cylinder contained additional canals to enable adequate formalin penetration. After fixation and eventual decalcification (s. above), the sample was cut into approx. 6 mm thick rings with the cylinder and embedded in large (75 × 52 × 15 mm) histology cassettes (Engelbrecht, Edermünde, Germany). The suture necessary to enable adequate fixation and sectioning, was removed before paraffinization.

Histologic staining

Sections of paraffin-embedded samples (2 µm for classic samples, 3 µm for ring samples) were mounted on glass slides (Menzel SuperFrost, 76 × 26 × 1 mm, Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany for standard size; 52 × 72 × 1 mm, Engelbrecht, Edermünde, Germany for ring approach). Hematoxylin–eosin (HE) (ethanolic eosin Y solution, Mayer’s acidic hemalum solution, Waldeck, Münster, Germany) as well as Eelastica van Gieson (EvG) (picrofuchsin solution after Romeis 16th edition, Weigert’s solution I after Romeis 15th edition) stainings were accomplished according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Slides were covered using Pertex (Histolab products, Askim, Sweden) as mounting medium and glass coverslips (24 × 50 mm for standard size, 50 × 60 mm for ring approach, Engelbrecht, Edermünde, Germany).


Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections used for immunohistochemistry were mounted on poly-l-lysine (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) pretreated glass slides for better attachment (classic approach and ring approach) or untreated (ring approach). The sections were incubated over night at 60 °C, followed by de-paraffinization. Demasking of the antibody binding sites was achieved by cooking for 7 min in citrate acid (pH 6), made by dissolving citric acid monohydrate (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in distilled water. After every following step the samples were washed in Tris-buffer (Trizma base, NaCl, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by incubating for 15 min with 3% hydrogen peroxide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Subsequently, the sections were incubated with the respective primary antibody (Suppl. Table 1). Dako REAL Antibody Diluent (Dako, Glosirup, Denmark) was used for antibody dilution. Target staining was done by incubating the samples for 25 min with the biotinylated secondary antibody, followed by incubation of 25 min adding streptavidin peroxidase and additional incubation for 2–3 min with DAB + chromogen, diluted in horseradish peroxidase substrate buffer (Dako REAL Detection System Peroxidase/DAB + , Rabbit/Mouse Kit; Dako, Glosirup, Denmark). Counterstaining was done with Mayer’s hemalum solution (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). The sections were dehydrated and subsequently covered as described above. Especially for the large tissue sections of the aortic ring approach, detachment can occur to a certain extent, mostly during the demasking, most likely due to a greater surface. For our ring specimens, pretreatment of slides with poly-l-lysine, incubation of sections for 48 h at 60 °C, staining immediately after sectioning, and careful handling of specimens was the best and most reliable method (data not shown).

All antibodies have been used and validated in our lab before, also on aortic samples [5, 25]. Antibody specificity is routinely tested on tonsil samples and evaluated by a pathologist. Here, control incubations were performed with secondary antibody only (data not shown).

Digital slide scanning and semi-quantitive histology

Slides (including immunohistochemistry) were then scanned with Aperio AT2 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), and pictures were taken with the Aperio ImageScope software (Leica). For large slides, an AxioScan.Z1 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) microscope using a Plan-Apochromat 10x/0.45 (Zeiss) objective and a HV-F202SCL (Hitatchi, Tokio, Japan) camera was available. Scanned slides were analyzed and prepared for composite figures using QuPath-0.3.2 open-source software [1]. Each cutout presented in the respective composite figure aims to cover at least one view from the luminal surface (eventual thrombus) to the adventitia. Wall thickness of fixed samples was measured with QuPath in 3–4 locations with macroscopic maximum diameter covering a perpendicular length from the beginning of the adventitia (peri-adventitial fatty tissue to collagen margin) to the supposed end of the cellular wall. The mean ± one standard deviation is shown in Table 1. Additionally, AHA classification for atherosclerosis was used to describe the amount of atherosclerosis [33].

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics and indication for open repair

Section alignment and 3D histology image acquisition

Serial sections from Patients 3 and 4 were scanned and aligned digitally using the HeteroGenius MIM Multi-stain Add-on (HeteroGenius, Leeds, UK) to form two 3D image stacks [32]. This add-on initially estimates relative rotation and translation between sequential sections and corresponding sections of different stains, before correcting for non-rigid warping caused by the sectioning process. The HE stained stack was used as the reference stack, and the EvG stack was used as the secondary stack, with the software aligning all images in the reference stack first, before aligning the secondary images to their corresponding primary image. The aligned sections were exported at full resolution in SVS format for visualization in the open-source software Inviwo [15, 18]. The white background of the slide images was turned transparent to reveal the three-dimensional structure of the slide stack. Additional depth cues are provided by adding a dark tint to the transparent regions.

