Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) promoter methylation and expression in pituitary adenoma

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Diagnostic Pathology201712:33

  • Received: 21 October 2016
  • Accepted: 28 March 2017
  • Published:



Pituitary adenoma (PA) is a benign primary tumor that arises from the pituitary gland and is associated with ophthalmological, neurological and endocrinological abnormalities. However, causes that increase tumor progressing recurrence and invasiveness are still undetermined. Several studies have shown N-myc downstream regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) as a tumor suppressor gene, but the role of NDRG2 gene in pituitary adenoma pathogenesis has not been elucidated. The aim of our research has been to examine NDRG2 mRNA expression in PA and to determine the associations between the NDRG2 gene epigenetic changes and the development of recurrence or invasiveness of PA and patient clinical data.


The MS-PCR was used for NDRG2 promoter methylation analysis and gene mRNA expression levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR in 68 non-functioning and 73 functioning adenomas. Invasiveness was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging with Hardy’s modified criteria. Statistical analysis was performed to find correlations between NDRG2 gene mRNA expression, promoter methylation and patient clinical characteristics and PA activity.


The NDRG2 mRNA expression was significantly lower in the case of acromegaly (GH and IGF-1 hypersecretion) than in other diagnoses of PAs (p < 0.05). Also, the NDRG2 expression was significantly higher in prolactinoma (PRL hypersecretion) than in in other diagnoses of PAs (p < 0.05). The promoter of NDRG2 was methylated in 22.69% (12/58 functioning and 15/61 non-functioning) of patients with PA. However, the NDRG2 gene mRNA expression was not significantly related to its methylation status. Clinical factors, such as: age, gender, relapse and diagnoses of Cushing syndrome were of no significance for NDRG2 promoter methylation and mRNA expression levels, as well as secreting or non-secreting PAs and the invasiveness of PAs.


The different NDRG2 promoter methylation and expression levels in PA samples showed tumor heterogeneity and indicates a potential role of this gene in pituitary adenoma pathogenesis, but the corresponding details require intensive research.


  • Pituitary adenoma
  • N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2
  • NDRG2
  • DNA methylation
  • mRNA expression
  • Invasiveness


Pituitary adenoma (PA) is a common intracranial neoplasm with reported estimated prevalence rates to be 14.4% to 22.5% in pooled autopsy and radiological series, respectively [1]. PAs are generally benign but can behave clinically in different ways. Some of pituitary tumors are hormonally inactive, others secrete hormones in excess, and some of PAs can cause morbidity because of dysregulation of hormone production and/or symptoms of mass effect [2, 3]. The pituitary gland is localized in a dual bag attached to the inferior aspect of the diaphragm of the sella and surrounded by venous spaces that correspond laterally to the cavernous sinuses [4]. Cavernous sinus invasion has an influence on the management and prognosis of PA [5], because dual wall invasion usually implies partial surgical removal of the tumor [6]. Early prediction of which pituitary tumor will recur and/or exhibit an invasive phenotype remains difficult despite the introduction of several tissue-based molecular markers [7].

Associations between tumors (including glioblastoma, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, breast and liver cancers, meningioma, bladder and thyroid cancers) and N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) have been reported in numerous studies [816]. NDRG2 is a member of the NDRG family, which consists of NDRG1, NDRG2, NDRG3 and NDRG4 [17] and is located at chromosome 14q11.2, a region that has been reported to harbor a tumor suppressor gene [18]. NDRG2 is highly expressed in the brain and skeletal muscle, while it is marginally expressed or almost undetectable in the several human cancer cell lines [17, 19]. NDRG proteins are reported to be involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, invasion and stress response [19]. It was shown that NDRG2 reduce tumor cell proliferation in glioblastomas [20]. Also, NDRG2 upregulation was associated with Alzheimer's disease or cerebral ischemia [21, 22]. Several studies have shown NDRG2 promoter CpG island methylation and down-regulation in liver [13], gastric [10], colorectal cancers (CRC) [23, 24], glioblastomas [8, 9] and anaplastic meningioma [25]. However, NDRG2 promoter methylation and mRNA expression levels in PAs has not been investigated.

