- Case Report
- Open access
- Published:
Uterine choriocarcinoma arising from serous carcinoma in a postmenopausal woman: an analysis of next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 immunochemistry
Diagnostic Pathology volume 17, Article number: 79 (2022)
Abstract
Background
Uterine somatic choriocarcinoma is a rare, clinically aggressive malignant tumor. They frequently concur with other cancer. However, the molecular pathogenesis between somatic choriocarcinoma and the concurrent carcinoma has rarely been addressed to date.
Case presentation
We report a 68-years old Chinese woman with a uterine choriocarcinoma arising from serous carcinoma. The patient underwent radical surgery including total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy and pelvic lymph node resection. She received 10 courses of post-operative chemotherapy. She died of disease 13 months after her surgery. Microscopically, the tumor showed a biphasic pattern of choriocarcinoma and serous carcinoma. The choriocarcinomatous component showed a combination of cytotrophoblast, intermediate trophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast with hemorrhage and necrosis. The component of serous carcinoma was characterized by solid sheets of small cells with marked nuclear atypia and occasional glandular and papillary formation. PD-L1 was exclusively expressed in the choriocarcinomatous component. Next-generation sequencing revealed that the genetic abnormalities were overlapping between the two components.
Background
Choriocarcinoma is a highly malignant tumor composed of neoplastic syncytiotrophoblast, intermediate trophoblast, and cytotrophoblast. It is usually gestational in origin. Non-gestational choriocarcinoma can be originated from germ cell or from a somatic high-grade malignant tumor [1]. Somatic choriocarcinoma is a rare entity with an aggressive clinical course. It has been hypothesized to be associated with aberrant differentiation within a somatic epithelial neoplasm although the molecular evidence remains very limited. In this manuscript, we report a case of uterine choriocarcinoma arising from serous carcinoma in a postmenopausal woman with detailed clinicopathological and molecular analysis.
Case presentation
A 68-year-old, G2P2, postmenopausal Chinese woman was admitted to our hospital. She complained of vaginal bleeding for 10 days. Gynecological physical examination revealed no significant abnormalities. Abdominal CT showed an intrauterine mass. Serum HCG was 6374.21U/L. The pathological diagnosis of preoperative curettage was high grade endometrial carcinoma with choriocarcinomatous differentiation.
The patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, pelvic lymph node resection, and peritoneal multifocal biopsy. After surgery, the patient received 6 courses of paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) initially, followed by 4 courses of actinomycin D and 5-Fu. However, her serum hCG remained abnormal continuously, up to 24867 IU/L after her last chemotherapy. She died of disease at 13 months after her surgery.
Materials and methods
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, using PT Link and Dako Autostainer Link 48 and REAL EnVision detection Kit (EnVision ™ FLEX + systems, DAKO). The antibodies used included: Estrogen Receptor (ER, clone: EP1), Progesterone Receptor (PR, clone: 1E2), Ki67 (clone: MIB-1), Paired box 8 (Pax8, clone: EP298), Insulin-like growth factor mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3, clone: EP286), P53 (clone: DO-7), Vimentin (clone: V9), Spalt-like transcription factor 4 (SALL4, clone: 6E3), Gata3 (clone: EP368), MLH1 (clone: ES05), PMS2 (clone: EP51), MSH2 (clone: RED2), MSH6 (clone: EP49), β-human chorionic Gonadotropin (β-HCG, clone: CG04 + CG05), Programmed cell death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1, clone: 22C3). All antibodies were prediluted (ready-to-use).
Genomic DNA was extracted from the two components with macro-dissection in 5-μm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. Next-generation sequencing (1500 ×) was performed in the Geneseeq Laboratory, a College of American Pathologists (CAP)–accredited and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)–certified laboratory (Geneseeq, Nanjing, China) using the GENESEEQ PRIME™ panel with probes targeting all exons of 437 cancer related genes, alternative splicing sites, selected introns with gene arrangement and microsatellite sites (Nanjing Shihe Gene Biotechnology Co. Ltd, China). The sequencing data were analyzed by a custom bioinformatics pipeline to detect various genomic variations.