Additionally, as second method, we attempted the 3D reconstruction of histological samples using exclusively open source software. Therefore, a subset of histological sections were first aligned with an arbitrarily chosen central section of the available stack using a registration workflow [9]. Briefly, this applied Big Warp registration toolbox and Fiji (v 1.53q) for the alignment as well as QuPath (v4.0) for the data handling and image transformations. The data was then exported as separate images in tif-format and concatenated along the z-axis. We finally used Napari to generate a freely navigable rendering of the histological data stack [31].


Five circumferential AAA patient samples were available for further analysis, thereof one ruptured and four elective cases. Circumferential ILT was present in every AAA (Fig. 1). Patient details and indications for open repair are shown in Table 1. None of the patients had connective tissue disease or showed any such stigmata. All patients were successfully operated and could be discharged from hospital after 16.6 ± 10.6 days. No aneurysm related bleeding complication occurred (data not shown).

Sample acquisition covered rings perpendicular to the aneurysm centerline from the proximal or distal part of the aneurysm sac (Fig. 1, Suppl. Fig. 1). For patient 2, the complete middle and distal section of the aneurysm including the aortic bifurcation was available (Fig. 2). For standard histology and staining, no major problems were observed during the slide production. However, immunohistochemistry was technically challenging for aortic rings, especially during epitope retrieval due to tissue/slide disintegration (Suppl. Figs. 1820).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Patient 2 sample acquisition, cutting scheme and histomorphology. CT-angiogram and photo of the un-fixed specimen and sequentially cut formalin fixed sample demonstrate the approx. acquisition site. The dotted box and circle depict the specific termination for samples (1–9; I-VIII). Histologic photos show eight (I-VIII) representative whole wall cutouts at level 3 (HE staining). Specific histologic features observed include: A fragmented elastic fibres, B collagen deposition/medial fibrosis, C calcification, D intramural bleeding, E mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltration F thrombus coverage, and G cholesterol clefts. Overall, disorganization of vascular smooth muscle cells and lamellar units is seen to various extents. All samples are presented in the same orientation (A = anterior, P = posterior, R = right, L = left, H = head, T = tail). For all histologic photos the aortic lumen is oriented upwards (scale bar 250 µm)