The aim of this study was to determinate aberrant promoter methylation and mRNA expression of NDRG2 in PAs and to evaluate the associations between the methylation profile of gene, mRNA expression, patients’ clinical characteristics and tumor invasiveness and recurrence.


Description of subject

One hundred forty one pituitary adenoma tissues and clinical patient data were collected at the Department of Neurosurgery of Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences between 2010 and 2016. Tumor tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after their surgical resection. The age at the time of the operation, gender, relapse, size and diagnoses of Cushing syndrome, acromegaly or prolactinoma were collected for each patient. The endocrinological features were: 73 functioning and 68 nonfunctioning adenomas. According to the clinical findings functioning adenomas were: 7 growth hormone (GH) - secreting adenomas, 2 insulin-like grow factor 1 (IGF-1) - secreting adenomas, 1 cortisol (COR) - secreting adenoma, 44 prolactin (PRL) - secreting adenomas, 1 adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) - secreting adenoma and 18 adenomas secreting more than one hormone. According to tumor size all PAs were macroadenomas (greater than 10 mm).

Invasion of pituitary adenomas were analyzed using MR imaging findings and classified according to Hardy classification, modified by Wilson [5]. The Knosp classification system was used to quantify the invasion of the cavernous sinus [6]. Invasiveness was established in 71 patients with pituitary adenoma. From them, 51 invasive and 20 non-invasive PAs were found.

Nucleic acid extraction

Tissue specimens were pulverized and stored at -80 °C until DNA and RNA was obtained. Genomic DNA was extracted from 119 PA specimens by SDS/proteinase K treatment, followed by phenol–chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The remaining 22 samples were missing because of containing too small an amount of tumor tissue. All the samples were stored at -20 °C until DNA was modified with sodium bisulfite.

Total RNA was extracted from 141 PAs using Trizol reagent, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Ambion, Life Technologies) and stored at -80 °C until cDNA synthesis. However, 10 mRNA samples were lost because the concentrations for cDNA synthesis were too small. The genomic DNA and RNA concentrations and purity was determined using Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Eppendorf). For pure DNA, A260/280 is ~1.8 and for pure RNA A260/280 is ~2.

Bisulfite Modification and MS-PCR

Extracted genomic DNA of 119 PA samples was modified with EZ DNA methylation kit™ (Zymo Research), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sodium bisulfite treated DNA was eluted in 40 μL of nuclease-free water.

After bisulfite modification, the methylation-specific polymerase chain reactions (MS-PCR) were performed in 15 μl of 7.5 μL Maxima® Hot Start PCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific) with Hot Start Taq DNA polymerase, 10 pmol of each primer (Metabion International AG) and nuclease-free water. Primers for methylated NDRG2 allele were: 5'-AGAGGTATTAGGATTTTGGGTACG-3' (forward) and 5'-GCTAAAAAAACGAAAATCTCGC-3' (reverse) and for unmethylated allele: 5'-AGAGGTATTAGGATTTT GGGTATGA-3' (forward) and 5'-CCACTAAAAAAACAAAAATCTCACC-3' (reverse), according to the published data [23]. The reaction was hotstart at 95 °C for 5 min. The amplifications were carried out in a thermal cycler (Eppendorf) for 38 cycles, each of which consisted of denaturation at 92 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 15 s, followed by a final 5 min extension at 72 °C. For each set of methylation-specific PCR reactions methylated (Bisulfite-Converted Universal Methylated Human DNA Standard (Zymo Research, USA)), unmethylated (human blood lymphocyte DNA, treated with bisulfite) and negative (nuclease-free water) controls were included in all reactions.

The MS-PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV illumination.

cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR

First-strand cDNA was produced from total RNA by using RevertAid H Minus M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (ThermoFisher Scientific) and random hexamer primers (ThermoFisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Negative controls were prepared as above, but without Reverse Transcriptase.

