Open Access

Combination of serum RASSF1A methylation and AFP is a promising non-invasive biomarker for HCC patient with chronic HBV infection

Diagnostic Pathology201510:133

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-015-0317-x

Received: 26 April 2015

Accepted: 22 May 2015

Published: 4 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Hypermethylation of the promoter region of the RAS association domain family 1A gene (RASSF1A) occurs widely in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues. While the diagnostic performance of the use of RASSF1A methylation as a serum or plasma marker in patients with HCC has varied largely in the literature,we confirmed the clinical application value of serum RASSF1A methylation for HBV related HCC in this study.

Methods

A total of 584 participants were recruited into this study, including 190 patients with HCC, 114 patients with liver cirrhosis (LC), 120 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and 160 healthy individuals. Serum RASSF1A methylation was determined by the MethyLight method. In addition, we followed up 43 HCC patients who were unable to undergo surgery for 24 months.

Results

Serum RASSF1A methylation occurred significantly more frequently in patients with HCC (122/190, 64.2 %) than in patients with LC (20/114, 17.5 %), patients with CHB (6/120, 5.0 %) and in healthy individuals (0/160, 0) (P < 0.001); moreover, it allowed for the discrimination of patients with HCC from those with CHB with an areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of 0.796 (64.2 % sensitivity and 89.8 % specificity). Furthermore, the AUC for the combination of serum RASSF1A methylation and AFP level (≥20 ng/L) was 0.876 (80.9 % sensitivity and 93.4 % specificity). Serum RASSF1A methylation positive in patients with HCC was associated with more malignant clinical characteristics and a worse overall survival (OS) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Serum RASSF1A methylation demonstrated a satisfactory value for in the diagnosis of HBV related HCC, and could predict clinical progression and prognosis. In addition, our findings suggested that the combination of serum RASSF1A methylation and AFP level may be a promising non-invasive biomarker for the discrimination of patients with HCC from those with CHB.

Virtual slides

The virtual slides for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/13000_DPAT-D-15-00090.1

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma RAS association domain family 1A Methylation

Background

HCC (Hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC) is one of the high incidence and mortality malignant tumors in the world. Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important etiological factor of HCC in Southeast Asia. The estimated overall HBV carrier prevalence among Chinese aged 1 to 59 years was 9.75 %, and the prevalence in difference provinces in China ranged from 4.49 to 17.85 %, which has led to a large number of individuals who are at risk for HCC [1]. At present, a serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) assay is widely used, but it has a relatively low sensitivity and specificity, and thus its clinical value is limited. Depending on currently clinical diagnostic tools, the patients with HCC may not undergo the most effective treatment as most of them have already progressed to advanced stages by the time they are diagnosed. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the identification of effective diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for HCC.

Aberrant DNA methylation is one of the most common characteristics of malignant cells. Some tumor suppressor genes and other pivotal genes that regulate cell signaling pathways are frequently silenced due to the promoter methylation in tumor tissues; these changes have been tested and shown to be sensitive and specific markers for HCC [24]. However, the use of tumor tissues to test for promoter methylation is invasive and thus impractical for HCC screening in high-risk populations. Several studies have shown that the detection of DNA promoter methylation in serum or plasma is highly consistent with its presence in tumor tissues [5], which suggests that the gene promoter methylation in the serum might be a promising non-invasive biomarker for tumor diagnosis.

The RAS association domain family 1A gene (RASSF1A) is a tumor suppressor gene that is located in the 3p21.3 region and is an important member of the RAS signaling pathway. It plays a critical role in apoptosis cell cycle, microtubule stability, cell adhesion and migration [6]. The RASSF1A gene has been concerned and studied intensively for its tumor suppression, and hypermethylation in the promoter region is suspected as the main mechanism of silencing that is observed widely in human malignancies, including HCC tissues [7, 8]. Although its diagnostic value in serum, plasma or the other body fluids of patients with HCC has been studied, large discrepancies exist in regards to its diagnostic performance, such as the sensitivity (0.27 to 0.94) and specificity (0.38 to 0.95) [9].

The aim of this study was to explore whether the promoter methylation status of RASSF1A as detected by MethyLight assay is altered in the serum of patients with HBV-related HCC compared with age- and gender-matched patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), liver cirrhosis (LC) and healthy individuals. In addition, we evaluated the potential relationship between serum RASSF1A methylation status and the clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) of patients with HCC. Finally, we assessed whether serum RASSF1A methylation was a satisfactory biomarker for HCC patients with chronic HBV infection.

