Skip to main content
Download PDF

Rare histologic transformation of a CTNNB1 (β-catenin) mutated prostate cancer with aggressive clinical course

Diagnostic Pathology volume 19, Article number: 83 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Catenin (Cadherin-Associated Protein), Beta 1 (CTNNB1) genomic alterations are rare in prostate cancer (PCa). Gain-of-function mutations lead to overexpression of β-catenin, with consequent hyperactivation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, implicated in PCa progression and treatment resistance. To date, successful targeted treatment options for Wnt/β-catenin - driven PCa are lacking.

Methods

We report a rare histologic transformation of a CTNNB1 (β-catenin) mutated metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), clinically characterized by highly aggressive disease course. We histologically and molecularly characterized the liver metastatic tumor samples, as well as successfully generated patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) from a liver metastasis. We used the generated cell models for further molecular characterization and drug response assays.

Results

Immunohistochemistry of liver metastatic biopsies and PDX tumor showed lack of expression of typical PCa (e.g., AR, PSA, PSAP, ERG) or neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin), compatible with double-negative CRPC, but was positive for nuclear β-catenin expression, keratin 7 and 34βE12. ERG rearrangement was confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Drug response assays confirmed, in line with the clinical disease course, lack of sensitivity to common drugs used in mCRPC (e.g., enzalutamide, docetaxel). The casein kinase 1 (CK1) inhibitor IC261 and the tankyrase 1/2 inhibitor G700-LK showed modest activity. Moreover, despite harbouring a CTNNB1 mutation, PDOs were largely insensitive to SMARCA2/4- targeting PROTAC degraders and inhibitor.

Conclusions

The reported CTNNB1-mutated mCRPC case highlights the potential challenges of double-negative CRPC diagnosis and underlines the relevance of further translational research to enable successful targeted treatment of rare molecular subtypes of mCRPC.

Background

Catenin (Cadherin-Associated Protein), Beta 1 (CTNNB1) genomic alterations are rare in prostate cancer (PCa), being found in ∼3–5% of the cases [1, 2]. Gain-of-function CTNNB1 mutations lead to nuclear overexpression of β-catenin, which is a core component of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway [3]. β-catenin plays a relevant role in PCa carcinogenesis, disease progression and therapy resistance [1, 4,5,6,7,8,9]. An epigenomics and transcriptomics-based classification of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)-derived organoids, proposed four subgroups of mCRPC, including a Wnt-driven subtype [10]. Three out of four patient-derived organoids (PDOs) in the Wnt-driven subgroup harboured a missense hot spot mutation in CTNNB1, with concomitant increased messenger RNA (mRNA) expression [10]. Previous studies have shown that activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway confers resistance to treatment with androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and chemotherapy with docetaxel [6, 11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, to date little is known about the biological disease course of PCa with Wnt//β-catenin pathway activation, and no molecularly targeted treatment strategies are available for these tumors. We report a case of rare histologic transformation of a CTNNB1-mutated metastatic PCa, clinically characterized by a fulminant disease course. We, moreover, generated a 3D PDO as well as a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) from patient’s liver metastatic biopsy, characterized them histologically and molecularly, as well as used the generated cellular models to assess response to several standard and experimental drugs.

Methods

Patient-derived organoids (PDOs)

3D organoids were derived following previously published protocols [17]. Briefly, fresh tumor tissue was mechanically and enzymatically dissociated using collagenase type II at a concentration of 5 mg/ml (Gibco™, catalog 17,101,015), supplemented with 10 µM of Y-27,632 (Selleck Chemicals, catalog S1049). Tumor tissue was incubated during 1 h in collagenase II in a 1.5 ml tube and at 37 °C on a shaker. Following enzymatic digestion, dissociated tumor tissue was washed in advanced DMEM/F12 (Gibco™, catalog 12,634,010) supplemented with GlutaMax (Gibco™, catalog 35,050,061), Hepes (Gibco™, catalog 15,630,056) and penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco™, catalog 15,140,122) (adDMEM/F12 +++) and centrifuged for 5 min at 250G and 4 °C. 1 ml of TrypLE Express (Gibco™, catalog 12,605,028) with 10 µM Y-27,632 was added to the pellet for further digestion during approximately 15 min at 37°. Mixture was repetitively (ca. every 5 min) pipetted up and down to ensure optimal dissociation. After washing with adDMEM/F12 +++, pellet was resuspended in undiluted ice-cold Matrigel and quickly placed as 40 µl Matrigel (VWR, catalog BDAA356239) droplets in the middle of a prewarmed 24-well cell culture plate (Corning, catalog 3526). To allow Matrigel solidification the plate was placed into cell culture incubator at 37° for 10–15 min. Afterwards, prewarmed human prostate cancer medium was added, and changed every 3–4 days [17]. Growth of derived PCa organoids was monitored and they were passaged 1:2 every 7 to 14 days.