For the NDRG2 gene mRNA expression, Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using the SYBR Green chemistry in a Real-Time PCR System “Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast” (Applied Biosystems, USA). The 12 μl reaction mixture contained of 6 μl Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (2×) (ThermoFisher Scientific), 15 ng of the cDNA, nuclease-free water and gene-specific primers: NDRG2 forward 5`-AGAGCTACGACCTGAC-3`, reverse 5`-AGCACTGTGTGTACAG-3` resulting in a 128 bp PCR amplicon to a total concentration of 0.6 μM. The housekeeping gene β-actin was used as an internal control with primers: forward 5`-CATTACACATCCAACC-3`, reverse 5`-GGAGTCAGCCTGAGGA-3`, resulting in a 184 bp PCR amplicon to a total concentration of 0.1 μM. The NDRG2 and β-actin primers were designed according to the published data [26]. The PCR amplification was performed after denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles, each of which consisted of denaturation at 92 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and a final step for the generation of a melting curve to distinguish between the main PCR product and primer-dimers. All measurements were performed in triplicate.

The comparative 2-ΔΔCt method was used for the calculations of NDRG2 gene mRNA expression. The comparison was carried out between PA normalized threshold cycle (Ct) values and healthy human brain (RHB) normalized Ct values: ΔΔCt = (Ct, NDRG2 - Ct, β-actin )PA sample x - (Ct, NDRG2 - Ct, β-actin )RHB [27]. The final result was given as log2(2-ΔΔCt) calculation.

For standard curve design, RHB “FirstChoice Human Brain Reference RNA” (Ambion, cat. No. AM6050) was used. Standard curve parameters for NDRG2 were: efficiency 99.71%, R2 0.994, slope −3.33; for β-actin were: efficiency 100.08%, R2 0.997, slope −3.32.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS Statistics 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) software package was used for statistical analysis. Chi-square test was used to evaluate associations among NDRG2 gene promoter methylation, mRNA expression levels and clinical characteristics (age, gender, relapse, Cushing syndrome, acromegaly, prolactinoma, invasiveness, secreting and non-secreting pituitary adenomas and hormone groups). The correlation between NDRG2 gene expression and methylation and the other clinical factors were evaluated by use of the Mann-Whitney test. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to reveal the difference across medians of NDRG2 mRNA expression in all hormone groups. The significance level was defined as p value less than 0.05.


NDRG2 gene methylation frequency in PAs and associations with patient clinical data

Methylation specific PCR analysis was performed to determine the methylation status of NDRG2 gene in 119 PA samples (Fig. 1c). The gene was methylated in 22.69% (27/119) of cases. Representative chart is shown in Fig. 1a. These results indicate that NDRG2 gene has low methylation status in PAs.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Analysis of NDRG2 gene promoter methylation in PA samples. a Methylation frequency (%). b Hormone distribution of PAs in methylated and unmethylated NDRG2 promoter groups. PRL – prolactin, IGF-1 – insulin-like grow factor 1, GH – growth hormone, ACTH – adrenocorticotropic hormone, multiple – PAs secreting more than one hormone, NS – non-secreting PAs. c Representative MS-PCR for NDRG2 in PA samples. M indicates amplification of methylated alleles, U unmethylated alleles. M cont. – positive methylation control (Standard Bisulfite Converted Universal Methylated Human DNA), U cont. – negative methylation control (normal human peripheral lymphocytes), H2O – water control, I-VI designate PA samples

To characterize the correlation between methylation of NDRG2 promoter and clinical features of PAs, several clinicopathological characteristics including age, gender, relapse, invasiveness, diagnoses of acromegaly, prolactinoma and Cushing syndrome were compared between methylated and unmethylated NDRG2 promoter groups. However, Chi-square test showed that methylation of NDRG2 promoter was not associated with any of this clinical data (p > 0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1

Relationship between NDRG2 promoter methylation, patient clinical characteristics, PA invasiveness and NDRG2 mRNA expression


NDRG2 gene methylation


Number of patients

M (%)

U (%)




27 (22.69)

92 (77.31)


Age (years)



13 (27.08)

35 (72.92)




14 (20.00)

56 (80.00)




15 (22.06)

53 (77.94)




12 (23.53)

39 (76.47)

PA function



15 (24.59)

46 (75.41)