Pathologic findings
Grossly, the uterus measured 9 cm × 6 cm × 3 cm. The serosal surface was smooth. The thickness of myometrium measured 2–2.3 cm. Th multiple masses in the uterine cavity measured 1.5-4 cm the diameters (Fig. 1A). The cut surface was gray and white. It frequently had areas with hemorrhage and necrosis. The tumor involved the entire uterine layers (Fig. 1B). The left ovary closely adhered with the fallopian tube. The dilated ampullae of bilateral fallopian tubes showed a solid, gray and yellow appearance, and contained multiple necrosis foci inside. The right ovary and fallopian tube looked unremarkable grossly.
Microscopically, the tumor had two components, poorly-differentiated carcinoma and choriocarcinoma (Fig. 1C).The carcinomatous component accounted for 30–35%. It arranged in solid sheets predominantly, and in confluent glands and papillae occasionally. The tumor cells were small to moderate in size. They showed significant atypia. The larger, hyperchromatic nuclei had small but distinct nucleolus. The mitotic figures were frequently (> 10/10HPFs). The cytoplasm is light stained (Fig. 2A-B). The adjacent endometrium was unremarkable. The tumor cells showed a p53 mutant overexpression pattern (Fig. 2C), a high Ki67 index (~ 80%) (Fig. 2D), positive IMP3 (Fig. 2E) and Pax8, and negative ER (Fig. 2F) by IHC staining. The high grade carcinoma was consistent with an endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC).
The component of choriocarcinoma (CC) approximately accounted for 65–70%. It was composed of mononucleate and multinucleate trophoblastic cells with extensive hemorrhage and necrosis. It was characterized by a plexiform structure, in which, cytotrophoblast and intermediate trophoblasts were surrounded by syncytiotrophoblast. The significantly atypical trophoblasts showed hyperchromatic nuclei with obvious nucleoli and frequent mitotic figures. The cytoplasm was eosinophilic or transparent (Fig. 3A-B). CC was positive for SALL4 (Fig. 3C), GATA3 (Fig. 3D), HCG (Fig. 3E), and PD-L1 (Fig. 3F), and was negative for ER, PR, Pax8 by immunohistochemistry.
The tumor penetrated the whole uterine and invaded the wall rectal serosa and left pelvic lateral wall. Lymph-vascular space involvement (LVSI) was frequently present. The omentum and pelvic lymph nodes were free of tumor. The FIGO stage was IIIA.
Next generation sequencing
Most genetic abnormalities were identical in both components including TP53 c.742C > T (p.R248W), SPOP c.139G > A (p.E47K) and CTLA4 c.311C > T (p.T104M) mutations, MYC amplification (copy number > 4), NF2-CABP7 fusion (NF2: exon11 ~ CABP7: exon2 fusion), low tumor mutation burden (< 10/Mb), and microsatellite stability. Nevertheless, ATM c.506C > G (p.S169C) and LMO1 c.169C > T (p.R57C) mutations were only found in CC while PIK3CA c.1633G > A (p.E545K), and WRN c.3509A > C (p.K1170T) mutations, CCNE1 and FGFR2 amplification were present in ESC (Fig. 4).
Discussion and conclusion
Somatic choriocarcinoma is very uncommon in the female genital tract [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], prevailing in postmenopausal women. It also occurs in non-gynecologic organs, such as lung [11], breast [12], and gastrointestinal tract [13]. Somatic CC often concur with common carcinomas, mostly poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. They have a very aggressive clinical course and adverse prognosis. Most patients died of disease within 12–18 months after surgery because of advanced tumor stage and lack of effective therapy. We reviewed 10 cases of somatic cancers with CC differentiation in female genital organs, predominantly in the ovary and uterus (Table1). Ten women were in advanced stage and 9 died of disease within one and a half year. Rawish et al. [10] reported that endometrial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation often followed an aggressive course with poor clinical outcomes.