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX)

PDOs from passage 6 were used for PDX generation. 1.8 × 106 viable cells were injected subcutaneously (sc) in a 2-weeks old NOD scid gamma (NSG) male mouse. The mouse was regularly assessed for sc tumor growth (initially once weekly, and 2 times/week from detection of palpable tumor). Tumor would be allowed to grow to a maximum of 1 cm 3. All experiments were performed in agreement with local laws and regulations.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

IHC stainings were performed at the Translation Research Unit (TRU) of the Institute of Tissue Medicine and Pathology, University of Bern, as well as at the Institute of Pathology of the Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen. Staining was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) PDX tumor slides. Slides were stained with H&E, as well as antibodies against AR, PSA, PSAP, synaptophysin, ERG, keratin 7 (KRT7), 34βE12 and β-catenin. Following antibodies have been used: anti-AR (AR441, Cell Marque™, catalog 200 M-15, 1:100), anti-PSA (polyclonal rabbit, Dako, catalog A0562, 1:4000), anti-PSAP (PASE/4LJ, Dako, catalog M0792, 1: 2000), anti-synaptophysin (27G12, Novocastra, catalog NCL-L-SYNAP-299, 1:100), anti-ERG (EP111, Dako, catalog M73149, 1:50), anti-human KRT7 (OV-TL 12/30, Cell Marque™, catalog 307 M-96, 1: 800), anti-34βE12 (Dako, catalog M0630, 1: 200), β-catenin (Abcam, catalog ab35572, 1:2000).

DNA sequencing

DNA was extracted from fresh-frozen liver metastatic tumor tissue with using the AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE kit (Qiagen, catalog 80,234), and DNA concentration measured with Qubit (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using the commercially available FoundationOne® CDx assay, which interrogates 324 genes for substitutions, indels and copy number variations, and 36 genes for rearrangements, as well as provides information on tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability status [18].

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)

FISH for the detection of the TMPRSS2/ERG rearrangement was performed at the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, using the commercially available ZytoLight® ERG-dual color break apart probe (ZytoVision GmbH, Bremerhaven, Germany, catalog Z-2138-200), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Signals were counted in at least 50 tumour nuclei using an epifluorescence microscope (Axioplan 2 Imaging; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). FISH for ERG rearrangement was defined by the loss of one green signal (5′ probe) or as a separate green, and a separate orange signal in at least 15% of analyzed tumor cells.

Drug response assays

For drug response assays, PCa organoids were enzymatically and mechanically dissociated, allocating 1000 cells/well in previously Matrigel-coated 6-well-plate (Corning, catalog 3516), and cultivated for 24 h before drug treatment. Cell viability read-out with CellTiter-Glo® 3D Cell Viability Assay (Promega, catalog G9683) was performed after 120 h of drug exposure. Drugs were tested in a range of concentrations 1nM -10 µM to determinate the IC50. Generated data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism®, and IC50 curves for tested drugs were generated using the log(inhibitor) vs. response curves. We assessed response to following drugs: enzalutamide (Selleckchem, catalog S1250), docetaxel (MedChem Express, catalog HY-B0011), CFI-402,257 (GLPBio, catalog GC18491), IC261 (MedChem Express, catalog HY-12,774), G007-LK (MedChem Express, catalog HY-12,438), iCRT14 (MedChem Express, catalog HY-166,665), RCM1 (Selleckchem, catalog S6898), AU15330 (synthesized by Genentech), A947 (synthesized by Genentech), FHD286 (Genentech), ACBI1 (Boehringer Ingelheim) and VZ185 (Boehringer Ingelheim).

