Skip to main content

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas and concomitant urogenital malformations in a young woman



Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas is a rare pancreatic tumor with low malignant potential. It occurs characteristically more often in young women. SPT associated with extra- and pancreatic anomalies are occasionally reported. Here we report a case of pancreatic SPT with concomitant urogenital malformations including solitary kidney and uterus didelphys in a 25-year-old woman. The patient underwent central pancreatectomy, and SPT was confirmed with pathological results. Recurrence or metastasis was not found after 14 months of follow-up.

Virtual Slides

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here:


Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas is rare, accounting for 0.13-2.7% of all pancreatic tumors [1]. It is unique, has low malignant potential and predominantly affects young women [1, 2]. Radiological and pathological studies have revealed that the tumor is quite different from other pancreatic tumors [37]. But the cell origin of SPT and tumorigenesis are still enigmatic. Occasionally, SPT has been reported to be associated with extra- and pancreatic anomalies [811]. Here we present radiological, PET/CT and histological findings of a case of pancreatic SPT with concomitant urogenital malformations.

Case presentation

A 25-year-old unmarried woman with no remarkable past or family history of neoplasms was admitted to our hospital due to a tumor located at the pancreatic neck, which was incidentally found by abdominal ultrasound during a medical check up. Physical examination revealed no abnormal findings. There were no abnormalities in clinical laboratory tests such as serum amylase level or tumor markers, including AFP, CA199, CEA, CA125, and CA724. Precontrast abdominal CT showed a round hypo-attenuation mass approximately 4.5 cm in diameter with clear margin. After contrast administration, the tumor displayed peripheral enhancement, corresponding to the solid part of the tumor. Hypo-attenuation without enhancement was depicted in the central zone corresponding to cystic degeneration. Pancreatic duct of the upper stream did not dilate. No parenchymal atrophy or vessel invasion was found. Accordingly, SPT was the most probable diagnosis, and nonfunctional PNET was considered as the differential diagnosis. Meanwhile, the left kidney was not found within the coverage of the abdominal CT scan. Later, the patient received FDG PET/CT scan covering from the skull base to the upper part of the thigh for further evaluation of the pancreatic tumor. With regard to the PET findings, the pancreatic tumor showed inhomogeneous FDG uptake (Figure 1) with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 7.5 in the peripheral zone of solid component. The left kidney was still not found. Interestingly, PET image showed two foci of slight FDG-accumulation at the uterine cavity (Figure 2B), and uterus didelphys were suspected. After consulting the clinical paper of the patient, we found that she had regular menses. She received abdominal ultrasound, and uterus didelphys was confirmed (Figure 2C). For this patient, PET/CT helped to diagnose the unexpected urogenital agesi, and to determine the stage of the pancreatic tumor as being confined without metastasis. After PET/CT scan, the patient underwent central pancreatectomy. Gross surgical specimen showed that the tumor was well encapsulated by a fibrous pseudocapsule with solid and cystic components. Microscopically, the tumor was composed of sheets and nests of uniform polygonal epithelioid cells with round or oval nuclei and acidophilic cytoplasm divided by thin fibrovascula stroma. Degenerative changes were seen in some parts of the tumor. Invasion of the vascular space or perineural invasion was not identified. The proliferation marker Ki-67 index was less than 5% and cellular atypia was mild. According to immunohistochemical analysis, the tumor cells showed nuclear type of β-catenin (++), CD10 (+), CD56 (+), Vimentin (+), and α1-antitrypsin (+), but were negative for chromogranin A (CgA) or Synaptophysin (Syn). These finding supported a final diagnosis of SPT of the pancreas (Figure 3). The patient had a smooth recovery and was released 10 days after resection. Recurrence or metastasis was not found after 14 months of follow-up.

Figure 1
figure 1

The tumor was located in the body of the pancreas with intense FDG uptake (A-B, solid red arrow). The tumor exhibited hypoattenuation on pre-contrast CT (C), and was enhanced inhomogeneously after contrast administration (D). The FDG accumulation was mainly located in the peripheral part of the tumor (B), corresponding to the solid part of the tumor with enhancement (D). Only the right kidney was found (A-D, red arrow).

Figure 2
figure 2

Two linear foci of FDG accumulation in the central part of the uterus were found in the PET/CT fusion image (B, blue arrow). Ultrasound scan showed two cavities (blue arrows) with muscular septum (red arrow) (C).

Figure 3
figure 3

A low power view showing the cystic components (arrowheads) of the tumor (H&E, magnification ×12.5, A). Sheets and nests of uniform polygonal epithelioid cells with round or oval nuclei and acidophilic cytoplasm divided by thin fibrovascula stroma were found. Pseudopapillary structures were observed. Cell atypia was mild and mitosis was not found (H&E, magnification ×200, B; H&E, magnification ×400, C). Immunohistochemistry showed that the tumor cells were positive for CD56 (D), CD10 (E), and the nuclear type of β-catenin (F) (Magnification ×400, D-F).


SPT is rare and far less common than the other pancreatic tumors, including ductal adenocarcinoma, cystic and neuroendocrine tumors. It is occasionally found because of the vague symptoms, like those of some nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors [12]. In our case, the pancreatic tumor was an occasional finding during physical check-up, and was typical in terms of demographic figure, radiological feature and pathological findings. First, it occurred in a young woman, which represented the typical population. Previous studies have shown that SPT predominantly affects young women from 20 to 40 years old [1]. Second, it exhibited the typical radiological features on CT, including regular shape, well-defined margin and inhomogeneous appearance corresponding to the solid and cystic texture [2, 3, 5, 13]. Such radiological features are very different from those of ductal adenocarnoma, as the latter is always infiltrative with poorly defined margin and is invasive to the surrounding tissues. Last, the pathologic examination, light microscopy and immunohistological staining results of our case were typical. The tumor is characterized with fibroscapsule surrounding and varied protion of solid and cystic components showing hemorrhagic changes [13]. Under light microscope, the pseudopapillary structures and degenerative changes, such as necrosis, hemorrhage, cholesterol clefts and foamy macrophages, are characteristic findings [2]. Besides, the tumor cells are characteristically uniform with mild atypia and rare mitosis, indicating its benign entities [1, 2]. It is relatively easy to differentiate SPT from ductal adenocarcinoma based on these histological features, as the latter is ofter more moderately or poorly differentiated and is composed of haphazardly arranged glands admixed with a dense desmoplastic stroma [14]. Cystic neoplasms, such as mucinous or serous cystic neoplasm, can also be easily differentiated from SPT, because they lack communication with the pancreatic duct system and have no mucinous or serous epithelium usually supported by an “ovarian” stroma [15, 16]. Neuroendocrine tumors, especially the well-differentiated ones, are the most important entities in the differential diagnosis of SPT, because they may display similar light microscopic features, and neuroendocrine markers are variably expressed in SPT [1, 2]. Excep for the consistently negative results for chromogranin A, expressions of other neuroendocrine markers such as synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase and CD56 at various levels were demonstrated [1, 2, 17, 18]. Recently, the nuclear type of β-catenin has been regarded as an unique immunohistochemical feature of SPT as it underlies the genetic mutation of catenin found in more than 90% of SPT [6, 7]. Abnormal nuclear labeling of β-catenin strongly supports the diagnosis of SPT. SPT is largely benign according to its pathological features, but interestingly, it always shows hyper-metabolism of FDG on PET [1921], which mimics malignant tumor. The high cellular density, rich mitochondria and the hypervascular nature as shown in radiological findings have been thought to contribute to the FDG accumulation [19]. In rare cases, SPT metastasizes to liver or transplants on peritomeum. In this patient, PET/CT staged the tumor to be confined without metastasis or transplantation, and she had safely undergone central pancreatectomy. Because of the indolent entity, patients usually have very good prognosis with less likelihood of recurrence and metastasis after resection of SPT [1, 2]. Different from SPT, ductal adenocarcinoma always has very poor prognosis even after complete resection, as metastasis and recurrence are common.

In our case, the urogenital anomalies of solitary kidney and uterus didelphys were incidental findings. In premenopausal women, uteral endometrium always display physiologic FDG uptake, and can be easily recognized with its characteristically linear shape and central location in the uterus [22]. But different from other patients, the patient in this case had two separate linear FDG accumulations at the central part of her uterus, indicating two locations of endometrium. So uterus didelphys was suspected when we read the PET/CT image and was confirmed by ultrasound.

SPT has been reported to occur occasionally in patients with pancreatic anormalies such as pancreatic dorsal agenesis [9, 11] and pancreatic divicum [10, 23]. There is another report of SPT in a young woman with Mulvihill-Smith syndrome (MSS), a congenital mental anomaly characterized by progeria-like aspect, multiple pigmented nevi, mental retardation, microcephaly, low stature and lack of facial subcutaneous fat [8]. But this is the first case of SPT with concomitant urogenital anomalies. The findings are very interesting because both SPT and urogenital anomaly are very rare diseases. When they were found in one patient, we wondered whether the concomitant occurrence was just a coincidence.

Recently, β-catenin and Wnt signaling pathway has been found to play an important role in SPT tumorigenesis [7, 2426]. SPT almost consistently harbors β-catenin gene (CTNNB1) mutations in exon 3 [27], resulting in the activation of the Wnt-signaling pathway. The CTNNB1 gene mutations inactivate one of the glycogen synthase kinase-3β phosphorylation sites on the β-catenin protein, and block the degradation of β-catenin. The β-catenin protein binds to the T-cell transcription factor (Tcf)/lymphoidenhancer-bind-factor (Lef), and is then translocated to the nucleus, as indicated by nuclear expression of β-catenin [25, 26, 28]. In the nucleus, the β-catenin-Tcf/Lef complex activates the transcription of several oncogenic genes, including c-myc and cyclin D1. As a matter of fact, activation of β-catenin in mice induces large pancreatic tumor resembling human SPT, presenting in vivo evidence that β-catenin/Wnt signaling pathway plays a critical role in SPT tumorigenesis [29]. Renal agenesis (RA) is embryologically associated with genital malformations because Wolffian or mesonephric duct has inductive function on the Müllerian duct during normal development [30, 31]. Patients with urogenital malformations always harbor Wnt muations or abnormal catenin [32, 33]. Besides, urogenital malformations are induced in mice model by variable interruptions of the β-Catenin/Wnt-signaling pathway [34], but the exact molecular mechanisms are so complicated and far from complete disclosure.

As mentioned above, β-catenin and the Wnt-signaling pathway play important roles in both SPT tumorigenesis and urogenital malformations. We wondered whether the concurrent tumor of SPT and urogenital malformations in this young woman were triggered by a primary insult, which subsequently served to propagate aberrant urogenital development as well as SPT tumoregenesis, a process in which β-Catenin/Wnt-signaling pathway played important roles. But similar cases have not been found in the literature. The underlying molecular genetic mechanism and the relationship between SPT and the congenital anomalies need to be further investigated.

In conclusion, SPT is rare and specific in demography, radiology and pathology. It is benign and the prognosis is good after resection. It occasionally occurs in patients with extra- and pancreatic anomalies. The concurrent SPT and congenital malformations might be associated with the β-catenin/Wnt-signaling pathway. But the association needs to be confirmed.


Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief.



Solid pseudopapillary tumor


Positron emission tomography/computed tomography




  1. Papavramidis T, Papavramidis S: Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: review of 718 patients reported in English literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2005, 200: 965-972. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim CW, Han DJ, Kim J, Kim YH, Park JB, Kim SC: Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: can malignancy be predicted. Surgery. 2011, 149: 625-634. 10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buetow PC, Buck JL, Pantongrag-Brown L, Beck KG, Ros PR, Adair CF: Solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas: imaging-pathologic correlation on 56 cases. Radiology. 1996, 199: 707-711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu MH, Lee JY, Kim MA, Kim SH, Lee JM, Han JK, Choi BI: MR imaging features of small solid pseudopapillary tumors: retrospective differentiation from other small solid pancreatic tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010, 195: 1324-1332. 10.2214/AJR.10.4452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baek JH, Lee JM, Kim SH, Kim SJ, Kim SH, Lee JY, Han JK, Choi BI: Small (<or=3 cm) solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas at multiphasic multidetector CT. Radiology. 2010, 257: 97-106. 10.1148/radiol.10092089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Bahrawy MA, Rowan A, Horncastle D, Tomlinson I, Theis BA, Russell RC, Stamp G: E-cadherin/catenin complex status in solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008, 32: 1-7. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31813e0676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavard C, Audebourg A, Letourneur F, Audard V, Beuvon F, Cagnard N, Radenen B, Varlet P, Vacher-Lavenu MC, Perret C: Gene expression profiling provides insights into the pathways involved in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas. J Pathol. 2009, 218: 201-209. 10.1002/path.2524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yagihashi T, Kato M, Izumi K, Kosaki R, Yago K, Tsubota K, Sato Y, Okubo M, Watanabe G, Takahashi T: Case report: Adult phenotype of Mulvihill-Smith syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2009, 149A: 496-500. 10.1002/ajmg.a.32551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ulusan S, Bal N, Kizilkilic O, Bolat F, Yildirim S, Yildirim T, Niron EA: Case report: solid-pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas associated with dorsal agenesis. Br J Radiol. 2005, 78: 441-443. 10.1259/bjr/91312352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Watanabe D, Miura K, Goto T, Nanjo H, Yamamoto Y, Ohnishi H: Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas with concomitant pancreas divisum. A case report. JOP. 2010, 11: 45-48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura Y, Egami K, Maeda S, Hosone M, Onda M: Solid and papillary tumor of the pancreas complicating agenesis of the dorsal pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001, 8: 485-489. 10.1007/s005340100014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Surlin V, Ramboiu S, Ghilusi M, Plesea IE: Incidental intraoperative discovery of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor associated with chronic pancreatitis. Diagn Pathol. 2012, 7: 132-136. 10.1186/1746-1596-7-132.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao XJY, Zeng MRS, Yang B: Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: cross-sectional imaging and pathologic correlation. Pancreas. 2010, 39: 486-491. 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181bd6839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi C, Daniels JA, Hruban RH: Molecular characterization of pancreatic neoplasms. Adv Anat Pathol. 2008, 15: 185-195. 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31817bf57d.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adsay NV: Cystic neoplasia of the pancreas: pathology and biology. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008, 12: 401-404. 10.1007/s11605-007-0348-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li P, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Lv Y, Wang Z: A noninvasive mucinous cystic neoplasm with intermediate-grade dysplasia of the pancreas and extensive squamous metaplasia: a case report with clinicopathological correlation. Diagn Pathol. 2012, 7: 89-93. 10.1186/1746-1596-7-89.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Geers C, Moulin P, Gigot JF, Weynand B, Deprez P, Rahier J, Sempoux C: Solid and pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas–review and new insights into pathogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006, 30: 1243-1249. 10.1097/01.pas.0000213311.28682.b2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu BA, Li ZM, Su ZS, She XL: Pathological differential diagnosis of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm and endocrine tumors of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 2010, 16: 1025-1030. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.1025.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sato M, Takasaka I, Okumura T, Shioyama Y, Kawasaki H, Mise Y, Asato Y, Yoshimi F, Imura J, Nakajima K: High F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in solid pseudo-papillary tumors of the pancreas. Ann Nucl Med. 2006, 20: 431-436. 10.1007/BF03027379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JK, Tyan YS: Detection of a solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas with F-18 FDG positron emission tomography. Clin Nucl Med. 2005, 30: 187-188. 10.1097/00003072-200503000-00010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shimada K, Nakamoto Y, Isoda H, Maetani Y, Yamashita R, Arizono S, Hirokawa Y, Nitta T, Doi R, Haga H: F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in a solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas mimicking malignancy. Clin Nucl Med. 2008, 33: 766-768. 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318187f0f0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lerman H, Metser U, Grisaru D, Fishman A, Lievshitz G, Even-Sapir E: Normal and abnormal 18 F-FDG endometrial and ovarian uptake in pre- and postmenopausal patients: assessment by PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2004, 45: 266-271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakamura S, Okayama Y, Imai H, Aoki S, Kobayashi S, Hattori T, Shiraki S, Goto K, Sano H, Ohara H: A solid cystic tumor of the pancreas with ossification and possible malignancy, coexisting nonfusion of the pancreatic ducts. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001, 33: 333-336. 10.1097/00004836-200110000-00017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang SC, Ng KF, Yeh TS, Chang HC, Su CY, Chen TC: Clinicopathological Analysis of beta-catenin and Axin-1 in Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011, 19 (Suppl 3): S438-46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tiemann K, Heitling U, Kosmahl M, Kloppel G: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas show an interruption of the Wnt-signaling pathway and express gene products of 11q. Mod Pathol. 2007, 20: 955-960. 10.1038/modpathol.3800902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chetty R, Jain D, Serra S: p120 catenin reduction and cytoplasmic relocalization leads to dysregulation of E-cadherin in solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008, 130: 71-76. 10.1309/FEYD99TXC4LMYVA5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka Y, Kato K, Notohara K, Hojo H, Ijiri R, Miyake T, Nagahara N, Sasaki F, Kitagawa N, Nakatani Y: Frequent beta-catenin mutation and cytoplasmic/nuclear accumulation in pancreatic solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 8401-8404.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abraham SC, Klimstra DS, Wilentz RE, Yeo CJ, Conlon K, Brennan M, Cameron JL, Wu TT, Hruban RH: Solid-pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas are genetically distinct from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and almost always harbor beta-catenin mutations. Am J Pathol. 2002, 160: 1361-1369. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62563-1.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heiser PW, Cano DA, Landsman L, Kim GE, Kench JG, Klimstra DS, Taketo MM, Biankin AV, Hebrok M: Stabilization of beta-catenin induces pancreas tumor formation. Gastroenterology. 2008, 135: 1288-1300. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.089.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Acien P, Acien M: Unilateral renal agenesis and female genital tract pathologies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010, 89: 1424-1431. 10.3109/00016349.2010.512067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Biedel CW, Pagon RA, Zapata JO: Mullerian anomalies and renal agenesis: autosomal dominant urogenital adysplasia. J Pediatr. 1984, 104: 861-864. 10.1016/S0022-3476(84)80481-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gimelli S, Caridi G, Beri S, McCracken K, Bocciardi R, Zordan P, Dagnino M, Fiorio P, Murer L, Benetti E: Mutations in SOX17 are associated with congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract. Hum Mutat. 2010, 31: 1352-1359. 10.1002/humu.21378.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Biason-Lauber A, Konrad D, Navratil F, Schoenle EJ: A WNT4 mutation associated with Mullerian-duct regression and virilization in a 46, XX woman. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 792-798. 10.1056/NEJMoa040533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bridgewater D, Cox B, Cain J, Lau A, Athaide V, Gill PS, Kuure S, Sainio K, Rosenblum ND: Canonical WNT/beta-catenin signaling is required for ureteric branching. Dev Biol. 2008, 317: 83-94. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bai-Xuan Xu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ZG contributed to PET/CT interpretation and literature review. ZG wrote the manuscript. LS performed histologic and immunohistochemic analyses. YW contributed to ultrasound interpretation. BX reviewed the manuscript and proof read the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guan, ZW., Sun, L., Wang, YQ. et al. Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas and concomitant urogenital malformations in a young woman. Diagn Pathol 8, 35 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: