- Open Access
Sialadenoma papilliferum: clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, molecular analyses of new five cases and review of the literature
Diagnostic Pathology volume 16, Article number: 22 (2021)
Sialadenoma papilliferum (SP) is an extremely rare benign neoplasm of salivary glands. To explore and define the clinicopathological features of SP, we retrospectively analyzed 89 cases previously reported and five new cases.
The clinical features, histopathology, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis of our cases were further performed and the related literatures were reviewed and analyzed.
Combining 89 cases from the literature with our cases, the hard palate was the most common locations for SP. However, two of our cases were rarely located in the esophageal mucosa. Among all cases, the male gender was more affected, with the average age and median age of 61.8 and 62 years, respectively. Conventional histomorphologically, SP was characterized by complex papillary structures with a biphasic growth pattern of exophytic squamous component and endophytic glandular component. The glandular structures were lined by a double layer of epithelium composed of flattened or cuboidal basal cells and a cuboidal or columnar luminal cells formed papillary infoldings into the ductal lumina. Immunohistochemically, the luminal epithelial configurations showed strong expression of CK7 along the luminal cell membrane, while the basal myoepithelia displayed strong nuclear p63 expression. In both the glandular and squamous tumour components showed BRAF V600E-positive immunostaining and BRAF V600E mutation.
For the first time, we have comprehensively aggregated and analyzed 90 cases sialadenoma papilliferum from almost all previous publications, and further explored the clinicopathological features of SP; concordantly, this study demonstrated that SP shows a papillomatous growth pattern with exophytic and endophytic proliferation of ductal epithelium composed of double-layered cells harboring BRAF V600E mutation. Additionly, adequate treatment for SP is surgical excision, with a favorable prognosis in patients.
Sialadenoma papilliferum (SP) is a rare benign neoplasm [1,2,3], estimated to account for less than 1% of all minor salivary gland tumours and 3–5% of head and neck tumours [2,3,4,5,6,7]. It was described initially in 1969 by Abrams and Finck, because of its histomorphology closely resembling that of the syringocystadenoma papilliferum of cutaneous adnexal origin, and a total of 90 cases were reported by 2021 [2,3,4,5, 8]. SP is characterized by coexisting papillar and glandular configurations, which occurs mainly in the palate, especially the hard palate. It can also occur in the soft palate, buccal mucosa, nasal cavity, upper lip, parotid glands, and rarely in the bronchus and esophagus [9, 10]. SP usually presents as a painless exophytic papillary mass with the peak incidence in the fifth, sixth and seventh decades of life [2, 5, 6, 11,12,13,14,15,16]. The prognosis of SP is mostly good; and in single cases may have recurrence  or malignant transformation [12, 13]. Given the rareness of SP and difficulty in distinguishing it from other malignant tumours, the experience gained from the present cases and thorough analysis of medical literature may be useful for pathologists and clinicians on the correct diagnosis of this disease.
Materials and methods
Patients and samples
With Institutional Board Review approval, the Department of Pathology of the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University and consultation archives from 2017 to 2019 were searched for cases of SP and analyzed for their clinicopathological features. In addition, all available hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were reviewed and confirmed by two pathologists with expertise in head and neck tumour pathology. Apart from this, a thorough English language literature search was performed primarily through Google Scholar, PubMed, and the different editions of WHO classifications of salivary gland tumours using the keyword sialadenoma papilliferum, which included single case reports and short series of SP since 1969. Consequently, a total of 48 articles were remained for the literature analysis, and the following indexes were taken into account: patient gender, age at diagnosis, lesion occurrence site, lesion size, progression time, clinical diagnosis, clinical features, follow-up period, and recurrence. Also excluded from our study were cases with questionable histopathologic features or without available microscopic images.
The immunohistochemical analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded sections using the EnVision two-step method. Primary antibodies used in the study were displayed as follows: CK7 (MAB-0828, MX053), CK5/6 (MAB-0744, MX040), p63 (MAB-0694, MX013), CK8 (MAB-0670, MX004), S-100 (Kit-0007, 4C4.9), and Ki-67 (MAB-0672, MX006), Ready-to-use, Maixin Bio, Fujian, China. Anti-BRAF V600E (VE1, Ventana) antibody was performed on Ventana BenchMark GX autostainer (Ventana) followed by the Optiview DAB Detection Kit (Ventana). Appropriate positive and negative controls were performed concomitant for all the markers tested.