Results

Clinical presentation

An 82-year-old patient was diagnosed with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. His previous medical history included hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atrial fibrillation. Biopsy of the prostate revealed an adenocarcinoma Gleason score (GS) 4 + 4 = 8 with pronounced cribriform growth pattern without neuroendocrine differentiation. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at presentation was 304 µg/l. Conventional imaging with computer tomography (CT) of chest-abdomen and bone scan showed pelvic and abdominal lymph node metastases (M1a), with no signs of visceral or bone involvement. First-line treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue and apalutamide was initiated. Radiotherapy to the prostate given low volume disease analog STAMPEDE trial was evaluated but rejected by the patient [19]. Under first-line treatment with GnRH and apalutamide, the PSA value dropped down to 0.04 µg/l. Two years after treatment initiation the patient reported intense fatigue, dysuria, and peripheral edema of the lower limbs. Laboratory values revealed a grade 1 increase of transaminases, an alkaline phosphatase of 288U/l and a lactate dehydrogenase of 646 U/l, as well as a low PSA (0.1 µg/l) and elevated neuron-specific enolase values (236 µg/l). CT imaging revealed local progression of the primary tumor infiltrating bladder and rectum and new extensive metastatic spread to the lung and liver. Liver biopsy was performed to assess small-cell transformation, revealing a highly proliferative high-grade adenocarcinoma with prominent nucleoli; no neuroendocrine features were observed. Based on the working current classification of advanced PCa, this tumor fits into a class of double-negative CRPC expressing neither AR or neuroendocrine features (personal communication PCF Pathology working group). The patient presented rapid clinical deterioration complicated with sepsis and leading to death one month later (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic illustration of patient’s clinical disease course. (A) Timeline showing disease course and received treatment lines; (B) PSA levels over disease course; (C) Computed tomography image of liver metastatic spread (yellow arrow shows liver metastases). GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone; mHSPC: metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; PSA: prostate-specific antigen

Full size image

Phenotypic and genomic characterization

While primary PCa tumor showed mucin-containing glandular formation, liver biopsy and PDX hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides showed high-grade solid carcinoma with prominent nucleoli, lack of cribriform growth pattern, absence of acid mucin and no evidence of neuroendocrine features (Fig. 2). The liver metastases and PDX tumor histology slides were negative for AR, PSA, PSAP and ERG protein expression; the tumor strongly expressed KRT7 and focally 34βE12 (Fig. 3). To help exclude a urothelial carcinoma keratin 34βE12 was performed, resulting in focal positivity (Fig. 3A-B) [20]. β-catenin IHC nuclear staining was strongly positive in the derived PDX (UB_PCa03), as well as in the established Wnt-dependent PCa PDO WCM1078 [10] (Fig. 4A-B). On the contrary, in the neuroendocrine PDO PM154, β-catenin staining was uniquely cytoplasmatic, acting as a negative control (Fig. 4C). Targeted DNA NGS (FoundationOne®CDx) performed from the liver metastatic biopsy material uncovered a hotspot CTNNB1 gain-of-function mutation in exon 2 (94G > A, D32N), as well as a loss-of-function mutation in TP53 (R282W), along with PTEN loss and a TMPRSS2 rearrangement (with unclear partner). The tumor molecular burden was low (2.4 mutations/megabase) and the microsatellite status stable (Fig. 5A, Suppl. Table 1). The presence of an ERG rearrangement was confirmed by FISH on the PDX histology slides, showing a split signal in 92% of the analyzed tumor cells (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of (A) primary PCa tumor, (B) liver metastases and (C) patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumor material. (A) Primary PCa tumor showing glandular formations with mucin; (B) Liver metastasis showing highly proliferative high-grade adenocarcinoma with prominent nucleoli; no neuroendocrine features are observed; (C) PDX tumor material showing highly proliferative neoplasia, histologically similar to the liver metastatic biopsy