Methods

Subjects

A total of 584 participants who visited Hangzhou First People’s Hospital from June 2011 to June 2013 were enrolled in this study. They were divided into four age- and gender-matched groups (HCC, LC, CHB patients and healthy subjects). In all, 190 patients with HCC had been diagnosed by serum AFP level, liver ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Those who met the diagnostic criteria for HCC, which was confirmed by histological examination were enrolled. These HCC patients had not received any preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy. 114patients with LC were diagnosed by liver ultrasound, CT, and MRI, and exhibited accompanying portal hypertension and hypersplenism. 120 patients with CHB met the diagnostic criteria based on the guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B (2010 version) by the Chinese Society of Hepatology and Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases of the Chinese Medical Association, and did not have LC and HCC as detected by liver ultrasound. 160 healthy individuals were obtainde from Physical Examination Center of Hangzhou First People’s Hospital.

In addition, the patients with HCC, LC and CHB were HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive in the serum, and had not undergone anti-viral treatment. The participants who presented with other liver diseases, such as autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis and other types of hepatitis virus infections were excluded from this study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hangzhou First People’s Hospital.

Serum samples collection and DNA extraction

Two milliliters of serum was isolated after centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min and was then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. One milliliter of serum was isolated carefully and stored at −80 °C until use. Serum DNA was extracted by a serum DNA extraction kit (GenMagBio Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) following the protocol recommended by the manufacturer.

Sodium bisulfite modification

Serum DNA was modified by sodium bisulfite treatment and purified using the EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the protocol recommended by the manufacturer.

DNA methylation assay

The methylation status of RASSF1A was examined using methylation-specific quantitative PCR (MethyLight). The modified DNA samples were amplified with specific primers and Taqman probes. The sequences of the primers and probes for RASSF1A and β-actin (ACTB) were previously described [10, 11]. The PCR mixture contained 1 μl bisulfite-treated DNA, 0.15 μl of each primer (10 uM), 0.1 μl of each probe (10 uM), 9.6 μl nuclease-free water, and 10.0 μl 2 × PCR Buffer (Toyobo Co., Ltd, Japan), which consisted of Taq DNA polymerase, reaction buffer, and a deoxynucleotide triphosphate mixture, in a final volume of 20 μl. The PCR was performed for RASSF1A and ACTB in parallel in an ABI 7500 Sequence Detection System (Life Technologies, USA). The PCR program included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, and annealing at 60 °C for 1 min. Genomic DNA from healthy individuals, which was treated with SssI methylase and sodium bisulfite in vitro, was used as a positive control. DNA from healthy human blood was used as a negative control. Water without DNA served as a control for contamination was included in each assay. Serum RASSF1A methylation is presented as the Percentage Methylated Reference (PMR) [12]. A PMR ≥ 4 % would be classified as positive, while a PMR < 4 % would be classified as negative; these values have been validated in the literature as the standard cut-off values [1316].

Statistical analysis

The Mann–Whitney test was used to study the differences in the non-parameter variables. The Correlation between serum RASSF1A methylation and clinicopathologic parameters was determined using the χ2 test. Overall survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were calculated to determine the feasibility of using serum RASSF1A methylation and/or AFP level as a biomarker for HCC. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analyses were performed with SPSS software (version 15; SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).

Results

Demographics

The baseline characteristics of the enrolled participants are shown in Table 1. Of those, the serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TBIL) were obviously higher in cases of HCC, LC and CHB compared with the healthy controls (P < 0.05), whereas the albumin (ALB) and platelet (PLT) levels were higher in the healthy controls (P < 0.05). The frequency of a serum AFP level ≥20 ng/L was highest in patients with HCC followed by patients with CHB and patients with LC (P <0.05).
Table 1

The baseline clinical data of 584 subjects

Characteristics

HCC (n = 190)

LC (n = 114)

CHB (n = 120)

Health (n = 160)

Age (y)

52.32 ± 18.63

54.65 ± 15.39

54.65 ± 15.33

52.12 ± 16.76

Male

136 (71.58)

76 (66.67)

84 (70.00)

110 (68.75)

ALT (U/L)

62.82 ± 46.27

71.19 ± 32.40

90.81 ± 60.23

24.62 ± 16.28

ALB (g/L)