Circumferential histologic evaluation included elastic fiber loss and fragmentation. Specifically, less than 25% of the expected 20–25 layers were observed in all patients and all samples. Collagen deposition or medial fibrosis, calcification, intramural micro bleedings, inflammatory cell infiltration and eventual thrombus coverage revealed a very distinct histomorphology along the perimeter of the aneurysm sac (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Suppl. Figs. 220). Disorganization of vascular smooth muscle cells and lamellar units was seen to a great extent, with no obvious distribution pattern of morphologic features for i.e. anterior vs. posterior aneurysm wall in all patients investigated. This was similarly observed for patient 2 in longitudinal orientation (Fig. 2, Suppl. Figs. 1116). A clearly detectable intima was absent in most samples, where ILT was visible to various extents. Mucoid depositions were seen in some samples adjacent to the thrombus (Figs. 2 and 4). Similar aneurysm sac morphology was seen at various ILT coverage (Figs. 1, 4 and 6). Inflammatory and immune-cell visualization equally showed a heterogeneous distribution of i.e. CD3, CD68 and CD45 positive cells along the circumference (Figs. 3 and 5, Suppl. Figs. 310, 18, 19). However, histology at the potential rupture site in patient 4 was distinct from the remaining perimeter in this unique sample showing intramural hemorrhage and CD45/CD20 positive adventitial infiltrates (Fig. 5, Suppl. Figs. 1719).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Patient 1 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry left anterior wall (III) and dorsal wall (VIII). CT-angiogram and dotted lines demonstrate the approx. site of samples acquisition. Histologic and immunohistochemistry photos show a representative cutout from the same position of the specimen for HE, EVG and various antibody stainings. Specific histologic features observed include: A fragmented elastic fibers, B collagen deposition/medial fibrosis, C calcification, E mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltration, F thrombus coverage and H mucoid deposition. CD 68 positive cells are seen around the intramural plaque (upper panel) but also in the ILT (lower panel). CD 3 positive cells are located in proximity to the plaque, whereas CD45 positive cells are seen in and close to the ILT. For all histologic photos the aortic lumen is oriented upwards. All samples are presented in the same orientation (A = anterior, P = posterior, R = right, L = left, H = head, T = tail) (scale bar 200 µm; cutouts 50 µm)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Patient 3 sample acquisition and histomorphology. CT-angiogram and dotted lines demonstrate the approx. site of samples acquisition. The arrow marks the aneurysm sac incision during open repair. The histologic photos show a complete circular preparation of the aneurysm sac for HE (outer picture) and EVG (inner picture). Samples are oriented in line with the CT-angiogram. The left side of the aneurysm is covered with notable ILT ( +), whereas only minimal ILT seen on the right part of the aneurysm sac. The histomorphology comparing both sides of the aneurysm sac appears similar (cutouts) (A = anterior, P = posterior, R = right, L = left, H = head, T = tail) (scale bar 5 mm each, upper bar = inner photo)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Patient 4 sample acquisition, rupture site and histomorphology. CT-angiogram demonstrates the approx. site of sample acquisition. The arrow marks the aneurysm sac incision during open repair. Photo shows the intraoperative situs with the rupture site (asterisk) at the dorsal right part of the aneurysm sac (iliac arteries marked with red vessel loops. The histologic photos show a complete circular preparation of the aneurysm sac (HE) oriented in line with the CT-angiogram. Cutouts are presented from the right lateral wall (upper panel) and the rupture site (lower panel). EvG stainig demonstrates fragmented elastic fibers and matrix remodeling as described above for the lateral wall and an amorphous bleb-like structure with massive intramural hemorrhage (#) at the rupture site. At the outer margins of this structure, CD45 and CD20 positive cells are found in the adventitia. For all histologic photos the aortic lumen is oriented upwards. All samples are presented in the same orientation (A = anterior, P = posterior, R = right, L = left, H = head, T = tail) (scale bar 5 mm for HE; cutouts upper panel 250 µm; cutouts lower panel 500 µm)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Patient 3 sample acquisition, histomorphology and 3D histology. CT-angiogram demonstrates the approx. site of samples acquisition. The arrow marks the aneurysm sac incision during open repair. The histologic photos (upper panel) show a complete circular preparation of the aneurysm sac for HE and four representative cutouts demonstrating a differing histomorphology (lumen orientated upwards). The lower panel demonstrates 3D histology HE representative images. The slide image background was removed based on color similarity to white and then set to be transparent. This enables the interactive exploration of the internal structures. Zooming in the 3D histology visualization highlights the large differences between the horizontal resolution of up to 0.25 um/pixel and the vertical axis. Samples are oriented mirrored with the CT-angiogram. (A = anterior, P = posterior, R = right, L = left, H = head, T = tail) (scale bar 2 mm for overview and 250 µm for blow-ups)

In our subjective perception, analysis and visualization were easier using complete circular samples made digitally available (Figs. 4, 5 and 6, Suppl. Figs. 1720). For patients 1 and 4, immunohistochemistry for various inflammation-related epitopes emphasized these impressions (Figs. 3 and 5, Suppl. Figs. 310, 18, 19, Suppl. Table 1).

Finally, the consecutive aortic ring alignements are shown for 3D histology. This provided an illustrative amendment to the observations described above, emphasizing the distinct circumferential histomorphology in all samples investigated (Fig. 6).


To our best knowledge, this study shows for the first time a detailed histomorphology of circular AAA specimen and explored the possibility of embedding complete aortic rings from intraoperative human samples. Here, we demonstrate a very heterogeneous appearance around the aneurysmatic circumference (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Suppl. Figs. 220).

This uneven histomorphologic apparel observed among individual patients is in line with previous results from the ascending aorta as well as the infrarenal aneurysmatic aorta [4, 5, 11, 17, 26]. Here, even a consensus document on diagnostic criteria exists [34, 35]. However, AAA patients are typically older than patients suffering from ascending or thoracic aortic disease and have rarely connective tissue disorders. Additionally, the infrarenal aorta has a different composition and phylogenetic background [27]. Thus histologic hallmarks might differ [29].