12 (20.69)

46 (79.31)




2 (20.00)

8 (80.00)




25 (22.94)

84 (77.06)




9 (24.32)

28 (75.68)




6 (25.00)

18 (75.00)




4 (33.33)

8 (66.67)




11 (22.45)

38 (77.55)

Cushing syndrome



0 (0.00)

1 (100.00)




15 (25.00)

45 (75.00)




9 (24.32)

28 (75.68)




0 (0.00)

2 (100.00)




2 (33.33)

4 (66.67)




0 (0.00)

1 (100.00)




4 (30.77)

9 (69.23)





10 (24.39)

31 (75.61)




3 (15.79)

16 (84.21)

NDRG2 mRNA expression



3 (13.64)

19 (86.36)




13 (26.00)

37 (74.00)




7 (18.92)

30 (81.08)

M methylated, U unmethylated, PRL prolactin, IGF-1 insulin-like grow factor 1, GH growth hormone, ACTH adrenocorticotropic hormone, multiple PAs secreting more than one hormone

We then analyzed the relationship between NDRG2 promoter methylation and PA hormonal activity (Fig. 1b). The histogram of hormones distribution in methylated and unmethylated gene groups revealed that hypersecretion of PRL, IGF-1, GH, ACTH and more than one hormone mostly occur in PAs with unmethylated promoter of NDRG2 gene. Also, in most cases nonfunctioning PAs have unmethylated NDRG2 gene. However, the data showed no statistically significant differences between these groups (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

NDRG2 gene expression in PAs and associations with NDRG2 promoter methylation and patient clinical data

The expression of NDRG2 mRNA in 131 PAs was determined by qRT-PCR method using the SYBR Green chemistry. The values were normalized with internal β-actin control. To investigate the correlation between NDRG2 promoter methylation and mRNA expression, statistical analysis was performed in 109 PA samples that have the values of methylation and expression. However, Mann-Whitney test showed no significant differences of NDRG2 mRNA expression between the group of NDRG2 methylation samples (23 tumors) and the group of unmethylated NDRG2 gene (86 tumors, p = 0.323).

We then analyzed the correlation between NDRG2 gene mRNA expression and patient clinical characteristics. Using the Mann-Whitney test, we found that the expression of NDRG2 had no correlation with age, gender, presence or absence of repeated surgery, secreting or non-secreting PAs and Cushing syndrome (p = 0.076, p = 0.545, p = 0.783, p = 0.927 and p = 0.980, respectively). Nevertheless, NDRG2 expression was increased with diagnoses of prolactinoma and decreased with diagnoses of acromegaly, compared to patients with other symptoms (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2a, b).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

NDRG2 gene expression associations with diagnoses of prolactinoma and acromegaly. a Box plots of relative NDRG2 expression associated with diagnoses of prolactinoma. b Box plots of relative NDRG2 expression associated with diagnoses of acromegaly. None – no diagnoses of acromegaly. The line inside each box represents the median, the lower and upper edges of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively, and upper and lower lines outside the boxes represent minimum and maximum values (error bars). The Mann-Whitney test showed, that the NDRG2 expression level was increased with diagnoses of prolactinoma and decreased with diagnoses of acromegaly (p < 0.05)

To further investigate whether NDRG2 gene mRNA expression was associated with hormones, we compared medians of NDRG2 mRNA expression in PRL, IGF-1, GH, ACTH, COR and multi hormone groups and nonfunctioning PAs (Fig. 3a). Kruskal–Wallis test revealed that the medians of NDRG2 mRNA expression in all hormone groups statistically differ (p < 0.05), and the box plots showed the tendency that GH-secreting, ACTH-secreting and more than one hormone secreting PAs are at lower gene expression level than other hormone groups. To specify these findings, we then analyzed whether the hormone groups and nonfunctioning PAs reflect on expression levels of NDRG2 gene. For this matter, the NDRG2 mRNA expression values were divided into three gene mRNA expression groups: “low” - values 1.0-fold lower than the NDRG2 gene mRNA expression median, “medium” - values ranging in between “low” and “high”, and “high” - values 1.0-fold higher than the gene median) As shown in Fig. 3b, distribution of hormones in NDRG2 expression levels were different. In most cases PRL hypersecretion was detected with medium NDRG2 gene expression level (p < 0.05). IGF-1, COR, GH, and ACTH hormones showed no statistically significant differences (p = 0.730, p = 0.172, p = 0.075, p = 0.379, respectively) as well as multiple (more than one hormone) and non-secreting PAs (p = 0.096, p = 0.584, respectively). Nevertheless, the histogram of hormone groups distribution showed a tendency, that the hypersecretion of IGF-1 hormone mostly occur with medium and low NDRG2 gene expression levels, COR - with high NDRG2 mRNA expression level, GH, ACTH and multiple – at low gene expression level (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