33.39 ± 14.57

30.18 ± 11.95

38.13 ± 8.26

40.13 ± 4.67

TBIL (μmol/L)

26.54 ± 19.83

76.49 ± 42.35

50.28 ± 46.03

9.81 ± 6.73

PLT (×109/μL)

15.65 ± 13.07

11.36 ± 9.81

16.85 ± 13.49

19.04 ± 10.27

HBeAg (+)

96 (50.52)

60 (52.63)

68 (56.67)

0 (0)

HBV DNA (log10 copies/mL)

5.93 ± 1.86

5.78 ± 1.29

5.87 ± 1.13

0

AFP (≥20 ng/L)

118 (62.11)

62 (54.39)

32 (26.67)

0 (0)

There were significant differences in the levels of ALT, ALB, TBIL, PLT and AFP in the HCC, LC and CHB groups (P < 0.05). All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%)

HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, LC liver cirrhosis, CHB chronic hepatitis B; ALT alanine aminotransferase, ALB albumin, TBIL total bilirubin, PLT blood platelet, HBeAg HBV e-antigen, AFP α-fetoprotein

Methylation status of RASSF1A in the serum

Methylation of RASSF1A in the serum was detected in 122 of 190 (64.2 %) from patients from the HCC group, in 20 of 114 (17.5 %) patients from the LC group and in 6 of 120 (5.0 %) patients from the CHB group, but no methylation of RASSF1A was detected in the healthy controls. The rate of serum RASSF1A methylation in patients with HCC patients was significantly higher than that in patients with LC or CHB patients (P < 0.001) Fig. 1.

Evaluation of serum RASSF1A methylation as a potential HCC diagnostic marker for HCC

To further investigate the diagnostic value of serum RASSF1A methylation in HCC, ROC curves were constructed. Serum RASSF1A methylation discriminated HCC patients from CHB patients with an AUC of 0.796 (95 % CI = 0.721–0.864), the sensitivity and specificity for it was 64.2 and 89.8 %, respectively. The serum AFP at the cut-off value of 20 ng/mL yielded an AUC of 0.756 (95 % CI = 0.652–0.805) with a sensitivity of 62.1 % and a specificity of 80.7 %. Furthermore, the AUC for the combination of both indicators was 0.876 (95 % CI = 0.781–0.933), the sensitivity 80.9 % and specificity at 93.4 % Fig. 2.

Methylation and clinicopathological characteristics in HCC patients

The association between serum RASSF1A methylation and the clinicopathological characteristics of HCC was assessed (Table 2). Some of the clinical parameters, such as histological grading, tumor stage and portal venous invasion were significantly related to serum RASSF1A methylation (P < 0.05). However, no significant relationship was observed between serum RASSF1A methylation and the other parameters, such as serum HBeAg status, tumor number, tumor size and liver cirrhosis (P > 0.05).
Table 2

Correlation between serum RASSF1A methylation status and clinico-pathological features of HCC [n (%)]

Characteristics

Case (n = 190)

RASSF1A methylation positive (n = 122)

χ 2

P

HBeAg

    

 Positive

96 (50.5)

71 (58.2)

1.757

0.185

 Negative

94 (49.5)

51 (41.8)

  

Tumor number

    

 Single

128 (67.4)

84 (68.9)

0.075

0.784

 Multiple

62 (32.6)

38 (31.1)

  

Tumor size

    

  < 5 cm

92 (48.4)

50 (41.0)

1.657

0.198

  ≥ 5 cm

98 (51.6)

72 (59.0)

  

Histological grading

    

 I + II

134 (70.5)

69 (56.6)

6.378

0.012

 III + IV

56 (29.5)

53 (43.4)

  

TNM stage

    

 I + II

68 (35.8)

26 (21.3)

7.859

0.005

 III + IV

122 (64.2)

96 (78.7)

  

Portal venous invasion

    

 Yes

122 (64.2)

62 (50.8)

5.506

0.019

 No

68 (35.8)

60 (49.2)

  

Liver cirrhosis

    

 Yes

118 (62.1)

64 (52.5)

2.844

0.092

 No

72 (37.9)

58 (47.5)

  

All data are presented as n (%)

HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, HBeAg HBV e-antigen

Serum RASSF1A methylation status and survival of HCC patients

Forty-three HCC patients were unable to undergo surgical operation in this study, which were followed up for 24 months completely. These patients were divided into the positive group (n = 24) and the negative group (n = 19) according to the PMR of serum RASSF1A promoter. The patients with serum RASSF1A methylation were more likely to have worse OS according to the Kaplan–Meier analysis (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1

The rate of positive serum RASSF1A methylation in the HCC, LC, CHB and healthy control groups. The positive rate was 64.2 % (122/190), 17.5 % (20/114), 5.0 % (6/120) and 0 (0/160), respectively; P * < 0.01 versus CHB; P ** < 0.001 versus LC, CHB

Fig. 2

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses using serum RASSF1A methylation and AFP for the discrimination of patients with HCC from patients with CHB. Positive serum RASSF1A methylation yielded an AUC of 0.796 (95 % CI: 0.721–0.864) with a sensitivity of 64.2 % and a specificity of 89.8 % for the discrimination of patients with HCC from patients with CHB; serum AFP at the cut-off value (≥20 ng/mL) yielded an AUC of 0.756 (95 % CI: 0.652–0.805) with a sensitivity of 62.1 % and a specificity of 80.7 %; combined, both indicators yielded an AUC of 0.876 (95 % CI: 0.781–0.933) with a sensitivity of 80.9 % and a specificity of 93.4 %

Fig. 3

Kaplan–Meier analysis of the overall survival (OS) of 43 patients with HCC. Forty-three patients with HCC were followed-up for 25 months. A Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients with HCC with serum RASSF1A positivity (n = 24) were more likely to experience a worse OS (P = 0.017)

Discussion

Aberrant promoter methylation of the tumor suppressor RASSF1A leads to many malignancies, which indicates that it plays an important role in the development of human cancer [17]. Down-regulation of RASSF1A expression was unrelated to some conventional etiologies, such as HBV / HCV infection, alcohol consumption, and food aflatoxin B1 contamination [3], which suggested that the inactivation of RASSF1A may be a common event in HCC development. Some studies have reported that the rate of RASSF1A methylation was up to 85, 95 and 100 % in HCC tissues, [1820]. In addition, Hu [21] has shown that reduced of RASSF1A protein expression was related to clinicopathological features of HCC patients with regard to TNM stage, AFP level, tumor metastasis and presence of multiple nodules. These data suggested that RASSF1A methylation may be a promising non-invasive biomarker for HCC. However, the results of current studies on the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RASSF1A methylation in peripheral blood of HCC patient have been so varied [9]; this phenomenon may be attributed to the detection methods or the sample size, and therefore its non-invasive application value for HCC needs to be further confirmed.

In this study, we used the MethyLight method to detect serum RASSF1A methylation in a larger sample, and when the PRM ≥4 the result is positive. We found that the rate of serum RASSF1A methylation in HCC patients was significantly higher than that in LC or CHB patients; however, no RASSF1A methylation was detected in healthy subjects. Currently, the serum AFP level (≥20 ng/L) is widely used in the distinction of HCC from CHB, and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 62.1 and 80.7 % in this study, respectively. In the same way, serum RASSF1A methylation yielded a sensitivity of 64.2 % and specificity of 89.8 %, which were prior to AFP level (≥20 ng/L). When RASSF1A methylation and serum AFP are used in combination to distinguish HCC from CHB, the sensitivity and specificity are inceased to 80.9 and 93.4 %, respectively. This result indicates that both indicators combined would be a better marker for HCC in HBV prevalence region. Through an analysis of the relationship between the RASSF1A methylation status and the clinicopathological features of HCC patients, we found that serum RASSF1A methylation was associated with higher histological grading, tumor stage and the occurrence of portal venous invasion. This result suggested that serum RASSF1A methylation positive could predict the clinical progression of HCC patients.