The unstained paraffin-embedded sections were collected for DNA extraction (QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). And then DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction using primers for exon 15 of BRAF (HotStarTaq Master Mix kit (Qiagen), 5′-TCA TAA TGC TTG CTC TGA TAGGA-3′ (BRAF-Exon15-F), 5′-GGC CAA AAA TTT AAT CAG TGGA-3′(BRAF-Exon15-R)). The amplified products were purified using a QIAquick Spin Kit (Qiagen), and then purified products were sequenced with a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Bio-systems, Foster City, CA, USA) on an ABI Prism 3700 instrument (Applied Biosystems). The confirmed assay was repeated for mutational specimens.
There were five cases of SP from our hospital, including three males and two females, and age at diagnosis ranged from 50 to 78 years with an average age of 62 years. Four patients were found by accident in physical examination, only with slight local numbness but no obvious pain. In addition, one patient was treated for palatal tumours because of pain for 1 month. Two of the five cases occurred in the palate, one in nasal cavity and two in esophagus. All patients underwent tumour resection and were sent to the pathology department for pathological examination, with size of the mass ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 cm. Patients were followed for 6 to 22 months, and their prognosis was good without recurrence and worsening progression.
Combining 94 cases from the literature with our cases, the hard palate was the most common location, accounting for 60%, and others included the junction of the hard and soft palate, soft palate, buccal mucosa, nasal cavity, upper lip, parotid glands, etc. (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Moreover, two of our cases were rarely located in the esophageal mucosa. There were 56 men and 38 women, showing preference for males, and age at diagnosis ranged from 2 to 96 years, with mean age and median age were 61.8 and 62 years, respectively (Fig. 2). Duration of the lesions ranged from 1 month to over 8 years, with 49.8 months of average duration. The misinterpreted clinical diagnosis included squamous papilloma, fibroma, mucocele, salivary gland neoplasm, warty dyskeratoma, cystadenoma, cystadenocarcinoma or verrucous carcinoma.
The tumour varied in sizes, from 0.2 to 3.0 cm in 70 cases known, with an average size of 0.81 cm, excluding two cases from the parotid gland (7.5 cm) and another two cases from the palate and left lower gingiva (4.0 cm). Gross observation showed that the cut surface of the lesion was slightly solid with grey-white to grey red colour, clear margins, and the papillary surface.
Histologically, the tumours in our cases were characterized by biphasic differentiation, consisting of exophytic papillary structures covered by stratified squamous epithelium and endophytic glandular structures below the mucosa (Fig. 3a). The surface of papillary structures was covered with multiple layers of squamous epithelium, and the squamous epithelium was locally contiguous with a proliferation of papillomatous ductal epithelium located underneath the mucosal surface and extending downward into the deeper stroma (Fig. 3b). These papillas supported by fibrovascular connective tissue core often protruded into the lumen (Fig. 3c). The ductal epithelium was double-layered or multilayered structures, lined by luminal cuboidal to columnar cells and cuboidal to flattened basal cells (Fig. 3d). The luminal cells had round to oval, bland nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli. The nuclei of regional tumours were enlarged with clear nucleoli, but without atypia. Inflammatory cell infiltration, including plasma cells, lymphocytes and neutrophils, was seen around the lumen and the connective tissue. Enlarged cysts with eosinophilic deposits (Fig. 3e) and accidental areas of oncocytic metaplasia can be seen in the ductal structures of 3 cases, and mucinous cells and necrosis were seen locally in 2 cases. In addition, The tumour area showed normal cell morphology and mucinous cells can be seen in some tumour areas (Fig. 3f).
Immunohistochemical studies of our cases have shown that CK7 (Fig. 4a) and CK8 were strongly expressed in the ductal luminal cells, while p63 (Fig. 4b), CK5/6 and S-100 (Fig. 4c) were strongly expressed in the basal cell layer but were negative in the luminal cells. Ki67 decorated less than 30% lesional cells in all cases (Fig. 4d and Table 2). BRAF V600E in both the glandular and squamous tumour components showed a moderate or weak staining (Fig. 4e, f).