The overlapping molecular change in ESC and CC components suggested their common clonal origin. However, such molecular tests of somatic choriocarcinoma were rarely performed. A case study analyzed the copy number variation profiles of chromosomes on the whole genomic found the same clonal origin between endometrioid carcinoma and carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation separately [6]. Recently, Xing et al.[14] analyzed that choriocarcinomatous components of mixed gynecologic tumor was somatic origin. Except PIK3CA c.1633G > A (p.E545K), most mutations in our case were not detected in the case series of Xing et al. [14]. The morphology, immunohistochemistry and NGS test suggest that our case be categorized into the TCGA molecular subtype of copy number-high/TP53 mutant (CN-H; serous-like) endometrial carcinoma. However, no serous carcinoma was found by Xing [14]. The distinct subtype in our case is the fundamental cause that is responsible for the substantial molecular difference between that report and the present study.
TP53 mutation is well documented in the pathogenesis of many cancers, and might be an indicator for poor prognosis, and chemoresistance [15]. MYC amplification can promote cell proliferation, immortalization, dedifferentiation and transformation in the initiation and development of tumors [16]. CCNE1 amplification and SPOP mutation were two preferential genetic alterations in serous carcinoma [17] although the latter was more frequent in clear cell carcinoma than in serous carcinoma [18]. Neron et al. [19] found that FGFR2 mutation was one of the driver mutations in endometrial carcinoma metastasis by analyzing the biological and genomic profiles in 11 pairs of primary and metastatic carcinomas. These genetic changes provide potential molecular biomarkers to uncover the poor prognosis of our case.
CTLA4 is a key molecule in the regulation of immune checkpoint, and was mutated in ESC and CC. Moreover, we observed that PD-L1 was strong expressed in the CC component consistent with a previous report by Lu et al. [20]. These findings implicated a potential therapeutical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibition for our patient. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have shown its promising anti-tumoral effects on various gynecologic cancers [21]. Unfortunately, our patient did not receive immunotherapy owing to its unavailability of the drugs at that time.
Choriocarcinomatous components of mixed gynecologic tumor was considered as “retrodifferentiation”, by which rejuvenation to early embryonic development may occur when differentiated cells lose their specific properties acquired during previous steps of mutations [14]. LMO1 mutation is critical for cancer initiation and progression [22]. ATM mutation was germline mutations of non-Lynch syndrome genes which may be associated with endometrial cancer [23]. LMO1 and ATM mutation in our CC also provided the evidence to support that CC might be dedifferentiated from ESC, thereby having a more dismal clinical outcome. Ashton [6] reported that carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation was more aggressive than the endometrial carcinoma. We assume that epithelial malignancy with CC differentiation can be interpreted as a dedifferentiated form with a worse clinical outcome.
In summary, we describe a case of ESC with CC. NGS study provided evidence that CC was a retrodifferentiation form of ESC, as clonality evidence between the two components. The epithelial malignancy with CC differentiation was considered as a dedifferentiated tumor with rapid progression and poor prognosis.
References
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Broad. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs [M]. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2020. p. 327–31.
Mukonoweshuro P, McCluggage WG. Clear cell carcinoma of the cervix with choriocarcinomatous differentiation: report of an extremely rare phenomenon associated with mismatch repair protein abnormality [J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2017;36(4):323–7.
Hirabayashi K, Yasuda M. Ovarian non-gestational choriocarcinoma mixed with various epithelial malignancies in association with endometriosis [J]. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102(1):111–7.
Hu YJ, Ip PP, Chan KK, et al. Ovarian clear cell carcinoma with choriocarcinomatous differentiation: report of a rare and aggressive tumor [J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29(6):539–45.