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) stainings of liver metastatic biopsy material and PDX histology slides. (A) Strongly positive IHC staining for KRT7, negative IHC for PSA and high Ki-67 index (90–95%), liver metastatic biopsies. (B) strongly positive IHC staining for KRT7 and focally positive for 34βE12, PDX tumor; (C) Negative IHC stainings on PDX tumor for AR, PSA PSAP, synaptophysin and ERG. 34βE12: cytokeratin 34βE12; AR: androgen receptor; KRT7: keratin 7; ERG: ETS-related gene; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; PSAP: prostate-specific acid phosphatase

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

IHC staining for β-catenin in derived PDX (UB_PCa03) and two other Wnt-dependent established PDOs. Strong nuclear positivity for β-catenin staining is observed in the reported PDX UB-PCa03 (A), as well as in the established Wnt-dependent PDO WCM1078 (B). The neuroendocrine PDO PM154 (C) shows uniquely cytoplasmatic staining for β-catenin, as negative control

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for TMPRSS2/ERG rearrangement. (A) NGS (FoundationOne® CDx) results from liver metastatic biopsy. (B). FISH confirming presence of the ERG rearrangement in 92% of the analyzed cells on PDX histologic material. MS: microsatellite; TMB: tumor mutational burden

Full size image

Patient-derived organoids and xenografts

3D PDOs (UB_PCa03) were derived from fresh liver metastatic tumor tissue, following the protocol described in the Methods section, and could be successfully used for drug response assays (Fig. 6A). Por PDX derivation, 1.8 × 106 viable cells (passage 6), were sc injected in an NSG male mouse. Palpable sc tumor was first detected at day + 16, reaching maximum volume at day + 35 (Fig. 6B-D).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and xenograft (PDX). (A) PDO derived from liver metastatic biopsies, passage 6, day + 10, objective 5x; (B) PDX growth curve: palpable subcutaneous tumor was first detected at day + 16, reaching maximum volume at day + 35. (B) PDX tumor on NOD scid gamma mouse (day + 35); (C) PDX tumor explanted

Full size image

Drug vulnerabilities

We used the generated PDOs to assess sensitivities to several drugs of interest, including drugs commonly used in mCRPC, as well as selected experimental agents potentially targeting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. As predicted by the patient disease course, PDOs showed lack of sensitivity to treatment with ARPI (enzalutamide), as well as chemotherapy with docetaxel. Among the experimental drugs potentially targeting the Wnt/β-catenin, we assessed response to the spindle assembly checkpoint kinase inhibitor (TTKi) CFI-402,257 [21], the casein kinase 1 (CK1) inhibitor IC261 [22], the tankyrase 1/2 inhibitor G007-LK [23, 24], the forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) inhibitor RCM1 [6], the Wnt/β-catenin inhibitor iCRT14 [25]. Due to the implications of SWI/SNF complex-targeting agents in AR-driven PCa [26] and Wnt-driven PCa [16] fxc, we included the BRD9 and BRD7 proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) degrader VZ185 [27, 28], the PROTAC degraders of SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 (subunits of the SWI/SNF complex) AU15330, A947, ACBI1, and the dual SMARCA4/SMARCA2 inhibitor FH286. Within the assayed drugs, uniquely the targeted treatment with IC261 (IC50 = 0.47 µM) and G007-LK showed a modest effect on PDOs viability (Suppl. Figure 1). For enzalutamide and docetaxel, results were compared with sensitivities of two established PCa PDOs (MSKPCa8 and PM154) (Suppl. Figure 2).