In addition, we conducted 2 years of follow-up study in 43 patients who were not treated with surgery. Our results showed that the OS of patients with serum RASSF1A methylation was significantly lower than that of the patients without RASSF1A methylation. Circulating free DNA may result from the formation of circulating tumor cells or DNA fragments generated by tumor cell necrosis and apoptosis [22, 23]. This hypothesis implies that serum RASSF1A methylation may originate in circulating tumor cells, which then leads to tumor metastasis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, serum RASSF1A methylation may be a valid biomarker for HBV-related HCC and could predict clinical progression. Specifically, the combination of serum RASSF1A methylation and the AFP level could strengthen the power of discrimination of HCC and CHB.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Qiao-Feng Tu and Wen-Juan Tong for their excellent technical assistance and Xiang Fang for serum specimen processing and acquisition. This research was supported by the Hangzhou Board of Health (#2012Z04), Zhejiang Province, China.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hangzhou First People’s Hospital
(2)
The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

References

  1. Tanaka M, Katayama F, Kato H, Tanaka H, Wang J, Qiao YL, et al. Hepatitis B and C virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a review of epidemiology and control measures. J Epidemiol. 2011;21:401–16.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sceusi EL, Loose DS, Wray CJ. Clinical implications of DNA methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:369–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Nishida N, Nagasaka T, Nishimura T, Ikai I, Boland CR, Goel A. Aberrant methylation of multiple tumor suppressor genes in aging liver, chronic hepatitis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2008;47:908–18.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yang B, Du Z, Gao YT, Lou C, Zhang SG, Bai T, et al. Methylation of Dickkopf-3 as a prognostic factor in cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:755–63.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Dulaimi E, Hillinck J, Ibanez de Caceres I, Al-Saleem T, Cairns P. Tumor suppressor gene promoter hypermethylation in serum of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:6189–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Agathanggelou A, Cooper WN, Latif F. Role of the Ras-association domain family 1 tumor suppressor gene in human cancers. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3497–508.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Donninger H, Vos MD, Clark GJ. The RASSF1A tumor suppressor. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:3163–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. van der Weyden L, Adams DJ. The Ras-association domain family (RASSF) members and their role in human tumourigenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1776:58–85.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhao ZH, Fan YC, Yang Y, Wang K. Association between Ras association domain family 1A promoter methylation and hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:7189–96.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Fackler MJ, McVeigh M, Mehrotra J, Blum MA, Lange J, Lapides A, et al. Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR assay for the detection of promoter hypermethylation in multiple genes in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:4442–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Widschwendter M, Siegmund KD, Muller HM, Fiegl H, Marth C, Muller-Holzner E, et al. Association of breast cancer DNA methylation profiles with hormone receptor status and response to tamoxifen. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3807–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Eads CA, Danenberg KD, Kawakami K, Saltz LB, Blake C, Shibata D, et al. MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28, E32.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Eads CA, Lord RV, Wickramasinghe K, Long TI, Kurumboor SK, Bernstein L, et al. Epigenetic patterns in the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3410–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Brahmandam M, Cantor M, Kirkner GJ, Spiegelman D, et al. Precision and performance characteristics of bisulfite conversion and real-time PCR (MethyLight) for quantitative DNA methylation analysis. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8:209–17.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman WB, Rivenbark AG. Quantitative DNA methylation analysis: the promise of high-throughput epigenomic diagnostic testing in human neoplastic disease. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8:152–6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Uccella S, Cerutti R, Placidi C, Marchet S, Carnevali I, Bernasconi B, et al. MGMT methylation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: validation of quantitative methylation-specific PCR and comparison with MGMT protein expression. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:715–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfeifer GP, Yoon JH, Liu L, Tommasi S, Wilczynski SP, Dammann R. Methylation of the RASSF1A gene in human cancers. Biol Chem. 2002;383:907–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang YJ, Ahsan H, Chen Y, Lunn RM, Wang LY, Chen SY, et al. High frequency of promoter hypermethylation of RASSF1A and p16 and its relationship to aflatoxin B1-DNA adduct levels in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2002;35:85–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhong S, Yeo W, Tang MW, Wong N, Lai PB, Johnson PJ. Intensive hypermethylation of the CpG island of Ras association domain family 1A in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:3376–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yu J, Ni M, Xu J, Zhang H, Gao B, Gu J, et al. Methylation profiling of twenty promoter-CpG islands of genes which may contribute to hepatocellular carcinogenesis. BMC Cancer. 2002;2:29.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu L, Chen G, Yu H, Qiu X. Clinicopathological significance of RASSF1A reduced expression and hypermethylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int. 2010;4:423–32.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Stroun M, Maurice P, Vasioukhin V, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Lefort F, et al. The origin and mechanism of circulating DNA. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;906:161–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Philipp AB, Nagel D, Stieber P, Lamerz R, Thalhammer I, Herbst A, et al. Circulating cell-free methylated DNA and lactate dehydrogenase release in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:245.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Dong et al. 2015

Advertisement