Additionally, a high variance of gene expression patterns has been demonstrated between i.e. tunica media and adventitia emphasizing the distinct pathologic features associated with a distinct histomorphology [6, 22]. Our images demonstrate an uneven distribution of defined histopathologic features over the entire aneurysm circumference, differently affecting the adventitial and medial layer (Figs. 2 and 5, Suppl. Figs. 18 and 25). While this intra-individual disease specificity is often considered responsible for negative results from previous and current clinical trials on AAA growth abrogation [21, 24] – one could also hypothesize that the inflicted pathomechanisms may be found in every patient at differing circumferential and longitudinal positions, yet might not always play the predominant role in the imbalance of pro-aneurysmatic pathways and potential healing responses [13, 29].

In addition, an uneven geometry of the aneurysm centerline might influence an uneven distribution of ILT affecting the histologic apparel and vice versa [3, 30]. The five patients investigated here did not show excessive bulging to either side of their respective aneurysm (Fig. 1). Also, the maximum diameters varied from 55-75 mm (Table 1). However, no correlations between histologic features and AAA diameter have been reported so far. The possible association of ILT on histologic appearance should be investigated in a larger patient cohort. In this context, experimental radiology using new radioactive tracers or specific magnetic resonance imaging probes have shown an unequal distribution of their respective target in human aortic aneurysm, both in circumferent and longitudinal direction [19, 20].

Previous reports on specific pathologic features from AAA rupture sites have demonstrated an increased local expression of matrix-metalloproteinases, however, are inconclusive about the cellular microenvironment and the potentially involved cytokines [39, 40]. The sample of patient 4 included in this study connects the potential macroscopic rupture site to a bleb in the aortic ring, which did show intramural hemorrhage and inflammatory cells positive for CD20 and CD45 (Fig. 5, Suppl. Figs. 18 and 19). However, such observations and reported results need to be considered with caution, since a standardized approach towards histologic analysis is missing for AAAs [4, 16, 26, 35]. Humoral immune cells such as B-/T-cells have been shown to reside in the aneurysm wall before (Figs. 3 and 5, Suppl. Figs. 310) [13, 29]. Additionally, the exact localization of sample acquisition is not defined in most studies and certainly non-standardized regarding the potential rupture site [39, 40].

These limitations also apply to our study with only five individual tissue samples included in total and one ruptured case specifically. Thus, the results reported are purely descriptive and no universal conclusions can be drawn. Most importantly, longitudinal data from the middle of the AAA to the aortic bifurcation was only available for patient 2 (Fig. 2, Suppl. Figs. 1116). However, such information is crucially warranted since many expressions analysis focus on the differences between i.e. non-dilated aneurysm neck areas and the most dilated parts within the same patient [2, 40].

While three dimensional radiologic imaging is frequently used to study the biomechanical behavior of aortic aneurysms, 3D histology has been mostly reported to improve diagnostic accuracy and visualization in cancer specimen [37]. Both, HE and immunofluorescence for vessel imaging have been applied, [15, 36]. Technical challenges include correct tissue preparation and clearing, followed by digital slide registration and computation of 3D models with contrast between the horizontal resolution of the 2D slide images, which is 0.25 um/pixel at 40 × magnification, and the total number of images in the slide stack. Eventual correction for tissue shrinkage, misalignment and missing data between two consecutive slides and artifacts of slide preparation, i.e. different stain colors, overlapping tissue have an effect on registration and 3D histology [28].

While technically feasible, the diagnostic benefit is yet to be elucidated. However, regarding the examples provided in this study, 3D histology is of great value to improve visualization of complex intraoperative specimen by enabling the interactive exploration of the co-registered slide stack, thereby revealing three-dimensional structures also along the z-axis. We demonstrated the generation of a 3D rendering of the aligned histological sections using exclusively open-source software [31]. To improve the 3D histology, many more slides of the same sample with a better registration between consecutive slides are required to compensate for the mentioned shortcomings. Limitations are given by the dimensions of the data rather than the software used as well as the tissue disintegration during the mounting process (data not shown).


This exploratory study including five circumferential detailed analyzes of human AAA specimen demonstrates heterogeneous histomorphology along the aneurysm sac perimeter. Warranting a higher number of specimen investigated, these results need to be considered in future mechanistic research and advanced imaging. 3D histology of such circular specimen is time consuming, yet feasible and could be a valuable tool for improved visualization and further analysis.