NDRG2 gene expression associations with PAs hormones. a Box plots of medians of NDRG2 mRNA expression in PRL, IGF-1, GH, ACTH, COR, multiple hormone groups and nonfunctioning PAs. The line inside each box represents the median, the lower and upper edges of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively, and upper and lower lines outside the boxes represent minimum and maximum values (error bars). PRL – prolactin, IGF-1 – insulin-like grow factor 1, GH – growth hormone, ACTH – adrenocorticotropic hormone, multiple – PAs secreting more than one hormone, NS – non-secreting PAs. b Hormones distribution in low, medium and high NDRG2 expression levels. Significantly increased amount of PRL hormone was observed at medium NDRG2 mRNA expression level (* p < 0.05)

Finally, we analyzed the relationship between NDRG2 gene promoter methylation, mRNA expression, and invasiveness of 71 pituitary adenomas (51 invasive and 20 noninvasive). However, the analysis (Chi-square and Mann-Whitney test) showed no significant differences between these groups (p = 0.452, p = 0.472, respectively). Additionally, secreting and non-secreting PAs also had no correlations with invasiveness (p = 0.571). We also wanted to reveal the tendency of invasiveness in PRL, IGF-1, GH, COR, ACTH and more than one hormone secreting PAs. In addition to this, the dot plot analysis was performed (Fig. 4). The comparison showed that the means of NDRG2 gene mRNA expression of hormones in invasive and non-invasive tumor groups were various. The lowest NDRG2 expression was detected in PAs secreting more than one hormone, and the highest in PRL-secreting and non-secreting pituitary adenomas (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Dot plot analysis of NDRG2 mRNA expression in invasive and noninvasive hormones of PAs. The horizontal bars represent the mean values with 95% confidence interval, the spots represent the amount of samples. PRL – prolactin, IGF-1 – insulin-like grow factor 1, multiple – PAs secreting more than one hormone, NS – non-secreting PAs; I – invasive, N – non-invasive PA


Pituitary adenoma is a common benign monoclonal neoplasm [28]. Early prediction of which pituitary tumors will recur and/or exhibit an invasive phenotype remains difficult [7]. NDRG2 gene may be a promising target for cancer, because NDRG2 down-regulation is associated with cancer development and progression, including such features as malignant clinical manifestations and increased pathological grade. Moreover, this gene is a relevant biomarker for predicting aggressive behavior, tumor recurrence and overall patient survival [29]. Therefore, should be further studies to show that NDRG2 up-regulation may be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cancer and that might be associated with PA development, as well.

We began our study by defining NDRG2 promoter methylation status in PA samples, including all the clinically functioning and hormonally inactive types. We have determined 22.69% (27/119) NDRG2 methylation frequency. These results indicate that NDRG2 gene has low methylation status in PAs. A number of studies using various techniques have shown that epigenetic silencing of the NDRG2 promoter has been found in the majority of primary tumors, and different cancer cell lines and other tumor tissues such as glioma (46.3 - 62%), primary gastric (54%) and colorectal carcinoma (64.28%) cancers [811]. NDRG2 promoter methylation was observed to be associated with the invasiveness in gastric and colorectal cancer and with the aggressiveness of glioma tumor [810]. However, our analysis has hown no significant association between NDRG2 gene methylation and pituitary adenoma invasiveness. Meanwhile, we have demonstrated that hypersecretion of PRL, IGF-1, GH, ACTH hormones appear with a methylated NDRG2 gene more often than with an unmethylated gene. Also, in most cases nonfunctioning PAs have an unmethylated NDRG2 gene. However, the mechanisms related to this are still unknown.

Moreover, previous studies have shown that NDRG2 mRNA expression is low in numerous types of tumor tissues and cancer cell lines, and is a novel tumor suppressor candidate gene [8, 1216]. It was observed that NDRG2 expression loss is significantly correlated with aggressive tumor behaviors such as late tumor-node-metastasis stage, differentiation grade, portal vein thrombi, infiltrative growth pattern, nodal/distant metastasis, as well as shorter patient survival rates in liver cancer [13]. Also, NDRG2 overexpression can inhibit tumor growth and invasion in vitro in bladder and breast cancer [12, 15]. Meanwhile, our results have showed no correlation between NDRG2 gene mRNA expression and pituitary adenoma invasiveness. The mechanism of NDRG2 expression in pituitary adenoma proliferation and invasion has not yet been reported, making it necessary to further elucidate the role of NDRG2 gene in pathogenesis of PA.

In addition, we have analyzed the associations of NDRG2 gene mRNA expression with clinical features of PAs. Our study has revealed that in the case of acromegaly, NDRG2 gene mRNA expression is significantly lower than in other diagnoses of PAs. It is known that acromegaly is an insidious disorder characterized by excess secretion of growth hormone and elevated circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-I [30], and in our examination, in most cases the hypersecretion of GH and IGF-1 hormones were determined with low NDRG2 gene expression level as well. Moreover, NDRG2 gene mRNA expression is significantly higher with diagnoses of prolactinoma than in other diagnoses of PAs, and in most cases the hypersecretion of PRL hormone that causes prolactinoma have been detected with medium NDRG2 expression level. These results are consistent with previous reports that the expression of NDRG2 is regulated by many hormones, including adrenal steroids [31], dexamethasone [32], insulin [33], androgen [34] and aldosterone [35]. It was also shown that hormone estrogen can enhance the expression of NDRG2 and may influence Na+/K + -ATPase activation as well as ion transport in salivary glands, brain, heart, skeletal muscle, and kidney where Na+/K + -ATPases were enriched [36]. Also, in human and in animal models estrogen stimulates PRL secretion in vitro and induces PRL adenomas in vivo [37]. However, more studies for signal pathway are needed to show the mechanism underlying and the significant results we showed in this study.


This is the first study that has demonstrated the NDRG2 gene promoter methylation and mRNA expression in patients with diagnoses of pituitary adenoma and analyzed the relationships between NDRG2 epigenetic changes and the association with PA clinical features including patient age, gender, relapse, hormone groups, invasiveness, diagnoses of prolactinoma, acromegaly and Cushing syndrome. Our data have revealed that in the case of acromegaly, NDRG2 gene mRNA expression is significantly lower than in other diagnosis of PAs and PA that secretes hormones GH and IGF-1 hormones have low NDRG2 gene expression level as well. Moreover, NDRG2 gene expression is significantly higher with diagnoses of prolactinoma than in other diagnosis of PAs. Therefore, there is need for intensive research to confirm our findings and justify the hypothesis that NDRG2 could be a diagnostic marker for diagnosis of prolactinoma and acromegaly in PAs.



Adrenocorticotropic hormone




Colorectal cancer


Threshold cycle


Growth hormone


Insulin-like growth factor 1


Magnetic resonance


Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction


N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2


Pituitary adenoma




Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction


Human brain reference RNA.



The authors thank Silvija Jakstiene for radiological evaluation.


This research was funded by a grant (No. MIP-008/2014) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact author for data requests.

Authors’ contributions

PV, RL and BG generated the idea. RL and BG gathered postoperative pituitary adenoma tissue and patient data. PV and IV extracted tissue DNA and RNA, and performed bisulfate modification of DNA, MS-PCR experiments, and qRT-PCR . PV and IV did statistical analysis of data. PV, IV, RL and BG wrote a manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission (Number P2-9/2003) to undertake the study was obtained from the Kaunas Regional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee. Written patient consent under the approval of Ethics Committee of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences was obtained for every patient.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str.4, LT-50009 Kaunas, Lithuania


  1. Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, Barr CE, Dodge WE, Vance ML, McCutcheon IE. The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer. 2004;101(3):613–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Asa SL. Tumors of the pituitary gland. In: AFIP Atlas of Tumor Pathology. (Series 4, Fascicle 15). Washington: American Registry of Pathology Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  3. Monsalves E, Juraschka K, Tateno T, Agnihotri S, Asa SL, Ezzat S, Zadeh G. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in the pathophysiology and treatment of pituitary adenomas. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014;21(4):R331–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Destrieux C, Kakou MK, Velut S, Lefrancq T, Jan M. Microanatomy of the hypophyseal fossa boundaries. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:743–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wilson CB. Neurosurgical management of large and invasive pituitary tumors. In: Clinical management of pituitary disorders. In: Tindall GT, Collins WF, editors. New York, Raven press; 1979. p. 335-42.Google Scholar
  6. Sekhar LN, Burgess J, Akin O. Anatomical study of the cavernous sinus emphasizing operative approaches and related vascular and neural reconstruction. Neurosurgery. 1987;21:806–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Heaney A. Management of aggressive pituitary adenomas and pituitary carcinomas. J Neurooncol. 2014;117(3):459–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhou B, Tang Z, Deng Y, Hou S, Liu N, Lin W, Liu X, Yao L. Tumor suppressor candidate gene, NDRG2 is frequently inactivated in human glioblastoma multiforme. Mol Medicine Rep. 2014;10(2):891–6.Google Scholar
  9. Tepel M, Roerig P, Wolter M, Gutmann DH, Perry A, Reifenberger G, Riemenschneider MJ. Frequent promoter hypermethylation and transcriptional downregulation of the NDRG2 gene at 14q11.2 in primary glioblastoma. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:2080–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang X, Li Z, Ma J, Deng P, Zhang S, Zhi Y, Chen J, Dai D. DNA methylation of NDRG2 in gastric cancer and its clinical significance. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:715–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Feng L, Xie Y, Zhang H, Wu Y. Down-regulation of NDRG2 gene expression in human colorectal cancer involves promoter methylation and microRNA-650. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;25(406):534–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lorentzen A, Lewinsky RH, Bornholdt J, Vogel LK, Mitchelmore C. Expression profile of the N-myc Downstream Regulated Gene 2 (NDRG2) in human cancers with focus on breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11(14):1–8.Google Scholar
  13. Lee DC, Kang YK, Kim WH, Jang YJ, Kim DJ, Park IY, Sohn BH, Sohn HA, Lee HG, et al. Functional and clinical evidence for NDRG2 as a candidate suppressor of liver cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2008;68(11):4210–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Skiriute D, Tamasauskas S, Asmoniene V, Saferis V, Skauminas K, Deltuva V, Tamasauskas A. Tumor grade-related NDRG2 gene expression in primary and recurrent intracranial meningiomas. J Neurooncol. 2011;102(1):89–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Li R, Yu C, Jiang F, Gao L, Li J, Wang Y, Beckwith N, Yao L, Zhang J, Wu G. Overexpression of N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) regulates the proliferation and invasion of bladder cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):1–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhao H, Zhang J, Lu J, He X, Chen C, Li X, Gong L, Bao G, Fu Q, et al. Reduced expression of N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 2 in human thyroid cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8(303):1–9.Google Scholar
  17. Qu X, Zhai Y, Wei H, Zhang C, Xing G, Yu Y, He F. Characterization and expression of three novel differentiation-related genes belong to the human NDRG gene family. Mol Cell Biochem. 2002;229(1-2):35–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mutirangura A, Pornthanakasem W, Sriuranpong V, Supiyaphun P, Voravud N. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 14 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1998;78(2):153–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Melotte V, Qu X, Ongenaert M, van Criekinge W, de Bruïne AP, Baldwin HS, Engeland M. The N-myc downstream regulated gene (NDRG) family: diverse functions, multiple applications. FASEB J. 2010;24(11):4153–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Deng Y, Yao L, Chau L, Ng SS, Peng Y, Liu X, Au WS, Wang J, Li F, et al. N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) inhibits glioblastoma cell proliferation. Int J Cancer. 2003;106(3):342–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitchelmore C, Buchmann-Moller S, Rask L, West MJ, Troncoso JC, Jensen NA. NDRG2: a novel Alzheimer's disease associated protein. Neurobiol Dis. 2004;16(1):48–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Y, Shen L, Cai L, Wang Q, Hou W, Wang F, Zeng Y, Zhao G, Yao L, et al. Spatial-temporal expression of NDRG2 in rat brain after focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. Brain Res. 2011;1382:252–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Piepoli A, Cotugno R, Merla G, Gentile A, Augello B, Quitadamo M, Merla A, Panza A, Carella M, et al. Promoter methylation correlates with reduced NDRG2 expression in advanced colon tumour. BMC Med Genomics. 2009;2:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hong SN, Kim SJ, Kim ER, Chang DK, Kim YH. Epigenetic silencing of NDRG2 promotes colorectal cancer proliferation and invasion. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(1):164–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lusis EA, Watson MA, Chicoine MR, Lyman M, Roerig P, Reifenberger G, Gutmann DH, Perry A. Integrative genomic analysis identifies NDRG2 as a candidate tumor suppressor gene frequently inactivated in clinically aggressive meningioma. Cancer Res. 2005;65(16):7121–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Skiriute D, Steponaitis G, Vaitkiene P, Mikučiūnas M, Skauminas K, Tamašauskas A, Kazlauskas A. Glioma malignancy-dependent NDRG2 gene methylation and downregulation correlates with poor patient outcome. J Cancer. 2014;5(6):446–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using RealTime Quantitative PCR and the 2-∆∆Ct method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Page RB. Sellar and parasellar tumors. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS, editors. Neurosurgery. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1996. pp. 791-804.Google Scholar
  29. Hu W, Fan C, Jiang P, Ma Z, Yan X, Di S, Jiang S, Li T, Cheng Y, et al. Emerging role of N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) in cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;7(1):209–23.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Frara S, Maffezzoni F, Mazziotti G, Giustina A. The modern criteria for medical management of acromegaly. In: Progress in molecular biology and translation science. Vol. 138. Elsevier; 2016. pp. 63-83.Google Scholar
  31. Nichols NR. Ndrg2, a novel gene regulated by adrenal steroids and antidepressants, is highly expressed in astrocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;1007:349–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Takahashi K, Saitoh A, Yamada M, Iwai T, Inagaki M, Yamada M. Dexamethasone indirectly induces Ndrg2 expression in rat astrocytes. J Neurosci Res. 2012;90(1):160–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Burchfield JG, Lennard AJ, Narasimhan S, Hughes WE, Wasinger VC, Corthals GL, Okuda T, Kondoh H, Biden TJ, Schmitz-Peiffer C. Akt mediates insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of Ndrg2: evidence for cross-talk with protein kinase C theta. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(18):18623–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Boulkroun S, Le Moellic C, Blot-Chabaud M, Farman N, Courtois-Coutry N. Expression of androgen receptor and androgen regulation of NDRG2 in the rat renal collecting duct. Pflugers Arch. 2005;451(2):388–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Boulkroun S, Fay M, Zennaro MC, Escoubet B, Jaisser F, Blot-Chabaud M, Farman N, Courtois-Coutry N. Characterization of rat NDRG2 (N-Myc downstream regulated gene 2), a novel early mineralocorticoid-specific induced gene. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(35):31506–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Li Y, Yang J, Li S, Zhang J, Zheng J, Hou W, Zhao H, Guo Y, Liu X, et al. N-myc Downstream-regulated Gene 2, a Novel Estrogen-targeted Gene, Is Involved in the Regulation of Na/K-ATPase. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(37):32289–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Heaney AP, Fernando M, Melmed S. Functional role of estrogen in pituitary tumor pathogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2002;109(2):277–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017