Molecular analysis revealed that BRAF mutation was confirmed in three of four cases, because of one case lacking sufficient tissue for testing (Fig. 5).
Treatment and follow up
Our patients were followed for 6 to 22 months, and their prognosis was good without recurrence and worsening. According to the literature review, conservative surgery was documented in 56 cases and treatment was not specified in 6 cases. And one case from the left lower gingiva with malignant transformation invading the mandible was treated by partial mandibular resection and cervical lymph node dissection. Another case from the parotid gland, considering the preservation of the facial nerve, only superficial parotidectomy was performed. In addition, the follow-up information of 37 cases was available, in which the length of follow-up period of the patients ranged from 1 month to 96 months, with an average length of 31 months. Three cases with malignant transformation of SP have been recognized, and only two recurrences were recorded, each at 36 months after initial treatment, which indicated a recurrence rate of 6.5%.
SP is a subtype of intraductal papilloma, a rare benign tumour commonly found in older adults with hard palate, accounting for approximately 80%. It can also occur in the parotid gland, submandibular gland, nasopharynx and esophagus [2, 3, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Clinically, there are generally no obvious clinical symptoms with mostly painless growth, but sometime papillary erythema or pedicled lumps, occasional ulcers [3, 32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Grossly, most of the lesions presents as a round to oval mass with white-colored and papillary surface, sharing about 80%.
Histologically, SP is formed by mucosal surface epithelium and ductal epithelium of the salivary gland which proliferate outward and inward simultaneously, with the characteristics of biphasic proliferation of squamous and ductal epithelium [11, 44]. Generally, SP has two components [5, 6]: (1) superficial papillary structure: stratified squamous epithelium covered with incomplete keratinization, in addition to acanthosis or acanthosis cell edema; (2) ductal structure: the lumen-like structure lined by two or more layers of columnar and cuboidal cells is formed under the mucosa, and the ductal lumina can be mesh-like, fissure-like or expanded into a large cystic cavity. In addition, there are numerous inflammatory cells in the epithelial space, such as plasma cells and lymphocytes [5, 6]. It’s worth noting that we found out some oncocytic changes in accidental areas of the tumour, just as Hsieh and colleagues reported in 2020 [3, 5], which they named the oncocytic SP relative to the classic SP. Furthermore, the mucosal surface of most cases has many papillary projections supported by fibrovascular connective tissue core, while a few cases only formed numerous micropapillae without a central fibrovascular core [32, 44].
Immunohistochemistry showed that CK7 and CK8 were strongly expressed in columnar luminal cells, and p63 was strongly positive in basal cells, but was negative in luminal cells from Table 2 and reported literatures, and some cases were positive for S-100 and GFAP, which indicate the convoluted ductal structures of SP include two cell types at least [5, 7]. Additionly, in Heieh’s study [3, 5], SOX10 was diffusely and strongly positive in the proliferative ductal cells of classic SP but was completely negative in the oncocytic SP, which suggests the latter may have distinctive cell origin and pathogenesis.
The Histogenesis of SP is still not fully understood [5, 7, 44]. There are several viewpoints as follows. Freedman, Lumerman, and Anuradha et al. proposed that it may originate from the excretory tube cell, which is supposed to be a primitive precursor cell capable of multi-directional differentiation [42, 43]. According to Abrams and Finck, the lesion was of pleuripotential myoepithelial origin because the tumour cells revealed the immunoreactivity for SMA . Moreover, Asahina and others suggested that the lesion derived from the intercalated duct cell due to the presence of the tumour cells coexpressing cytokeratin, vimentin, and desmin . Conversely, Eversole and several authors considered SP as the result of focal hyperplasia after salivary duct obstruction rather than a true neoplasm. Recently, the genetic alteration of SP has been discovered in the reported cases of Hsieh  and Nakaguro , that is, most SPs have BRAF V600E mutations and one case has HRAS Q61R mutations, but except oncocytic SP. Notably, syringocystadenoma papilliferum of the skin, histologically analogous to SP, also exists BRAF and HRAS mutations, which suggests SP may be considered to be a salivary counterpart of syringocystadenoma papilliferum of the skin [3, 5, 44]. Furthermore, in our limited series of SP, BRAF V600E immunoexpression presented in both the proliferative ductal and squamous tumour elements, which confirmed by molecular analysis, similar to the results of Hsieh and Nakaguro [3, 5, 44], suggested the neoplastic nature of both components, and the transition of ductal epithelium to squamous epithelium seen in SP indicated this tumour may originate in the excretory ducts. However, the ductal cells shows SOX10 positivity, suggesting classic SP may be derived from intercalated duct or ductal progenitor cells [3, 5]. Therefore, given the complex histopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of SP, its tumor cells may be derived from several components [3, 5, 6, 44]. Despite the cells of origin are not entirely clear at present, BRAF analysis and SOX10 immunostaining can be useful to make a definite diagnosis.