Ishida M, Okabe H. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma with choriocarcinomatous differentiation: a case report and review of the literature [J]. Oncol Lett. 2013;6(3):655–8.
Ashton KA, Scurry J, Ouveysi A, et al. Transformation of endometrioid carcinoma to carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation: clinicopathological and whole genomic study [J]. Pathol. 2014;46(4):351–3.
Horn LC, Hanel C, Bartholdt E, et al. Serous carcinoma of the endometrium with choriocarcinomatous differentiation: a case report and review of the literature indicate the existence of a prognostically relevant tumor types [J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2006;25(3):247–51.
Akbulut M, Tosun H, Soysal ME, et al. Endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium with choriocarcinomatous differentiation: a case report and review of the literature [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;248(1):79–84.
Nguyen CP, Levi AW, Montz FJ, et al. Coexistent choriocarcinoma and malignant mixed mesodermal tumor of the uterus [J]. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79(3):499–503.
Rawish KR, Buza N, Zheng W, et al. Endometrial carcinoma with trophoblastic components: clinicopathologic analysis of a rare entity [J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2018;37(2):174–90.
Buza N, Baine L, Hui P. precision genotyping diagnosis of lung tumors with trophoblastic morphology in young women [J]. Mod Pathol. 2019;32(9):1271–80.
Zhu Y, Liu M. Breast carcinoma with choriocarcinomatous features: a case report and review of the literature [J]. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;30(12):239.
Chen L, Yi X. Coexistence of gastric choriocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma with reproductive hormone secretion in a man: a case report [J]. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(3):300060520904876.
Xing D, Zheng G. Lineage-specific alteration in gynecologic neoplasms with choriocarcinomatous differentiation: Implication for origin and therapeutics [J]. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(14):4516–29.
Zhang GN, Liu H, Huang JM, et al. TP53 K351N mutation-associated platinum resistance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer [J]. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(3):752–7.
Kobayashi Y, Kitazono I, Akahane T, et al. Molecular evaluation of endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and serous carcinoma using a custom-made small cancer panel [J]. Pathol Oncol Res. 2021;27:1610013.
DeLair DF, Burke KA, Selenica P, et al. The genetic landscape of endometrial clear cell carcinomas [J]. J PATHOL. 2017;243(2):230–41.
Momeni-Boroujeni A, Dahoud W, Vanderbilt CM, et al. Clinicopathologic and genomic analysis of TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas [J]. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(9):2613–23.
Neron M, Guille A, Allegre L, et al. Investigation of molecular features involved in clinical responses and survival in advanced endometrial carcinoma treated by hormone therapy [J]. J Pers Med. 2022;12(5):655.
Lu B, Teng X, Fu G, et al. Analysis of PD-L1 expression in trophoblastic tissues and tumors [J]. Hum Pathol. 2019;84(2):202–12.
Kooshkaki O, Derakhshani A, Safarpour H, et al. The latest findings of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor application in gynecologic cancers [J]. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):5034–54.
Saeki N, Saito A, Sugaya Y, et al. Indirect Down-regulation of tumor-suppressive let-7 family microRNAs by LMO1 in neuroblastoma [J]. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2018;15(5):413–20.
Wang Y, Yu M, Yang JX, et al. Genomic comparison of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and its precancerous lesions in Chinese patients by high-depth Next Generation sequencing [J]. Front Oncol. 2019;9:123.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Li M designed and drafted the manuscript. Bao L gave essential advice in the design of the report and provided the critical revision of the manuscript. Ge W, Lu B and Ren L participated in the collection and assembly of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent for publication
Written informed consent to publish the clinical data was obtained from the patient before the initiation of the report.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, M., Bao, L., Lu, B. et al. Uterine choriocarcinoma arising from serous carcinoma in a postmenopausal woman: an analysis of next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 immunochemistry. Diagn Pathol 17, 79 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-022-01262-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-022-01262-z