  1. Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernandez JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, McQuaid S, Gray RT, Murray LJ, Coleman HG, James JA, Salto-Tellez M, Hamilton PW. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16878.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Biros E, Moran CS, Rush CM, Gabel G, Schreurs C, Lindeman JH, Walker PJ, Nataatmadja M, West M, Holdt LM, Hinterseher I, Pilarsky C, Golledge J. Differential gene expression in the proximal neck of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. Atherosclerosis. 2014;233(1):211–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd AJ. Intraluminal thrombus: Innocent bystander or factor in abdominal aortic aneurysm pathogenesis? JVS Vasc Sci. 2021;2:159–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruijn LE, van Stroe Gomez CG, Curci JA, Golledge J, Hamming JF, Jones GT, Lee R, Matic L, van Rhijn C, Vriens PW, Wagsater D, Xu B, Yamanouchi D, Lindeman JH. A histopathological classification scheme for abdominal aortic aneurysm disease. JVS Vasc Sci. 2021;2:260–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Busch A, Grimm C, Hartmann E, Paloschi V, Kickuth R, Lengquist M, Otto C, Eriksson P, Kellersmann R, Lorenz U, Maegdefessel L. Vessel wall morphology is equivalent for different artery types and localizations of advanced human aneurysms. Histochem Cell Biol. 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Busch A, Hartmann E, Grimm C, Ergun S, Kickuth R, Otto C, Kellersmann R, Lorenz U. Heterogeneous histomorphology, yet homogeneous vascular smooth muscle cell dedifferentiation, characterize human aneurysm disease. J Vasc Surg. 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Busch A, Pauli J, Winski G, Bleichert S, Chernogubova E, Metschl S, Winter H, Trenner M, Wiegering A, Otto C, Fischer J, Reiser J, Werner J, Roy J, Brostjan C, Knappich C, Eckstein HH, Paloschi V, Maegdefessel L. Lenvatinib halts aortic aneurysm growth by restoring smooth muscle cell contractility. JCI Insight. 2021;6(15):e140364.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA, Mastracci TM, Mell M, Murad MH, Nguyen LL, Oderich GS, Patel MS, Schermerhorn ML, Starnes BW. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(1):2-77.e72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiaruttini N, Burri O, Haub P, Guiet R, Sordet-Dessimoz J, Seitz A. An open-source whole slide image registration workflow at cellular precision using Fiji QuPath and elastix. Front Computer Sci. 2022;3:780026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choke E, Cockerill GW, Laing K, Dawson J, Wilson WR, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Whole genome-expression profiling reveals a role for immune and inflammatory response in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(3):305–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins MJ, Dev V, Strauss BH, Fedak PW, Butany J. Variation in the histopathological features of patients with ascending aortic aneurysms: a study of 111 surgically excised cases. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61(4):519–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cosford PA, Leng GC (2007) Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD002945. doi:

  13. Curci JA, Thompson RW. Adaptive cellular immunity in aortic aneurysms: cause, consequence, or context? J Clin Invest. 2004;114(2):168–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Erhart P, Grond-Ginsbach C, Hakimi M, Lasitschka F, Dihlmann S, Bockler D, Hyhlik-Durr A. Finite element analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: predicted rupture risk correlates with aortic wall histology in individual patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21(4):556–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Falk M, Ynnerman A, Treanor D, Lundstrom C. Interactive Visualization of 3D Histopathology in Native Resolution. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Halushka MK, Angelini A, Bartoloni G, Basso C, Batoroeva L, Bruneval P, Buja LM, Butany J, d’Amati G, Fallon JT, Gallagher PJ, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Gouveia RH, Kholova I, Kelly KL, Leone O, Litovsky SH, Maleszewski JJ, Miller DV, Mitchell RN, Preston SD, Pucci A, Radio SJ, Rodriguez ER, Sheppard MN, Stone JR, Suvarna SK, Tan CD, Thiene G, Veinot JP, van der Wal AC. Consensus statement on surgical pathology of the aorta from the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology and the Association For European Cardiovascular Pathology: II. Noninflammatory degenerative diseases - nomenclature and diagnostic criteria. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2016;25(3):247–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Homme JL, Aubry MC, Edwards WD, Bagniewski SM, Shane Pankratz V, Kral CA, Tazelaar HD. Surgical pathology of the ascending aorta: a clinicopathologic study of 513 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(9):1159–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jonsson D, Steneteg P, Sunden E, Englund R, Kottravel S, Falk M, Ynnerman A, Hotz I, Ropinski T. Inviwo - A Visualization System with Usage Abstraction Levels. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020;26(11):3241–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Joshi NV, Elkhawad M, Forsythe RO, McBride OMB, Rajani NK, Tarkin JM, Chowdhury MM, Donoghue E, Robson JMJ, Boyle JR, Fryer TD, Huang Y, Teng Z, Dweck MR, Tawakol AA, Gillard JH, Coughlin PA, Wilkinson IB, Newby DE, Rudd JHF. Greater aortic inflammation and calcification in abdominal aortic aneurysmal disease than atherosclerosis: a prospective matched cohort study. Open Heart. 2020;7(1):e001141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufmann JO, Brangsch J, Kader A, Saatz J, Mangarova DB, Zacharias M, Kempf WE, Schwaar T, Ponader M, Adams LC, Mockel J, Botnar RM, Taupitz M, Magdefessel L, Traub H, Hamm B, Weller MG, Makowski MR. ADAMTS4-specific MR probe to assess aortic aneurysms in vivo using synthetic peptide libraries. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lindeman JH, Matsumura JS. Pharmacologic Management of Aneurysms. Circ Res. 2019;124(4):631–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindquist Liljeqvist M, Hultgren R, Bergman O, Villard C, Kronqvist M, Eriksson P, Roy J. Tunica-Specific Transcriptome of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and the Effect of Intraluminal Thrombus, Smoking, and Diameter Growth Rate. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40(11):2700–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magee D, Song Y, Gilbert S, Roberts N, Wijayathunga N, Wilcox R, Bulpitt A, Treanor D. Histopathology in 3D: From three-dimensional reconstruction to multi-stain and multi-modal analysis. J Pathol Inform. 2015;6:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Matthews EO, Moxon JV, Singh TP, Thanigaimani S, Jones RE, Gasser TC, Fitridge R, Lindeman JHN, Dalman RL, Golledge J, Investigators T. Athero-occlusive Disease Appears to be Associated with Slower Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth: An Exploratory Analysis of the TEDY Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Menges AL, Busch A, Reutersberg B, Trenner M, Kath P, Chernogubova E, Maegdefessel L, Eckstein HH, Zimmermann A. The structural atrophy of the aneurysm wall in secondary expanding aortic aneurysms with endoleak type II. J Vasc Surg. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rijbroek A, Moll FL, von Dijk HA, Meijer R, Jansen JW. Inflammation of the abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1994;8(1):41–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruddy JM, Jones JA, Spinale FG, Ikonomidis JS. Regional heterogeneity within the aorta: relevance to aneurysm disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(5):1123–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. SabdyushevaLitschauer I, Becker K, Saghafi S, Ballke S, Bollwein C, Foroughipour M, Gaugeler J, Foroughipour M, Schavelova V, Laszlo V, Dome B, Brostjan C, Weichert W, Dodt HU. 3D histopathology of human tumours by fast clearing and ultramicroscopy. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):17619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sakalihasan N, Michel JB, Katsargyris A, Kuivaniemi H, Defraigne JO, Nchimi A, Powell JT, Yoshimura K, Hultgren R. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sangha GS, Busch A, Acuna A, Berman AG, Phillips EH, Trenner M, Eckstein HH, Maegdefessel L, Goergen CJ. Effects of Iliac Stenosis on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation in Mice and Humans. J Vasc Res. 2019;56(5):217–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sofroniew N, Lambert T,  Evans K, Nunez-Iglesias J, Bokota G, Winston P, Peña-Castellanos  G,  Yamauchi K, Bussonnier M, Pop DD, Solak AC, Liu Z, Wadhwa P, Burt A, Buckley  G, Sweet A, Migas L, Hilsenstein V, Gaifas L, Bragantini J, Rodríguez-Guerra J, Muñoz H, Freeman J,  Boone P, Lowe A, Gohlke C, Royer L, Pierre A, Har-Gil H, McGovern A.  napari: a multi-dimensional image viewer for Python. 2022.