Discussion

We report a rare transformation of a metastatic PCa, acquiring histological features of urothelial carcinoma, atypical IHC pattern and a highly aggressive disease course. However, DNA NGS from liver metastatic biopsies revealed, along with the clonal CTNNB1 gain-of-function mutation (D32N), molecular findings characteristic for PCa, such as the presence of a TMPRSS2 rearrangement, a loss-of-function mutation in TP53 (R282W), and PTEN loss. FISH performed on PDX tumor material could confirm the presence of the TMPRSS2: ERG rearrangement, reassuring the final diagnosis of PCa metastases. In line with patient aggressive clinical disease course, derived PDOs showed lack of sensitivity to common drugs used for mCRPC, such as enzalutamide and docetaxel. We further assessed sensitivity to several experimental drugs with potential activity in tumors with Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation. Our preliminary drug response results showed only modest sensitivity to treatment with the CK1 inhibitor IC261 and the tankyrase inhibitor G007-LK, which are known to interfere with Wnt/β-catenin signaling in PCa [7]. Further experiments would be required to confirm these findings. CK1α phosphorylates β-catenin and induces its degradation, so that inhibition of CK1α leads to an excessive Wnt/β-catenin activation 3,29. Moreover, both CK1α and CK1δ phosphorylate the Wnt co-receptor low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6), resulting again in Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation [29, 30]. IC261 inhibits CK1δ, CK1ε and CK1α, therefore, having potential impact on the WNT/β-catenin signaling. However, further work showed that IC261 may induce Wnt-independent cancer cell death, contrary to other CK1δ/ε inhibitors [22]. Tankyrase 1/2 inhibitors lead to decreased degradation of axin, a negative regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin promoting β-catenin degradation [31]. Based on previous data showing that BRG1 (SMARCA4), a key component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, plays a relevant role in the Wnt//β-catenin pathway regulation, we additionally aimed to assess sensitivity to SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 PROTAC degraders and inhibitors [16, 32,33,34]. Moreover, increased Wnt//β-catenin signaling activity has been demonstrated in PCa tumors with high SMARCA4 levels [35]. However, none of the used drugs targeting the SWI/SNF complex components SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 showed activity in the reported PDO.

Finally, the morphologic and molecular features of this double negative PCa highlight a challenge in the classification of advanced metastatic CRPC. Histology alone, unlike primary untreated PCa, is insufficient to adequately characterize these tumors. A recent working group on the pathology of CRPC is supporting a classification approach that includes morphology, molecular, and IHC information (Hafner, Rubin, Beltran, in preparation). For example, in this case high-grade adenocarcinoma would be modified with the description of double negative CRPC referring to the lack of AR activity or neuroendocrine features; these features may only become apparent through molecular testing. The working group comprised of pathologists, oncologists, and a surgeon specialized in prostate cancer, noted that this information may have important clinical treatment implications.

Conclusions

We characterized a rare histologic transformation of an advanced CTNNB1-mutated mCRPC, clinically characterized by an aggressive lung and hepatic metastatic spread and fulminant disease course. We successfully derived PDOs and PDX from liver metastatic tumor material. Derived PDOs showed, as expected, lack of response to common drugs used in mCRPC, such as enzalutamide and docetaxel. Preliminary experiments showed only a modest sensitivity to the CK1 inhibitor IC261 and to the tankyrase inhibitor G007-LK, which are known to interfere with Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Further research work is needed to explore the effect of these compounds in more detail. The reported mCRPC case underlines the need of further research work required to enable successful targeted treatment of rare molecular subtypes of PCa.

Data availability

The datasets generated, as well as the derived PDO, during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. NGS results from liver metastasis are provided as Suppl. Table 1.

Abbreviations

AR:

androgen receptor

ARPI:

androgen receptor pathway inhibitor

CK1:

casein kinase 1

ERG:

ETS-related gene

FISH:

fluorescent in situ hybridization

FOXM1:

forkhead box M1

IHC:

immunohistochemistry

mCRPC:

metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

NGS:

next-generation sequencing

NSG:

NOD scid gamma

PCa:

prostate cancer

PDO:

patient-derived organoid

PDX:

patient-derived xenograft

PROTAC:

proteolysis-targeting chimera

PSA:

prostate-specific antigen

PSAP:

prostatic acid phosphatase

Sc:

subcutaneously

References

  1. Gerstein AV, Almeida TA, Zhao G, et al. APC/CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) pathway alterations in human prostate cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002;34:9–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Voeller HJ, Truica CI, Gelmann EP. Beta-catenin mutations in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58:2520–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu J, Xiao Q, Xiao J, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signalling: function, biological mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities. Signal Transduct Target Therapy. 2022;7:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearson HB, Phesse TJ, Clarke AR. K-ras and wnt signaling synergize to accelerate prostate tumorigenesis in the mouse. Cancer Res. 2008;69:94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang C, Chen Q, Xu H. Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction pathway in prostate cancer and associated drug resistance. Discov Oncol. 2021;12:40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Z, Cheng L, Li J, et al. Inhibition of the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway overcomes resistance to Enzalutamide in Castration-resistant prostate Cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78:3147–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Leibold J, Ruscetti M, Cao Z, et al. Somatic tissue Engineering in Mouse models reveals an actionable role for WNT pathway alterations in prostate Cancer metastasis. Cancer Discov. 2020;10:1038–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Isaacsson Velho P, Fu W, Wang H, et al. Wnt-pathway activating mutations are Associated with Resistance to First-line Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Castration-resistant prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2020;77:14–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen G, Shukeir N, Potti A, et al. Up-regulation of Wnt-1 and beta-catenin production in patients with advanced metastatic prostate carcinoma: potential pathogenetic and prognostic implications. Cancer. 2004;101:1345–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang F, Xu D, Wang S, et al. Chromatin profiles classify castration-resistant prostate cancers suggesting therapeutic targets. Science. 2022;376:eabe1505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. He Y, Xu W, Xiao Y-T, et al. Targeting signaling pathways in prostate cancer: mechanisms and clinical trials. Signal Transduct Target Therapy. 2022;7:198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cristóbal I, Rojo F, Madoz-Gúrpide J, et al. Cross talk between Wnt/β-Catenin and CIP2A/Plk1 signaling in prostate Cancer: promising therapeutic implications. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36:1734–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen WS, Aggarwal R, Zhang L, et al. Genomic drivers of poor prognosis and Enzalutamide Resistance in Metastatic Castration-resistant prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76:562–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bian P, Dou Z, Jia Z, et al. Activated Wnt/β-Catenin signaling contributes to E3 ubiquitin ligase EDD-conferred docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer. Life Sci. 2020;254:116816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bisson I, Prowse DM. WNT signaling regulates self-renewal and differentiation of prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics. Cell Res. 2009;19:683–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thienger P, Rubin PD, Yao X et al. Androgen receptor-negative prostate cancer is vulnerable to SWI/SNF-targeting degrader molecules. bioRxiv:2024.03.24.586276, 2024.

  17. Drost J, Karthaus WR, Gao D, et al. Organoid culture systems for prostate epithelial and cancer tissue. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:347–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Frampton GM, Fichtenholtz A, Otto GA, et al. Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:1023–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392:2353–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Genega EM, Hutchinson B, Reuter VE, et al. Immunophenotype of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2000;13:1186–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zaman GJR, de Roos J, Libouban MAA, et al. TTK inhibitors as a targeted therapy for CTNNB1 (β-catenin) mutant cancers. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:2609–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheong JK, Nguyen TH, Wang H, et al. IC261 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of human cancer cells via CK1δ/ɛ and Wnt/β-catenin independent inhibition of mitotic spindle formation. Oncogene. 2011;30:2558–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Norum JH, Skarpen E, Brech A, et al. The tankyrase inhibitor G007-LK inhibits small intestine LGR5(+) stem cell proliferation without altering tissue morphology. Biol Res. 2018;51:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Waaler J, Mygland L, Tveita A, et al. Tankyrase inhibition sensitizes melanoma to PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in syngeneic mouse models. Commun Biol. 2020;3:196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Trujano-Camacho S, Cantú-de León D, Delgado-Waldo I, et al. Inhibition of Wnt-β-Catenin signaling by ICRT14 drug depends of Post-transcriptional Regulation by HOTAIR in Human cervical Cancer HeLa cells. Front Oncol. 2021;11:729228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao L, Parolia A, Qiao Y, et al. Targeting SWI/SNF ATPases in enhancer-addicted prostate cancer. Nature. 2022;601:434–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fang D, Wang M-R, Guan J-L, et al. Bromodomain-containing protein 9 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2021;406:112727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X, Song C, Ye Y, et al. BRD9-mediated control of the TGF-β/Activin/Nodal pathway regulates self-renewal and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells and progression of cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:11634–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zeng X, Tamai K, Doble B, et al. A dual-kinase mechanism for wnt co-receptor phosphorylation and activation. Nature. 2005;438:873–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang S, Zhang M, Sun J, et al. Casein kinase 1α: biological mechanisms and theranostic potential. Cell Communication Signal. 2018;16:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang S-MA, Mishina YM, Liu S, et al. Tankyrase inhibition stabilizes axin and antagonizes wnt signalling. Nature. 2009;461:614–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Griffin CT, Curtis CD, Davis RB, et al. The chromatin-remodeling enzyme BRG1 modulates vascular wnt signaling at two levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:2282–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Park JI, Venteicher AS, Hong JY, et al. Telomerase modulates wnt signalling by association with target gene chromatin. Nature. 2009;460:66–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Barker N, Hurlstone A, Musisi H, et al. The chromatin remodelling factor Brg-1 interacts with beta-catenin to promote target gene activation. Embo j. 2001;20:4935–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Muthuswami R, Bailey L, Rakesh R, et al. BRG1 is a prognostic indicator and a potential therapeutic target for prostate cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:15194–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the patient, the nursing and physician staff at the Kantonsspital St. Gallen. We thank Dr. Mariana Ricca at the University of Bern for her editorial support.

Funding

This work has been supported by funding from the following research foundations: SPHN SOCIB, Krebsliga Schweiz (Swiss Cancer League), Nuovo-Soldati Foundation for Cancer Research, ISREC Fondation Recherche Cancer, Werner and Hedy Berger-Janser Foundation, Stiftung für klinisch-experimentelle Tumorforschung (SKET).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, 3008, Switzerland

    Dilara Akhoundova, Joanna Triscott, Marika Lehner, Phillip Thienger, Sina Maletti, Muriel Jacquet, Dinda S.H. Lubis & Mark A. Rubin

  2. Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, 3010, Switzerland

    Dilara Akhoundova

  3. Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, 9007, Switzerland

    Stefanie Fischer

  4. Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland

    Lukas Bubendorf

  5. Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, 9007, Switzerland

    Wolfram Jochum

  6. Bern Center for Precision Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, 3008, Switzerland

    Mark A. Rubin

Authors
  1. Dilara Akhoundova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefanie Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joanna Triscott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marika Lehner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Phillip Thienger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sina Maletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Muriel Jacquet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dinda S.H. Lubis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lukas Bubendorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Wolfram Jochum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mark A. Rubin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The work reported in the paper has been performed by the authors, unless clearly specified in the text. D.A, S. F., J. T., M. L., P. T., S.M., M.J., D.L., L. B., W.J.: investigation, D.A., S.F: manuscript writing; D.A. and M.R.: supervision; all authors: manuscript review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Rubin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern, BASEC ID 2022 − 00978). The patient provided written consent for anonymized use of his clinical data. No identifiable images or data are included in this report. All study procedures were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines, such as such as the Declaration of Helsinki, as well as local regulations. All animal studies were approved by the Cantonal Veterinary Ethical Committee, Switzerland (license BE46/2021).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interests

M.A.R. is a co-inventor on patents in the area for diagnosis and therapy in prostate cancer for ETS fusions (University of Michigan and the Brigham and Women’s Hospital), SPOP mutations (Cornell University), and EZH2 (University of Michigan). S.F. has the following conflicts of interest to declare: Advisory Board – Ipsen (compensated, institutional), Speakers’ bureau – Janssen (compensated, institutional), Travel support – Bayer. D.A. and the rest of the authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akhoundova, D., Fischer, S., Triscott, J. et al. Rare histologic transformation of a CTNNB1 (β-catenin) mutated prostate cancer with aggressive clinical course. Diagn Pathol 19, 83 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-024-01511-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-024-01511-3

Keywords

Diagnostic Pathology

ISSN: 1746-1596

Contact us