Although SP has been proposed as a distinct entity, it also needs to be differentiated from the following neoplasms. First of all, papillary squamous cell carcinoma, a papillary subtype of squamous cell carcinoma similar to the histopathological characteristics of SP, is characterized by an exophytic and papillary growth pattern. However, there is no glandular component with mucous cells in the lesion, and the squamous cell papilloma is mainly composed of the squamous epithelium, which manifests highly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with keratinized beads structure, without downward extension of SP. Inverted ductal papilloma is another candidate for differential diagnosis, mainly composed of hyperplastic squamous epithelium under the mucosa that protrudes into connective tissue and connects with duct, but unlike SP with characteristic papillary surface configuration. Another antidiastole is highly differentiated mucoepidermoid carcinoma, which is rich in mucous cells, often forming a glandular cavity, and sometimes hyperplastic mucous cells form the papillary structure resembling that of SP, while mucoepidermoid carcinoma usually composed of epidermal-like cells, intermediate cells, mucus cells and other cell components . Wathin tumour shares papillary adenoid structure with characteristic double layer of epithelium lining the glandular cavity liking SP should also be considered, but the interstitial of it is a lymphoid component associated with lymphoid follicle formation . Also papillary cystadenocarcinoma is a rare malignant tumour characterized by predominantly cystic growth and cell types that comprise the lining epithelium of cysts include most often cuboidal and columnar cells, which though resemble SP, neither exhibits squamous elements.
The current treatment of SP is conservative surgical resection [6, 45]. In addition, Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) is a novel technique for head and neck surgery in some centers around the world . Atarbashi-Moghadam proposed the first successful removal of SP tumours by TORS . The use of TORS provides better control of surgical procedures and reduced morbidity compared to traditional oral surgical procedures.
Although there have been a few reports of recurrence and malignant transformation, in which SP has reported that it can transformed into epithelial-muscle epithelial carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma, but malignant transformation is rare and not entirely convincing [6, 16, 32, 47]. As the results of the statistics show that the prognosis of this lesion is very good, we believe that SP does not have malignant potential [14, 44, 48].
Summarily, SP is a rare, benign and exophytic tumour of salivary gland neoplasm that commonly occurs in the hard palate in middle aged males with a painless and slow growing lesion. Characteristic of this tumour is its exophytic growth pattern, with multiple papillary surface fronds and deeper ductlike structures, which may be continuous with the surface epithelial component. In this study, we added another five cases of SP to the literature and discussed the clinicopathologic features of the 94 described cases of this unusual neoplasm. Although to identify the cell of origin of SP is difficult, we conclude that SP is a neoplastic lesion by immunophenotypic feature and molecular analysis, and virtually has no potentially malignant features mostly with good prognosis, which should be distinguished from other malignant tumours and avoided resultant overtreatment.
Availability of data and materials
The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
World Health Organization
Trans-oral robotic surgery
Bobos M, Hytiroglou P, Karkavelas G, Papakonstantinou C, Papadimitriou CS. Sialadenoma papilliferum of bronchus. Virchows Arch. 2003;443(5):695–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-003-0879-y.
Campisi A, Dell'Amore A, Bertolaccini L, Ricci C, Cancellieri A, Stella F. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the bronchus: a rare tumour of salivary gland origin. Adv Respir Med. 2020;88(3):267–70. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.2020.0111.
Hsieh MS, Bishop JA, Yu Fong Chang J. Sialadenoma Papilliferum. Surg Pathol Clin. 2021;14(1):43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.path.2020.09.006.
Abrams AM, Finck FM. Sialadenoma papilliferum. A previously unreported salivary gland tumor. Cancer. 1969;24(5):1057–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196911)24:5<1057::AID-CNCR2820240529>3.0.CO;2-L.
Hsieh MS, Bishop JA, Wang YP, Poh CF, Cheng YL, Lee YH, et al. Salivary Sialadenoma Papilliferum consists of two morphologically, Immunophenotypically, and genetically distinct subtypes. Head Neck Pathol. 2020;14(2):489–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-019-01068-4.
Fowler CB, Damm DD. Sialadenoma Papilliferum: analysis of seven new cases and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2018;12(2):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-017-0852-8.
Gera M, Tan A. Sialadenoma papilliferum arising in the nasal cavity: immunohistochemical analysis. Pathology. 2017;49(1):94–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.08.019.
Loehn B, Sutton C, Jastram-Belcher J, Harton A, Anderson D, Walvekar RR. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the parotid gland: case report and review of literature. Head Neck. 2013;35(3):E74–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21879.
Ozel HE, Ergul G, Gur OE, Kulacoglu S, Ozdem C. Sialadenoma papilliferum of nasal cavity: case report. J Laryngol Otol. 2008;122(9):e21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215108003253.
Pimentel MT, Lopez Amado M, Garcia SA. Recurrent sialadenoma papilliferum of the buccal mucosa. J Laryngol Otol. 1995;109(8):787–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100131330.
Reis de Sa Silva e Costa FE, Vizcaino Vazquez JR. Sialadenoma papilliferum with inverted pattern in a young patient: a case report. Am J Case Rep. 2015;16:663–6.
Ponniah I. A rare case of sialadenoma papilliferum with epithelial dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104(2):e27–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.053.
Shimoda M, Kameyama K, Morinaga S, Tanaka Y, Hashiguchi K, Shimada M, et al. Malignant transformation of sialadenoma papilliferum of the palate: a case report. Virchows Arch. 2004;445(6):641–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-004-1091-4.
Mahajan D, Khurana N, Setia N. Sialadenoma papilliferum in a young patient: a case report and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(3):e51–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.012.
Kubota Y, Kubo C, Mori Y. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the hard palate: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(7):1609–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.012.
Atarbashi-Moghadam S, Lotfi A, Moshref M, Mokhtari S. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the hard palate: a rare case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;62(1):163–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_687_17.
Gomes AP, Sobral AP, Loducca SV, de Araujo VC. Sialadenoma papilliferum: immunohistochemical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33(6):621–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.019.
Ubaidat MA, Robinson RA, Belding PJ, Merryman DJ. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the hard palate: report of 2 cases and immunohistochemical evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125(12):1595–7. https://doi.org/10.5858/2001-125-1595-SPOTHP.
Brannon RB, Sciubba JJ, Giulani M. Ductal papillomas of salivary gland origin: a report of 19 cases and a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92(1):68–77. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.115978.
Argyres MI, Golitz LE. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the palate: case report and literature review. J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26(5):259–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.1999.tb01840.x.
Markopoulos A, Kayavis I, Papanayotou P. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the oral cavity: report of a case and literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55(10):1181–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90305-0.
Asahina I, Abe M. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the hard palate: a case report and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55(9):1000–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90078-1.
Maiorano E, Favia G, Ricco R. Sialadenoma papilliferum: an immunohistochemical study of five cases. J Oral Pathol Med. 1996;25(6):336–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1996.tb00273.x.
van der Wal JE, van der Waal I. The rare sialadenoma papilliferum. Report of a case and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;21(2):104–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80543-0.
Nakahata A, Deguchi H, Yanagawa T, Yoshida H, Sato M, Hayashi Y. Coexpression of intermediate-sized filaments in sialadenoma papilliferum and other salivary gland neoplasms. J Oral Pathol Med. 1990;19(7):313–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1990.tb00851.x.
Papanicolaou SJ, Triantafyllou AG. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the oral cavity: a case report and review of the literature. J Oral Med. 1987;42(1):57–60.
Fantasia JE, Nocco CE, Lally ET. Ultrastructure of sialadenoma papilliferum. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986;110(6):523–7.
Mitre BK. Sialadenoma papilliferum: report of case and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44(6):469–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(86)80014-3.
Rennie JS, MacDonald DG, Critchlow HA. Sialadenoma papilliferum. A case report and review of the literature. Int J Oral Surg. 1984;13(5):452–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(84)80074-5.
Miyamoto S, Ogawa T, Chikazu D. Sialadenoma papilliferum in the buccal mucosa detected on (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(7):727–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.05.004.
Puts JJ, Voorsmit RA, van Haelst UJ. Sialocystadenoma papilliferum of the palate. J Maxillofac Surg. 1984;12(2):90–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(84)80218-0.
Sunil S, Babu SS, Panicker S, Pratap N. Sialadenoma papilliferum: a rare case report and review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(1):148–51. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.187300.
Shirasuna K, Watatani K, Miyazaki T. Ultrastructure of a sialadenoma papilliferum. Cancer. 1984;53(3):468–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3<468::AID-CNCR2820530317>3.0.CO;2-R.
Wertheimer FW, Bonk K, Ruskin WJ. Sialoadenoma papilliferum. Int J Oral Surg. 1983;12(3):190–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(83)80066-0.
Nasu M, Takagi M, Ishikawa G. Sialadenoma papilliferum: report of case. J Oral Surg. 1981;39(5):367–9.
McCoy JM, Eckert EF Jr. Sialadenoma papilliferum. J Oral Surg. 1980;38(9):691–3.
Drummond JF, Giansanti JS, Sabes WR, Smith CR. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the oral cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978;45(1):72–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(78)90225-6.
Jensen JL, Reingold IM. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the oral cavity. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;35(4):521–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(73)90009-1.
Su JM, Hsu HK, Hsu PI, Wang CY, Chang HC. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93(3):461–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00461.x.
Rouse RV, Soetikno RM, Baker RJ, Barnard IC, Triadafilopoulos G, Longacre TA. Esophageal submucosal gland duct adenoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19(10):1191–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199510000-00009.
Honda Y, Shiraishi K, Nomori H, Ishihara S, Iyama K. Sialadenoma papilliferum of the bronchus: rare tracheobronchial tumor of salivary gland type. Pathol Int. 2009;59(8):572–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02408.x.
Freedman PD, Lumerman H. Sialadenoma papilliferum. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978;45(1):88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(78)90228-1.
Anuradha A, Ram Prasad VV, Kashyap B, Srinivas V. Sialadenoma papilliferum: clinical misdiagnosis with a histological decree. Case Rep Dent. 2012;2012:356271.
Nakaguro M, Urano M, Ogawa I, Hirai H, Yamamoto Y, Yamaguchi H, et al. Histopathological evaluation of minor salivary gland papillary-cystic tumours: focus on genetic alterations in sialadenoma papilliferum and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Histopathology. 2020;76(3):411–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13990.
Hamilton J, Osborne RF, Smith LM. Sialadenoma papilliferum involving the nasopharynx. Ear Nose Throat J. 2005;84(8):474–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/014556130508400807.
Koc AK, Yegin Y, Celik M, Sar M, Sakiz D, Kayhan FT. The first successful case of transoral robotic surgery in a patient with Sialadenoma Papilliferum. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;28(88):357–61.
Ide F, Kikuchi K, Kusama K, Kanazawa H. Sialadenoma papilliferum with potentially malignant features. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63(4):362–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2009.072660.
Aguado A, Seoane J, Valbuena L, Sanchez-Vicario D, Garcia I. Intraoral sialadenoma papilliferum. A new clinical case and review of the literature. Med Oral. 1997;2(1):44–8.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871990 and 81472263 to YS).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical committee from Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this study and any accompanying images.
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, S., Peng, J., Yuan, C. et al. Sialadenoma papilliferum: clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, molecular analyses of new five cases and review of the literature. Diagn Pathol 16, 22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-021-01084-5
- Sialadenoma papilliferum
- Clinical features