  32. Song Y, Treanor D, Bulpitt AJ, Wijayathunga N, Roberts N, Wilcox R, Magee DR. Unsupervised content classification based nonrigid registration of differently stained histology images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61(1):96–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;92(5):1355–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stone JR, Basso C, Baandrup UT, Bruneval P, Butany J, Gallagher PJ, Halushka MK, Miller DV, Padera RF, Radio SJ, Sheppard MN, Suvarna K, Tan CD, Thiene G, van der Wal AC, Veinot JP. Recommendations for processing cardiovascular surgical pathology specimens: a consensus statement from the Standards and Definitions Committee of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology and the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012;21(1):2–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stone JR, Bruneval P, Angelini A, Bartoloni G, Basso C, Batoroeva L, Buja LM, Butany J, d’Amati G, Fallon JT, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Gouveia RH, Halushka MK, Kelly KL, Kholova I, Leone O, Litovsky SH, Maleszewski JJ, Miller DV, Mitchell RN, Preston SD, Pucci A, Radio SJ, Rodriguez ER, Sheppard MN, Suvarna SK, Tan CD, Thiene G, van der Wal AC, Veinot JP. Consensus statement on surgical pathology of the aorta from the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology and the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology: I Inflammatory diseases. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2015;24(5):267–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun Q, Tiziana P, Khan AUM, Heuveline V, Gretz N. A simple optical tissue clearing pipeline for 3D vasculature imaging of the mediastinal organs in mice. Int J Exp Pathol. 2021;102(4–5):218–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. van Ineveld RL, van Vliet EJ, Wehrens EJ, Alieva M, Rios AC. 3D imaging for driving cancer discovery. EMBO J. 2022;41(10):e109675.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, Dick F, van Herwaarden J, Karkos C, Koelemay M, Kolbel T, Loftus I, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell J, Szeberin Z, Esvs Guidelines C, de Borst GJ, Chakfe N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Kakkos S, Koncar I, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, de Vega M, Vermassen F, Document R, Bjorck M, Cheng S, Dalman R, Davidovic L, Donas K, Earnshaw J, Eckstein HH, Golledge J, Haulon S, Mastracci T, Naylor R, Ricco JB, Verhagen H. Editor’s Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(1):8–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilson WR, Anderton M, Schwalbe EC, Jones JL, Furness PN, Bell PR, Thompson MM. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 and -9 are increased at the site of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Circulation. 2006;113(3):438–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilson WR, Wills J, Furness PN, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture is not associated with an up-regulation of inflammation within the aneurysm wall. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(2):191–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references




Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported through grants from the Excellence Center at Linkoping and Lund in Information Technology (ELLIIT) (MF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Study composition: ALM, MN, NS, AB; funding: AB, HHE, CR; data acquistion: ALM, MLE, RH, JP, GB, AZ; 3D histology: JRM, DM, MF; manuscript composition: ALM, MN, AB; All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Busch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors state no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: the authors requested to update affiliations 4 and 6.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Suppl. Table 1.

Antibody list. Suppl. Figure 1. Sample preparation Patient 1-5. Suppl. Figure 2. Patient 1 sample acquisition and HE histomorphology. Suppl. Figure 3. Patient 1 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry I. Suppl. Figure 4. Patient 1 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry II. Suppl. Figure 5. Patient 1 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry III. Suppl. Figure 6. Patient 1 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry IV. Suppl. Figure 7. Patient 1 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry V. Suppl. Figure 8. Patient 1 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry VI. Suppl. Figure 9. Patient 1 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry VII. Suppl. Figure 10. Patient 1 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry VIII. Suppl. Figure 11. Patient 2 sample acquisition and histomorphology 1. Suppl. Figure 12. Patient 2 sample acquisition and histomorphology 2. Suppl. Figure 13. Patient 2 sample acquisition and histomorphology 4. Suppl. Figure 14. Patient 2 sample acquisition and histomorphology 5. Suppl. Figure 15. Patient 2 sample acquisition and histomorphology 6. Suppl. Figure 16. Patient 2 sample acquisition and histomorphology 7. Suppl. Figure 17. Patient 4 sample acquisition and histomorphology. Suppl. Figure 18. Patient 4 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry 1. Suppl. Figure 19. Patient 4 sample acquisition, histomorphology and immunohistochemistry 2. Suppl. Figure 20. Patient 5 sample acquisition and histomorphology.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menges, AL., Nackenhorst, M., Müller, J.R. et al. Completing the view – histologic insights from circular AAA specimen including 3D imaging. Diagn Pathol 18, 73 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: